The aim of this study was to measure the effect of hospital case volume on the survival of revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). This is a retrospective analysis of Scottish Arthroplasty Project data, a nationwide audit which prospectively collects data on all arthroplasty procedures performed in Scotland. The primary outcome was RTHA survival at ten years. The primary explanatory variable was the effect of hospital case volume per year on RTHA survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the lifespan of RTHA. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used to estimate relative revision risks over time. Hazard ratios (HRs) were reported with 95% CI, and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. From 1999 to 2019, 13,020 patients underwent RTHA surgery in Scotland (median age at RTHA 70 years (interquartile range (IQR) 62 to 77)). In all, 5,721 (43.9%) were female, and 1065 (8.2%) were treated for infection. 714 (5.5%) underwent a second revision procedure. Co-morbidity, younger age at index revision, and positive infection status were associated with need for re-revision (p<0.001). The ten-year survival estimate for RTHA was 93.3% (95% CI 92.8 to 93.8). Adjusting for sex, age, surgeon volume, and indication for revision, high hospital case volume was not significantly associated with lower risk of re-revision (HR1, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.00, p 0.073)). The majority of RTHA in Scotland survive up to ten years. Increasing yearly hospital case volume cases is not independently associated with a significant risk reduction of re-revision

Introduction. Orthopaedic surgeons are frequently asked to perform a revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients over 80 years of age. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes after revision THA in patients 80 years or older and compare them to a cohort of patients less than 80 years of age. Methods. We reviewed all revision THAs performed in our institution from 3/1996 to 12/2008. We compared intra- and post-operative complications (medical and orthopaedic), mortality, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between the two age groups. Peri-operative information and complications were collected prospectively, and clinical outcome data were obtained both pro- and retrospectively. The Merle d'Aubigné score, Harris Hip score, general health (SF-12) and patient satisfaction (visual analog scale) were assessed. Results. Overall, 325 revision THAs were included, 84 (25.8%) in patients 80 years and 241 in patients <80 years. In both groups the reason for revision was aseptic loosening in 62% of the patients (mean interval primary THA - revision 142 vs. 97 months). The older group was more often revised for periprosthetic fractures and recurrent dislocation. Mean follow-up time was 4.3 years. Mortality (80 vs. <80 years) was 6% vs. 0% 3 months postoperative, 9.5% vs. 1.2% 1 year postoperative, and 31% vs. 8.3% 5 years postoperative. 3 (3.6%) re-revisions were performed in patients 80 years compared to 24 (10%) in the younger group. Postoperative medical complications developed in 22.6% compared to 6.6% in the younger group. There were one infection and 13 dislocations in patients 80 years vs. 12 infections and 22 dislocations in the other group. The Merle d'Aubigné score improved from 9.6 to 13.7 (p=0.001) in patients 80 years or older vs. 10.3 to 14.3 (p<0.001), and the Harris Hip score at last follow-up was 74.2 vs. 78.5. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the older group (8.4 vs. 7.5, mean difference 0.9, 95% CI 0.2;1.8). Conclusion. Revision THA in patients over 80 years was associated with substantial clinical improvement, and patient satisfaction was greater than among the younger group. However, the medical complication rate and the 3-months-mortality were substantially higher

Aim. Our goals were to minimize the invasiveness of the revision hip arthroplasty approach in order to accelerate the patient's rehabilitation, shorten the length of hospitalization and reduce the postoperative complications, especially the rate of joint dislocation. Our study aimed to prove whether and under which conditions the less invasive approach is preferable in revision arthroplasty. Material and Methods. The modified revision technique differs from the conventional approach in the following main aspects:. Oncologic: applying larger hip balls and inserts, after expanding the variety of the available articulating joint components in 4 mm steps (28–40 mm),. sparing and reconstructing the joint capsule, whereby the integrity of its acetabular origin is crucial. That procedure was combined with tissue dissection strictly parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers. The transgluteal approach after Bauer was applied. The small skin incision was closed by running subcuticular technique. The inpatient postoperative phase after revision total hip arthroplasty was evaluated in the last 6.5 years. All patients completed a questionnaire. Results. Less invasive revision hip arthroplasty was performed in 55 cases in a period of 6.5 years. No intraoperative method-specific complication was observed. Only one dislocation and one early infection, which needed surgical intervention, were recorded. The mean postoperative length of stay was 9.5 days after less invasive revision hip arthroplasty compared to an average of 20.5 days for all revisions. The duration of inpatient treatment was thus halved. This technique was mostly applied in the isolated stem exchange, followed by exchange of bearing components and complete joint exchange. The isolated socket exchange with stable stem is, however, difficult to be realized in the less invasive technique. Conclusion. The less invasive revision hip arthroplasty is associated with a low complication rate. It can be applied in about 30–50% of revision cases. Reconstructing the integrity of the capsule represents the most important modification of the operation's technique. The postoperative joint stability is on the midterm increased and the reconstruction of leg length is indirectly facilitated compared to resecting the joint capsule. Applying larger ball-insert pairs depending on the outer diameter of the socket allows a long-term increase in the joint stability and thus a reduction in the dislocation risk. Owing to its low complication rate and significant reduction of the length of stay, the less invasive revision hip arthroplasty approach is medically and economically recommended

