Peri-prosthetic infection remains a leading cause of revision surgery. Recent publications from the American Musculoskeletal Infection Society have sought to establish a definition of peri-prosthetic infection based on clinical findings and laboratory investigations. The limitations of their approach are discussed and an alternative definition is proposed, which it is felt may better reflect the uncertainties encountered in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION. Peri-prosthetic fungal infection is generally considered more difficult to cure than a bacterial infection. Two-stage exchange is considered the gold standard of surgical treatment. A recent study, however, reported a favorable outcome after one stage exchange in selected cases where the fungus was identified prior to surgery. The routine one stage exchange policy for bacterial peri-prosthetic infection involves the risk of identifying a fungal infection mimicking bacterial infection solely on intraoperative samples, i.e. after reimplantation, realizing actually a one stage exchange for fungal infection without pre-operative identification of the responsible fungus, which is considered to have a poor prognosis. We report two such cases of prosthetic hip and knee fungal infection. Despite this negative characteristic, no recurrence of the fungal infection was observed. CASE N°1: A 78 year old patient was referred for loosening of a chronically infected total hip arthroplasty (Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus dysgalactiae). One stage exchange was performed. Intraoperative bacterial cultures remained sterile. Two fungal cultures were positive for Candida albicans. Antifungal treatment was initiated for three months. No infection recurrence was observed at three year follow up. CASE N° 2: A 53-year-old patient was referred for loosening of a chronically infected total knee prosthesis (Staphylococcus aureus methicillin susceptible, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus epidermidis). One stage exchange was performed. Intraoperative bacterial cultures remained sterile. Five fungal cultures were positive for Candida albicans. Antifungal treatment was initiated for three months. No infection recurrence was observed at two-year follow-up. DISCUSSION. This experience suggests that eradication of fungal infection of a total hip or knee arthroplasty may be possible after one stage exchange even in cases where the diagnosis of fungal infection was not known before surgery, when the fungus was not identified and its antifungal susceptibility has not been evaluated before surgery. It is however not possible to propose this strategy as a routine procedure. CONCLUSION. We suggest evaluating the results of one stage exchange for peri-prosthetic fungal infection on a larger scale

Introduction

Periprosthetic infection following lower extremity total joint arthroplasty often requires multiple surgical procedures and imposes a marked economic burden on the patient and hospital. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of surgical site infections in total joint arthroplasty patients who used an advance at-home pre-admission cutaneous preparation protocol and to compare these results to a cohort of patients who underwent standard in-hospital peri-operative preparation only.

Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one the most devastating complications of joint arthroplasty. Although PJI is an infrequent complication (the reported incidence is 1%-2% in the United States), it is the most common indication for revision total knee arthroplasty in the Medicare population and the third most frequent indication for revision total hip arthroplasty. Moreover, the prevalence of PJI appears to be on the rise, with a projected number exceeding 60,000 to 70,000 cases in the United States by 2020. It is estimated that more than 25% of revision procedures annually are attributed to PJI and this number is expected to increase in the upcoming years. The increase in the prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and other comorbidities among the patient population and the emergence of resistant infecting organisms are some of the reasons for the expected rise in the number of infections that medical community will witness. The challenges that PJI present to the orthopaedic community are on many fronts. Prevention of PJI has proven to be a difficult task indeed. Effective strategies for prevention of PJI are being refined. The Center for Disease Control will be publishing its updated Surgical Site Prevention Guidelines in the next few months that consists of specific recommendations for prevention of PJI. In recent years, strides are made in introducing novel molecular techniques for diagnosis of PJI, which may stand to change our practices. The current surgical technique for management of PJI, besides the immense cost, fall short of delivering high success to the patients. The major problem in eradication of infection relates to formation of biofilm on the implant surface and internalization of the organisms by affected cells. Biofilm is a sophisticated structure comprising of organisms embedded in multiple layers of glycoccalyx that allows the organisms to evade host immunity and is impenetrable to antibiotics. These organisms are capable of communicating through molecular mechanisms such as quorum sensing that affords them advantage for survival in the host environment. In recent years strategies to prevent colonization of the implant surface, an essential first step in formation of biofilm, or biofilm disruption techniques have been introduced. A recent International Consensus meeting on PJI that assembled more than 350 experts identified some of the best practices in this field and identified areas in need of future research. Moving into the future, the field of orthopaedics in general and PJI in particular stand to benefit from the discoveries in the field of molecular diagnostics, metabolomics and epigenetics

