Background:. Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental and other procedures when patients have joint replacements in situ remains controversial. Recommendations seem to generally be intuitive and not based on any sound scientific evidence. Recently, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons altered their previous standpoint and suggested that orthopaedic surgeons review their current practice of routine prescription of antibiotic prophylaxis. Method:. We conducted an electronic survey of members of the South African Orthopaedic Association to determine the opinion of the average orthopaedic surgeon in South Africa in respect of this prophylaxis. 111 surgeons responded. Results:. 73% of respondents were of the opinion that patients with joint replacements in situ should take antibiotic prophylaxis prior to undergoing any dental procedure. 65% of surgeons were of the opinion that this prophylaxis should be life-long. 59% of surgeons recommended that prophylaxis start before the procedure, 24% at the same time as the procedure. 35% of surgeons recommended prophylaxis with every dental procedure, and 61% only with more invasive procedures. We also show that working in private practice and greater surgical experience increases the likelihood that surgeons will prescribe prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental procedures. Scientific evidence linking bacteraemia from dental procedures with infected prosthetic implants is limited, however 19% of surgeons reported managing an infected implant as a result of dental surgery. Conclusion:. We could find no evidence to substantiate the practice of using antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental or any other procedures in those patients with joint replacements in situ. Practice in South Africa is at odds with world-wide trends and we would recommend that these patients do not use antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental and other procedures, except possibly those that may be immune-compromised

Ten RCTs published between 2000 and 2013 support treating distal radius buckle fractures and other low-risk distal radius fractures with a removable splint and with no orthopaedic follow-up. Application of this evidence has been shown to be variable and suboptimal resulting in unnecessary costs to a strained healthcare system. The Canadian evidence on this topic has been generated by subspecialist physicians working in paediatric hospitals. It is unclear what factors affect the dissemination of this information. We investigated the association of hospital type and physician type with the application of best-evidence treatment for low-risk distal radius fractures in children with the goal of improving our understanding of evidence diffusion in Ontario for this common injury.

We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked health care administrative data. We identified all children aged 2–14 treated in Ontario emergency departments from 2003–2015 with distal radius fractures with no reduction and no operation within a six week period. We excluded refractures and children with comorbidities. We evaluated the followup received – orthopaedic, general practitioner, or none. We examined the data for trends over time. Multivariable log binomial regression was used to quantify associations between hospital and physician type and best-evidence treatment. We adjusted for patient-related variables including age, sex, rural or urban location, and socioeconomic status.

70,801 fractures were analyzed. Best-evidence treatment was more likely to occur in a small (RR 1.86, 95%CI 1.72–2.01), paediatric (RR 1.16, 95%CI 1.07–1.26), or community (RR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20) hospital compared with treatment in a teaching hospital. Best-evidence treatment was more likely if initial management was by a paediatrician with additional emergency medicine training (RR 1.73, 95%CI 1.56–1.92) or paediatrician (RR 1.22, 95%CI 1.11–1.34). Paediatric and teaching hospitals have improved their use of best-evidence over time while other hospital types have stagnated or deteriorated. Paediatricians, paediatricians with additional emergency medicine training, and emergency medicine residency trained physicians have improved their use of best-evidence over time, while other physician types have stagnated or deteriorated. Overall, only 20% of patients received best-evidence treatment and 70% had orthopaedic follow-up.

Significant over-utilization of resources for low-risk distal radius fractures continues decades after the first randomized trials showed it to be unnecessary. Physician type and hospital rurality are most strongly associated with best-evidence treatment. Physician types involved in generating, presenting, and publishing best-evidence for this fracture type are successfully implementing it, while others have failed to change their practices. Rural hospitals are excellent resource stewards by necessity, but are deteriorating over time. Our results strongly indicate the need for targeted implementation strategies to explicitly apply clinical evidence in clinical practice Canada-wide, with the goal of providing more cost-effective care for common children's fractures.

The time at which patients should drive following total hip replacement (THR) is dependant upon recovery and the advice they are given. The Driver Vehicle and Licensing Agency (DVLA) in the United Kingdom does not publish recommendations following THR and insurance companies usually rely on medical instruction. Few studies have been performed previously and have reached different conclusions.

Brake reaction times for patients undergoing primary THR were measured pre-operatively and at four, six and eight weeks after surgery using a vehicle driving simulator at a dedicated testing centre. Patients were prospectively recruited. Ethical approval was granted. Participants included eleven males and nine females, mean age 69 years. Side of surgery, frequency of driving and type of car (automatic or manual) were documented. Patients with postoperative complications were excluded. No adverse events occurred during the study.

