This study aimed to quantify self-reported outcomes and walking gait biomechanics in patients following primary and revision THA. The specific goals of this study were to investigate: (i) if primary and revision THA patients have comparable preoperative outcomes; and (2) if revision THA patients have worse postoperative outcomes than primary THA patients. Forty-three patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis and 23 patients undergoing revision THA were recruited and followed longitudinally for their first 12 postoperative months. Reasons for revision were loosening (73%), dislocation (9%), and infection (18%). Patients completed the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and underwent gait analysis preoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. A 10 camera motion analysis system (V5 Vantage, Vicon, UK) recorded marker trajectories (100 Hz) during walking at self- selected speeds. A generic lower-body musculoskeletal model (Gait2392) was scaled using principal component analysis [1] and the inverse kinematics tool in Opensim 3.3 was used to compute joint angles for the lower limbs in the sagittal plane. Independent samples t-test were used to compare patient reported outcomes between the primary and revision groups at each timepoint. Statistical parametric mapping was used to compare gait patterns between the two groups at each timepoint. Preoperatively, patients undergoing primary THA reported significantly worse pain (p<0.001), symptoms (p<0.001), function (p<0.001), and quality of life (p=0.004). No differences were observed at 3 and 12 months postoperatively between patients who had received a primary or revision THA. The only observed difference in gait pattern was that patients with a revision THA had reduced hip extension at 3 months, but no differences were observed preoperatively and 12 months. Despite the suggestions in the literature that revision THA is bound to have worse outcomes compared to primary THA, we found no differences in in patient-reported outcomes and gait patterns at 12 months postoperatively. This suggests that it may be possible, in some circumstances, for patients following revision THA to achieve similar outcomes to their peers undergoing primary THA

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) are well-established operative interventions in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, which of these interventions is more beneficial, to patients with KOA, is not known and remains a topic of much debate. Aims: (i) To determine whether UKA or HTO is more beneficial in the treatment of isolated medial compartment KOA, via an assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). (ii) To investigate the relationship between PROMs and radiographic parameters of knee joint orientation/alignment. This longitudinal observational study assessed a total of 42 patients that had undergone UKA (n=23) or HTO (n=19) to treat isolated medial compartment KOA. The PROMs assessed, pre-operatively and 1-year post-operatively, consisted of the: self-administered comorbidity questionnaire; short form-12; oxford knee score; knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score; and the EQ-5D-5L. The radiographic parameters of knee joint alignment/orientation assessed, pre-operatively and 8-weeks post-operatively, included the: hip-knee-ankle angle; mechanical axis deviation; and the angle of the Mikulicz line. Statistical analysis demonstrated an overall significant (p<0.001), pre-operative to post-operative, improvement in the PROM scores of both groups. There were no significant differences in the post-operative PROM scores of the UKA and HTO group. Correlation analyses revealed that pre-operatively, a more distolaterally angled Mikulicz line was associated with worse knee function (p<0.05) and overall health (p<0.05); a relationship that, until now, has not been investigated nor commented upon within the literature. UKAs and HTOs are both efficacious operations that provide a comparable degree of clinical benefit to patients with isolated medial compartment KOA. To further the scientific/medical community's understanding of the factors that impact upon health-outcomes in KOA, future research should seek to investigate the mechanism underlying the relationship, between Mikulicz line and PROMs, observed within the current study

