Femoral impaction bone grafting (IBG) may be used to restore bone stock in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and allow use of a shorter, than otherwise, length prosthesis. This is most beneficial in young patients who are more likely to require further revision surgery. This study aimed to assess the results of femoral IBG for staged revision THA for infection. A prospective cohort of 29 patients who underwent staged revision THA for infection with femoral IBG and a cemented polished double-tapered (CPDT) stem at the final reconstruction was investigated. The minimum follow-up was two years (2 – 10 years, median 6 years). Stem subsidence was measured with radiostereometric analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Harris Hip, Harris Pain, and and Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie Activity (SICOT) Scores. The original infection was eradicated in 28 patients. One patient required a repeat staged revision due to re-infection with the same organism. At two-year follow-up, the median subsidence at the stem-bone interface was −1.70 mm (−0.31 to −4.98mm). The median Harris Hip Score improved from 51 pre-operatively to 80 at two years (p=0.000), the Harris Pain Score from 20 to 44 (p=0.000) and the SICOT Score from 2.5 to 3 (p=0.003). As successful eradication of infection was achieved in the majority of patients and the stem migration was similar to that of a primary CPDT stem, this study supports the use of femoral IBG during the final reconstruction of the femur after staged revision THA for infection

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents with increasing challenges, potentially compromising the integrity of a revision. The objective of this study was to assess radiologic outcomes of patients who underwent revision THA with a modular tapered stem (Reclaim, DePuy Synthes). This study retrospectively examined all revision Reclaim THAs between 2012 and 2016. Radiologic assessment compared x-rays at two time points: immediately after surgery and the most recent x-ray available. Leg length discrepancy, subsidence and line-to-line fit was assessed. Significant subsidence was considered ≥10mm. Adequate line-to-line fit was considered ≥30mm of bicortical contact. Descriptive statistics included clinical factors (i.e. age, Paprosky classification). P values <0.05 were considered significant. A total of 81 femoral revisions were completed. There were 42 females and 38 males with a mean age of 71 years (range, 46–89). Of these, 6 were revised (dislocation, fracture or infection), and 7 were lost to follow up. Average follow up time was 18 months (range, 1–46 months). Femoral revisions were classified as Paprosky 3a or 3b. Mean stem subsidence was 4.15mm (range, 0–25.6mm). Subsidence of the femoral stem was <10mm in 88% of patients. A total of 62% of patients had both subsidence <10mm and ≥30mm of bicortical contact. In patients with <10mm subsidence, 70% had ≥30mm of bicortical contact. There was a positive trend between cortical contact and stem stability (OR 2.3). The Reclaim modular femoral system has demonstrated radiographic stability. Inadequate initial fit is a potential determinant of subsidence

This study aimed to quantify self-reported outcomes and walking gait biomechanics in patients following primary and revision THA. The specific goals of this study were to investigate: (i) if primary and revision THA patients have comparable preoperative outcomes; and (2) if revision THA patients have worse postoperative outcomes than primary THA patients.

Forty-three patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis and 23 patients undergoing revision THA were recruited and followed longitudinally for their first 12 postoperative months. Reasons for revision were loosening (73%), dislocation (9%), and infection (18%). Patients completed the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and underwent gait analysis preoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. A 10 camera motion analysis system (V5 Vantage, Vicon, UK) recorded marker trajectories (100 Hz) during walking at self- selected speeds. A generic lower-body musculoskeletal model (Gait2392) was scaled using principal component analysis [1] and the inverse kinematics tool in Opensim 3.3 was used to compute joint angles for the lower limbs in the sagittal plane. Independent samples t-test were used to compare patient reported outcomes between the primary and revision groups at each timepoint. Statistical parametric mapping was used to compare gait patterns between the two groups at each timepoint.

Preoperatively, patients undergoing primary THA reported significantly worse pain (p<0.001), symptoms (p<0.001), function (p<0.001), and quality of life (p=0.004). No differences were observed at 3 and 12 months postoperatively between patients who had received a primary or revision THA. The only observed difference in gait pattern was that patients with a revision THA had reduced hip extension at 3 months, but no differences were observed preoperatively and 12 months.