To report our experience with the use of local antibiotic co-delivery with a synthetic bone graft substitute during a second stage re-implantation of an infected proximal humeral replacement. A 72 year old man was admitted to our department with a pathological fracture through an osteolytic lesion in the left proximal humerus, due to IgG Myelomatosis. He was initially treated with a cemented proximal humerus replacement hemiarthroplasty. Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) with significant joint distention was evident three weeks post operatively. Revision surgery confirmed presence of a large collection of pus and revealed disruption of the soft tissue reattachment tube, as well as complete retraction of rotator cuff and residual capsule. All modular components were removed and an antibiotic-laden cement spacer (1.8g of Clindamycin and Gentamycin, respectively) was implanted onto the well-fixed cemented humeral stem. Initial treatment with i.v. Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid was changed to Rifampicin and Fusidic Acid during a further 8 weeks after cultures revealed growth of S. epidermidis. During second stage revision, a hybrid inverse prosthesis with silver coating was implanted, with a total of 20 ml Cerament ™G (injected into the glenoid cavity prior to insertion of the base plate and around the humeral implant-bone interface) and again stabilized with a Trevira tube. Unfortunately, this prosthesis remained unstable, ultimately requiring re-revision to a completely new constrained reverse prosthesis with a custom glenoid shell and silver-coated proximal humeral component. 18 months postoperatively, the patient's shoulder remains pain free and stable, without signs of persistent or reinfection since the initial second stage revision. The function however, unfortunately remains poor. This case report illustrates the application of an antibiotic-eluting bone graft substitute in a specific clinical situation, where co-delivery of an antibiotic together with a bone remodeling agent may be beneficial to simultaneously address PJI as well as poor residual bone quality

Aim. Advocates of Debridement-Antibiotics-and-Implant-Retention (DAIR) in hip peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) argue that a procedure not disturbing a sound prosthesis-bone interface is likely to lead to better survival and functional outcome compared to revision. However, no evidence supports this. This case-control study's aims were to compare outcome of DAIRs for infected 1° total hip arthroplasty (THA) with outcomes following 1° THA and 2-stage revisions of infected 1° THAs. Method. We retrospectively reviewed all DAIRs, performed for confirmed infected 1° THR (DAIR-Group, n=80), in our unit between 1997–2013. Data recorded included patient demographics, medical history, type of surgery and organism identified. Outcome measures included complications, mortality, implant survivorship and functional outcome using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Outcome was compared with 2 control groups matched for gender and age; a cohort of 1° THA (1°-THA-Group, n=120) and a cohort of 2-stage revisions for infection (2-Stage-Revision-Group, n=66). Results. The mean age at DAIR was 69 years and mean follow-up was 8 years (SD:5). 60% of DAIRs were for early PJI (< six weeks). Greater infection eradication with DAIR was detected with early-PJI, interval less than a week between onset of symptoms and exchange of modular components with the DAIR procedure. Infection eradication, complications and re-operation rates were similar in the DAIR- and 2-stage-revision Groups (p>0.05). For hips with successful infection eradication with DAIR, the 5-yr survival (98%) was similar to the 1°THA-Group (98%) (p=0.3). The DAIR-Group had inferior OHS (38) compared to the 1°THA-Group (42) (p=0.02) but significantly better OHS compared to the 2-stage-revision-Group (31) (p=0.008). Patients that required only one DAIR for infection eradication had similar OHS (41) to the 1° THA-Group (p=0.2). Conclusions. DAIRs are associated with similar complication and infection eradication to 2-stage revisions. Exchange of modular components is advised for improved chances of infection eradication. Functional outcome following DAIRs was better than a 2-stage revision and as good as that of a 1° THA if a single DAIR was necessary for infection eradication

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). According to registry-based studies, some bearing couples are associated with an increased risk of PJI. The recent International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection stated that metal-on-metal (MOM) bearing surface appeared to be associated with a higher incidence of PJI. Based on emerging reports, the incidence of PJI appears to be different among different bearing surfaces. We conducted a multi-institutional study attempting to study this exact issue. The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was any difference in the incidence of PJI in two commonly used bearing couples (metal- on-polyethylene versus ceramic-on-polyethylene).

