The effects of surgical approach in total hip replacement on health-related quality of life and long-term pain and satisfaction are unknown. From the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, we extracted data on all patients that had received a total hip replacement for osteoarthritis through either the posterior or the direct lateral approach, with complete pre- and one-year post-operative Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). A total of 42 233 patients met the inclusion criteria and of these 4962 also had complete six-year PROM data. The posterior approach resulted in an increased mean satisfaction score of 15 (sd 19) vs 18 (sd 22) (p <  0.001) compared with the direct lateral approach. The mean pain score was 13 (sd 17) vs 15 (sd 19) (p < 0.001) and the proportion of patients with no or minimal pain was 78% vs 74% (p < 0.001) favouring the posterior approach. The patients in the posterior approach group reported a superior mean EQ-5D index of 0.79 (sd 0.23) vs 0.77 (sd 0.24) (p < 0.001) and mean EQ score of 76 (sd 20) vs 75 (sd 20) (p < 0.001). All observed differences between the groups persisted after six years follow-up. Although PROMs after THR in general are very good regardless of surgical approach, the results indicate that some patients operated by the direct lateral approach report an inferior outcome compared with the posterior approach. The large number of procedures and the seemingly sustained differences make it likely these findings are clinically relevant.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:590–6.

An intra-articular steroid injection can be a useful diagnostic tool in patients presenting with debilitating hip pain and radiographically mild osteoarthritis. The clinical and patient reported outcomes associated with patients who have radiographically mild osteoarthritis and undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain poorly studied. Patients undergoing primary, elective THA at a single academic medical center by a fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon between 2017–2023 were identified. Only those patients who underwent an intra-articular corticosteroid injection into the operative hip within one year of surgery were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the severity of their osteoarthritis as determined by preoperative radiographs; those with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I-II arthritis were classified as “mild” whereas those with KL grade III-IV arthritis were classified as “severe”. Clinical and patient reported outcomes at final follow-up were compared between cohorts. The final cohorts included 25 and 224 patients with radiographically mild and severe osteoarthritis, respectively. There were no baseline differences in age, gender or time between intra-articular corticosteroid injection and THA between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the preoperative or postoperative HOOS JR values between patients with mild or severe arthritis (all p>0.05). There were no significant differences in the change in HOOS JR scores from the preoperative to final follow-up timepoints between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the HOOS JR questionnaire between cohorts. Patients with radiographically mild osteoarthritis who feel relief of their hip pain following an intra-articular corticosteroid injection report similar preoperative debility and demonstrate similar improvements in patient reported outcome scores following THA compared to patients with radiographically severe osteoarthritis

This study evaluates patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) scores after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in matched cohorts, while simultaneously evaluating implant survivorship and 90-day hospital utilization. It is hypothesized that while both procedures would yield similar PROMIS score improvements, THA would demonstrate superior mid-term implant survivorship. Primary THA and TAA patients from 2015–2022 with minimum one-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. After applying exclusion criteria, 2,092 THAs and 478 TAAs were included for analysis. Demographics, pre- and post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), revision surgeries, ED visits, and re-admissions were collected. THA and TAA patients were then propensity score matched at 2:1 ratio for age, sex, race, BMI, ASA, and comorbidities, resulting in a final cohort of 844 THAs and 455 TAAs for comparison. There were similar pre-operative PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) scores between THA and TAA, with both showing improvement at six weeks. However, THA patients exhibited lower PI scores at one year (53.0 versus 54.0; p=0.009). Pre-operative PROMIS Physical Function (PF) was worse in THA patients but showed greater improvement compared to TAA patients at both six weeks (p<0.001) and one year (p<0.001). Pre-operative PROMIS depression scores were similar and improved similarly in both groups. Joint-specific PROMs (HOOS for THA and FAAM for TAA) improved in both cohorts. THA demonstrated superior survivorship free of all-cause revision at five years compared to TAA (95% versus 77%; p<0.0001). Patients undergoing THA or TAA experienced significant improvements in their general and joint-specific PROMs post-operatively. However, patients undergoing THA demonstrated higher PROMIS PI and PF scores at one-year when compared to TAA, as well as improved survivorship. Generic PRO instruments enable comparison of medical treatments in different anatomic sites to the patients overall health