Despite the suggestions in the literature that revision THA is bound to have worse outcomes compared to primary THA, we found no differences in in patient-reported outcomes and gait patterns at 12 months postoperatively. This suggests that it may be possible, in some circumstances, for patients following revision THA to achieve similar outcomes to their peers undergoing primary THA.

Repeat revision hip replacements can lead to severe bone loss necessitating salvage procedures such as proximal or total femoral replacement. We present medium term outcomes from our experience of the Limb Preservation System (LPS) in patients with failed revision hip arthroplasties. All patients undergoing proximal femoral or total femoral replacement from 2003–2007 at our unit were reviewed. Data was collected preoperatively and at annual assessment post procedure for a minimum of 5 years. This included clinical review, functional outcome scores (WOMAC, Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score) and radiographic evaluation. A total of 17 patients underwent femoral replacement (13 proximal, 4 total) using the LPS during the study period. Within this cohort there were 13 males and 4 females with a mean age of 64 years (range 47–86). Median follow up was 7 years (range 5–9 years). Primary diagnoses were DDH (7), Primary OA (5), RA (2), proximal femoral fracture (2) and phocomelia (1). Five patients (29%) required further revision surgery for infection (2 patients) or recurrent dislocations (3 patients). No stems required revision due to aseptic loosening or stem failure at 5–9 years. Compared to preoperative assessment, there was significant improvement in median outcome scores at 5 years (WOMAC increased by 33 points, Oxford hip score by16 points and Harris hip score by 43 points). 82% of patients maintained functional independence at latest review. The Limb Preservation System offers a salvage procedure for failed revision total hip arthroplasty with significant symptom and functional improvement in most patients at medium term follow up

We performed 83 consecutive cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in 77 patients between 1977 and 1983 using improved cementing techniques. One patient (two hips) was lost to follow-up. The remaining 76 patients (81 hips) had an average age at revision of 63.7 years (23 to 89). At the final follow-up 18 hips (22%) had had a reoperation, two (2.5%) for sepsis, three (4%) for dislocation and 13 (16%) for aseptic loosening. The incidence of rerevision for aseptic femoral loosening was 5.4% and for aseptic acetabular loosening 16%. These results confirm that cemented femoral revision is a durable option in revision hip surgery when improved cementing techniques are used, but that cemented acetabular revision is unsatisfactory

Total hip arthroplasty is well established as a successful treatment modality for end stage arthritis, with a variety of components currently available. However, utilising traditional stemmed implants in patients with distorted proximal femoral geometry can be technically challenging with increased risk of complications.

We present seven patients with distorted proximal femoral anatomy or failed hip arthroplasty in whom a technically challenging primary or revision operation was simplified by use of a Proxima stem. This is a short, stemless, metaphyseal loading implant with a pronounced lateral flare.

At twelve months follow up there have been no complications with average improvement in Oxford and Harris scores of forty and forty-nine respectively. Radiological analysis shows all stems to be stable and well fixed.

Designed primarily as a bone conserving implant for primary hip arthroplasty we propose that the Proxima prosthesis also be considered in cases where a conventional stemmed implant may not be suitable due to challenging proximal femoral anatomy. The use of the stemless Proxima implant provided a simple solution in seven difficult and potentially lengthy complex primary and revision hip arthroplasties with gratifying clinical and radiological outcomes.

We used a biodegradable mesh to convert an acetabular defect into a contained defect in six patients at total hip replacement. Their mean age was 61 years (46 to 69). The mean follow-up was 32 months (19 to 50). Before clinical use, the strength retention and hydrolytic in vitro degradation properties of the implants were studied in the laboratory over a two-year period. A successful clinical outcome was determined by the radiological findings and the Harris hip score. All the patients had a satisfactory outcome and no mechanical failures or other complications were observed. No protrusion of any of the impacted grafts was observed beyond the mesh. According to our preliminary laboratory and clinical results the biodegradable mesh is suitable for augmenting uncontained acetabular defects in which the primary stability of the implanted acetabular component is provided by the host bone. In the case of defects of the acetabular floor this new application provides a safe method of preventing graft material from protruding excessively into the pelvis and the mesh seems to tolerate bone-impaction grafting in selected patients with primary and revision total hip replacement

