Purpose of study:. The question of prolonged bracing following injury in patients diagnosed with SCIWORA remains controversial. Proponents of the ‘Segmental Spinal Instability’ hypothesis claim that there is occult ligamentous injury leading to instability and a risk of recurrent injury. Published reports of recurrent SCIWORA involve patients with minor, transient neurological symptoms and normal MRI findings. The contradicting ‘differential stretch hypothesis’ is based on the premise that the spinal column will deform elastically, exceeding the elastic deforming potential of the more fragile spinal cord, but will return to its baseline stability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for bracing in patients with SCIWORA based on MRI evidence of instability. Methods:. A retrospective chart review was performed for a series of eleven patients with documented SCIWORA that presented to Red Cross Children's Hospital over the past 8 years. Details regarding mode of injury, age at presentation, neurological deficit at presentation, MRI findings and long term prognosis were documented. MRI's were reviewed by the authors as well as a consultant radiologist. Results:. There were 9 males and 2 females. The average age was 4.5 years. All patients were victims of motor vehicle accidents and had multiple injuries. Five patients had cervical, five thoracic and one had both cervical and thoracic injuries. There were 1 monoplegia, 4 hemiplegias, 3 paraplegias and 3 triplegias. None of the MRIs performed on these patients demonstrated ligamentous or bony injury. Patients with only T2 changes demonstrated progressive neurological recovery within a few months following injury. There were no recurrences and none of the patients were braced following the diagnosis of SCIWORA. Conclusion:. Our results from this small series support the ‘differential stretch hypothesis’ and we maintain that patient's with SCIWORA does not demonstrate spinal instability and therefore does not require bracing following injury

Introduction. Knee injuries are common amongst footballers. The aim of this study was to establish frequency and variation of knee injuries within one English Premier League (EPL) professional football club over two seasons, to assess number of days missed due to injury, and analyse current treatment regimen for each injury type. Method. Data was collected prospectively for injuries suffered by players between 2009 and 2011, spanning two EPL seasons at one EPL club. Demographics were recorded along with various factors influencing injury, including playing surface, pitch condition, dominant side, type of injury, ability to continue playing, and mechanism of injury. Time taken for return to play, and treatment received was recorded. Results. 35 injuries occurred that were severe enough to cause players to miss at least one competitive match. The commonest injury was to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) in 34%. Patella tendon injuries were seen in 29%, other injuries included meniscus tears, ACL ruptures, and osteochondral defects. All grade II MCL Injuries received sclerosant injections. 40% of patella tendon injuries were given plasma-rich protein (PRP) injections, and 30% underwent surgery. The mean recovery time following MCL and patella tendon injuries was 44 days and 77 days respectively. 60% of injuries were sustained during training and 40% were suffered in competitive games. 26% were recurring injuries, recurrent meniscus and patella tendon injuries took twice as long to recover compared to the initial injury. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that MCL and patella tendon injuries are the most common knee injuries amongst professional footballers and that meniscus tears and ligament ruptures are relatively rare in comparison. Injuries appear to occur more frequently during training. A high proportion of injuries in the study received injection therapy in the form of PRP or sclerosant. The study suggests recurrent injuries can prolong recovery two-fold

Background. Isolated fractures of the distal fourth or fifth metacarpal bones, known as boxer's fractures (BF), are the most common type of metacarpal fracture. Boxer's fractures received their name from one of their most common causes — punching an object with a closed fist. This injury has been described as “a tolerable fracture in an intolerable patient” (1) It occurs commonly during fistfights or from punching a hard object such as a wall. Greer and William demonstrated that it is usually an intentional injury and these patients were at increased risk for recurrent injury (2). Further work suggested that patients with such injuries had higher features of antisocial, self-defeating personality disorders, self harm and impulsive behaviour, compared with control groups (3). It has been suggested that all patients presenting with such an injury should have psychiatric assessment. The majority of studies in the literature have concentrated on adults and little has been reported on children and adolescents who present with such fractures. This study aims to assess aggression scores in young patients discharged with metacarpal fractures due to punching using a validated questionnaire and this abstract presents the interim analysis. Methodology. Following ethical permissions patients between 11 and 18 years of age, discharged with a metacarpal fracture caused by punching diagnosis codes S622, S623 or S624 and willing to complete an anonymous quetionnairre were included. All patients recieved an information sheet and for young people under 16 parental permission was sought. The Bus and Warren validated questionnaire was completed by post, in person or over the telephone. The questionnaire included subscales of physical aggression and anger scales as well as overall aggression scoring and patients were asked to complete all sections. Results. Twenty one patients who had metacarpal fractures due to punching have. completed the study to date. All were males aged between the age of 11 and 18. The physical aggression scores ranged from 13-39 with a mean of 27.5, median 31 and mode 33. Fifteen patients demonstrated high aggression scores. Six patients demonstrated average scores. Anger scores ranged from 7-31. Median 18.5, mode 13, median 20. Thirteen patients had high anger scores compared with their peers. Eight patients were within the average range. Overall aggression scores ranged from 66-133 with a mean of 100 and median of 100. Eleven patients demonstrated high scores and 5 were in the high average range. Discussion/Conclusions. The initial interim results of this study show that over half the patients had higher overall aggression levels than the normal population. The physical aggression subscale focussed on the use of physical force and 71% had high physical aggression levels. High scores in this subscale indicate a lack of ability to control urges toward physical aggression and this is often seen in children with attention deficit disorder. Anger scores may indicate a number of conduct disorders or abusive situations and in this study 62% had raised anger scores. This may be relevant in assessing children with punch injuries as they may benefit from assessment by the CAMS team for investigation and management of their anger and aggression issues which in turn may reduce recurrence of the injuries

Stand-up paddle-boarding (SUP) is an increasingly popular water sport. To our knowledge no published data exists regarding injuries sustained whilst participating in this new sport. This study investigates the frequency, pattern, and mechanism of SUP injuries. Data was collected from UK SUP and surfing clubs via an online survey. Completed surveys were obtained from 31 paddle-boarders (M:F 25:6, median age 27, range 21–65) reporting 18 injuries and 130 surfers reporting 4 SUP-related injuries. 50% of paddle-boarders reported an injury. All SUP injuries were sustained when surfing waves, rather than paddling on calm water. Sprains accounted for 50%, lacerations 22%, contusions 17% and fractures 5%. 78% of injuries were to the lower extremity, and 17% to the head and neck. 17% sustained recurrent twisting injuries, two suffering recurrent knee injuries and one suffering recurrent ankle injuries, resulting in sprains. 17% of injuries resulted from contact with one's own paddle-board, 17% from another paddle-board, and 5% from the sea floor. Despite surfer concerns regarding paddle-board mass and control, paddle-board related injuries only accounted for 1% of the 335 injuries reported by surfers. SUP is relatively safe in calm water conditions, with a similar injury pattern to surfers when used in waves