Based on a retrospective multi-institutional query all patients who received primary THA with MOP or COP bearing surfaces performed during 2005–2009 in two high-volume arthroplasty centers were identified. Demographic factors, comorbidities, length of hospital stay, complications and other relevant information were extracted. PJI was defined based on the MSIS (International Consensus) criteria. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether bearing coupling was independently correlated with PJI.

In our data, 25/2,921 (0.9%) patients with MOP and 11/2,643 (0.4%) patients with COP developed PJI. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.01). After the multivariate analysis, controlling for potential confounders (age, body mass index and length of hospital stay, Charlson comorbidity index), MOP bearing surface was found to be an independent factor correlating with higher incidence of PJI (odds ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.02–6.54, p=0.04).

The finding of this study, and others from centers in Europe, suggest that the bearing surface may have an influence on the incidence of PJI. Although, we had originally thought that ceramic bearing surfaces may be used in younger and healthier patients, the multivariate analyses that controlled for all these variables confirms that use of metal femoral head is an independent risk factor for development of PJI. The finding of this study is compelling and begs for future basic science mechanistic investigations.

There is limited evidence in the literature suggesting that ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) THA is associated with lower risk of revision for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) than other bearing combinations especially metal-on-poly (MoP) and metal-on-metal (MoM). Pitto and Sedel reported hazard ratios of 1.3 – 2.1 for other bearing surfaces versus CoC. Of interest, the PJI rate was not significantly lower in the first 6 months, when most infections occur, but only became significant in the long term. While factors such as patient age, fixation, mode, OR type, use of body exhaust suits, and surgeon volume were considered in the multivariate analysis, BMI, medical comorbidities, and ASA class were not. This is a major weakness that casts doubt on the conclusion, since those three factors are MAJOR risk factors for PJI AND all three factors are more likely to be unevenly distributed, and much more likely present in groups other than CoC. The data was also limited by the fact that it was drawn from a retrospective review of National Registry data, The New Zealand Joint Registry. While similar findings have recently been reported from the Australian Joint Registry, the danger in attributing differences in outcomes to implants alone is possibly the single greatest danger in interpreting registry results. While device design can impact implant survival, other factors such as surgical technique, surgeon, hospital, and especially patient factors have a far greater likelihood of explaining differences in observed results. A recent report from the same New Zealand joint registry reported that obesity, ASA class, surgical approach, and trainee operations all were associated with higher PJI and all would be more likely in non-CoC THAs. Accuracy of diagnosis is also a major concern. Revision for trunnionosis is more common in non-CoC THA and is frequently misdiagnosed as PJI.

Numerous non-registry studies and reviews have compared PJI in CoC vs. other bearings and none have concluded than the incidence of PJI differed significantly.

Aim

Compare clinical outcomes following staged revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) secondary to either multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria or non-MDR (NMDR) bacteria.

Aim

Dissolvable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate beads have been utilized for management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and for aseptic revision arthroplasty. However, wound drainage and toxic reactive synovitis have been substantial problems in prior studies. Currently a commercially pure, physiologic product has been introduced that may reduce complications associated with this treatment modality. We aim to answer the question: does a commercially pure, physiologic version of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads reduce wound drainage and provide efficacious treatment for PJI and aseptic revision arthroplasty?