Background. Over 96% of primary total hip replacements (THR) recorded in the National Joint Registry (NJR) are performed through a posterior or lateral surgical approach. There is no high quality evidence available to support the use of one approach over the other in primary THR and even less evidence when the outcome of revision THR is considered. Methods. Questionnaires were sent to 267 patients who had revision hip replacements between January 2006 and March 2010 for aseptic loosening. They rated their pain from 0–10, and used the Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale (SAPS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short form-12 (SF-12). Results. We performed 275 revision total hip replacements for aseptic loosening on patients in whom the primary operation details were available. Their mean age was 69 years (SD12) with 43% male and 57% right-sided procedures. 205 patients responded to our questionnaires (209/275 hips, 76%). Unfortunately 19 patients had died, 4 had dementia and 13 declined to participate. We were unable to contact a further 33.Grouping by approach, 20% (43/209) had primary and revision lateral approaches, 20% (43/209) had primary lateral and revision posterior and 60% (123/209) had both primary and revision via posterior approaches. The WOMAC and OHS were significantly better in patients who had a posterior approach for both primary and revision surgery, compared to those that did not (OHS p=0.028, WOMAC p=0.026). We found no significant differences in pain, satisfaction or health-related quality of life between the groups. Conclusions. Registry data may help further explore the relationship between surgical approach and outcome in revision hip surgery. A randomised controlled trial of the posterior versus lateral approach for revision surgery would provide a definitive answer. Level of Evidence. 2b - retrospective cohort study. Disclosures. No financial disclosures or conflicts of interests from any authors

Rivaroxaban has been recommended for routine use as a thromboprophylactic agent in patients undergoing lower-limb arthroplasty. Starting January 2011, our unit has converted from aspirin to Rivaroxaban use routinely following lower-limb arthroplasty for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. The aim of this audit was to retrospectively review its efficacy and the morbidity associated with its use. All patients undergoing primary and revision lower-limb arthroplasty between February 2011 and July 2011 were reviewed. All patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery and total hip replacement surgery received oral rivaroxaban 10 mg daily post-operatively for 14 days and 35 days respectively. Outcome measures recorded were; investigation for DVT/PE, rate of DVT/PE, wound complications (infection, dehiscence, leaking, bleeding), blood transfusion rate and readmission rate within 6 weeks of surgery. Of the 162 patients identified, 19 were excluded due to insufficient information or because they did not receive rivaroxaban as VTE prophylaxis. 141 patients (mean age 71.7 years) were included. 69 primary and 5 revision total knee replacements were performed. 60 primary and 7 revision total hip replacements were performed. 9 patients (6.4%) underwent Doppler USS for a painful swollen leg with 1 (0.7%) DVT diagnosed. None were investigated for a pulmonary embolus. 25 (17.7%) patients developed wound complications: 10 superficial infections requiring oral antibiotics, 2 deep infections requiring theatre washout, 1 wound dehiscence, 5 continuously leaking wounds, 5 bleeding wounds/haematomas. 26 (18.4%) patients required post-operative blood transfusion (average 2.2 units). 12 (8.5%) patients were re-admitted within 6 weeks with post-op complications (6 wound complications, 5 painful/swollen limbs, 1 large per-vaginal bleed). In keeping with previous literature, the rate of VTE following lower-limb arthroplasty using rivaroxaban as prophylaxis is low. However, the rate of morbidity was higher when compared with the use of aspirin in our centre between April and September 2010