Although remnant-preserved ACL reconstruction (ACLR) restores knee joint stability and dampens the problem of acute ACL rupture-induced knee pain, an increasing number of patients still develop post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) after 10 to 15 years of ACLR. We previously found that remnant-preserved ACLR with concomitant medial and lateral meniscus repair may not prevent cartilage degeneration and weaken muscle strength, while the clinical features of PTOA are not clear. We hypothesized that remnant-preserved ACLR with concomitant medial and lateral meniscus tears is related to early cartilage damage, worse function recovery, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and delayed duration to return to sports. The aim is to evaluate the remnant-preserved ACLR with complicated meniscal injuries in predicting which patients are at higher risk of osteoarthritic changes, worse function and limited activities after ACLR for 12 months. Human ethical issue was approved by a committee from Xi'an Jiaotong University. 26 young and active patients (24 male, 2 female) with ACL injuries (Sherman type I and II) with concomitant medial and lateral meniscus within 2 months were included from January 2014 to March 2022. The average age of the ACLR+ meniscus repair was 26.77±1.52 (8 right, 5 left) and isolated ACLR control was 31.92±2.61 years old (7 left, 6 right). Remnant-preserved ACLR with a 5- to 6-strand hamstring tendon graft was operated on by the same sports medicine specialists. MRI CUBE-T. 2. scanning with 48 channels was conducted by a professional radiologist. The volume of the ACL graft was created through 3 dimensional MRI model (Mimics 19, Ann Arbor). Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (ACLOAS) was applied to score visible cartilage damage. IKDC 2000 score and VAS were assessed by two blinded researchers. Results were presented as mean± SEM of each group. The cross-sectional area and 3D volume of the ACL graft were greater in the remnant-preserved ACLR+meniscus group compared with isolated ACLR (p=0.01). It showed that ACLR+ meniscus group had early signs of joint damage and delayed meniscus healing regarding ACLOAS compared to control group (p=0.045). MRI CUBE-T. 2. prediction of radiographic cartilage degeneration was not obvious in both groups post remnant-preserved ACLR over 12 months (p>0.05). However, higher VAS scores, lower IKDC scores, and long-last joint swelling were reported in the ACLR+ meniscus repair group at the end of 12 months follow-up. Although remnant-preserved ACLR+ meniscus was able to maintain the restore the knee function, it showed delayed timing (>12 months) to return to play at the pre-injury stage, while no difference between the timing of returning to the normal daily routine of their ACLR knee compared to control (p=0.30). The cost of ACLR+ meniscus (average 10,520.76$) was higher than the control group (6,452.92$, p=0.018). Remnants-preserved ACLR with concomitant injured medial and lateral meniscus repair shows a higher risk of cartilage damage, greater cost, worse functional performance, and longer time for young male patients to return to sports after 12-month follow-up compared to isolated ACLR. Further evidence and long-term follow-up are needed to better understand the association between these results and the risk of development of PTOA in this patient cohort

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are widely used in the orthopaedic field to assess the impact of conservative and surgical interventions from a patient's perspective. Available instruments cover a range of outcome parameters, such as pain, function, stiffness, quality of life or joint awareness. Choice of instrument for a specific study for clinical practice should include the appraisal of the psychometric characteristics of the measure. The presentation will focus on the assessment of the psychometric characteristics of PRO instruments and provide criteria for evaluating those. The concepts of objectivity, reliability and validity will be explained in the context of PRO instrument and the interpretation of score points derived from PRO instruments will be discussed detailing concepts such as minimal important change/difference, norm data, and thresholds based on external criteria. Finally, international guidelines that define standards for the various procedures on development, validation and translation of PRO instruments will be summarised

Patient-reported outcome measures are a cornerstone of outcome assessment in orthopaedics. However, completing the pencil and paper questionnaires in clinic is something of a burden to the individual patient and the health care institution. We do not provide much in the way of incentives to collect PRO data. Lengthy questionnaires and hidden data analysis offer no direct benefit to the individual patient nor the clinician. Employing ePRO, utilising tablet PCs for questionnaire completion, can improve this situation considerably. Swift and cost-effective data management and instant availability of results using intuitive graphical display make questionnaire completion more rewarding. Direct feedback of PRO data during the consultation can inform the individual's care. Completing electronic questionnaires also makes computer-adaptive testing (CAT) possible. CAT creates dynamic questionnaires, adapting to the individual symptom burden of the individual patient. CAT both increases measurement precision and reduces the number of questions required. As such, ePRO assessment may help to maximise the efficiency and the utilisation of PRO data