Femoroacetabular impingement is a prearthritic deformity frequently associated with early chondral damage. Several techniques exist for restoring larger cartilage defects. While AMIC proved to be an effective treatment in knee and ankle, there are only short-term data available in hip. This study aimed to investigate the mid-term clinical outcome of patients with chondral lesions treated by AMIC and evaluate the quality of repair tissue via MRI. This retrospective, single center study includes 18 patients undergoing surgical hip dislocation for FAI between 2013 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were: cam or pincer-type FAI, femoral or acetabular chondral lesions > 1 cm. 2. , (IRCS III-IV). Due to exclusion criteria and loss-to-follow-up 9 patients (10 hips) could be included. Patient reported outcome measures included Oxford Hip Score (OHS) & Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI)). MRIs were evaluated using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. None of the patients underwent revision surgery except screw removals from the greater trochanter. Followup data indicate a satisfactory to good hip function at 5 years: PROMS improved from pre- to postop at 5 years: OHS from 38.1 to 43.4, COMI from to 1.8 and UCLA from 4 to 8.1 respectively. MOCART score was 67.5 postoperatively. Subgrouping showed slightly better results for acetabular defects (Ø 69.4) compared femoral defects (Ø 60). Based on the reported mid-term results, we consider AMIC as a valuable treatment option for larger chondral defects of the hip

Periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of primary total hip replacement (THR) with significant associated morbidity. In acute infection, Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) may be considered. Current national guidelines recommend a DAIR should be performed by “an experienced arthroplasty surgeon┕ but do not specify the need for this to be a revision arthroplasty surgeon. We investigated outcomes in our NHS Trust of DAIR procedures performed by revision and non-revision arthroplasty surgeons. Infection registry data and patient records were analysed for all DAIR procedures of infected primary THRs between 2017 and 2021. Data collected included details of the primary surgery, the presentation with infection, the DAIR procedure and any subsequent complications including return to theatre at any time point. Routinely collected pre- and post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were reviewed. 54 periprosthetic joint infections of primary THRs received a DAIR procedure. 41 DAIRs were performed by a revision surgeon and 13 by non-revision surgeons. There was no significant difference in time from primary THR to presentation with infection, time from presentation to DAIR or pre-operative C-reactive protein between the two groups. In 21 (38.9%) patients the DAIR procedure was classed as a treatment failure; 17 patients (31.5%) returned to theatre for further revision surgery, one (2.4%) died related to infection and three (5.6%) had persistent infection but did not receive further surgery. Treatment failure was significantly higher in the non-revision surgeon group (9/13 (69.2%)) than in the revision surgeon group (12/41 (29.3%)) (p = 0.02). Overall, improvement in PROMs after DAIR was seen at both six and 12 months. The overall success rate of DAIR was 61.1% and there was a sustained improvement in PROMs after surgery. However, there was a significant difference in failure rates between revision surgeons and non-revision surgeons

There is little known about how patient socioeconomic status impacts clinical outcomes in hip preservation surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between indices of multiple deprivation, funding provider (NHS Funded or Private Funded) and clinical outcomes following surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The study analysed the data of 5590 patients recorded in the NAHR who underwent primary hip arthroscopic treatment for FAI between November 2013 and July 2023. Records were matched to the UK National index of multiple deprivation using the lower layer super output area. Using iHOT12 score, patient reported outcome measures were analysed at base line and 1 year following surgery. 2358 records were matched to LLSOA deciles. Between the lowest (most deprived) 3 deciles and the highest (least deprived) the average baseline iHOT12 score was 28.98 (n=366) and 35.33 (n=821). The proportion of patients receiving treatment through NHS funding compared to independent funding for the most deprived, 292 (90%) 37 (10%) respectively compared to the least deprived 515 (70%) and 244 (30%) respectively. At 1year, iHOT12 scores for each group were 51.64 (29.1 SD) compared to 61.5 (28.06 SD) respectively. The study demonstrates that patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds had poorer baseline and one-year post-surgery iHOT12 scores compared to those from higher socioeconomic strata. Furthermore, a higher reliance on NHS funding was observed among the most deprived, while more affluent patients predominantly opted for private funding. These findings underscore the significant influence of socioeconomic status on both the quality of healthcare received and recovery outcomes in hip preservation surgery, calling attention to the need for more equitable healthcare solutions