Aim. Despite the availability of numerous tests, the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection (PJI) continues to be complex. Although several studies have suggested that coagulation-related markers, such as D-dimer and fibrinogen, may be promising tools in the diagnosis of prosthetic infections, their role is still controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum D-dimer and fibrinogen in patients with painful total knee replacement. Method. 83 patients with painful total knee replacement and suspected peri-prosthetic infection were included. All patients underwent pre-operative blood tests to evaluate inflammation indices (ESR and CRP) and serum D-Dimer and Fibrinogen levels. The diagnostic performance of the tests was assessed using the ICM definition as the gold standard. The diagnostic accuracy of the D-dimer and fibrinogen was measured by assessing sensitivity, specificity and by calculating the area under the ROC curve. Results. The definition of prosthetic infection based on the ICM criteria has made it possible to classify 40 peri-prosthetic infections and 43 aseptic failures. The mean value of fibrinogen, D-Dimer, VES and PCR observed in patients with prosthetic infection was significantly higher than in patients with aseptic failure [fibrinogen 468 mg / dl vs 331 mg / dl, p <0.001; D-Dimero 2177 ng/mL vs. 875 ng / mL, p <0.005], ESR 49 mm / hr vs 24 mm/h, p <0.001; PCR 25.5 mg /L vs 8.9 mg/L, p <0.001]. The optimal threshold value of the fibrinogen indicative of the presence of infection was 418 mg/dl, with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 88%. The serum concentration of d-dimer greater than 945 ng / ml showed a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 76.7%. Conclusions. Although in this multicenter prospective study we found that serum D-dimer may have significantly higher statistical values in PJI than aseptic failures, its diagnostic power appears however limited when compared with other markers including plasma fibrinogen. Fibrinogen is regularly analyzed before surgery, the evaluation of this marker does not involve additional costs. The diagnostic accuracy appears to be similar to that of classic markers such as the level of PCR and VES. Plasma D-dimer may have a limited value in the diagnosis of PJI unlike plasma fibrinogen which has shown moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity. However, in our limited series of cases, both tests cannot be used alone in the diagnosis of infection but could contribute to the diagnosis if contextualized to ves and pcr

Aim. Whether pre-operative microbiological sampling contributes to the management of chronic peri-prosthetic infection remains controversial. We assessed agreement between the results of pre-operative and intra-operative samples in patients undergoing single-stage prosthesis exchange to treat chronic peri-prosthetic infection. The tested hypothesis was that agreement between pre-operative and intra-operative samples exceeds 75% in patients undergoing single-stage exchange of a hip or knee prosthesis to treat chronic peri-prosthetic infection. Method. This single-centre retrospective study included 85 single-stage prosthesis exchange procedures in 82 patients with chronic peri-prosthetic infection at the hip or knee. Agreement between pre-operative and intra-operative sample results was evaluated. Changes to the initial antibiotic regimen made based on the intra-operative sample results were recorded. Associations between sample agreement and infection-free survival were assessed. Results. Of 149 pre-operative samples, 109 yielded positive cultures, in 75/85 cases. Of 458 intra-operative samples, 354 yielded positive cultures, in 85/85 cases. Agreement was complete in 54 (63%) cases and partial in 9 (11%) cases; there was no agreement in the remaining 22 (26%) cases. The complete agreement rate was significantly lower than 75% (p=0.01). The initial antibiotic regimen was inadequate in a single case. Agreement between pre-operative and intra-operative samples was not significantly associated with infection-free survival. Conclusions. Pre-operative sampling may contribute to the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection but is neither necessary nor sufficient to confirm the diagnosis and identify the causative agent. The spectrum of the initial antibiotic regimen cannot be safely narrowed based on the pre-operative sample results. We suggest the routine prescription of a probabilistic broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen immediately after the prosthesis exchange, even when a pathogen was identified before surgery. No funding from any part was received for the purpose of this study

