Abstract
Aim
Our goals were to minimize the invasiveness of the revision hip arthroplasty approach in order to accelerate the patient's rehabilitation, shorten the length of hospitalization and reduce the postoperative complications, especially the rate of joint dislocation. Our study aimed to prove whether and under which conditions the less invasive approach is preferable in revision arthroplasty.
Material and Methods
The modified revision technique differs from the conventional approach in the following main aspects:
Oncologic: applying larger hip balls and inserts, after expanding the variety of the available articulating joint components in 4 mm steps (28–40 mm),
sparing and reconstructing the joint capsule, whereby the integrity of its acetabular origin is crucial.
That procedure was combined with tissue dissection strictly parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers. The transgluteal approach after Bauer was applied. The small skin incision was closed by running subcuticular technique. The inpatient postoperative phase after revision total hip arthroplasty was evaluated in the last 6.5 years. All patients completed a questionnaire.
Results
Less invasive revision hip arthroplasty was performed in 55 cases in a period of 6.5 years. No intraoperative method-specific complication was observed. Only one dislocation and one early infection, which needed surgical intervention, were recorded. The mean postoperative length of stay was 9.5 days after less invasive revision hip arthroplasty compared to an average of 20.5 days for all revisions. The duration of inpatient treatment was thus halved. This technique was mostly applied in the isolated stem exchange, followed by exchange of bearing components and complete joint exchange. The isolated socket exchange with stable stem is, however, difficult to be realized in the less invasive technique.
Conclusion
The less invasive revision hip arthroplasty is associated with a low complication rate. It can be applied in about 30–50% of revision cases. Reconstructing the integrity of the capsule represents the most important modification of the operation's technique. The postoperative joint stability is on the midterm increased and the reconstruction of leg length is indirectly facilitated compared to resecting the joint capsule. Applying larger ball-insert pairs depending on the outer diameter of the socket allows a long-term increase in the joint stability and thus a reduction in the dislocation risk. Owing to its low complication rate and significant reduction of the length of stay, the less invasive revision hip arthroplasty approach is medically and economically recommended.
