Aims. To assess the diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), leucocyte count (LC), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in late fracture-related infection (FRI). Materials and Methods. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched focusing on the diagnostic value of CRP, LC, and ESR in late FRI. Sensitivity and specificity combinations were extracted for each marker. Average estimates were obtained using bivariate mixed effects models. Results. A total of 8284 articles were identified but only six were suitable for inclusion. Sensitivity of CRP ranged from 60.0% to 100.0% and specificity from 34.3% to 85.7% in all publications considered. Five articles were pooled for meta-analysis, showing a sensitivity and specificity of 77.0% and 67.9%, respectively. For LC, this was 22.9% to 72.6%, and 73.5% to 85.7%, respectively, in five articles. Four articles were pooled for meta-analysis, resulting in a 51.7% sensitivity and 67.1% specificity. For ESR, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 37.1% to 100.0% and 59.0% to 85.0%, respectively, in five articles. Three articles were pooled in meta-analysis, showing a 45.1% sensitivity and 79.3% specificity. Four articles analyzed the value of combined inflammatory markers, reporting an increased diagnostic accuracy. These results could not be pooled due to heterogeneity. Conclusion. The serum inflammatory markers CRP, LC, and ESR are insufficiently accurate to diagnose late FRI, but they may be used as a suggestive sign in its diagnosis

Aims. The optimum type of antibiotics and their administration route for treating Gram-negative (GN) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remain controversial. This study aimed to determine the GN bacterial species and antibacterial resistance rates related to clinical GN-PJI, and to determine the efficacy and safety of intra-articular (IA) antibiotic injection after one-stage revision in a GN pathogen-induced PJI rat model of total knee arthroplasty. Methods. A total of 36 consecutive PJI patients who had been infected with GN bacteria between February 2015 and December 2021 were retrospectively recruited in order to analyze the GN bacterial species involvement and antibacterial resistance rates. Antibiotic susceptibility assays of the GN bacterial species were performed to screen for the most sensitive antibiotic, which was then used to treat the most common GN pathogen-induced PJI rat model. The rats were randomized either to a PJI control group or to three meropenem groups (intraperitoneal (IP), IA, and IP + IA groups). After two weeks of treatment, infection control level, the side effects, and the volume of antibiotic use were evaluated. Results. Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen in GN-PJI, and meropenem was the most sensitive antibiotic. Serum inflammatory markers, weightbearing activity, and Rissing score were significantly improved by meropenem, especially in the IA and IP + IA groups ( p < 0.05). Meropenem in the IA group eradicated E. coli from soft-tissue, bone, and prosthetic surfaces, with the same effect as in the IP + IA group. Radiological results revealed that IA and IP + IA meropenem were effective at relieving bone damage. Haematoxylin and eosin staining also showed that IA and IP + IA meropenem improved synovial inflammation and bone destruction. No pathological changes in the main organs or abnormal serum markers were observed in any of the meropenem-treated rats. The IA group required the lowest amount of meropenem, followed by the IP and IP + IA groups. Conclusion. IA-only meropenem with a two-week treatment course was effective and safe for PJI control following one-stage revision in a rat model, with less meropenem use. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(10):546–558