Statistical analysis using Friedman's test demonstrated a statistically significant difference (P=0.015) in reaction times across the four time periods. Wilcoxon test demonstrated a highly significant difference between initial and six week mean results (P=0.003), and between four and six week results (P=0.001). No significant difference was found between six and eight weeks.

Our data suggests reaction times improve until week six and significantly between week four to six. Patients making an uncomplicated recovery following primary THR may be considered safe to return to driving from week six onwards. We recommend this is clearly documented in the medical notes, and patients should check with their insurance company prior to recommencement.

Introduction. A 6cm femoral gain requires 5-Y during normal growth, but only 6–8-W surgically (x30–40 faster). In lengthening surgery, losses of muscle force (MF) and circumferences (MC) are major. Recovery is long, preventing sports till bone fusion. Can we maintain MC and strength throughout the entire lengthening and how?. We monitored for over 30 years patients for muscle force (isokinetic), circumferences, activities (including sports) and food intake, and acted on the 5 principles of the Osteostasis. Materials & Methods. Over 750 femoral lengthening with Full WB Nails (FWBN) got Isokinetic testing (≧1991), circumferences measurements (≧2012; 20-15-10-5-0cm above patella, max-calf, mini/max-ankle), food intake (≧2012), using MyFitnessPal App (≧2016), gradually enforced. Preoperative training along with a daily post-operative training are supervised by our trainers. Recommendations for food intake and activities were provided. Patients noted on a specific App all parameters. Compliance was noted. Results. Instead of a traditional 7–9cm circumference loss for 8–10cm gains using Ex-fix or nails, with FWBN and our protocols, no MC loss could be noted in compliant pre-trained patients, intensive early post-op resistance training, high calory intake (M:>4200, F:>3000; 20–25% Proteins) and supplements (no fat pad increase). Bone fusion could be obtained at the end of lengthening or within short weeks (Healing Index down to 8D/cm). Non-compliant patients (or using morphine), lost weight and MC. Conclusions. Increasing by 8–10cm muscle length, even bilaterally, and maintaining MC during lengthening, is possible, with very fast bone fusion. It requires building up several hundred of grams of muscles. The ‘building up equation’ associating resistance bike from the early post-operative phase with sports, strong food intake with increased protein intake, and added supplements with no morphine medication, proved to boost circumferences and bone fusion. It induced fast recovery, walking and sports capacities

Aim. Treatment recommendations for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) include surgical debridement, antibiotic therapy or staged revision. In surgical related foot and ankle infections (SR-FAI), implant removal will lead to instability. Debridement is difficult because the implant is outside the joint. Recommendations regarding PJI treatment can therefore not be extrapolated to the treatment of SR-FAI. Method. We searched PubMed for the etiology and treatment of SR-FAI, taken into account the time of occurrence, causative microorganisms and surgical treatment options. We integrated this knowledge into a treatment algorithm for SR-FAI. Results. Within the first 6 weeks after surgery, it is difficult to distinguish acute osteomyelitis from surgical site infection in which infection is limited to the soft tissue. The predominantly causative microorganism is Staphylococcus aureus. No debridement can be performed, because of the diffuse soft tissue inflammation and the absence of a joint space. If early SR- FAI is suspected without signs of systemic symptoms, fistula or abscess, empirical antibiotic treatment covering Staphylococcus aureus is recommended. If there is suspicion of ongoing SR-FAI after 2 weeks of empirical treatment, samples for culture after an antibiotic free window should be obtained to identify the causative microorganisms. If SR-FAI is confirmed, but there is no consolidation yet, targeted antibiotic treatment is given for 12 weeks without initial implant removal. In all other cases, debridement and samples for culture should be obtained after an antibiotic free window. Staged revision surgery will be performed if there is still a nonunion. Conclusions. Treatment algorithm regarding PJI cannot be extrapolated to the treatment of SR-FAI. Until now, no treatment guideline for SR-FAI is available. We have introduced a treatment algorithm for the treatment of SR-FAI. The guideline will be validated during the next 2 years

