Aims. The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques. Methods. We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates. Results. The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes. Conclusion. The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(3):227–235

There is an increasing acceptance that the clinical outcomes following posterior malleolar fractures are less than satisfactory. Current ankle classification systems do not account for differences in fracture patterns or injury mechanisms, and as such, the clinical outcomes of these fractures are difficult to interpret. The aim of this study was to analyse our posterior malleolar fractures to better understand the anatomy of the fracture. In a series of 42 consecutive posterior malleolar, who all underwent CT imaging, we have described anatomically different fracture patterns dictated by the direction of the force and dependent on talus loading. We found 3 separate categories. Type 1 – a rotational injury in an unloaded talus resulted in an extraarticular posterior avulsion of the posterior ligaments. This occurred in 10 patients and was most commonly associated with either a high fibular spiral fracture or a low fibular fracture with Wagstaffe fragment avulsion. The syndesmosis was usually disrupted in these patients. Type 2 – a rotational injury in a loaded talus resulting in a posterolateral articular fracture, of the posterior incisura. This occurred in 16 patients and was most commonly associated with a posterior syndesmosis injury, low fibular spiral fracture and an anterior collicular fracture of the medial malleolus. Type 3 – axially loaded talus in plantarflexion causing a posterior pilon. This occurred in 16 patients and was most commonly associated with a long oblique fracture of the fibular and a Y shape fracture of the medial malleolus. The syndesmosis was usually intact in these patients. In conclusion, the anatomy of the posterior malleolar should not be underestimated and requires careful consideration during treatment and categorisation in outcome studies to prevent misinterpretation

Introduction. Fixation of posterior malleolar fragments associated with ankle fractures aims to stabilise the syndesmosis and prevent posterior subluxation. Haraguchi described 3 types of posterior malleolar fractures, with type 2 being a medial extension injury, these fractures often involve medial and posterior fragments. We describe the techniques and outcomes for a double window posteromedial approach allowing optimal reduction and stabilisation. Methods. A retrospective review was performed at 2 units, Bristol Royal Infirmary and QE Hospitals Birmingham, between August 2014 and April 2016. Inclusion criteria were all patients having this posteromedial approach for closed ankle fracture fixation. Patients were assessed for complications and postoperative ankle function with the Olerud and Molander scoring system. Results. We identified 9 patients treated over an 18 months with average follow up 9 months (range 4–18 months). All had an ankle dislocation reduced on scene or in ED, with 5 having posterior subluxation of the talus on the original films. None were open injuries. All had fixation of a posteromedial malleolar fragment, with 7 requiring a further direct lateral incision. Olerud and Molander ankle function score averaged at 72 (range 60–85) at short term follow up. Discussion. Approaches to the posteromedial fragments have been previously described in 2 ways. One utilises a window just medial to the Achilles tendon taking the neurovascular bundle medially, while the other approaches between tibialis posterior and FDL taking the neurovascular bundle laterally. Neither delivers complete access to an injury that often has sagittal and coronal splits needing individual reduction and fixation. Our approach over the neurovascular bundle allows 2 safe corridors through a single incision facilitating fragment specific fixation of both the medial and posterior components of the injury. Early results suggest this to be a safe and reliable technique to reduce and stabilise complex posteromedial ankle fractures

Aims

Involvement of the posterior malleolus in fractures of the ankle probably adversely affects the functional outcome and may be associated with the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Anatomical reduction is a predictor of a successful outcome.

The purpose of this study was to describe the technique and short-term outcome of patients with trimalleolar fractures, who were treated surgically using a posterolateral approach in our hospital between 2010 and 2014.

Introduction. The treatment of posterior malleolar fractures is developing. Mason and Molloy (Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Nov;38(11):1229-1235) identified only 49% of posterior malleolar rotational pilon type fractures had syndesmotic instabilities. This was against general thinking that fixation of such a fragment would stabilize the syndesmosis. Methods. We examined 10 cadaveric lower limbs that had been preserved for dissection at the Human Anatomy and Resource Centre at Liverpool University in a solution of formaldehyde. The lower limbs were carefully dissected to identify the ligamentous structures on the posterior aspect of the ankle. To compare the size to the rotational pilon posterior malleolar fracture (Mason and Molloy 2A and B) we gathered information from our posterior malleolar fracture database. 3D CT imaging was analysed using our department PACS system. Results. The PITFL insertion on the posterior aspect of the tibia is very large. The average size of insertion was 54.9×47.1mm across the posterior aspect of the tibia. Medially the PITFL blends into the sheath of tibialis posterior and laterally into the peroneal tendon sheath. 78 posterior lateral and 35 posterior medial fragments were measured. On average, the lateral to medial size of the posteromalleolar fragment was 24.5mm in the posterolateral fragment, and 43mm if there is a posteromedial fragment present also. The average distal to proximal size of the posterolateral fragment was 24.5mm and 18.5mm for the posteromedial fragment. Conclusion. The PITFL insertion on the tibia is broad. In comparison to the average size of the posterior malleolar fragments, the PITFL insertion is significantly bigger. Therefore, for a posterior malleolar fracture to cause posterior syndesmotic instability, a ligamentous injury will also have to occur. This explains the finding by Mason and Molloy that only 49% of type 2 injuries had a syndesmotic injury on testing