The diagnosis of infection following shoulder arthroplasty is notoriously difficult. The prevalence of prosthetic shoulder infection after arthroplasty ranges from 3.9 – 15.4% and the most common infective organism is Cutibacterium acnes. Current preoperative diagnostic tests fail to provide a reliable means of diagnosis including WBC, ESR, CRP and joint aspiration. Fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous synovial biopsy (PSB) has previously been reported in the context of a pilot study and demonstrated promising results. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous synovial biopsy compared with open culture results (gold standard). This was a multicenter prospective cohort study involving four sites and 98 patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty. The cohort was 60% female with a mean age was 65 years (range 36-83 years). Enrollment occurred between June 2014 and November 2021. Pre-operative fluoroscopy-guided synovial biopsies were carried out by musculoskeletal radiologists prior to revision surgery. A minimum of five synovial capsular tissue biopsies were obtained from five separate regions in the shoulder. Revision shoulder arthroplasty was performed by fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons. Intraoperative tissue samples were taken from five regions of the joint capsule during revision surgery. Of 98 patients who underwent revision surgery, 71 patients underwent both the synovial biopsy and open biopsy at time of revision surgery. Nineteen percent had positive infection based on PSB, and 22% had confirmed culture positive infections based on intra-operative tissue sampling. The diagnostic accuracy of PSB compared with open biopsy results were as follows: sensitivity 0.37 (95%CI 0.13-0.61), specificity 0.81 (95%CI 0.7-0.91), positive predictive value 0.37 (95%CI 0.13 – 0.61), negative predictive value 0.81 (95%CI 0.70-0.91), positive likelihood ratio 1.98 and negative likelihood ratio 0.77. A patient with a positive pre-operative PSB undergoing revision surgery had an 37% probability of having true positive infection. A patient with a negative pre-operative PSB has an 81% chance of being infection-free. PSB appears to be of value mainly in ruling out the presence of peri-prosthetic infection. However, poor likelihood ratios suggest that other ancillary tests are required in the pre-operative workup of the potentially infected patient

Deep peri-prosthetic infection after partial or total knee arthroplasty is a disconcerting problem for patient and surgeon alike. The diagnosis of infection is sometimes obvious but frequently requires that the surgeon maintain a substantial index of suspicion for infection as the cause of pain or poor outcome after any joint arthroplasty. While surgical debridement with component retention is appropriate in a subgroup of patients with an acute peri-prosthetic infection, most delayed and chronic infections are best treated with component resection. With carefully selected patients and very aggressive debridement protocols some success has been demonstrated in Europe with single-stage exchange for infection. Most surgeons in North America, however, are unfamiliar with the very aggressive debridement techniques employed at European centers that promote single stage replant; and few surgeons in North America are currently comfortable in cementing a hinged total knee replacement in place for the typical infected TKA nor do they have the patience to re-prep and drape with an entirely new OR setup after debridement and prior to the insertion of the new implant − 2 steps that are often mentioned as important to the success of single stage exchange. The pre-eminent role of two-stage exchange as the definitive treatment was established over 30 years ago. Two-stage exchange remains the gold-standard in treatment with an established track record from multiple centers and with multiple different types of infecting organisms. Some of the historical problems with two-stage exchange, such as limited mobility during the interval stage, have been mitigated with the development of effective articulating spacer techniques. Further, the emergence of drug resistant bacteria and the possibility of fungal infection make two-stage exchange the best choice for the majority of patients with deep periprosthetic joint infection in 2017

Aim. The diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection is sometimes difficult to assess, and there is no universal diagnostic test. The recommendations currently accepted include several diagnostic criteria, and are based mainly on the results of deep bacteriological samples, which only provide the diagnosis after surgery. A predictive score of the infection might improve the peri-operative management before repeat surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The goal of this study was to attempt defining a composite score using conventional clinical, radiological and biological data that can be used to predict the positive and negative diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection before repeat surgery after THA. The tested hypothesis was that the score thus defined allowed an accurate differentiation between infected and non-infected cases in more than 75% of the cases. Method. 104 cases of repeat surgery for any cause after THA were analyzed retrospectively: 61 cases of infection and 43 cases without infection. There were 54 men and 50 women, with a mean age of 70 ± 12 years (range, 30 to 90 years). A univariate analysis looked for individual discriminant factors between infected and uninfected case file records. A multivariate analysis integrated these factors concomitantly. A composite score was defined, and its diagnostic effectiveness was assessed by the percentage of correctly classified cases and by sensitivity and specificity. Results. The score was defined with the following items which were individually weighted: body mass index (BMI), presence of diabetes (D, yes = 1, no = 0), mechanical complication (MC, yes = 1, no = 0), scar complication after THA implantation (SC, yes = 1, no = 0), fever (F, yes = 1, no = 0). The score was calculated as (0.09 × BMI) + (0.94 × D) − (1.34 × MC) + (17.55 × SC) + (1.22 × F) − 3.63. This composite score separated the infected (positive score) and non-infected (negative score) patients accurately in 78% of cases, with a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 93%. Conclusions. Subject to prospective validation, this score could be a significant help to define the medico-surgical strategy during a reoperation of the hip prosthesis for whatever reason. No funding from any part was received for the purpose of this study