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of preoperative serum CRP, white blood cell count (WBC), percentage of neutrophils (%N), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) when using the fracture-related infection (FRI) consensus definition. Methods. A cohort of 106 patients having surgery for suspected septic nonunion after failed fracture fixation were studied. Blood samples were collected preoperatively, and the concentration of serum CRP, WBC, and differential cell count were analyzed. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of diagnostic tests were compared using the z-test. Regression trees were constructed and internally cross-validated to derive a simple diagnostic decision tree. Results. Using the FRI consensus definition, 46 patients (43%) were identified as infected. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of CRP were 67% (95% confidence interval (CI) 52% to 80%), 61% (95% CI 47% to 74%), and 0.64 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.74); of WBC count were 17% (95% CI 9% to 31%), 95% (95% CI 86% to 99%), and 0.57 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.62); of %N 13% (95% CI 6% to 26%), 87% (95% CI 76% to 93%), and 0.50 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.56); and of NLR 28% (95% CI 17% to 43%), 80% (95% CI 68% to 88%), and 0.54 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.63), respectively. A better performance of serum CRP was shown in comparison to the leucocyte count (p = 0.006), %N (p < 0.001), and NLR (p = 0.001). A statistically lower serum CRP level was shown in patients with an infection caused by a low virulence microorganism in comparison to high virulence bacteria (p = 0.008). We found that a simple decision tree approach using only low serum neutrophils (< 3.615 × 10. 9. /l) and low CRP (< 2.45 mg/l) may allow better identification of aseptic cases. Conclusion. The evaluated serum inflammatory markers showed limited diagnostic value in the preoperative diagnosis of FRI when using the uniform FRI Consensus Definition. Therefore, they should remain as suggestive criteria in diagnosing FRI. Although CRP showed a higher performance in comparison to the other serum markers, it is insufficiently accurate to diagnose a septic nonunion, especially when caused by low virulence microorganisms. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):904–911

Aim. Fracture related infection (FRI) remains a challenging diagnosis in orthopedic and trauma surgery. In addition to clinical signs and imaging, serum inflammatory markers are often used to estimate the probability of FRI. To what extent serum inflammatory markers can be used to rule out and diagnose FRI remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the diagnostic value of the serum inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocyte count (LC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in suspected fracture related infection. Method. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for all articles focusing on the diagnostic value of CRP, LC and ESR in FRI. Studies on other inflammatory markers or other types of orthopedic infection, such as periprosthetic and diabetic foot infections, were excluded. For each serum inflammatory marker, all reported sensitivity and specificity combinations were extracted and graphically visualized. Average estimates were obtained using bivariate mixed effects models. This study utilized the QUADAS-2 criteria and was reported following the PRISMA statement. Results. The search resulted in 8280 articles, of which seven were eligible for inclusion. One study was excluded after quality assessment. CRP was reported in all included studies, with sensitivity ranging from 60.0 to 100.0% and specificity from 34.3 to 85.7%. Five of these studies were pooled. The average pooled sensitivity and specificity of CRP were, respectively, 77.0% (95% CI 66.5–85.0%) and 67.9% (95% CI 38.7–87.6%). LC was reported in five studies. Sensitivity ranged from 22.9 to 72.6% and specificity from 73.5 to 85.7%. The results of four of these studies were pooled, resulting in a 51.7% (95% CI 27.2–75.5%) sensitivity and 67.1% (95% CI 19.3–50.2%) specificity. ESR was reported in five studies. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 37.1 to 100.0% and 59.0 to 85.0% respectively. Three of these studies were pooled, showing a 45.1% (95% CI 37.8–52.6%) sensitivity and 79.3% (95% CI 71.7–85.2%) specificity of ESR. Four studies analyzed the combined value of inflammatory markers, reporting an increased diagnostic accuracy. These results could not be pooled due to heterogeneity. Conclusions. The serum inflammatory markers CRP, LC and ESR are insufficiently accurate to diagnose FRI. These markers cannot rule out the presence of FRI, but they may be used as a suggestive sign in the diagnosis of FRI

