Summary Statement. Reverse shoulder design philosophy can impact external rotation moment arms. Lateralizing the humerus can increase the external rotator moment arms relative to normal anatomy. Introduction. The design of reverse shoulders continues to evolve. These devices are unique in that they are not meant to reproduce the healthy anatomy. The reversal of the fulcurm in these devices impacts every muscle that surrounds the joint. This study is focused on analyzing the moment arms for the rotator cuff muscles involved in internal and external rotation for a number of reverse shoulder design philosophies. Methods. Four of the most common design philosophies were chosen. The first, a Grammont style prosthesis, with a center of rotation (COR) on the glenoid face and a humeral cup countersunk into the proximal humerus (MGMH). The second concept is the MGMH design lateralised by a 10mm bone graft (BIO). The third concept has a lateralised glenosphere COR and a humeral component inside the proximal humerus (LGMH). The fourth design has a medialised COR with a humeral component placed on top of the humerus (MGLH). This places the humerus further lateral than the previous designs. For each component set, a representative implant was modeled based on published specifications. Each design was implanted into the same digital bone models (consisting of a humerus, scapula, clavicle, and ribcage) following the manufacturer's recommended surgical technique. The muscles analyzed were the posterior-deltoid (PD), subscapularis (SSC), infraspinatus (IS), and teres minor (TM). These muscles were allowed to wrap around the bone of the scapula and proximal humerus through the range of motion. All muscle origin and insertion points were kept constant throughout the analysis. The assemblies were externally rotated from an initial position of 45° internal rotation to 45° of external rotation of the humerus with the arm at 0° of abduction. The moment arms for all muscles were compared to those calculated for the anatomic shoulder. Results. All the rotator cuff muscles displayed a similar trend with the reverse shoulder. The external rotators all had similar moment arm values at neutral (IS∼22mm, TM∼20mm), but increased at rates proportional to their humeral offsets with external rotation (IS-MGLH 32.3mm, LGMH 27.5mm, MGMH and BIO 26.25mm; TM-MGLH 31.3mm, LGMH 27.8mm, MGMH and BIO 26.5mm). The SSC internal rotation moment arm remains roughly constant at 20mm for the anatomic shoulder, but varies widely from 45° external to 45° internal rotation with the different designs (MGLH 31.4mm to 6.7mm; MGMH 25.1mm to 11.2mm; LGMH 26.2mm to 10.8mm; BIO 25.4mm to 4.8mm). The PD moment arm is increased relative to the anatomic shoulder during external rotation for the MGLH design (9.3mm vs. 7.4mm). The other designs exhibit a decrease in the moment arm of this muscle relative to the anatomic design (LGMH 7.3mm, MGMH 5.8mm, BIO 6.4mm). Discussion. The lateral offset between the center of humeral axis and the muscle insertion on the humerus dominates the external rotation moment arm value through this range of motion. This is evident by the increase in the moment arms with external rotation for the different reverse shoulder designs. The increase in external rotation efficiency for the external rotators and PD could play a critical role in post-operative external rotation strength and motion

Wear of polyethylene is associated with aseptic loosening of orthopaedic implants and has been observed in hip and knee prostheses and anatomical implants for the shoulder. The reversed shoulder prostheses have not been assessed as yet. We investigated the volumetric polyethylene wear of the reversed and anatomical Aequalis shoulder prostheses using a mathematical musculoskeletal model. Movement and joint stability were achieved by EMG-controlled activation of the muscles. A non-constant wear factor was considered. Simulated activities of daily living were estimated from in vivo recorded data. After one year of use, the volumetric wear was 8.4 mm. 3. for the anatomical prosthesis, but 44.6 mm. 3. for the reversed version. For the anatomical prosthesis the predictions for contact pressure and wear were consistent with biomechanical and clinical data. The abrasive wear of the polyethylene in reversed prostheses should not be underestimated, and further analysis, both experimental and clinical, is required

Wear of polymeric glenoid components has been identified as a cause of loosening and failure of shoulder implants1,2 in vivo. A small number of shoulder joint simulators have been built for in vitro wear testing, however none have been capable of testing with physiological motion patterns in three axes and with physiological loading. The Newcastle Shoulder Wear Simulator was designed with three axes of motion, which are programmable so that different activities of daily living might be replicated. The simulator uses three pneumatic cylinders with integral position encoders to move five shoulder prostheses simultaneously in the flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and internal-external rotation axes. Axial loading is applied with pneumatic cylinders supplied from a pneumatic proportional valve via a manifold, which also supplies a sixth static control station. In order to establish if that the machine can actually perform as intended, commissioning trials were conducted replicating lifting a 0.5 Kg weight to head height as a daily living activity. During the commissioning trials JRI Orthopaedics Reverse VAIOS shoulder prostheses were tested in 50% bovine serum at ambient temperature. The results show that the shoulder joint wear simulator can satisfactorily reproduce a daily living activity deliberately selected for having a large range of motion and loading. Other daily activities, such as drinking from a mug, are less demanding in the ranges of motion and loading and represent no difficulty in being reproduced on the simulator. Now successfully commissioned, this new multi-station shoulder wear simulator can wear test current and new designs of shoulder prosthesis in vitro

Objectives

To explore whether orthopaedic surgeons have adopted the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial results routinely into clinical practice.