Femoral stem design affects periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD), which may impact long term survival of cementless implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to examine proximal femoral BMD in three morphologically different uncemented femoral stems designs to investigate whether one particular design resulted in improved preservation of BMD. 119 patients were randomized to receive either a proximally coated dual taper wedge stem, a proximally coated anatomic stem or a fully coated collarless triple tapered stem. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans (Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI) assessed BMD across the seven Gruen zones pre-operatively, and post-operatively at 6-weeks, 1-year, and 2-years comparing the unoperated contralateral femur as a control. BMD increased in zones one (2.5%), two (17.1%), three (13.0%), five (10%) and six (17.9%) for all stems. Greater preservation of BMD was measured on the lateral cortex (zone 2) for both the dual taper wedge and anatomic stems (p = 0.019). The dual taper wedge stem also demonstrated preservation of BMD in the medial calcar (zone 7) whilst the anatomic and triple taper stem declined in this region, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.059). BMD decreased on average by 2.1% in the mid-diaphysis region, distal to the stem tip (zone 4) for all implants. All stems performed equivalently at final follow-up in all patient reported outcome measures. Implant design was shown to impact BMD changes. All stems preserved bone at the metaphyseal level in early follow-up, which theoretically indicates favorable implant fixation. There was no significant stress shielding observed, however longer follow-up is required to elucidate the impact of this finding on implant survivorship

The benefits of total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be significantly magnified in children, since the improvement in quality of life has a far greater exposure time and occurs during key developmental stages which may help to maximise lifetime achievement. The purpose of this study is to describe implant survival and patient reported outcomes (PROMS) in a cohort of children following THA. Retrospective cohort review of all patients treated with THA in a single centre. Routine data analysis did not require ethical approval. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and PROMs were recorded (EQ5D-S, Oxford hip score and modified Harris Hip Score) in a sub-group of patients. 66 hips in 47 patients with a median age of 16 years (range 10 to 19 years) underwent THA between 1971 and 2023. 57% (38/68) patients were female, the commonest indications were Mucopolysaccharidoses n = 15, Stills disease (n=15), and Avascular necrosis (n=12). 27 (41%) of constructs were cemented, 5 (8%) were hybrid, and 34 (51%) were cementless. 30 stems were custom made cementless stems. Median follow up was 3.8 years (range 0–34 years). Implant survival was 87% at 10 years, 61.6% at 20 years and 52.8% at 30 years. PROMS demonstrated mean preoperative OHS was 12, preoperative MHHS was 23 and EQ5Ds VAS of 38. PROMS improved steadily overtime with mean OHS of 43, MMHS of 75 and EQ5Ds VAS of 89 at one year. THA was associated with a very large change in patient reported hip function and quality of life. In this study, THA delivered a long-lasting solution to hip pain with survival similar to that seen in patients undergoing THA in the fourth and fifth decades of life. Socioeconomic benefits of THA need further investigation to establish treatment guidelines for children suffering with hip pain

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established treatment for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) in young adults and can also be utilised in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with acetabular retroversion. This study used a national registry to assess the outcomes of PAO for DDH and FAI. PAOs recorded in the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry between 2012 and November 2022 were identified along with recorded patient and surgical characteristics. Cases were grouped according to the primary pathology (DDH or FAI). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) captured included the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT)-12 (primary outcome) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index preoperatively and at 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years post-operatively. 1,087 PAOs were identified; 995 for DDH (91%), 98 for FAI (9%). Most patients (91%) were female. The DDH group were significantly older (mean 31.7 years) than the FAI group (25.4 years) but had similar body mass index (mean 25.7kg/m2). Overall, significant (all p<0.0001) iHOT-12 and EQ-5D improvement (delta) vs baseline pre-operative scores were achieved at 6 months (mean iHOT-12 improvement +27.4 (95%CI 25.3 to 29.5); n=515) and maintained out to 5 years (+30.0 (21.4 to 38.6); n=44 [9.8% of those eligible for follow-up at 5 years]), at which point 71% and 55% of patients continued to demonstrate a score improvement greater than or equal to the minimum clinically important difference (≥13 points) and substantial clinical benefit (≥28 points) for iHOT-12 respectively. This study demonstrates excellent functional outcomes following PAO undertaken for DDH and FAI in the short to medium term in a large national registry