Aims. The rationale for exacting restoration of skeletal anatomy after unstable ankle fracture is to improve outcomes by reducing complications from malunion; however, current definitions of malunion lack confirmatory clinical evidence. Methods. Radiological (absolute radiological measurements aided by computer software) and clinical (clinical interpretation of radiographs) definitions of malunion were compared within the Ankle Injury Management (AIM) trial cohort, including people aged ≥ 60 years with an unstable ankle fracture. Linear regressions were used to explore the relationship between radiological malunion (RM) at six months and changes in function at three years. Function was assessed with the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), with a minimal clinically important difference set as six points, as per the AIM trial. Piecewise linear models were used to investigate new radiological thresholds which better explain symptom impact on ankle function. Results. Previously described measures of RM and surgeon opinion of clinically significant malunion (CSM) were shown to be related but with important differences. CSM was more strongly related to outcome (-13.9 points on the OMAS; 95% confidence interval (CI) -21.9 to -5.4) than RM (-5.5 points; 95% CI -9.8 to -1.2). Existing malunion thresholds for talar tilt and tibiofibular clear space were shown to be slightly conservative; new thresholds which better explain function were identified (talar tilt > 2.4°; tibiofibular clear space > 6 mm). Based on this new definition the presence of RM had an impact on function, which was statistically significant, but the clinical significance was uncertain (-9.1 points; 95% CI -13.8 to -4.4). In subsequent analysis, RM of a posterior malleolar fracture was shown to have a statistically significant impact on OMAS change scores, but the clinical significance was uncertain (-11.6 points; 95% CI -21.9 to -0.6). Conclusion. These results provide clinical evidence which supports the previously accepted definitions. Further research to investigate more conservative clinical thresholds for malunion is indicated. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):841–849

Background. There is an increasing acceptance that the clinical outcomes following posterior malleolar fractures are less than satisfactory. In our previous multicenter study (Powell, BOFAS 2016) we showed that the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) was 79 for unimalleolar fractures and 65 for bi malleolar fractures, however it dropped significantly to 54 in trimalleolar fractures. In creating a treatment guiding classification, we report our results in a system change in management of posterior malleolar fractures in our unit. Method. All fractures were classified according to Mason and Molloy classification (BOFAS 2015, FAI 2017) based on CT scans obtained pre-operatively. This dictated the treatment algorithm. Type 1 fractures underwent syndesmotic fixation. Type 2A fractures underwent ORIF through a posterolateral incision, and type 2B and 3 fractures underwent ORIF through a posteromedial incision. The patient remained NWB for 6 weeks postoperative. Data was collected from December 2014 to July 2017. Results. Patient related outcome measures were obtained in 50 patients with at least 6 month follow up (mean 18 months). According to Mason and Molloy classification there were 17 type 1, 12 type 2A, 10 type 2B and 11 type 3. The mean OMAS for type 1 was 75.9 (Range 30–100, SD 18.4), type 2A 75.0 (range 35–100, SD 21.3), type 2B 74.0 (range 55–100, SD 13.7) and type 3 70.5 (Range 35–100, SD 17.1). An increase in OMAS of 4 is clinically significant. Conclusion. We have been able demonstrate an improvement in OMAS for all posterior malleolar fractures with the treatment algorithm applied using the Mason and Molloy classification. Compared to our previous study we have successfully increased our OMAS scores to what would be expected from unimalleolar fractures. Mason and Molloy type 3 fractures have marginally poorer outcomes, which correlates with a more significant injury, however this does not reach statistical significance

Aims

The morphology of medial malleolar fracture is highly variable and difficult to characterize without 3D reconstruction. There is also no universally accepeted classification system. Thus, we aimed to characterize fracture patterns of the medial malleolus and propose a classification scheme based on 3D CT reconstruction.

Aims

In a randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up, patients treated with suture button (SB) for acute syndesmotic injury had better outcomes than patients treated with syndesmotic screw (SS). The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes for these treatment groups after five years.

Aims

There has been an evolution recently in the management of unstable fractures of the ankle with a trend towards direct fixation of a posterior malleolar fragment. Within these fractures, Haraguchi type 2 fractures extend medially and often cannot be fixed using a standard posterolateral approach. Our aim was to describe the posteromedial approach to address these fractures and to assess its efficacy and safety.

Most posterior hindfoot procedures have been described with the patient positioned prone. This affords excellent access to posterior hindfoot structures but has several disadvantages for the management of the airway, the requirement for an endotracheal tube in all patients, difficulty with ventilation and an increased risk of pressure injuries, especially with regard to reduced ocular perfusion.

We describe use of the ‘recovery position’, which affords equivalent access to the posterior aspect of the ankle and hindfoot without the morbidity associated with the prone position. A laryngeal mask rather than endotracheal tube may be used in most patients. In this annotation we describe this technique, which offers a safe and simple alternative method of positioning patients for posterior hindfoot and ankle surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1317–19.