To document and assess the available evidence regarding single bundle, hamstrings autograft preparation techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and provide graft preparation options for different clinical scenarios. Three online databases (Embase, PubMed and Ovid [MEDLINE]) were searched from database inception until April 10, 2021. The inclusion criteria were English language studies, human studies, and operative technique studies for single bundle hamstrings autograft preparation for ACLR. Descriptive characteristics, the number of tendons, number of strands, tendon length, graft length and graft diameter were recorded. The methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) instrument and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for non-randomized and randomized studies, respectively. The initial search yielded 5485 studies, 32 met the inclusion criteria. The mean MINORS score across all nonrandomized studies was 8.2 (standard deviation, SD 6.6) indicating an overall low quality of evidence. The mean MINORS score for comparative studies was 17.4 (SD 3.2) indicating a fair quality of evidence. The GRADE assessment for risk of bias in the randomized study included was low. There were 2138 knees in 1881 participants, including 1296 (78.1%) males and 363 (21.9%) females recorded. The mean age was 30.3 years. The mean follow-up time was 43.9 months when reported (range 16-55 months). Eleven studies utilized the semitendinosus tendon alone, while 21 studies used both semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. There were 82 (3.8%) two-strand grafts, 158 (7.4%) three-strand grafts, 1044 (48.8%) four-strand grafts, 546 (25.5%) five-strand grafts, and 308 (14.4%) six-strand grafts included. Overall, 372 (19.7%) participants had a single-tendon ACLR compared to 1509 (80.2%) participants who had a two-tendon ACLR. The mean graft diameter was 9.4mm when reported. The minimum semitendinosus and gracilis tendon lengths necessary ranged from 210-280mm and 160-280mm respectively. The minimum graft length necessary ranged from 63-120mm except for an all-epiphyseal graft in the paediatric population that required a minimum length of 50mm. The minimum femoral, tibial, and intra-articular graft length ranged from 15-25mm, 15-35mm and 20-30mm respectively. Thirteen studies detailed intra-operative strategies to increase graft size such as adding an extra strand or altering the tibial and/or femoral fixation strategies to shorten and widen the graft. Two studies reported ACL reinjury or graft failure rate. One study found no difference in the re-injury rate between four-, five- and six-strand grafts (p = 0.06) and the other found no difference in the failure rate between four- and five- strand grafts (p = 0.55). There was no difference in the post-operative Lysholm score in 3 studies that compared four- and five-strand ACLR. One of the five studies that compared post-operative IKDC scores between graft types found a difference between two- and three- strand grafts, favoring three-strand grafts. There are many single bundle hamstrings autograft preparation techniques for ACLR that have been used successfully with minimal differences in clinical outcomes. There are different configurations that may be utilized interchangeably depending on the number, size and length of tendons harvested to obtain an adequate graft diameter and successful ACLR

Aims. The aim of this paper is to describe the impact of COVID-19 on spine surgery services in a district general hospital in England in order to understand the spinal service provisions that may be required during a pandemic. Methods. A prospective cohort study was undertaken between 17 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 and compared with retrospective data from same time period in 2019. We compared the number of patients requiring acute hospital admission or orthopaedic referrals and indications of referrals from our admission sheets and obtained operative data from our theatre software. Results. Between 17 March to 30 April 2020, there were 48 acute spine referrals as compared to 68 acute referrals during the same time period last year. In the 2019 period, 69% (47/68) of cases referred to the on-call team presented with back pain, radiculopathy or myelopathy compared to 43% (21/48) in the 2020 period. Almost 20% (14/68) of spine referrals consisted of spine trauma as compared to 35% (17/48) this year. There were no confirmed cases of cauda equine last year during this time. Overall, 150 spine cases were carried out during this time period last year, and 261 spine elective cases were cancelled since 17 March 2020. Recommendations. We recommend following steps can be helpful to deal with similar situations or new pandemics in future:. 24 hours on-call spine service during the pandemic. Clinical criteria in place to prioritize urgent spinal cases. Pre-screening spine patients before elective operating. Start of separate specialist trauma list for patients needing urgent surgeries. Conclusion. This paper highlights the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in a district general hospital of England. We demonstrate a decrease in hospital attendances of spine pathologies, despite an increase in emergency spine operations. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:281–286