Aim. To evaluate the association of BMI and improvement in patient-reported outcomes after TKA. Methods. Knee replacement outcome data for procedures carried out over an eight month period was extracted from a regional arthroplasty register in the UK. Data was available before surgery and 12 months after. We analysed the impact of overweight on post-operative change in the Forgotten Joint Score − 12 (FJS-12) measuring joint awareness and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) measuring pain and function using five BMI categories (A: <25, B: 25–29.9, C: 30–34.9, D: 35–39.9 and E: >40). Results. We analysed data from 431 TKA patients with a mean age of 70.1 (SD=9.2 years) and 54.5% being female. Frequency of the BMI categories in our sample were as follows: A) 15.8% with a BMI<25, B) 32.8 % with a BMI 25–29.9, C) 27.7% with a BMI 30–34.9, D) 16.5 % with a BMI 35–39.9, and E) 7.1 % with a BMI above 39.9. Data analysis showed a statistically significant association (Z= 12.10, p=0.02) of BMI with post-operative improvement in the FJS-12 from pre-surgery to 12 months: A) + 37.9 points (Cohen”s d= 1.67); B) + 40.3 points (Cohen”s d= 1.67); C) + 34.0 points (Cohen”s d= 1.54) D) + 29.7 points (Cohen”s d= 1.29) and E) + 23.5 points (Cohen”s d= 1.24). Post-operative change in OKS did not show a statistically significant association with the BMI categories (Z=1.24, p=0.872). Conclusions. Our study shows that obesity has an impact on improvement after TKA in terms of joint awareness, with overweight patients being at higher risk of less benefit from surgery. Whereas the FJS-12 showed a substantial difference in the recovery process, the postoperative improvement measured with the OKS was comparable for patients in the different BMI categories. This highlights that outcome scores may differ in their ability to capture the impact of BMI on postoperative recovery

Introduction

Patellar tendinopathy is a highly prevalent clinical diagnosis supported by ultrasound changes. Numerous interventions are targeted at improving both symptoms and structure of dysfunctional tendons, however little is known of the diagnostic value in a changing ultrasound profile whilst patient reported outcome measures determine recovery. The aim of this study was to assess if change in ultrasound measure is congruent with change in Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment – Patella (VISA-P) score and therefore indicates the use of using ultrasound to assess patellar tendinopathy during symptom change.

Abstract

Background. Complete and reliable outcome assessment is important for clinical quality control and research evidence. Online questionnaires offer the opportunity to perform follow-up at distance and desired frequency saving efforts and cost to patients and hospitals increasingly not reimbursed for this service. Patients in this unique study have been invited by mail (not at visit or by phone) and were asked to complete both methods (online, paper) instead of only one option. For the first time, response, completion and reliability of the HOOS, KOOS-PS and New-KSS, popular patient-reported outcomes (PROM's) in TJA were measured. Methods. Patients (n=107) were invited pre-operative by mail to register at atriumproms.nl (Interactive Studios, Netherlands) and complete PROM's online, followed by a second invitation three days later to complete the same on paper. THA patients (n=48) completed EQ-5D-3L, VAS pain and HOOS. TKA (n=59) questionnaires consisted of KOOS-PS, VAS pain and New-KSS. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC was considered excellent >0.75 according to literature. Results. Overall response rate was 77.6% (83/107) with no difference between THA (77.1%) and TKA (79.3%). Paper had a higher response rate (70.1% vs. 34.9%, p<0.01, Fisher Exact test). However, completion rate was higher online (95%) than on paper (54%, p<0.01). Age had a significant influence on online response rates (<70yrs: 43%, >=70yrs: 23%, p=0.03). Reliability was excellent in the THA group (ICC: 0.84 – 0.95) except for the EQ-5D-3L (ICC: 0.72). The TKA group showed excellent reliability for VAS-pain (0.92). However, for New-KSS reliability was only good (0.60) or poor for KOOS-PS (0.39). Conclusions. A high response rate shows patient cooperation making distance follow-up by mail feasible. Online PROM's were only half as popular as paper questionnaires but achieve twice the completion rate. Taking scores online has excellent reliability. Only when conversions are performed (KOOS-PS, EQ-5D) reliability suffers

Abstract

Companies manufacturing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses produce a variety of tibial and femoral components of different dimensions denoted by numbers or letters. Surgeons frequently implant components that are compatible but not of the same size on the femur and tibia. Recent studies suggest that equally sized femoral and tibial components produce better outcomes compared to size-mismatched components. In our study, we aim to explore the relationship between component size and outcome measured by oxford knee score at six weeks and one year following TKA.

A cohort of twenty-four patients who underwent TKA and had well-functioning prosthesis were studied. Thirteen (54%) had equally sized TKA components implanted, seventy-four patients (42%) had components that were mismatched by one size, and one (4%) had components that were mismatched by more than one size. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) obtained preoperatively, at six weeks and one year postoperatively were retrieved from an electronic database. All data were analysed using R software.

