Revision hip arthroplasty presents a challenge in the setting of femoral bone loss. Tapered stems are susceptible to subsidence which leads to leg length inequality, hip instability and may necessitate repeat femoral revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes in two modular tapered revision systems with different distal stem geometries. We sought to establish the minimum postoperative stem bi-cortical contact length that predicts subsidence for tapered stems. This study examined revision total hip arthroplasties between 2009 and 2016 in a European university affiliated major trauma center. Modular stem A has a taper of 3 degrees whereas modular stem B has a taper of 2 degrees. Radiologic assessment compared x-rays at two time points: immediately post-surgery and most recent x-ray available at a minimum follow up of two years. Leg length discrepancy, subsidence and postoperative bi cortical contact was assessed. Descriptive summary statistics calculated clinical factors (i.e. age, gender, Paprosky classification). 122 arthroplasties were completed. Complete data was available for 112. Revisions were carried out for Paprovski grade 3a/ 3b femoral deficits. Post-operative bi-cortical contact of the proximal stem < 20mm was associated with higher subsidence rates (P = 0.047). Subsidence rates for implant A and B system were 4.27mm (0.12–25.62mm) and 3.43 mm (0.3–11.1 mm) respectively. Significant subsidence was noted in 9.8% (n=8) in implant A and 5.2%(n=2) in implant B. We conclude that immediate postoperative bi-cortical stem contact of <20mm was associated with significantly higher subsidence rates in this study

Introduction. Acetabular bone deficiency presents one of the most challenging problems during revision hip arthroplasty. A variety of surgical options and techniques are available including impaction bone grafting. We present our medium to long-term experience of 68 consecutive hips in 64 patients who had acetabular revision using impacted cancellous bone grafting with bone cement with a mean follow up of 10.5 ±3.75) years (range 5.1 to 17.7 years). Methods. Patients' undergoing acetabular bone grafting during revision hip arthroplasty prior to insertion of a cemented cup between 1993 and 2000 were evaluated. Pre-operative, immediate post-operative, 1 year post-op and final follow-up radiographs were evaluated. The pre-operative bone loss was graded according to the AAOS and Paprosky classifications. The presence of radiolucencies, alignment and incorporation of bone graft were evaluated. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to assess clinical outcome. 13 patients who were unable to attend the department were contacted for a telephone interview. Analysis of the Data was carried out using SPSS17 [SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois]. Results. 64 consecutive patients (68 hips) were evaluated with an average age of 69.9 (± 10.24) years. At the mean follow up of 10.5 years [5.1–17.7 years] Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis predicted a rate of survival of the acetabular component of 95.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92 to 99) at 10 years, with revision for any reason as the endpoint. The median Harris hip score at final follow up was 79.5 [IQR 67.9–80.45]. Neither the extent of initial defect or acetabular inclination were related to clinical outcome or predicted further revision. Progression of the radiololucent zones between the cement bone interface was a predictor of loosening and further revision. Discussion. Our findings have shown that acetabular revision using impacted cancellous bone graft and a cemented acetabular component remains a reliable and successful technique for patients with poor femoral bone stock

Aim. Our goals were to minimize the invasiveness of the revision hip arthroplasty approach in order to accelerate the patient's rehabilitation, shorten the length of hospitalization and reduce the postoperative complications, especially the rate of joint dislocation. Our study aimed to prove whether and under which conditions the less invasive approach is preferable in revision arthroplasty. Material and Methods. The modified revision technique differs from the conventional approach in the following main aspects:. Oncologic: applying larger hip balls and inserts, after expanding the variety of the available articulating joint components in 4 mm steps (28–40 mm),. sparing and reconstructing the joint capsule, whereby the integrity of its acetabular origin is crucial. That procedure was combined with tissue dissection strictly parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers. The transgluteal approach after Bauer was applied. The small skin incision was closed by running subcuticular technique. The inpatient postoperative phase after revision total hip arthroplasty was evaluated in the last 6.5 years. All patients completed a questionnaire. Results. Less invasive revision hip arthroplasty was performed in 55 cases in a period of 6.5 years. No intraoperative method-specific complication was observed. Only one dislocation and one early infection, which needed surgical intervention, were recorded. The mean postoperative length of stay was 9.5 days after less invasive revision hip arthroplasty compared to an average of 20.5 days for all revisions. The duration of inpatient treatment was thus halved. This technique was mostly applied in the isolated stem exchange, followed by exchange of bearing components and complete joint exchange. The isolated socket exchange with stable stem is, however, difficult to be realized in the less invasive technique. Conclusion. The less invasive revision hip arthroplasty is associated with a low complication rate. It can be applied in about 30–50% of revision cases. Reconstructing the integrity of the capsule represents the most important modification of the operation's technique. The postoperative joint stability is on the midterm increased and the reconstruction of leg length is indirectly facilitated compared to resecting the joint capsule. Applying larger ball-insert pairs depending on the outer diameter of the socket allows a long-term increase in the joint stability and thus a reduction in the dislocation risk. Owing to its low complication rate and significant reduction of the length of stay, the less invasive revision hip arthroplasty approach is medically and economically recommended