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the reasons for delay to surgery are secondary to health system constraints or patient factors. This study explored factors that contribute to patients' delay to surgery as well as how patients perceive the delay in surgery to have affected their treatment and care. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 30 patients aged 18 to 50 years old who had undergone arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Qualitative data analysis was performed in accordance with the Straus and Corbin theory to derive codes, categories and themes. Patient interviews revealed three overarching themes regarding delay to ACL reconstruction surgery: access to care, finances and work, and personal advocacy. Elements of those factors were shown to influence the timing of ACL reconstruction surgery. Less common factors included choice of imaging study (i.e., ultrasound), geography, and family commitments. Patients' perceptions of delay in access to care was overwhelming due to the wait time for MRI. Several patients also described significant self-advocacy required to navigate the healthcare system, suggesting that some level of medical literacy may be necessary to gain timely access to surgery. Once patients had seen the surgeon, few patients described untimely delay to surgery, suggesting that OR resources are adequate. Recommendations to decrease delays to ACL reconstruction surgery include better access to MRI and broader education of non-surgical healthcare providers to help navigate access to surgery

Persistent post-surgical pain affects 10%-80% of individuals after common operations, and is more common among patients with psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, or catastrophising. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative psychotherapy for persistent postsurgical pain and physical impairment. We searched Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials to identify relevant RCTs, in any language, from inception of each database to September 1, 2016. Paired independent reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We pooled treatment effects of perioperative psychotherapy on similar outcomes across eligible trials, focusing on intention-to-treat analysis. We used random effects models to perform all meta-analyses. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. Our search found 15 trials (2220 patients) that were eligible for review. For both persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment, perioperative education was ineffective, while active psychotherapy suggested a benefit (test of interaction P=0.01 for both outcomes). Moderate quality evidence showed that active perioperative psychotherapy (cognitive-behaviour therapy, relaxation therapy, or both) significantly reduced persistent post-surgical pain [weighted mean difference (WMD) −1.06 cm on a 10 cm visual analogue scale for pain, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.56 to −0.55 cm, risk difference (RD) for achieving no more than mild pain (3 cm or less) 14%, 95% CI 8–21%] and physical impairment [WMD −9.87% on the 0–100% Oswestry Disability Index, 95% CI −13.42 to −6.32%, RD for achieving no more than mild disability (20% or less) 21%, 95% CI 13–29%]. Perioperative cognitive behavioural therapy and relaxation therapy are effective for reducing persistent pain and physical impairment after surgery. High quality evidence shows no significant effects of perioperative education or psychological support on persistent post-surgical pain or physical impairment compared with usual care. Future studies should explore targeted psychotherapy for surgical patients at higher risk for poor outcome

Electrical stimulators are commonly used to accelerate fracture healing, resolve nonunions or delayed unions, and to promote spinal fusion. The efficacy of electrical stimulator treatment, however, remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomised sham-controlled trials to establish the effectiveness of electrical stimulation for bone healing. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Central to identify all randomised sham-controlled trials evaluating electrical stimulators in patients with acute fractures, non-union, delayed union, osteotomy healing or spinal fusion, published up to February 2015. Our outcomes were radiographic nonunion, patient-reported pain and self-reported function. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and risk of bias, performed data extraction, and rated overall confidence in the effect estimates according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Fifteen randomised trials met our inclusion criteria. Electrical stimulation reduced the relative risk of radiographic nonunion or persistent nonunion by 35% (95%CI 19% to 47%; 15 trials; 1247 patients; number needed to treat = 7; p < 0.01; moderate certainty). Electrical stimulation also showed a significant reduction in patient-reported pain (Mean Difference (MD) on the 100-millimeter visual analogue scale = −7.67; 95% CI −13.92 to −1.43; 4 trials; 195 patients; p = 0.02; moderate certainty). Limited functional outcome data showed no difference with electrical stimulation (MD −0.88; 95% CI −6.63 to 4.87; 2 trials; 316 patients; p = 0.76; low certainty). Patients treated with electrical stimulation as an adjunct for bone healing have a reduced risk of radiographic nonunion or persistent nonunion and less pain; functional outcome data are limited and requires increased focus in future trials

Aims

The principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM) are the foundation of modern medical practice. Surgeons are familiar with the commonly used statistical techniques to test hypotheses, summarize findings, and provide answers within a specified range of probability. Based on this knowledge, they are able to critically evaluate research before deciding whether or not to adopt the findings into practice. Recently, there has been an increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze information and derive findings in orthopaedic research. These techniques use a set of statistical tools that are increasingly complex and may be unfamiliar to the orthopaedic surgeon. It is unclear if this shift towards less familiar techniques is widely accepted in the orthopaedic community. This study aimed to provide an exploration of understanding and acceptance of AI use in research among orthopaedic surgeons.

