Purpose of study. Internal
Anterior surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have increased popularity due to expected faster recovery and less pain. However, the direct anterior approach (Heuter approach which has been popularised by Matta) has been associated with a higher rate of early revisions than other approaches due to femoral component loosening and fractures. It is also noted to have a long learning curve and other unique complications like anterior femoral cutaneous and femoral nerve injuries. Most surgeons performing this approach will require the use of an expensive special operating table. An alternative to the direct anterior approach is the anterior-based muscle-sparing approach. It is also known as the modified Watson-Jones approach, anterolateral muscle-sparing approach, minimally invasive anterolateral approach and the Röttinger approach. With this technique, the hip joint is approached through the muscle interval between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteal muscles, as opposed to the direct anterior approach which is between the sartorius and rectus femoris and the tensor fascia lata. This approach places the femoral nerve at less risk for injury. I perform this technique in the lateral decubitus position, but it can also be performed in the supine position. An inexpensive home-made laminated L-shaped board is clamped on end of table allowing the ipsilateral leg to extend, adduct, and externally rotate during the femoral preparation. This approach for THA has been reported to produce excellent results. One study reports a complication rate of 0.6% femoral fracture rate and 0.4% revision rate for femoral stem loosening. In a prospective randomised trial looking at the learning curve with new approach, the anterior-based muscle-sparing anterior approach had lower complications than a direct anterior approach. The complications and mean operative time with this approach are reported to be no different than a direct lateral approach. Since this surgical approach is not through an internervous interval, a concern is that this may result in a permanent functional defect as result of injury to the superior gluteal nerve. At a median follow-up of 9.3 months, a MRI study showed 42% of patients with this approach had fat replacement of the tensor fascia lata, which is thought to be irreversible. The clinical significance remains unclear, and inconsequential in my experience. A comparison MRI study showed that there was more damage and atrophy to the gluteus medius muscle with a direct lateral approach at 3 and 12 months. My anecdotal experience is that there is faster recovery and less early pain with this approach. A study of the first 57 patients I performed showed significantly less pain and faster recovery in the first six weeks in patients performed with the anterior-based muscle-sparing approach when compared to a matched cohort of THA patients performed with a direct lateral approach. From 2004 to 2017, I have performed 1308 total hip replacements with the anterior-based muscle sparing approach. Alternatively, I will use the direct lateral approach for patients with stiff hips with significant flexion and/or external
Alignment of total joint replacement in the valgus knee can be done readily with intramedullary alignment and hand-held instruments. Intramedullary alignment instruments usually are used for the femoral resection. The distal femoral surfaces are resected at a valgus angle of 5 degrees. A medialised entry point is advised because the distal femur curves toward valgus in the valgus knee, and the distal surface of the medial femoral condyle is used as reference for distal femoral resection. In the valgus knee, the anteroposterior axis is especially important as a reliable landmark for rotational alignment of the femoral surface cuts because the posterior femoral condyles are in valgus malalignment, and are unreliable for alignment. Rotational alignment of the distal femoral cutting guide is adjusted to resect the anterior and posterior surfaces perpendicular to the anteroposterior axis of the femur. In the valgus knee this almost always results in much greater resection from the medial than from the lateral condyle. Intramedullary alignment instruments are used to resect the proximal tibial surface perpendicular to its long axis. Like the femoral resection, resection of the proximal tibial surface is based on the height of the intact medial bone surface. After correction of the deformity, ligament adjustment is almost always necessary in the valgus knee. Stability is assessed first in flexion by holding the knee at 90 degrees and maximally internally rotating the extremity to stress the medial side of the knee, then maximally externally rotating the extremity to evaluate the lateral side of the knee. Medial opening greater than 4mm, and lateral opening greater than 5mm, is considered abnormally lax, and a very tight lateral side that does not open at all with varus stress is considered to be abnormally tight. Stability is assessed in full extension by applying varus and valgus stress to the knees. Medial opening greater than 2mm is considered to be abnormally lax, and a very tight lateral side that does not open at all with varus stress is considered to be too tight. Release of tight structures should be done in a conservative manner. In some cases, direct release from bone attachment is best (popliteus tendon); in others, release with pie-crusting technique is safe and effective. In knees that are too tight laterally in flexion, but not in extension, the LCL is released in continuity with the periosteum and synovial attachments to the bone. When this lateral tightness is associated with internal