Most hip replacements are performed in an in-patient setting; however, there has been a shift in recent years in Canada towards doing more on an outpatient basis. In 2021–2022, 15.6% of hip replacements were performed as day surgeries compared to 0.7% in 2018–2019. This analysis will assess patient reported outcome measures of patients who had inpatient versus outpatient hip replacement surgery between 2018 and 2021. We analysed a retrospective sample of 4917 adult patients who had an elective primary unilateral hip replacement. Preoperative and three-month postoperative PROMs were completed - the Oxford Hip Score, EQD5L and patient satisfaction with the outcome were recorded. Patients who had an outpatient procedure were matched 1:1 with patients who are admitted to hospital for surgery based on age, sex and pre-COVID versus the COVID (March 15, 2020 as the start). Preoperative PROMs and Charlson Comorbidity Index were collected. T-tests and chi-square tests were used to assess the differences. The inpatient group on average was older, female and had a lower preoperative PROMs score and more comorbidities than the outpatient group. With cohort matching the sample consisted of 1244 patients. The inpatient and outpatient groups have similar Oxford scores, postoperative EQ-5D-5L scores and the proportion satisfied with their surgical results. The Oxford postoperative score was slightly higher in the outpatient group compared to the inpatient group; however, this is not clinically significant. We observed that outpatient protocols have no difference in patient satisfaction, self-reported functional outcomes and self-reported health-related quality of life three months after a hip replacement. Day surgery protocols represented potential solution to the challenges caused by the expected increase in demand for hip replacements. Our results demonstrated that patients do well clinically with day surgery procedures and there does not appear to be any detrimental effect on PROMs

A ceramic-on-ceramic hip resurfacing implant (cHRA) was developed and introduced in an MHRA-approved clinical investigation to provide a non metallic alternative hip resurfacing product. This study aimed to examine function and physical activity levels of patients with a cHRA implant using subjective and objective measures both before and 12 months following surgery in comparison with age and gender matched healthy controls. Eighty-two unilateral cHRA patients consented to this study as part of a larger prospective, non-randomised, clinical investigation. In addition to their patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), self- reported measures of physical activity levels and gait analysis were undertaken both pre- operatively (1.5 weeks) and post operatively (52 weeks). This data was then compared to data from a group of 43 age gender and BMI matched group of healthy controls. Kinetics and kinematics were recorded using an instrumented treadmill and 3D Motion Capture. Statistical parametric mapping was used for analysis. cHRA improved the median Harris Hip Score from 63 to 100, Oxford Hip score from 27 to 48 and the MET from 5.7 to 10.3. cHRA improved top walking speed (5.75km vs 7.27km/hr), achieved a more symmetrical ground reaction force profile, (Symmetry Index value: 10.6% vs 0.9%) and increased hip range of motion (ROM) (31.7° vs 45.9°). Postoperative data was not statistically distinguishable from the healthy controls in any domain. This gait study sought to document the function of a novel ceramic hip resurfacing, using those features of gait commonly used to describe the shortcomings of hip arthroplasty. These features were captured before and 12 months following surgery. Preoperatively the gait patterns were typical for OA patients, while at 1 year postoperatively, this selected group of patients had gait patterns that were hard to distinguish from healthy controls despite an extended posterior approach. Applications for regulatory approval have been submitted

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often performed in symptomatic patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) who do not qualify for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The impact of osteoarthritis (OA) severity on postoperative outcomes in DDH patients who undergo THA is not well described. We hypothesized that DDH patients who undergo THA with mild OA have slower initial recovery postoperatively, but similar one-year patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) when compared to DDH patients with severe OA. We performed a retrospective review at a single academic institution over a six-year period of patients with DDH who underwent primary THA and compared them to patients without DDH who underwent THA. Within the DDH cohort, we compared PROMs stratified by DDH severity and OA severity. Diagnosis of DDH was verified using radiographic lateral center edge angle (LCEA). Minimum one-year follow-up was required. PROMs were collected through one-year postoperatively. Logistic and linear regression models were used adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. 263 patients with DDH were compared to 1,225 THA patients without DDH. No significant differences were found in postoperative PROMs or revision rates (p=0.49). When stratified by DDH severity, patients with LCEA<10° had worse preoperative pain (p=0.01), mental health (p<0.01) and physical function (p=0.03) scores but no significant difference in postoperative PROMs. Within the DDH group, when stratified by OA severity, patients with Grade 3 Tonnis score had worse preoperative pain (p=0.04) but no significant difference in postoperative PROMs. Recovery curves in DDH patients based upon severity of DDH and OA were not significantly different at 2-weeks, 6-weeks and 1-year. DDH patients who have mild OA have similar recovery curves compared to those with severe OA. THA is reasonable in symptomatic DDH patients who have mild arthritis and do not qualify for PAO