Background. Preoperative diagnosis of fracture related infections can be challenging, especially when confirmatory criteria such as sinus tract and purulent discharge are absent. Although serum parameters, such as CRP and white blood cell count (WBC), showed poor accuracy in the literature, they are still often used in clinical practice. The European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) defined evidence-based criteria for fracture related infection. Elevated serum inflammatory markers were regarded as suggestive criteria only, as the literature was of limited quality. This study assessed the diagnostic value of the serum parameters CRP, WBC and differential cell count in the diagnosis of fracture related infections defined by the EBJIS-criteria for fracture related infections. Methods. In this retrospective cohort study, 94 patients who underwent surgical treatment for suspected infected non unions after failed fracture fixation were included. Preoperatively, blood samples including serum inflammatory markers were taken. For this study, cut-offs of 5 mg/L for CRP, 10×10⁁9 cells/L for WBC, and >70% for the percentage of neutrophils were regarded as positive for infection. All patients had intraoperative samples taken for microbiology and histology. Analysis of diagnostic accuracy was based on the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC). Results. Based on the EBJIS criteria, 40 patients (43%) were diagnosed with a fracture related infection. 11/94 (12%) patients had an elevated serum WBC count, 13/94 (14%) an increased percentage of neutrophils, and 43/82 (52%) an elevated serum CRP. The mean values of CRP concentration, WBC count, and percentage of neutrophils in the infection group were 7.9 mg/L (IQR:6.4 – 9.7), 18.3 G/l (IQR: 3.9 – 24.9), and 63% (IQR: 58 – 67%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of serum WBC count were 20% (95% CI: 10 −35%), 94.4% (84 −99%), and 0.57 (0.50 – 0.64), respectively; of percentage of neutrophils 12.5% (5 – 27%), 85.2% (73 −93%), and 0.49 (0.42 – 0.56); and of serum CRP 67.6% (51 – 90%), 60.0% (45 – 73%), and 0.64 (0.53 – 0.74), respectively. A statistically significant difference between the AUCs of all three serum parameters and AUC of tissue culture as well as AUC of histology was shown (p <0.0001). A simple decision tree approach using only low WBC and CRP may allow identification of aseptic cases. Conclusion. Based on the standardized and evidence-based EBJIS criteria, the three inflammatory serum markers showed an insufficient accuracy for the diagnosis of fracture related infections. They also correlate poorly with culture or histological diagnosis. Therefore, they should not be used alone as a confirmatory test

Aim. Diagnosing fracture related infections (FRI) based on clinical symptoms alone can be challenging and additional diagnostic tools such as serum inflammatory markers are often utilized. The aims of this study were 1) to determine the individual diagnostic performance of three commonly used serum inflammatory markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Leukocyte Count (LC) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and 2) to determine the diagnostic performance of a combination of these markers and their value additionally to clinical predictors for FRI. Method. This cohort study included patients who presented with a suspected FRI at two level I academic trauma centers between February 1. st. 2009 and December 31. st. 2017. The parameters CRP, LC and ESR, were obtained from hospital records when FRI was suspected. The gold standard for diagnosing or ruling out FRI was defined as: positive microbiology results of surgically obtained tissue samples, or absence of FRI at a clinical follow-up of at least six months. Separate markers were analysed using hospital thresholds, to determine current diagnostic performance, and continuously, to determine maximum possible diagnostic performance. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to obtain the discriminative performance (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic, AUROC) of (1) the combined inflammatory markers, and (2) the value of these markers additional to clinical parameters. Results. A total of 168 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. CRP had a 38% sensitivity, 34% specificity, 42% positive predictive value (PPV) and 78% negative predictive value (NPV). For LC this was 39%, 74%, 46% and 67% and for ESR 62%, 64%, 45% and 76% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 52%, 61% and 80% respectively. The AUROC was 0.64 for CRP, 0.60 for LC and 0.58 for ESR. The AUROC of the combined inflammatory markers was 0.63. Serum inflammatory markers combined with clinical parameters resulted in AUROC of 0.66 as opposed to 0.62 for clinical parameters alone. Conclusions. The added diagnostic value of CRP, LC and ESR for diagnosing FRI is limited. Clinicians should be aware of this finding in the diagnostic work-up of suspected FRI