Background. Hip resurfacing has resurged in the last decade due to a renewed interest in metal on metal bearing. One of the proposed advantages is ease of revision of the femoral component. Short term functional results after femoral revision are similar to those after conventional total hip replacement. Survival and function after revision of the acetabular component only or of both components have not been reported. We aimed to assess hip function and implant survival after revision of the acetabular component for failed Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR). Methods. The Oswestry Outcome Centre collected data prospectively on 5000 patients who underwent hip resurfacing between 1997 and 2002. Of these, 182 hips were revised: 42% had revision of the femoral component only, 8% revision of the acetabular component only, and 50% revision of both components. This study analyzed patients who had revision of the acetabular component, either in isolation or in combination with the femoral component. Results. In the isolated acetabular revision group the median Harris Hip Score was 74 at a mean of 4.5 years post-revision. In the both components revision group the median Harris hip score was 85 at a mean of 4 years. There was no significant difference in function between the groups. Kaplan-Meier survivor ship analysis after revision showed an average survival of 91% at 10 years. There was a significant difference between survival of isolated acetabular revision (75%) and both component revision (96%). Conclusions. Revision total hip replacement subsequent to failure of hip resurfacing has good outcome and good midterm survival. Isolated acetabular revision and revision of both components had similar function but survival was significantly worse in the isolated acetabular revision group

Ten acetabular cups coated with hydroxyapatite (HA) had originally been inserted in five primary and five revision total hip replacements. The thickness of the HA was 155 ± 35 μm. The cups, which were well-fixed, were retrieved, with their adherent tissue, at reoperation after 0.3 to 5.8 years because of infection (five hips), wear of polyethylene (three hips), and instability (two hips). Undecalcified sections showed a direct contact between bone and osteoid-like tissue which had formed directly onto the HA coating. The area within the threads and their mirror images, as well as the implant-tissue interfaces consisted of similar amounts of bone and soft tissue. Degradation of HA was seen in all hips. The mean thickness of the remaining HA coating was 97 μm (95% CI 94 to 101). The metal interface comprised 66% HA. The HA-tissue interface contained more bone than soft tissue (p = 0.001), whereas the metal-tissue interface included more soft tissue than bone (p = 0.019). Soft tissue at the implant interface and poor replacement of HA by bone may interfere with long-term fixation

The use of impacted, morsellised bone grafts has become popular in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The initial stability of the reconstruction and the effectiveness of any subsequent process of revitalisation and incorporation will depend on the mechanical integrity of the graft. Our aim in this study was to document the time-dependent mechanical properties of the morsellised graft. This information is useful in clinical application of the graft, in studies of migration of the implant and in the design of the joint. We used 16 specimens of impacted, morsellised cancellous bone from the sternum of goats to assess the mechanical properties by confined compression creep tests. Consideration of the graft material as a porous, permeable solid, filled with fluid, allowed determination of the compressive modulus of the matrix, and its permeability to fluid flow. In all specimens the compression tests showed large, irreversible deformations, caused by flow-independent creep behaviour as a result of rolling and sliding of the bone chips. The mean permeability was 8.82 *10. −12. m. 4. /Ns (SD 43%), and the compressive modulus was 38.7 MPa (SD 34%). No correlation was found between the apparent density and the permeability or between the apparent density and the compressive modulus. The irreversible deformations in the graft could be captured by a creep law, for which the parameters were quantified. We conclude that in clinical use the graft is bound to be subject to permanent deformation after operation. The permeability of the material is relatively high compared with, for example, human cartilage. The confined compression modulus is relatively low compared with cancellous bone of the same apparent density. Designs of prostheses used in revision surgery must accommodate the viscoelastic and permanent deformations in the graft without causing loosening at the interface

The role of bone-graft extenders in impaction revision surgery is becoming increasingly important. Tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite have been shown to be both biocompatible and osteoconductive, yet many surgeons remain reluctant to use them. The difficulty in handling bone-graft extenders can be partly alleviated by using porous particles and adding clotted blood.

In an in vitro model we measured the cohesive properties of various impaction graft mixes. Several factors were evaluated including the use of pure bone graft compared with mixes with extender, washing the bone and the addition of clotted blood.

Our findings showed that pure allograft bone particles had significantly higher cohesion than when mixed with extender (p < 0.001). Washing had no effect on cohesion. The addition of clotted blood significantly increased the cohesion of both pure bone (p < 0.019) and mixes with pure bone and with porous graft extender (p < 0.044).