Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1048 - 1055
1 Aug 2020
Cox I Al Mouazzen L Bleibleh S Moldovan R Bintcliffe F Bache CE Thomas S

Aims. The Fassier Duval (FD) rod is a third-generation telescopic implant for children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). Threaded fixation enables proximal insertion without opening the knee or ankle joint. We have reviewed our combined two-centre experience with this implant. Methods. In total, 34 children with a mean age of five years (1 to 14) with severe OI have undergone rodding of 72 lower limb long bones (27 tibial, 45 femoral) for recurrent fractures with progressive deformity despite optimized bone health and bisphosphonate therapy. Data were collected prospectively, with 1.5 to 11 years follow-up. Results. A total of 24 patients (33%) required exchange of implants (14 femora and ten tibiae) including 11 rods bending with refracture. Four (5%) required reoperation with implant retention. Loss of proximal fixation in the femur and distal fixation in the tibia were common. Four patients developed coxa vara requiring surgical correction. In total, 13 patients experienced further fractures without rod bending; eight required implant revision. There was one deep infection. The five-year survival rate, with rod revision as the endpoint, was 63% (95% confidence interval (CI) 44% to 77%) for femoral rods, with a mean age at implantation of 4.8 years (1.3 to 14.8), and 64% (95% CI 36% to 82%) for tibial rods, with a mean age at implantation of 5.2 years (2.0 to 13.8). Conclusion. FD rods are easier to implant but do not improve on the revision rates reported for second generation T-piece rods. Proximal femoral fixation is problematic in younger children with a partially ossified greater trochanter. Distal tibial fixation typically fails after two years. Future generation implants should address proximal femoral and distal tibial fixation to avoid the majority of complications in this series. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):1048–1055


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIV | Pages 6 - 6
1 May 2012
Wright D Sampath J Nayagam S Bass A
Full Access

The aim of this retrospective study was to review the outcome of patients treated with Fassier-Duval (FD) rods and highlight some of the complications found during treatment. Between April 2006 and August 2010 we inserted 24 FD rods in 13 patients. 17 rods for osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), 2 for fractures and deformity associated with cerebral palsy, 1 for fracture associated with muscular dystrophy, 1 for fibrous dysplasia and 3 for centralisation of single bone forearms. In the upper limb one patient required revision for proximal migration of the male component and another patient is waiting for revision for the same problem. In the lower limb, a tibial nail was revised because of proximal migration of the male component. A femoral nail was adjusted because of loss of the proximal fixation. One of the OI patients fell, fractured the femur and bent a femoral nail. This awaits revision at a later date. A second OI patient fell on 2 separate occasions bending both a tibial and a femoral nail respectively. These were both revised to trigen intramedullary nails. In all the other cases there were no complications. In summary the Fassier Duval system provides a versatile way of providing intramedullary stabilisation for growing bones through a single entry point. However in our experience we have a 33% complication rate most notably bending of the rods. We advocate careful patient selection and using as high a diameter nail as is feasible


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1276 - 1282
1 Sep 2016
Donnan LT Gomes B Donnan A Harris C Torode† I Heidt C

Aims

We wished to examine the effectiveness of tibial lengthening using a two ring Ilizarov frame in skeletally immature patients. This is a potentially biomechanically unstable construct which risks the loss of axial control.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 24 boys and 26 girls, with a mean age of 8.6 years (4 to 14), who underwent 52 tibial lengthening procedures with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years (4.0 to 16.9). Tibial alignment was measured before and after treatment using joint orientation lines from the knee and a calculation of the oblique plane axis.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 1 | Pages 137 - 142
1 Jan 2014
Nayagam S Davis B Thevendran G Roche AJ

We describe the technique and results of medial submuscular plating of the femur in paediatric patients and discuss its indications and limitations. Specifically, the technique is used as part of a plate-after-lengthening strategy, where the period of external fixation is reduced and the plate introduced by avoiding direct contact with the lateral entry wounds of the external fixator pins. The technique emphasises that vastus medialis is interposed between the plate and the vascular structures.

A total of 16 patients (11 male and five female, mean age 9.6 years (5 to 17)), had medial submuscular plating of the femur. All underwent distraction osteogenesis of the femur with a mean lengthening of 4.99 cm (3.2 to 12) prior to plating. All patients achieved consolidation of the regenerate without deformity. The mean follow-up was 10.5 months (7 to 15) after plating for those with plates still in situ, and 16.3 months (1 to 39) for those who subsequently had their plates removed. None developed a deep infection. In two patients a proximal screw fractured without loss of alignment; one patient sustained a traumatic fracture six months after removal of the plate.

Placing the plate on the medial side is advantageous when the external fixator is present on the lateral side, and is biomechanically optimal in the presence of a femoral defect. We conclude that medial femoral submuscular plating is a useful technique for specific indications and can be performed safely with a prior understanding of the regional anatomy.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:137–42.