The aim of this study was to re-assess whether the use of a ‘one-knife technique’ can be considered as safe as the alternative practice of using separate skin and inside knives for elective orthopaedic surgery. A total of 609 knife blades from 203 elective orthopaedic operations, with equal numbers of skin, inside and control blades, were cultured using direct and enrichment media. We found 31 skin blades (15.3%), 22 inside blades (10.8%), and 13 control blades (6.4%) gave bacterial growth. Of the 31 contaminated skin blades only three (9.7%) had growth of the same organism as found on the corresponding inside blade. It is not known whether contamination of deeper layers in the remaining 90% was prevented by changing the knife after the skin incision. The organisms cultured were predominantly coagulase-negative staphylococci and proprionibacterium species; both are known to be the major culprits in peri-prosthetic infection. Our study suggests that the use of separate skin and inside knives should be maintained as good medical practice, since the cost of a single deep infection in human and financial terms can be considerable

Purpose. Infection following total knee arthroplasty is a devastating complication, requiring considerable effort on the part of the surgeon to eradicate the infection and restore joint function. Two-stage revision is the standard of care in the treatment of peri-prosthetic infection, using a temporary antibiotic-impregnated spacer between procedures. However, controversy remains concerning the use of static versus dynamic spacers, as well as the spacer material. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty in patients treated with a metal-on-polyethylene articulating spacer, as compared to those treated with a static antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer at the same centre. Method. Twenty-seven knees in patients with a mean age of 65 years (range, 40 to 80 years) were treated with two-stage revision of an infected total knee arthroplasty using a metal-on-polyethylene dynamic prosthetic spacer fixed with antibiotic-impregnated cement. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using maximum active knee range of motion, as well as modified Knee Society knee scores and incidence of re-infection at a minimum one-year follow-up. The results were compared to those achieved at similar follow-up in 10 patients treated with a static cement spacer. Demographic profile as measured by age and gender, and pre-operative Knee Society scores and range of motion were similar between the two groups. Results. At a mean of twenty-five months following re-implantation (range, 12 to 50 months), the patients treated with dynamic spacers had significantly higher Knee Society scores (mean 93 points, range 77 to 100 points) as compared to the group treated with static spacers (mean 76 points, range 59 to 89 points; p=0.039). Additionally, mean range of motion at final follow-up was substantially higher in the patients treated with dynamic spacers (mean 102 degrees, range 60 to 120 degrees versus mean 92 degrees, range 40 to 120 degrees). There was one re-infection in the dynamic spacer group (3.7%), in a patient whos clinical course was previously complicated by subluxation of the dynamic spacer between procedures. Otherwise, no gross loosening or fractures of the dynamic spacers were noted. Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that the use of a cemented metal-on-polyethylene dynamic prosthetic spacer at the time of two-stage revision knee arthroplasty is similarly effective in eradicating peri-prosthetic infections when compared to the use of a cemented static spacer, while providing better clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up. Additionally, this spacer design provides a degree of mobility and knee function between procedures that is unachievable with a static construct, and appears to eliminate the potential complication of spacer fracture associated with pre-formed cement implants. The authors await further data to confirm these findings at longer-term follow-up