Aims. It can be extremely challenging to determine whether to perform reimplantation in patients who have contradictory serum inflammatory markers and frozen section results. We investigated whether patients with a positive frozen section at reimplantation were at a higher risk of reinfection despite normal ESR and CRP. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 163 consecutive patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) who had normal ESR and CRP results pre-reimplantation in our hospital from 2014 to 2018. Of these patients, 26 had positive frozen sections at reimplantation. The minimum follow-up time was two years unless reinfection occurred within this period. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the association between positive frozen sections and treatment failure. Results. Treatment failure occurred in eight (30.77%) of the 26 PJI patients with positive frozen sections at reimplantation, compared with 13 (9.49%) of 137 patients with negative results. In the multivariate analysis, positive frozen section increased the risk of failure (odds ratio 4.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64 to 13.45). The mean number of months to reinfection was lower in the positive frozen section group than in the control group (p = 0.041). While there were nine (34.62%) patients with positive frozen section and 25 (18.25%) patients with negative frozen section who had prolonged antibiotic use (p = 0.042), the mean duration of antibiotic use was comparable in two groups. Synovial white blood cell count (p = 0.137) and polymorphonuclear leucocyte percentage (p = 0.454) were not associated with treatment failure in logistic regression model. Conclusion. Positive frozen section at reimplantation was independently associated with subsequent failure and earlier reinfection, despite normal ESR and CRP levels pre-reimplantation. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of treatment failure in patients with positive frozen sections and carefully consider benefits of reimplantation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):916–922

Aim. Low-grade infections are difficult to diagnose. As the presence of a chronic infection requires extensive surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment, it is important to diagnose a SII prior to surgery, especially when the hardware is revised. We investigated whether serum inflammatory markers or nuclear imaging can accurately diagnose a chronic spinal instrumentation infection (SII) prior to surgery. Method. All patients who underwent revision spinal surgery after a scoliosis correction between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), . 18. F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) 3-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) to diagnose infection were studied. Patients with an acute infection or inadequate culture sampling were excluded. SII was diagnosed if ≥ 2 of the same microorganism(s) were isolated from intra-operative tissue cultures. Results. 31 patients were included. The indication for hardware extraction was pseudoarthrosis in the majority of patients (n = 15). 22 patients (71%) were diagnosed with SII. In all infected cases, Cutibacterium acnes was isolated, including 5 cases with a polymicrobial infection. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was: 4.5%, 100%, 100% and 30.0% for CRP >10.0 mg/L, 5.5%, 100%, 100% and 29% for ESR > 30 mm/h; 56%, 80%, 83% and 50% for FDG-PET/CT and 50%, 100%, 100% and 20% for TPBS, respectively. Conclusions. The prevalence of SII in patients undergoing revision spinal surgery is high, with Cutibacterium acnes as the main pathogen. No diagnostic tests could be identified that could accurately diagnose or exclude SII prior to surgery. Future studies should aim to find more sensitive diagnostic modalities to detect low-grade inflammation