Our understanding of pre-arthritic hip disease has evolved tremendously but challenges remain in categorizing diagnosis, which ultimately impacts choice of treatments and clinical outcomes. This study aims to report patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) comparing four different condition groups within hip preservation surgery by a group of fellowship-trained surgeons. From 2018 to 2021, 380 patients underwent hip preservation surgery at our center and were classified into five condition groups: dysplasia: 82 (21.6%), femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI): 173 (45.4%), isolated labral tear: 103 (27.1%), failed hip preservation: 20 (5.3%) and history of childhood disease/other: 2 (0.5%). International hip outcomes Tool 12 (IHOT-12), numeric pain score and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) were collected pre-operatively and at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively, with 94% and 82% follow-up rate respectively. Arthroscopy (75.5%) was the most common procedure followed by peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) (22.4%) and surgical dislocation (2.1%). Re-operation rate were respectively 18.3% (15), 5.8% (10), 4.9% (5), 30% (6) and 0%. There were 36 re-operations in the cohort, 14 (39%) for unintended consequences of initial surgery, 10 (28%) for mal-correction leading to a repeat operation, 8 (22%) progression of arthritis, and 4 (11%) for incorrect initial diagnosis/intervention. Most common re-operations were hardware removal 31% (7 PAO, 3 surgical hip dislocation and 1 femoral de-rotational osteotomy), arthroscopy 31% (11) and arthroplasty 28% (10). All groups had significant improvements in their IHOT-12 as well as PROMIS physical and numerical pain scales, except those with failed hip preservation. Dysplasia group showed a slower recovery. Overall, this study demonstrated a clear relation between the condition groups, their respective intervention and the significant improvements in PROMs with isolated labral pathology being a valid diagnosis. Establishing tertiary referral centers for hip preservation and longer follow-up is needed to monitor the overall survivorship of these various procedures

The purpose of this study was to determine long-term survival free from all-cause revision and stem-related failure, as well as radiographic and functional outcomes of the ZMR stem in revision THA. We retrospectively identified all patients in our institutional database who underwent revision THA using the ZMR Revision Hip system from the year 2000 to 2007 (minimum two-year follow-up). Of the 112 ZMR hips (110 patients) identified, a total of 106 hips (104 patients) met inclusion criteria. The mean study follow-up 13.9 years (range 2–22). Indications for index ZMR revision included aseptic loosening (72.1%), periprosthetic joint infection (17.3%), periprosthetic fracture (9.6%), and stem fracture (1.0%). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the all-cause and stem-related failure revision-free survival. Validated patient reported outcomes were collected and available radiographs were reviewed to determine implant stability. A total of 17 hips (16.0%) underwent a re-revision of any component. The indications for re-revision were stem failure (35.3%), infection (29.4%), instability (29.4%), and aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (5.9%). The five- and 15-year all-cause survivorship was 89.5% (95% CI 86.5–92.5) and 83.0% (95% CI 79.2–86.8), respectively. There were six re-revisions for stem failure (5.7%); five for stem fracture and one for aseptic loosening. The average time to stem failure was 4.6 years (range 1.3–8.2). The five- and 15-year survivorship free from stem-related failure was 97.2% (95% CI 95.6–98.8) and 93.9% (95% CI 91.5–96.3), respectively. At final follow-up the mean Oxford hip score was 36.9 and all surviving ZMR stems were well fixed on radiographs. Femoral revision with the ZMR stem offers satisfactory long-term survivorship and promising clinical outcomes. Although uncommon, stem fracture was the most common reason for stem-related failure