Aim. To determine the benefit of dissolvable Balloon Arthroplasy in managing patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCT). Methods. This is prospective pilot study carried out adhering to the local approval process. Patients having massive cuff tear with pain or functional limitation were seen by consultants and MRI confirmed the diagnosis. The patients were explained of ‘all available’ treatment options and information leaflet about the new procedure balloon arthroplasty, provided. Patients were seen after 4 weeks in a dedicated clinic to find out if they were willing to participate. Patients were seen by a physiotherapist pre and post-operatively at 6 weeks then at 3, 6 and 12months in addition to medical follow-ups, using VAS, Oxford Shoulder, Constant and SF36 scores. All procedures were carried out by consultant shoulder surgeons and where the cuff was reparable or contraindications identified were excluded. Results. Of the 25 recruited 4 were lost for follow up. 17 of the remaining 21 completed 12 month follow up, and the remaining completed their 6 month follow up. Male to female ratio was 2:1 and no surgical complications were noted. Two patients required an inverse shoulder arthroplasty. Improvements were noted in the SF36, VAS and OSS. Conclusion. The balloon arthroplasty seems to offer benefit for a group of patients who are unfit or not keen on major surgery to offer pain relief possibly function. Recommendations cannot be made due to the study but suggest a multicentre study

Surfing is a popular UK water-sport. Recommendations for protective gear are based on studies abroad from trauma from large waves and reef breaks which may not be relevant in the UK. This study assesses the aetiology of UK surfing injuries in order to assist treatment and provide formative recommendations on protective equipment. Data was collected from UK surf clubs via an online survey. 130 individuals reported 335 injuries. M:F ratio 85:45, median age 28 (range 17–65). Head injuries were the most common (24%) followed by foot and ankle (19%). Surfers collided most often with their own boards (31%) followed by rocks/coral (15%), the sea (11%) and other surf boards (10%). Lacerations were the commonest injury (31%); followed by bruises/ black-eyes (24%) and joint/ligament sprains (15%). Concussions (5%), fractures (3%) and teeth injuries (1%) were rare. Less than 1/3 of all injuries required professional medical attention, 2 required operative intervention. Surfing injuries in the UK are common but usually minor. Serious head injuries (fractures and concussions) are rare. There is insufficient evidence to warrant the routine use of protective helmets whilst surfing in the UK, although protective head and foot gear may be considered when surfing the rarer reef/ rock breaks

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recently identified musculoskeletal care as a major global health issue in the developing world. However, little is known about the quality and trends of orthopaedic research in resource-poor settings. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of orthopaedic research in low-income countries (LIC). The primary objective was to determine the quality and publication parameters of studies performed in LIC. Secondary objectives sought to provide recommendations for successful strategies to implement research endeavors in LIC. A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching MEDLINE (1966-November 2014), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify peer-reviewed orthopaedic research conducted in LICs. The PRISMA guidelines for performing a systematic review were followed. LIC were defined by the WHO and by the World Bank as countries with gross national income per capita equal or less than 1045US$. Inclusion criteria were (1) studies performed in a LIC, (2) conducted on patients afflicted by an orthopaedic condition, and (3) evaluated either an orthopaedic intervention or outcome. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were used to objectively rate the overall methodological quality of each study. Additional data collected from these studies included the publication year, journal demographics, orthopaedic subspecialty and authors' country of origin. A total of 1,809 articles were screened and 277 studies met our inclusion criteria. Eighty-eight percent of studies conducted in LIC were of lower quality evidence according to the GRADE score and consisted mostly of small case series or case reports. Bangladesh and Nepal were the only two LIC with national journals and produced the highest level of research evidence. Foreign researchers produced over 70% of the studies with no collaboration with local LIC researchers. The most common subspecialties were trauma (42%) and paediatrics (14%). The 3 most frequent countries where the research originated were the United States (42%), United Kingdom (11%), and Canada (8%). The 3 most common locations where research was conducted were Haiti (18%), Afghanistan (14%), and Malawi (7%). The majority of orthopaedic studies conducted in LIC were of lower quality and performed by foreign researchers with little local collaboration. In order to promote the development of global orthopaedic surgery and research in LIC, we recommend (1) improving the collaboration between researchers in developed and LIC, (2) promoting the teaching of higher-quality and more rigorous research methodology through shared partnerships, (3) improving the capacity of orthopaedic research in developing nations through national peer-reviewed journals, and (4) dedicated subsections in international orthopaedic journals to global healthcare research

