Objectives. To quantify and compare
We report our early experience with a new
We set out to determine the impact of surgery on quality of life and function in patients who had undergone surgery for symptomatic
Reconstructive acetabular osteotomy is a well established and effective procedure in the treatment of acetabular dysplasia. However, the dysplasia is frequently accompanied by intra-articular pathology such as labral tears. We intended to determine whether a concomitant hip arthroscopy with
Introduction:
Aim. The saddle prosthesis was originally developed for reconstruction of large acetabular defects in hip revision arthroplasty. Later on the saddle prosthesis was also used for hip reconstruction after resection of
We treated 98 patients with
Introduction
Pelvic and acetabular surgery may be associated with significant blood loss because of the vascularity and anatomy of the pelvis. Concerns continue in relation to blood transfusion because of the potential for disease transmission and because of the increasing cost of providing safe blood products. The purpose of this study was to examine in a retrospective fashion the blood transfusion requirements in a consecutive series of patients undergoing
We have investigated the effect of using tranexamic
acid (TXA) during
Ganz
Ganz
We report a patient with a
Aims. To determine whether there is any benefit using a minimally invasive trans-sartorial approach as described by Professor Søballe compared to the ilio-femoral for
Since acetabular osteolytic lesions following total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be asymptomatic until extensive bone loss occurs, early detection and monitoring the progression of these lesions is important. The purpose of this study was to use high resolution helical CT to determine the progression of the osteolytic lesions over time by comparing serial studies. Fifty patients (Fifty-eight hips) with primary, cementless THA done between 1984–1996 were evaluated as part of an ongoing prospective study. These patients had a history of a high level of activity that was believed to place them at increased risk for accelerated polyethylene wear. The mean age was 51 yrs, 55% male:45% female. The average time from date of surgery to initial scan was 8.0 years (4.7–16.6). If an acetabular lytic lesion was identified, the patients were offered Alendronate for potential suppression of bone resorption with a repeat CT scan for follow-up. The area of the maximum size osteolytic lesions on axial images were measured on the initial scan and compared at the same level on the subsequent study. The interval between scans averaged 15 months (10 – 27). Progression was noted on 87% hips. The mean initial area was 328 mm2 (40–1084) with the follow-up area of 386 mm2 (46–1344) with a mean of progression of 15.7%. Once established,
Periacetabular osteolysis is seen in response to particles (polyethylene, ceramic, metal or cement), at times in the presence of an unstable implant, and perhaps made worse by the unique host response to the particle burden. The impact of wear modes: due to either the primary bearing surface (MOP, MOM, COC) or unintended surfaces as seen in impingement, as well as the quality of the bearing counterface all influence the extent of the osteolytic response. The final common pathway appears to be via macrophage stimulation, an upregulation of cytokines leading to a resorption of bone. The patterns of lysis range from linear resorption at the implant interface to more expansile patterns which can be more dramatic in size and may place the implant at jeopardy for loosening. Assessment of implant fixation as well as extent of the lytic process employs the use of plain radiographs (including oblique views), computerised tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The utility of MRI for the quantification of bone loss as well as the newer phenomena of associated soft tissue lesions (pseudotumors, adverse tissue reactions) has turned out to be a valuable tool in helping determine timing and need for revision. The basic principles in determining need for revision surgery revolve around: degree of lysis, integrity of the soft tissues, fixation of the implant, track record of the implant, as well as patient factors including symptoms, age and activity. In cemented sockets, progressive bone loss, pain with or without overt loosening is indication for revision which is generally accomplished using an uncemented hemispherical acetabular component with bone graft and screw augmentation. In the uncemented socket, the decision to revise is based upon a) implant stability, 2) the integrity of the locking mechanism, 3) degree of bone loss. With stable implants, polyethylene exchange and “lesional” treatment is appropriate. Well fixed implants with extensive lysis can be successfully managed with liner exchange and bone grafting as necessary. If the liner locking mechanism is compromised, cementing a liner into place is an excellent strategy. Removing a well fixed cup with extensive lysis runs the risk of encountering a large acetabular defect which may be difficult to reconstruct. Loose implants clearly require revision. In the era of “hard bearings”, progressive soft tissue expansion leading to damage of the abductor and other soft tissue constraints about the hip is an indication for revision. Revision of MOM THR's may be performed by maintaining the femoral component and performing an isolated acetabular revision or in some instances of modular acetabular components, maintaining the shell and inserting a new liner. In all instances of implant retention, it is critical to confirm that the components are in optimised position: implants retained in suboptimal position are at risk for early failure.
The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) improves hip joint mechanics in patients with symptomatic dysplasia. As a consequence of the multi-planar acetabular re-orientation, the course of the iliopsoas tendon over the hip may be affected, potentially resulting in iliopsoas tendon-related pain. At present, little information regarding the incidence of iliopsoas-related pathology following PAO exists. We aimed to identify the incidence of iliopsoas-related pain following PAO. Secondarily, we aimed to identify any risk factors associated with this pathology. We retrospectively reviewed the PAO's performed from 2014–2017, for symptomatic dysplasia in our unit (single-surgeon, minimum 1-year follow-up). All patients with adequate pelvic radiographs were included. Radiographic parameters of dysplasia were measured from pre- and post-operative AP pelvic radiographs using a validated software (Introduction
Methods
With cementless porous-coated acetabular replacements, extensive bone loss can occur without effecting implant stability. As a result, the surgeon is frequently faced with re-operating on a well-fixed cementless acetabular component with osteolysis and must decide whether or not to remove a well-fixed porous coated socket. A classification system and treatment algorithm has been developed to aid in management decisions regarding re-operation for polyethylene wear and pelvic osteolysis. Cases are classified into one of 3 possible categories depending on the radiographic stability of the porous coated shell and the ability to replace the polyethylene liner. Type I case; stable porous coated shell, liner replaceable; Type II case; socket stable, liner not replaceable; Type III case; socket loose, not osseointegrated. Treatment Algorithms - Retain well-fixed shell in Type I cases and replace the liner. Debride accessible lytic lesions and graft with allograft chips. Remove the well-fixed shell in Type II case. Assess defect once the shell is removed. Reconstruction based on the bony defect present. The vast majority can be revised with a larger porous coated socket. Remove loose socket in Type III cases. Assess defect and reconstruct based on the defect. There is a greater need for more extensive grafting and the use of reconstruction rings with Type III cases. This treatment algorithm has helped the authors successfully evaluate and treat a large series of patients with polyethylene wear and pelvic osteolysis in association with porous coated acetabular components. The stability of the acetabular component and appropriate knowledge of the implant are important factors that impact surgical management.