Executing an extended retinacular flap containing the blood supply for the femoral head, reduction osteotomy (FHO) can be performed, increasing the potential of correction of complex hip morphologies. The aim of this study was to analyse the safety of the procedure and report the clinical and radiographic results in skeletally mature patients with a minimum follow up of two years. Twelve symptomatic patients (12 hips) with a mean age of 17 years underwent FHO using surgical hip dislocation and an extended soft tissue flap. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging producing radial cuts (MRI) were obtained before surgery and radiographs after surgery to evaluate articular congruency, cartilage damage and morphologic parameters. Clinical functional evaluation was done using the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), the Hip Outcome Score (HOS), and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). After surgery, at the latest follow-up no symptomatic avascular necrosis was observed and all osteotomies healed without complications. Femoral head size index improved from 120 ± 10% to 100 ± 10% (p<0,05). Femoral head sphericity index improved from 71 ± 10% before surgery to 91 ± 7% after surgery (p<0,05). Femoral head extrusion index improved from 37 ± 17% to 5 ± 6% (p< 0,05). Twenty five percent of patients had an intact Shenton line before surgery. After surgery this percentage was 75% (p<0,05). The NAHS score improved from a mean of 41 ± 18 to 69 ± 9 points after surgery (p< 0,05). The HOS score improve from 56 ± 24 to 83 ± 17 points after surgery (p< 0,05) and the mHHS score improved from 46 ± 15 before surgery to 76 ± 13 points after surgery (p< 0,05). In this series, femoral head osteotomy could be considered as safe procedure with considerable potential to correct hip deformities and improve patients reported outcome measures (PROMS). Level of evidence - Level IV, therapeutic study. Keywords - Femoral head osteotomy, Perthes disease, acetabular dysplasia, coxa plana

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has been established as an effective technique to treat symptomatic hip dysplasia in young patients. Its role in treating borderline dysplasia and acetabular retroversion is evolving. The aim of this study was to:. Examine the prospectively collected outcomes following a minimally invasive PAO in a large cohort of patients. Compare the outcomes of patients with severe dysplasia, borderline dysplasia and acetabular retroversion. This is a single-surgeon review of patients operated in a high-volume centre with prospectively collected data between 2013 and 2020, and minimal followup of six months. PAO was performed using a minimally invasive modified Smith Peterson approach. 387 patients were operated during the study period and 369 eligible patients included in the final analysis. Radiographic parameters were assessed by two authors (GS and KB) with interrater reliability for 25 patients of 84–95% (IntraClass Coefficient). Patient reported outcome measures (i-HOT 12, NAHS, UCLA and EQ-5D) were collected prospectively. Case note review was also performed to collate complication data and blood transfusion rates. Radiological parameters improved significantly after surgery with Lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) improving by 16.4 degrees and Acetabular index (AI) improved by 15.8 degrees. Patient reported outcome measures showed significant improvement in post-op NAHS, iHOT and EQ5D at 2 years compared to pre-op scores (NAHS=30.45, iHOT=42, EQ5D=0.32, p=0.01). This significance is maintained over 2 years post procedure (p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the three groups (severe dysplasia, borderline dysplasia and acetabular retroversion). Clinical outcomes showed an overall complication rate n=31, 8.3% (Major complication rate: n=3, 0.81%). Non-union rate: n=11, 2.96% of which 3 required fixation (0.81%). Hip arthroscopy post PAO: n=7, 1.9%. Conversion to THR: n=4, 1.1%. Blood transfusion requirement: n=46, 12.5%. No patient developed a major neurovascular injury. In this large single-centre study, patients had radiological and reported outcome improvements following surgery. Overall, there was a low complication rate, providing further evidence of the safety and efficacy of PAO for ameliorating pain and long-lasting results in the management of symptomatic hip dysplasia

Identification of patients at risk of not achieving minimally clinically important differences (MCID) in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is important to ensure principled and informed pre-operative decision making. Machine learning techniques may enable the generation of a predictive model for attainment of MCID in hip arthroscopy. Aims: 1) to determine whether machine learning techniques could predict which patients will achieve MCID in the iHOT-12 PROM 6 months after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), 2) to determine which factors contribute to their predictive power. Data from the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry database was utilised. We identified 1917 patients who had undergone hip arthroscopy for FAI with both baseline and 6 month follow up iHOT-12 and baseline EQ-5D scores. We trained three established machine learning algorithms on our dataset to predict an outcome of iHOT-12 MCID improvement at 6 months given baseline characteristics including demographic factors, disease characteristics and PROMs. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) statistics with 5-fold cross validation. The three machine learning algorithms showed quite different performance. The linear logistic regression model achieved AUROC = 0.59, the deep neural network achieved AUROC = 0.82, while a random forest model had the best predictive performance with AUROC 0.87. Of demographic factors, we found that BMI and age were key predictors for this model. We also found that removing all features except baseline responses to the iHOT-12 questionnaire had little effect on performance for the random forest model (AUROC = 0.85). Disease characteristics had little effect on model performance. Machine learning models are able to predict with good accuracy 6-month post-operative MCID attainment in patients undergoing arthroscopic management for FAI. Baseline scores from the iHOT-12 questionnaire are sufficient to predict with good accuracy whether a patient is likely to reach MCID in post-operative PROMs