Aim. Although established serum inflammatory biomarkers, such as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum white blood cell count (WBC), showed low accuracies in the literature, they are still commonly used in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). For a sufficient preoperative diagnosis novel more accurate serum parameters are needed. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performances of the established and novel routinely available serum parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections when using the proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (pEBJIS) criteria. Method. In this retrospective study, 177 patients with an indicated revision surgery after a total joint replacement were included from 2015 to 2019. The easily accessible and routinely available serum parameters CRP, WBC, the percentage of neutrophils (%N), the neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), fibrinogen and the platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PC/mPV) were evaluated preoperatively. The performances were examined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (AUC). The curves were compared using the z-test. Seventy-five cases (42%) showed a PJI based on the pEBJIS-criteria. Results. The sensitivities of serum CRP (cut-off: ≥10mg/L), WBC (≥10×10^9 cells/L), %N (≥69.3%), NLR(≥ 3.82), fibrinogen (≥ 457 mg/dL), and PC/mPV (≥ 29.4) were calculated with 68% (95% CI: 57–78), 36% (26 – 47), 66% (54 – 76), 63% (51 – 73), 69% (57 – 78), and 43% (32 – 54), respectively. Specificities were 87% (79 – 93), 89% (81 – 94), 67% (57 76), 73% (63 – 81), 89% (80 – 93), and 81% (72 – 88), respectively. Serum CRP and fibrinogen showed better performances than the other evaluated serum parameters (p<0.0001). The median serum CRP (17.6 mg/L) in patients with PJI caused by a low virulence microorganism was lower compared with infections caused by high virulence organisms (49.2 mg/L; p=0.044). Synovial fluid leucocyte count and histology showed better accuracies than serum CRP, serum WBC, %N, NLR, serum fibrinogen, and PC/mPV (p<0.0001). Conclusions. Although serum CRP and fibrinogen showed the best performances among the evaluated serum inflammatory markers, their results should be interpreted with caution in clinical practice. Serum parameters may remain normal in chronic infections or may be elevated in patients with other inflammatory conditions. In addition, they also correlated poorly with synovial fluid leukocyte count and histology. Therefore, serum parameters are still insufficient to confirm or exclude a periprosthetic joint infection. Hence, they can only be recommended as suggestive criteria in diagnosing PJI

Two-stage exchange remains the gold standard for treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection after total hip replacement (THR). In the first stage, all components and associated cement if present are removed, an aggressive debridement is undertaken including a complete synovectomy, and an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer is put in place. Patients are then treated with six weeks of parenteral antibiotics, followed by an ‘antibiotic free period’ to help ensure the infection has been eradicated. If the clinical evaluation and serum inflammatory markers suggest the infection has resolved, then the second stage can be completed, which involves removal of the cement spacer, repeat debridement, and placement of a new THR. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:84–7

Aim. Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) remains one of the leading cause for revision arthroplasty. 1,2. Early recognition and appropriate initial treatment of early PJI with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) can eradicate infection on first attempt and prevent implant failure. We evaluated the outcome after one year of patients who were treated for an early PJI after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) with DAIR. Furthermore, we determined preoperative infection markers, microbiology, and treatment factors related to treatment failure after DAIR procedure. Method. A retrospective cohort study was assembled with 91 patients undergoing DAIR after primary TKA or THP with a high suspicion of an early PJI. For all patients intraoperative cultures were obtained. Records were reviewed for demographic details, preoperative laboratory results, microbiological data, given treatment and postoperative follow-up. The primary outcome measure was infection-free implant survival at one year. Repeated DAIR was not considered as treatment failure. Results. Following DAIR in early PJI the rate of infection-free implant survival was 83% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 79 to 91) at one year follow-up, including patients with multiple DAIR procedures. Univariate analysis indicate a higher failure rate in early PJI caused by Enterococcus faecalis (p=0.04). Multivariate analysis showed that a high C-reactive protein level (CRP >100) (odds ratio 7.5, 95% CI [1.4–39.7]) and multiple debridement procedures (≥2) (p=0.004, odds ratio 8.5, 95%CI [2.1–34.3]) were independently associated with treatment failure. Conclusions. Significantly elevated preoperative serum inflammatory markers may indicate difficult-to-treat, fulminant infections. The winning team in the eradication of an early PJI on first attempt and prevent implant failure is adequate debridement and appropriate empiric antibiotics. To improve treatment success and prevent the need for multiple debridement procedures it is important to use the adequate debridement technique and to have knowledge about local bacterial resistance patterns. Inadequate use of debridement and/or antibiotics can contribute to treatment failure in early PJIs and consequently in saving the affected joint arthroplasty