Background. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) for peripheral nerve injuries. 1. states:. “A careful examination of the peripheral nervous and vascular systems must be performed and clearly recorded for all injuries. This examination must be repeated and recorded after any manipulation or surgery.”. This study investigated whether this standard was met for patients with upper limb trauma at a busy London Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department. Method. Data was gathered prospectively from A&E admission notes for 30 consecutive patients with upper limb injuries from the week beginning 11. th. March 2013. Eligibilty: All patients with upper limb injuries. Results. 30 patients: 18 Males mean age of 39.2 and 12 Females mean age of 40.1. 17 patients (56.6%) had documentation of examination of neurovascular status. 14 patients required manipulation and/or splinting of their injury. Of these, no patients had their neurovascular examination documented after the procedure. Poor adherence to the standard is evident across all grades of doctors: FY2, SHO and SpR. Conclusion. There is clear scope to improve documentation of neurovascular status in upper limb injuries. It is especially important to clearly document neurovascular status following manipulation or splinting from a medico-legal perspective. This applies to all grades of staff in A&E. Recommendations. 1. Education of A&E staff of all grades at the departmental induction. 2. Posters in A&E with simple treatment algorithm for managing fractures and dislocated joints. 3. Re-audit in 6 months

Sledging related minor and major injuries represent a significant workload at ski-area medical centers across the world. Although safety rules exist, they are seldom obeyed or enforced. We set out to determine the incidence of sledging related injuries, identifying trends and causative factors at a busy New Zealand Ski resort. All sledging related injuries presenting during a 70-day period were prospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment were recorded. Sixty patients were identified, mean age 10 years, range 4-30 years. Injuries comprised; collisions with sledgers (21), collision with wall (14) and falling from sledge (14). Site of injury included head (36), lower limb (18), spine (9), upper limb (7), and abdomen (2). Fractures included; femur (1), tibia (1), fibula (1), ankle (2), cuboid (1), clavicle (2), scaphoid (1). One 9-year-old patient sustained a serious intracranial haemorrhage, with subsequent permanent neurological sequelae. Sledging related injuries are mostly minor, however significant major injuries do occur requiring intervention at a secondary center. The potential for serious morbidity is evident. Recommendations supporting safety improvement measures does exist, however most were not implemented by the study cohort examined. The use of basic cycling helmets would seem an appropriate minimum level of protection, and greater sledging safety awareness should be encouraged

Introduction. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common sporting injury, often managed surgically with patella-tendon or hamstrings autograft. Surgeons are under increasing pressure for open transparent assessment of their performance. Scoring systems can be used to assess outcome. More than 50 different scoring systems have been identified to assess the ACL deficient knee. Aims. The survey is investigating the use of ACL scoring systems between knee surgeons in the United Kingdom as a method of assessing performance. Method. 134 knee surgeons in the United Kingdom, performing ACL reconstruction, were asked to complete a written questionnaire regarding their use of scoring systems & outcome measures. Written questionnaires were sent and responses were received by post. Results. 81 (60%) surgeons responded to the questionnaire by stating their preferred scoring system. 40 (49%) surgeons routinely use ACL scoring systems versus 41 (51%) surgeons who do not. The Lysholm (I and II) knee scoring scale (80%) and Tegner activity score (67.5%) were most commonly used (57.5% both of them) followed by the Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) (30%), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score (22.5%), Medical Outcome Study 12 Item Short Form (SF12) (20%), the Medical Outcome Study 36 Item Short Form (SF 36) (12.5%), Cincinnati Knee Scoring System (10%), and ACL Quality of Life scoring system (7.5%). Recommendations. The routine use of ACL scoring systems by 49% of surgeons raises the question - should all surgeons be using scoring systems in their ACL practice? This would be relatively easy to do as most patients are followed up post operatively for 6 months. This will help to adopt a transparent assessment of the performance of every consultant to the procedure they perform

Aims

The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic is directly impacting the field of orthopaedic surgery and traumatology with postponed operations, changed status of planned elective surgeries and acute emergencies in patients with unknown infection status. To this point, Germany's COVID-19 infection numbers and death rate have been lower than those of many other nations.

Aims

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted and delayed medical and surgical examinations where attendance is required in person. Our article aims to outline the validity of online assessment, the range of benefits to both candidate and assessor, and the challenges to its implementation. In addition, we propose pragmatic suggestions for its introduction into medical assessment.

Aims

COVID-19 represents one of the greatest global healthcare challenges in a generation. Orthopaedic departments within the UK have shifted care to manage trauma in ways that minimize exposure to COVID-19. As the incidence of COVID-19 decreases, we explore the impact and risk factors of COVID-19 on patient outcomes within our department.