Revision hip arthroplasty presents a challenge in the setting of femoral bone loss. Tapered stems are susceptible to subsidence which leads to leg length inequality, hip instability and may necessitate repeat femoral revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes in two modular tapered revision systems with different distal stem geometries. We sought to establish the minimum postoperative stem bi-cortical contact length that predicts subsidence for tapered stems. This study examined revision total hip arthroplasties between 2009 and 2016 in a European university affiliated major trauma center. Modular stem A has a taper of 3 degrees whereas modular stem B has a taper of 2 degrees. Radiologic assessment compared x-rays at two time points: immediately post-surgery and most recent x-ray available at a minimum follow up of two years. Leg length discrepancy, subsidence and postoperative bi cortical contact was assessed. Descriptive summary statistics calculated clinical factors (i.e. age, gender, Paprosky classification). 122 arthroplasties were completed. Complete data was available for 112. Revisions were carried out for Paprovski grade 3a/ 3b femoral deficits. Post-operative bi-cortical contact of the proximal stem < 20mm was associated with higher subsidence rates (P = 0.047). Subsidence rates for implant A and B system were 4.27mm (0.12–25.62mm) and 3.43 mm (0.3–11.1 mm) respectively. Significant subsidence was noted in 9.8% (n=8) in implant A and 5.2%(n=2) in implant B. We conclude that immediate postoperative bi-cortical stem contact of <20mm was associated with significantly higher subsidence rates in this study

Introduction. Obesity has been associated with higher complication rates and poorer outcomes following joint replacement surgery. Body mass index (BMI) is a simple index of body composition and forms part of preoperative assessment. It does not take into account the proportion of lean mass and body fat and can give a false impression of body composition in healthy manual workers. A more accurate measure of body composition is available using non-invasive bioimpedance methods. This study aims to identify whether BMI provides an accurate measure of body fat composition in patients awaiting lower limb arthroplasty surgery. Methods. Consecutive patients attending for pre-assessment clinic prior to total knee and hip replacement surgery were examined. All patients had their BMI calculated and underwent bioimpedance testing using a bedside Bodystat 1500 scanner (Bodystat, UK). Results. 83 patients (28 male) were included. Mean age was 68 years (range 16 to 92). All were awaiting lower limb arthroplasty surgery (39 primary total hip replacement, 4 revision total hip replacement, 38 primary total knee replacement, one unicompartmental knee replacement and one patellofemoral joint replacement). Mean BMI was 30.8 (range 20.8 to 48.9). Mean body fat percentage was 37.4% (range 17% to 53.9%). A weak correlation was seen between the calculated BMI and the measured body fat percentage (r=0.42, Pearson's correlation coefficient). Mean body fat percentage in obese patients (BMI > 30; mean BMI 34.9; n=42) was 42% while in the non-obese patients (BMI < 30; mean BMI 26.6; n=41) was 32.8%. This difference was significant (p<0.001). Conclusion. In patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty the calculated BMI has a weak correlation with the measured body fat percentage. Bedside, non-invasive bioimpedance analysis provides a quick and accurate measure of body composition and can be used during preoperative assessment. Future correlation of outcome against body composition and BMI will validate the use of body composition in these patients. Care should be taken when relying on BMI alone to assess body fat composition

Aims

This study describes and compares the operative management and outcomes in a consecutive case series of patients with dislocated hemiarthroplasties of the hip, and compares outcomes with those of patients not sustaining a dislocation.

Aims

Currently, periprosthetic fractures are excluded from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFFs). This study aims to report on a series of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) that otherwise meet the criteria for AFFs. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) and quantify the complications of treatment.