Recently, femoroacetabular impingement has been recognised as a cause of early osteoarthritis. There are two mechanisms of impingement: 1) cam impingement caused by a non-spherical head and 2) pincer impingement caused by excessive acetabular cover. We hypothesised that both mechanisms result in different patterns of articular damage. Of 302 analysed hips only 26 had an isolated cam and 16 an isolated pincer impingement. Cam impingement caused damage to the anterosuperior acetabular cartilage with separation between the labrum and cartilage. During flexion, the cartilage was sheared off the bone by the non-spherical femoral head while the labrum remained untouched. In pincer impingement, the cartilage damage was located circumferentially and included only a narrow strip. During movement the labrum is crushed between the acetabular rim and the femoral neck causing degeneration and ossification. Both cam and pincer impingement lead to osteoarthritis of the hip. Labral damage indicates ongoing impingement and rarely occurs alone

Summary Statement. Pincer deformities are involved in the genesis of femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI). Radiographic patterns suggestive of pincer deformities are common among general population. Prevalence of the pincer deformities among general population may be overestimated if only plain radiographs are considered. Background. Pincer deformities (coxa profunda, protrusio acetabuli, global retroversion, isolated cranial over-coverage) have been advocated as a cause of femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) and early hip osteoarthritis (OA). Different radiographic patterns may advocate the presence of a pincer deformity. The prevalence of these radiographic patterns among general adult population, as their role in early hip OA, is poorly defined. Methods. From a database of 40.351 pelvic radiograms and CT collected at our institution between 2005 and 2010, we selected 118 caucasian individuals (56 females, 62 males), aged between 15 and 60 years, who underwent both plain radiographs and CT of the pelvis. A series of exclusion criteria were strictly applied to achieve a sample of adult general population as more representative as possible. In particular patients with presence of any disease involving hip joint, including: advanced hip OA (grade II or III of Tonnis scale), head necrosis, fractures, heterotopic ossifications, bone and soft tissue tumors, rheumatic pathologies, classic hip dysplasia with lateral center-edge angle (L-CEA) less than 20°, clinical diagnosis of FAI or hip pain, were excluded from the present study. We also excluded patients in which open growth plates, osteopenia, hardware or evidence of prior surgery were present. Radiographs were investigated for pelvic tilt, signs of retroversion, lateral center-edge angle (L-CEA), presence of coxa profunda or protrusio acetabuli. EAV was measured on CT scans at the equatorial plane of the acetabulum passing by the 3 o'clock position, while CAV was calculated at a more cranial level corresponding to the 1 o'clock position EAV and CAV were obtained in the axial plane by measuring the angle made by a line connecting the anterior and posterior rims of the acetabulum and a line perpendicular to the line connecting the ischial spines. A new parameter, Acetabular torsion (AT), has been introduced in order to discriminate between global retroversion and isolated cranial over-coverage. AT was defined as the difference between EAV and CAV. Cam deformity was assessed by calculating the alpha angle on the femoral side; an alpha angle > 55° was considered abnormal and suggestive of cam deformity. Radiological signs of chondrolabral degeneration were noticed. Results. Mean EAV and mean CAV were higher in females, mean AA was higher in males. L-CEA, EAV and CAV increased with age. Mean AT was 8.8±6.3. AT was inversely related to CAV (r=−0.799; p<0.0005) but independent from EAV (r=−0.076; p=0.244). EAV≤10.2° was defined as the marker of global retroversion, while AT≥21.2° was defined as the marker of isolated cranial over-coverage. Overall prevalence of pincer deformities was 21.6% (> females; p=0.02). Early OA changes were related to age (p<0.0005) and AA (p<0.0005), but not to pincer deformities (p=0.96). Radiological signs of retroversion showed good or excellent negative predictability but poor positive predictability. Conclusions. Radiographic patterns of pincer deformities are common among general population. Relationship with radiological signs of chondrolabral degeneration is poor. CT allows to discriminate between global retroversion and isolated cranial over-coverage. Prevalence of the pincer deformities among general population may be overestimated if only plain radiographs are considered

Abstract. Objective. To assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion in patients presenting with Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis using both validated radiological signs and CT-angle measurements. Methods. A retrospective review of all cases involving surgical management for acute SUFE presenting to the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne were assessed from 2012–2018. Pre-operative plain radiographs were assessed for slip angle, validated radiological signs of retroversion (post wall/crossover/ischial spine sign) and standardised post-operative CT Scans were used to assess cranial and mid-acetabular version. Results. 116 SUFEs presented in 107 patients who underwent surgical intervention; 47 females and 60 boys, with an average age of 12.7 years (range 7.5–16.6 years). Complete radiological data was available for 91 patients (99 hips) with adequate axial CT imaging of both hips. 82% patients underwent pinning in situ (PIS) with subcapital realignment surgery (SRS) performed in 18% (slip angles >75°). Contralateral prophylactic hip PIS was performed in 72 patients (87%). On the slip side, 68% of patients had 1 or more radiological signs of retroversion in the slipped hip, with 60% on the contralateral side. The mean cranial and mid-acetabular version measurements were −8°(range −30 – 8°) and 10.5°(range −10 – 25°), respectively. Conclusions. Acetabular retroversion is rare in the normal population with studies reports ranging from 0–7%. This study showed an increased prevalence of 68% in SUFE patients, which is likely to be a primary anatomical abnormality, subsequently increasing the shear forces across the proximal femoral growth plate due to superior over-coverage. The resulting CAM lesion from SUFE in combination with the pincer lesion due to retroversion can lead to premature hip impingement and degeneration. Further larger studies are required to assess if acetabular retroversion is a true risk factor, and its role in helping guide management including prophylactic pinning. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project