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe services available to patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) in England and Wales, with focus on variation between centres and areas for care improvement.

Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is the second most common metabolic bone disease. Osteoarthritis (OA) affects one-third of patients with PDB. The incidence of THR (total hip replacement) and TKR (total knee replacement) is 3.1- and 1.7-fold higher in PDB patients compared to non-affected age-matched controls. No large studies or joint registry reports exist describing the outcomes following THR or TKR in patients with PDB. The objectives of this study were to investigate the outcomes following THR and TKR in patients with PDB using national joint registry data. 144 THR and 43 TKR were identified using the Scottish Arthroplasty Project from 1996–2013. For THR, the most common early post-operative surgical complications were haematoma formation (1.4%), and surgical site infection (1.4%). The absolute incidence during follow-up of dislocation was 2.8%, and revision hip arthroplasty was performed in 2.8% of cases. Implant survival of the primary prosthesis was 96.3% (CI: 92.8 – 99.8) at 10-years, and patient survival was 50.0% (39.6 – 60.4) at 10-years. For TKR, the most common early post-operative surgical complication was surgical site infection (2.3%). The absolute incidence during follow-up of revision knee arthroplasty was 4.7%. On survival analysis, implant survival of the primary prosthesis was 94.5% (CI: 87.1 – 100) at 10-years, and patient survival was 38.3% (16.7 – 59.9) at 10-years. This is the largest reported series of outcomes following primary THR and TKR in patients with PDB. PDB patients are not at increased risk of surgical complications following primary THR or TKR compared to non-PDB patients

We reviewed 59 bone graft substitutes marketed by 17 companies currently available for implantation in the United Kingdom, with the aim of assessing the peer-reviewed literature to facilitate informed decision-making regarding their use in clinical practice. After critical analysis of the literature, only 22 products (37%) had any clinical data. Norian SRS (Synthes), Vitoss (Orthovita), Cortoss (Orthovita) and Alpha-BSM (Etex) had Level I evidence. We question the need for so many different products, especially with limited published clinical evidence for their efficacy, and conclude that there is a considerable need for further prospective randomised trials to facilitate informed decision-making with regard to the use of current and future bone graft substitutes in clinical practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:583–97.

A consecutive series of 320 patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip treated with a dynamic locking plate (Targon Femoral Neck (TFN)) were reviewed. All surviving patients were followed for a minimum of two years. During the follow-up period 109 patients died.

There were 112 undisplaced fractures, of which three (2.7%) developed nonunion or re-displacement and five (4.5%) developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Revision to an arthroplasty was required for five patients (4.5%). A further six patients (5.4%) had elective removal of the plate and screws.

There were 208 displaced fractures, of which 32 (15.4%) developed nonunion or re-displacement and 23 (11.1%) developed avascular necrosis. A further four patients (1.9%) developed a secondary fracture around the TFN. Revision to a hip replacement was required for 43 patients (20.7%) patients and a further seven (3.3%) had elective removal of the plate and screws.

It is suggested that the stronger distal fixation combined with rotational stability may lead to a reduced incidence of complications related to the healing of the fracture when compared with other contemporary fixation devices but this needs to be confirmed in further studies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1402–5.