Follow-up of arthroplasty varies widely across the UK. The aim of this NIHR-funded study was to employ a mixed-methods approach to examine the requirements for arthroplasty follow-up and produce evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations. It has been supported by BHS, BASK, BOA, ODEP and NJR. Four interconnected work packages have recently been completed: (1) a systematic literature review; (2a) analysis of routinely collected National Health Service data from four national data sets to understand when and which patients present for revision surgery; (2b) prospective data regarding how patients currently present for revision surgery; (3) economic modelling to simulate long-term costs and quality-adjusted life years associated with different follow-up care models and (4) a Delphi-consensus process, involving all stakeholders, to develop a policy document to guide appropriate follow-up care after primary hip and knee arthroplasty. We will present the following Recommendations:. For ODEP10A∗ minimum implants, it is safe to disinvest in routine follow-up from 1 to 10 years post non-complex hip and knee replacement provided there is rapid access to orthopaedic review. For ODEP10A∗ minimum implants in complex cases, or non-ODEP10A∗ minimum implants, periodic follow-up post hip and knee replacement may be required from 1 to 10 years. At 10 years post hip and knee replacement, we recommend clinical, which may be virtual, and radiographic evaluation. After 10 years post hip and knee replacement, frequency of further follow-up should be based on the 10-year assessment; ongoing rapid access to orthopaedic review is still required. Overarching statements. These recommendations apply to post primary hip and knee replacement follow-up. The 10-year time point in these recommendations is based on a lack of robust evidence beyond ten years. The term complex cases refer to individual patient and surgical factors that may increase the risk for replacement failure

Introduction

A fractured hip is the commonest cause of injury related death in the UK. Prompt surgery has been found to improve pain scores and reduce the length of hospital stay, risk of decubitus ulcer formation and mortality rates. The hip fracture Best Practice Tariff (BPT) aims to improve these outcomes by financially compensating services, which deliver hip fracture surgery within 36 hours of admission. Ensuring that delays are reserved for patients with conditions which compromise survival, but are responsive to medical optimisation, would facilitate enhanced outcomes and help to achieve the 36-hour target.

We aimed to identify medical conditions associated with patients failing to achieve the 36-hour cut off, and evaluated whether these were justified by calculating their associated mortality risk.

Deep infection occurs in 2–4% of lower limb arthroplasty resulting in increasing cost, co-morbidity and challenging revision arthroplasty surgery. Identifying the potential sources of infection helps reduce infection rates. The aim of our study is to identify the impact and potential for contamination of our hands and gowns whilst scrubbing using SSHS.

A colony-forming unit (CFU) is a pathogenic particle of 0.5 micrometers to 5 micrometers. Concurrent particle counts and blood agar exposure settle plates for 3 subjects and 1 alcohol cleaned mannequin; testing a standard arthroplasty hood, a SSHS with and without the fan on for a 2 minute exposure to represent scrubbing time. Microbiological plates were incubated using a standard protocol by our local microbiology department.

All SSHS were positive for gram-positive cocci with a mean colony count of 410cfu/m². Comparing background counts for laminar flow (mean 0.7 particle/m³; 95% CI 0–1.4) versus scrub areas (mean 131.5 particle/m3; 95% CI 123.5–137.9; p=0.0003), however neither grew any CFU's with a 2-minute exposure. For the mannequin, the only significant result was with the fan on with a 1.5× increase in the particle count (p=0.042) and a correlating positive organism (13CFU/m²). With human subjects, however, the particle count increased by 3.75× the background count with the fan on (total p=0.004, CFU p=0.047) and all had positive cultures, mean 36 CFU/m². There were no positive cultures with the standard arthroplasty hood or the SSHS with no fan on. If repeated in laminar flow, there was only a statistically significant increase with the fan on (p=0.049), but with negative cultures following a 2-minute exposure.

Sterile gloves and gowns can be contaminated when scrubbing with the SSHS fan on. We recommend having the fan switched off when scrubbing until the hood and gown is in place, ideally in a laminar flow environment.