We compared inflammation in the knee after total knee replacement (TKR) for primary osteoarthritis between two groups of patients undergoing joint replacement with and without synovectomy. A total of 67 patients who underwent unilateral TKR were randomly divided into group I, TKR without synovectomy, and group II, TKR with synovectomy. Clinical outcomes, serial serum inflammatory markers (including interleukin-6 (IL-6), CRP and ESR) and the difference in temperature of the skin of the knee, compared with the contralateral side, were sequentially evaluated until 26 weeks after surgery. Pre-operatively, there were no statistically different clinical parameters between groups I and II. At the 26-week follow-up, both groups had a similarly significantly improved American Knee Society clinical score (p < 0.001) and functional score (p < 0.001) with no differences between the groups. Similar changes in serial inflammatory markers were found in both groups, including mean peak levels of IL-6 (189 pg/ml (. sd. 53.4) versus 201 pg/ml (. sd. 49.4) for groups I and II, respectively) and CRP (91 mg/L (. sd. 24.1) versus 88 mg/L (. sd. 23.4), respectively) on the first post-operative day, returning to pre-operative values at two and six weeks, respectively. The mean peak level of ESR for the respective two groups was 46 mm/hr versus 48 mm/hr at two weeks, which had still not returned to its pre-operative mean value at 26 weeks. The elevation in the skin temperature appeared to mirror the peak elevation of the ESR, with a range of 2.5° C to 4.5° C with some reduction at 26 weeks but still exceeding the pre-operative value. We concluded that synovectomy at the time of TKR does not provide any benefit to the clinical outcome or shorten the duration of the inflammatory response after surgery

Purpose. There is controversial whether synovectomy must be done in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objectivity of the study was to compare the effect of synovectomy on inflammation and clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Methods. A total of 240 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKR were randomly divided into a group without (Group A) and with synovectomy (Group B). All operations were performed by the same surgeon and follow-up was for 4 year. Clinical outcomes (including American Knee Society score (AKS), SF-36, and HSS scores) serum inflammatory markers (including interleukin-6 (IL-6), CRP and ESR) and the difference in temperature of the affected knee skin, swelling, ROM, patients VAS satisfaction score and VAS pain score were sequentially evaluated until 4 years after surgery. Result. There were no statistically different clinical parameters between the two groups preoperatively. At the 4 years follow-up, both groups had a similarly significantly improved AKS clinical and functional score. Similar changes in serial inflammatory markers were identified in both groups. In addition, no difference was seen regarding drainage-fluid inflammatory markers at any follow-up time. There was no difference in respect to patients satisfaction score from surgery to 1 year, but Group B showed greater patients satisfaction score from 2 year to four year, with less number of patients suffering from anterior pain. There was no difference with regard to other parameters at any follow-up time. Conclusions. Synovectomy in primary TKA does not seem to have any clinical advantage and shorten the duration of the inflammatory response, but it might increase patient satisfaction score and reduce anterior knee pain