A significant improvement in pre-operative and one-year postoperative OKS was observed. Patients who received one-size mismatched tibial and femoral components demonstrated a less pronounced improvement in OKS as compared with patients who received equally sized components.

When possible, it may be best to utilise equally sized prosthetic tibial and femoral components when performing total knee arthroplasty. Manufacturers may be able to produce better patient outcomes by including prostheses that are between sizes as part of their production line.

Patient reported outcomes have become validated objective measures of success in research studies. They take time and effort to develop and administer. However, to remain relevant and universal PROMS should be gathered routinely and used to manage evidence-based change in healthcare systems. To ensure that they are adopted individual clinician involvement is key however a framework for comparison and relevance promotes engagement. Several examples will be presented of system change using PROMS and PREMS as well as using routine data to defend patient selection. How and what we present depends on whom we are expecting to influence.

Background

Patient reported outcomes measures are a fundamental part of the NHS. Since 2009, they have been used to measure quality from the patient's perspective. PROMS2.0 is a semi-automated web based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data. This study looks at the factors, which can influence PROMS. These include looking at general trends which affect reported outcomes such as surgeon, age and gender. We also look to assess the reasons for non-uptake in the study.

Increasingly more emphasis is being placed on Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). There are many used and reported in clinical studies, but there are no universally accepted or preferred measures. It is important for a researcher with a non-clinical background to understand how these assessments are performed, the type of information provided by each of the measures, and which diseases states are best reported by each measure.

Obese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) face increased risks of complications such as joint infection and early revision. However, the influence of obesity on measures of patient function following TKA is poorly defined.

Knee arthroplasty outcome data for procedures carried out over an eight month period was extracted from a regional database in the UK. We analysed the impact of weight categories (BMI<30, BMI=30–34.9, and BMI≥35) on the Forgotten Joint Score – 12 (FJS-12) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Data was available preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Physical and mental health was assessed with the SF-12 one year after surgery.

Data from 256 patients were available. 49.6% had a BMI<30, 27.4% had a BMI 30–34.9 and 23.1% had a BMI≥35. Mean FJS-12 results at 1-year were 48.7 points for patients with a BMI<30, 40.7 points for patients with a BMI=30–34.9 and 34.0 points for patients with a BMI≥35. Effect sizes for change from baseline to 12-month post-op were 3.0 (Cohen's d) in patients with BMI<30 and d=2.2 in patients with BMI≥35. Mean OKS results at 1 year were 36.9 (BMI<30), 33.7 (BMI=30–34.9) and 32.0 (BMI≥35) respectively. Effect sizes for change from baseline to 12-month was d=2.1 (BMI<30) and d=1.9 (BMI≥35). Differences between BMI groups with regard to post-operative change were statistically significant for the FJS-12 (p=0.038) but not for the OKS (p=0.229).

This study highlights that outcome scores may differ in their ability to capture the impact of obesity on patient function following TKA. The FJS-12 showed significant differences in outcome based on patient obesity category, whereas the OKS did not detect between group differences.

Background

PROMS and PREMS are a fundamental and essential part of the NHS. Chilectomy and fusion procedures for hallux rigidus produce varied outcomes due to their subjective nature. PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to compare what PROMS/PREMS for chilectomy/fusion for hallux rigidus are at UHSM including variance across osteoarthritis grades.

Background

This article reviews four commonly used approaches to assess patient responsiveness to a treatment or therapy [Return To Normal (RTN), Minimal Important Difference (MID), Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), OMERACT-OARSI (OO)], and demonstrates how each of the methods can be formulated in a multi-level modelling (MLM) framework.

Introduction

Management of the patellofemoral surface in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a topic of debate. Incidence of anterior knee pain and incidence of repeat operation have been the focus of several recent meta-analyses, however there is little recent data regarding patients” subjective ability to kneel effectively after TKA. The purpose of this study was to compare patient reported outcomes, including reported ability to kneel, after total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing.

Introduction

We used patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) to evaluate qualitative and societal outcomes of trauma.

Background

Patient reported outcomes/experience measures have been a fundamental part of the NHS since 2009. Osteotomy procedures for hallux valgus produce varied outcomes due to their subjective nature. We used PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to assess what the patient reported outcome/experience measures for scarf+/− akin osteotomy for hallux valgus are at UHSM.