Aims

Concurrent hip and spine pathologies can alter the biomechanics of spinopelvic mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study examines how differences in pelvic orientation of patients with spine fusions can increase the risk of dislocation risk after THA.

Over recent years hip arthroscopic surgery has evolved into one of the most rapidly expanding fields in orthopaedic surgery. Complications are largely transient and incidences between 0.5% and 6.4% have been reported. However, major complications can and do occur. This article analyses the reported complications and makes recommendations based on the literature review and personal experience on how to minimise them.

Aims

Using a systematic review, we investigated whether there is an increased risk of post-operative infection in patients who have received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection to the hip for osteoarthritis prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Two-stage exchange remains the gold standard for treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection after total hip replacement (THR). In the first stage, all components and associated cement if present are removed, an aggressive debridement is undertaken including a complete synovectomy, and an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer is put in place. Patients are then treated with six weeks of parenteral antibiotics, followed by an ‘antibiotic free period’ to help ensure the infection has been eradicated. If the clinical evaluation and serum inflammatory markers suggest the infection has resolved, then the second stage can be completed, which involves removal of the cement spacer, repeat debridement, and placement of a new THR.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:84–7.

There is great variability in acetabular component orientation following hip replacement. The aims of this study were to compare the component orientation at impaction with the orientation measured on post-operative radiographs and identify factors that influence the difference between the two. A total of 67 hip replacements (52 total hip replacements and 15 hip resurfacings) were prospectively studied. Intra-operatively, the orientation of the acetabular component after impaction relative to the operating table was measured using a validated stereo-photogrammetry protocol. Post-operatively, the radiographic orientation was measured; the mean inclination/anteversion was 43° (sd 6°)/ 19° (sd 7°). A simulated radiographic orientation was calculated based on how the orientation would have appeared had an on-table radiograph been taken intra-operatively. The mean difference between radiographic and intra-operative inclination/anteversion was 5° (sd 5°)/ -8° (sd 8°). The mean difference between simulated radiographic and intra-operative inclination/anteversion, which quantifies the effect of the different way acetabular orientation is measured, was 3°/-6° (sd 2°). The mean difference between radiographic and simulated radiographic orientation inclination/anteversion, which is a manifestation of the change in pelvic position between component impaction and radiograph, was 1°/-2° (sd 7°).

This study demonstrated that in order to achieve a specific radiographic orientation target, surgeons should implant the acetabular component 5° less inclined and 8° more anteverted than their target. Great variability (2 sd about ± 15°) in the post-operative radiographic cup orientation was seen. The two equally contributing causes for this are variability in the orientation at which the cup is implanted, and the change in pelvic position between impaction and post-operative radiograph.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1290–7

We systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature to relate the survival of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty devices to a National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) benchmark for choosing a primary total hip replacement, which is a survival rate of 90% at a follow-up of ten years.

A total of 29 articles (10 621 resurfaced hips) met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up ranged from 0.6 to 10.5 years and the survival of the implant ranged from 84% to 100%. Of the 10 621 hips, 370 were revised (3.5%), with aseptic loosening as the most frequent mode of failure.

None of the hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants used to date met the full ten-year NICE benchmark of survival. A total of 13 studies showed satisfactory survival compared with the three-year NICE benchmark.

The use of allograft struts and cerclage wire, possibly augmented by plate fixation, for the treatment of Vancouver type-B1 peri-prosthetic fractures around a total hip replacement has been strongly advocated. We examined our results using plate fixation without allograft struts and compared them with the results of the use of struts alone or when combined with plate fixation. Of 20 consecutive patients with type-B1 fractures treated by open reduction and plate fixation, 19 were available for follow-up. The fractures healed in 18 patients with a mean time to weight-bearing of ten weeks (4 to 19). There were no cases of infection or malunion. Nonunion occurred in one patient and required a second plate fixation to achieve union.

Safe, cost-effective treatment of Vancouver type-B1 fractures can be performed by plate fixation without the addition of cortical struts. This procedure may allow earlier weight-bearing than allograft strut fixation alone.