Introduction. There are several potential biological mechanisms that may influence aseptic implant failure including excessive innate and adaptive immune responses to implant debris. We investigated the hypothesis that patients with painful total joint replacements will exhibit elevated levels of metal reactivity and inflammatory markers compared to patients with well-performing TJA. We evaluated this hypothesis by testing for metal hypersensitivity using in vitro LTT assay and analyzing serum levels of selected inflammatory markers. Methods. Subject Groups: Blinded de-identified data from patients with TJR referred for metal hypersensitivity testing using a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and serum markers of inflammation using Luminex Multi-Analyte Assay was approved by Rush University IRB and retrospectively reviewed. None of the patients had radiographically identifiable osteolysis. Two groups of TJA patients were tested: Group 1: Well-functioning implant (<3 yrs. post-op), with no self-reported pain, i.e. <1 on 0–10 VAS scale (n=8) and Group 2: Painful TJR (<3 yrs. post-op), with self-determined pain of >8 on a 0–10 VAS scale at the time of blood draw (n=25). Metal-LTT: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from 30mL of peripheral blood by Ficoll gradient separation. PBMCs were cultured with NiCl2. 3H Thymidine was added at day 5 of culture and 3H thymidine incorporation was analyzed using a beta scintillation counter at day 6. A stimulation index (SI) of reactivity was calculated by dividing scintillation counts per minute (cpms) of Ni challenged cells by those of untreated controls. A SI of <2 was considered nonreactive, 2 to <4 was mildly reactive and 4 to <8 was reactive. Luminex Assay: Serum samples were collected from whole blood and were analyzed according to manufacturer's protocols. Statistical analysis: Statistical differences were determined using unpaired t-test with Welch's correction with statistical significance at p≤0.1 (90% confidence interval). Results. To test if differences in metal sensitization exist among individuals with joint pain following TJR vs. well-functioning TJR (no pain), we analyzed each person-specific PBMC SI of reactivity to NiCl2. Painful TJR group exhibited greater sensitivity as demonstrated by significantly higher in vitro metal SI level. In general, inflammatory markers measured in serum among patients with pain following TJR were significantly increased compared to patients with no pain following TJR. Specifically, inflammatory markers that are classified as prototypical markers of a M1 inflammatory macrophage i.e. GMCSF, IL-12, IL-18, IL-1β and TNFα were significantly greater in TJR patients with pain compared to TJR patients with no pain. Due to this increase in inflammatory markers, IL-4, an anti-inflammatory marker was also significantly greater in TJR patients with pain in order to combat/mitigate the inflammatory microenvironment. While VEGF was the only marker that was significantly greater in TJR patients with no pain and is characteristic of M2 anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotype. Discussion. Metal sensitivity reactivity and serum markers of inflammation demonstrated significant differences between groups of patients with painful TJRs vs. well-functioning TJR. Classical markers of M1 phenotype were significantly greater in painful TJR group. Our data suggests that patients with self-reported pain following a TJR demonstrate active innate and adaptive immune responses that are significantly higher than patients with a well-performing TJR and that these differences are associated with detectable serum inflammatory markers. An important limitation of this study however, is that group subject numbers were low and that statistical differences found in these groups suggests these inflammatory markers may be more marked than was anticipated

Aim. The optimal surgical approach for patients hospitalized for moderate to severe septic bursitis is not known, and there have been no randomized trials of a one-stage compared with a two-stage (i.e., bursectomy, followed by closure in a second procedure) approach. Thus, we performed a prospective, non-blinded, randomized study of adult patients hospitalized for an open bursectomy. Method. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a one-stage vs. a two-stage surgical approach. All patients received postsurgical oral antibiotic therapy for 7 days. These are the final results of the prospective study registered at ClinicalTrials (NCT01406652). Results. Among 164 enrolled patients, 130 had bursitis of the elbow and 34 of the patella. The surgical approach used was one-stage in 79 and two-stage in 85. The two groups were balanced with regards to sex, age, causative pathogens, levels of serum inflammatory markers, co-morbidities, and cause of bursitis. Overall, there were 22 treatment failures: 8/79 (10%) in the one-stage arm and 14/85 (16%) in the two-stage arm (Pearson-χ2-test; p=0.23). Recurrent infection was caused by the same pathogen a total of 7 patients (4%), and by a different pathogen in 5 episodes (3%). The incidence of infection recurrence was not significantly different between those in the one- vs. two-stage arms (6/79 vs. 8/85; χ2-test: p=0.68). In contrast, outcomes were better in the one- vs. two-stage arm for wound dehiscence (2/79[3%] vs. 10/85[12%]; p=0.02), median length of hospital stay (4.5 vs. 6 days), nurses’ workload (605 vs. 1055 points) and total costs (6,881 vs. 11,178 Swiss francs) (all p<0.01). Conclusions. For adult patients with moderate to severe septic bursitis requiring hospital admission, bursectomy with primary closure, together with 7 days of systemic antibiotic therapy, was safe, resource-saving and effective. Using a two-stage approach did not reduce the risk of infectious recurrence, and may be associated with a higher rate of wound dehiscence than the one-stage approach