Aims. The International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection (ICM, Philadelphia 2018) recommended histology as one of the diagnostic tests although this is not routinely used in a number of UK hospitals. This study aims to explore the role of histology in the diagnosis of infection and whether it is of practical use in those cases where the microbiology samples are either diagnostically unclear or do not correspond to the pre-operative diagnosis or the clinical picture. Patients and Methods. We identified 85 patients who underwent revision knee arthroplasty for either septic or aseptic loosening and for whom both microbiology and histology samples were taken. The procedures were performed by the senior experienced surgeons specialised in revision knee arthroplasty in two centres from Liverpool. Each patient had a minimum of five tissue samples taken, using separate knife and forceps and each sample was divided in half and sent for microbiology and histology in different containers. Fifty-four patients (63.5%) underwent a single-staged revision; ten patients (11.8%) underwent the 1. st. stage of a two staged revision; eleven patients (12.9%) underwent the 2. nd. stage of a two staged revision; one patient (1.2%) underwent an additional revision stage; three patients (3.5%) were treated with a DAIR; three patients (3.5%) had a 2-in-1 revision; two patients (2.4%) had a debridement and polyethylene exchange; and one patient (1.2%) had an arthroscopy biopsy of knee replacement. The cost to process five microbiology samples for each patient was £122.45 on average and for the five histology samples was £130. Results. In 63.5% (n=54) the histology and microbiology confirmed an aseptic joint as suspected beforehand. In 8.2% (n=7) the histology result was the same as the microbiology result confirming infection as suspected beforehand. In 15.3% (n=13) where asepsis was suspected beforehand, one of the five microbiology samples unexpectedly grew an organism but all the histological samples showed no evidence of infection. In these cases, the histology result supported the diagnosis of the likelihood of a contaminant. In 5.9% (n=5) we found differences in the microbiology and histology in one sample and in 7.1% (n=6) the histology was different to the microbiology in more than one sample. Conclusions. In cases where the diagnosis of sepsis within a knee replacement is not in doubt due to pre-operative microbiology, we found no benefit in additional histology sampling. In 28.3% of the cases, the histology was of use in the diagnosis of infection in complex cases and a useful tool in the decision process for further management. In over half of the cases where the revision was for aseptic loosening, the histology result did not alter the management but 28.3% of cases that were thought to be aseptic, microbiology revealed at least one positive sample hence the histology was of use in making a final diagnosis, be that of infection, contamination or to rule out infection. Whilst histology is of use in the latter groups but not the aseptic group, these outcomes are not predictable until after the post-operative period hence histology is required in all these cases. Overall, the histology is a cheap test which is of benefit in the diagnosis of complex peri-prosthetic joint infection in one–third of cases and we support the ICM recommendation

Metal Ion Levels Not Useful in Failed M-O-M Hips: Systematic Review; Revision of Failed M-O-M THA at a Tertiary Center; Trunnionosis in Metal-on-Poly THA?; Do Ceramic Heads Eliminate Trunnionosis?; Iliopsoas Impingement After 10 THA; Pain in Young, Active Patients Following THA; Pre-operative Injections Increase Peri-prosthetic THA Infection; Debridement and Implant Retention in THA Infection; THA after Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion; Lumbar Back Surgery Prior to THA Associated with Worse Outcomes; Raising the Joint Line Causes Mid-Flexion Instability in TKA; No Improvement in Outcomes with Kinematic Alignment in TKA; Botox For TKA Flexion Contracture; Intra-operative Synovitis Predicts Worse Outcomes After TKA for OA; When is it Safe for Patients to Drive After Right TKA?; Alpha-Defensin for Peri-prosthetic Joint Infection; Medial Tibia Overhang and Pain Score After TKA

The Control of Infection Committee at a specialist orthopaedic hospital prospectively collected data on all episodes of bacteriologically-proven deep infection arising after primary hip and knee replacements over a 15-year period from 1987 to 2001. There were 10 735 patients who underwent primary hip or knee replacement. In 34 of 5947 hip replacements (0.57%) and 41 of 4788 knee replacements (0.86%) a deep infection developed. The most common infecting micro-organism was coagulase-negative staphylococcus, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci and streptococci. Of the infecting organisms, 72% were sensitive to routine prophylactic antimicrobial agents. Of the infections, 29% (22) arose in the first three months following surgery, 35% between three months and one year (26), and 36% (27) after one year. Most cases were detected early and treated aggressively, with eradication of the infection in 96% (72). There was no significant change in the infection rate or type of infecting micro-organism over the course of this study. These results set a benchmark, and importantly emphasise that only 64% of peri-prosthetic infections arise within one year of surgery. These results also illustrate the advantages of conducting joint replacement surgery in the isolation of a specialist hospital