The aim of the study was to assess an effectiveness of S53P4 bioglass in reconstruction of postinflammatory bone loss. We have also evaluated wound healing after the surgical dead space management with use of the bioglass. A group of 7 patients with bone loss due to active osteomyelitis and with purulent fistula treated with use of S53P4 bioglass is presented in the paper. All the treated patients were male with mean of age 40,5 years. Mean time of an active inflammatory process with purulent discharge from the wound prior the surgery was 587 weeks. Wound healing pattern with an X-ray evaluation of reconstructed void was performed in postoperative period as well as in 1, 3, 6 and 12 mounth follow-up. In 6 out of 7 cases we did not observed any signs of infection recurrence in 1-year follow-up. Starting from 1-month follow-up inflammatory serum markers remained in their reference values. In all the successfully treated cases wound healing was assessed by two independent surgeons as excellent or good. Starting from 3-month follow-up we have observed gradual blurring of granular bioglass structure on an X-ray scans. In 1 complicated case we observed recurrence of septic inflammatory process with purulent fistula that required revision procedure with removal of the bioglass and extended debridement of inflammatory focus. In this case we have faced posttraumatic malunion of the femur that substantially complicated surgical access to the inflammatory focus during primary procedure. S53P4 bioactive glass is an effective solution in reconstruction of postinflammatory bone loss. Properties of this biomaterial efficiently prevent from focal infection recurrence by inhibiting of bacterial bone growth and reduction of dead space. The product requires however meticulous debridement and the access to a vital bone as a source of osteoblast cells. Underestimation of surgical debridement will likely result in reopening of the fistula due to reinfection. The study group requires further evaluation

Introduction:. Charcot arthropathy is a complex condition affecting diabetic patients with neuropathy. Diagnosis of acute Charcot arthropathy particularly in absence of any perceptible trauma is very challenging as clinically it can mimic osteomyelitis and cellulitis. Delay in recognition of Charcot arthropathy can result in gross instability of foot and ankle. Early diagnosis can provide an opportunity to halt the progression of disease. We report the role of SPECT /CT in the early diagnosis and elucidation of the natural progression of the disease. Methods:. Our multidisciplinary team analysed the scans of neuropathic patients presented with acute red, hot, swollen foot with normal radiological findings (Eichenholtz stage 0), attending the diabetic foot clinic from 2009–2013. The patients were selected from our database, clinic and nuclear medicine records. Initial workup included the assessment of peripheral neuropathy, temperature difference, between the feet, serum inflammatory markers and weight bearing dorsoplantar, lateral and oblique x-rays. All patients had three dimensional triple Phase Bone Scan using 800Mbq . 99m. Tc HDP followed by CT scan. Those patients with obvious radiological findings and signs of infection were excluded. Results:. We evaluated 193 scans in 189 patients. One hundred and forty nine patients showed increase in focal radionuclide uptake at ligament insertion or subchondral bone with a positive predictive value of 77 percent. Forty four out of 193 were negative for Charcot changes and they were not treated as Charcot. These patients did not develop any Charcot changes in the mean follow up of 8 months, indicating a clinically false positive rate of 23%. Conclusion:. SPECT/CT scan is a highly sensitive and specific tool for early diagnosis and accurate localisation of Charcot neuroarthropathy as clinical examination results in high false positive rate. SPECT/CT also helps to understand the natural progression of this disease

Aims

Although low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) combined with disinfectants has been shown to effectively eliminate portions of biofilm in vitro, its efficacy in vivo remains uncertain. Our objective was to assess the antibiofilm potential and safety of LIPUS combined with 0.35% povidone-iodine (PI) in a rat debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) model of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Aims

The aim of the present study was to assess the outcomes of the induced membrane technique (IMT) for the management of infected segmental bone defects, and to analyze predictive factors associated with unfavourable outcomes.