To quantify the prevalence of Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH), aka Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder, in adult patients presenting with hip pain to a sub-specialty hip practice, this 4-year, prospective, observational study evaluated correlations with clinical, demographic, and baseline outcomes. 1,004 consecutive new hip patients (390 males, 614 females) were evaluated for GJH using the Beighton 9-point physical exam criteria and the Hakim-Grahame 5-item history questionnaire. Diagnosis, age, sex and race were tested as predictors of GJH. Patient reported outcomes from iHOT-12 and a modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were also assessed. There were 333 patients presenting with hip dysplasia over this period. Hip dysplasia (DDH) patients without osteoarthritis (OA) had a significantly elevated prevalence of GJH (77.9%) compared to non-dysplastic hip patients (32.8%, p<0.0001) or to patients with DDH+OA (35.7%, p<0.0001). The prevalence of GJH was significantly higher in females (OR=4.2, 95% CI: 3.2 to 5.5, p<0.0001) and inversely proportional to age. Hispanic patients presented with significantly lower prevalence of GJH compared with other races (p<0.05). GJH was not a predictor of patient-reported outcomes scores (p=0.51 for iHOT-12 and p=0.44 for mHHS). During the course of this study, we successfully performed our first PAO procedure on an outpatient basis (February 2019). That is currently our standard practice. With a strong correlation observed between hypermobility and developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), further research is warranted to explore the genetic basis and significance of this association

This study aimed to analyse the incidence, the operative findings and outcomes of hip arthroscopy after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). We conducted a retrospective study of prospective collected data to report the operative findings and outcomes of hip arthroscopy for recurrent pain following PAO for acetabular dysplasia. Demographic data, radiographic and arthroscopic findings were analysed. Pre- and post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected. Of 184 PAO patients, 15 hips in 15 patients (8.2%) underwent post-PAO hip arthroscopy with 2 males and 13 females at a mean time of 3.9 ±2.9(0.3–10) years. Hip arthroscopy findings included labral tears (15 hips, 100%), chondral damage (11 hips, 73%) with one Beck 1, two Beck 2, four Beck 4, and four Beck 5 damage. There were 8 (53%) isolated labral debridement, 7 (47%) labral repair, and 2 (13%) adhesiolysis. A femoral osteochondroplasty was performed in 4 (27%) hips. Four hips (27%) were finally converted to total hip replacement at a mean delay of 2.3 ±1.4 (0.7–3.2) years post hip arthroscopy and these 4 patients were significantly older than those who were not (p=0.02). There were no significant differences in PROMs pre and post hip scope. 8.2% of patients undergoing a PAO required a hip scope for persistent hip pain. Common post-PAO hip arthroscopy findings included labral tears, chondral changes and femoroacetabular impingement. 27% of patients finally underwent conversion to total hip replacement at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years post hip scope

Until today it is unknown whether preservation of the joint capsule positively affects patient reported outcome (PROs) in DAA-THA. A recent RCT found no clinical difference at 1 year. Since 2015 we preserve the capsule suture it at the end. We here evaluate whether this change had any effect on PROs and revisions, 2 years post-operatively. Two subsequent cohorts operated by the senior author were compared. The capsule was resected in the first cohort (January 2012 – December 2014) and preserved in the second cohort (July 2015 – December 2017). No other technical changes have been introduced between the two cohorts. Patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and surgical data were collected from our clinical information system. 2-years PROs questionnaires (OHS, COMI Hip) were obtained. Data was analyzed with generalized multiple regression analysis. 430 and 450 patients were included in the resected and preserved cohorts, respectively. Demographics, CCI surgical time and length of stay were equal in both groups. Blood loss was less in the preserved cohort (p<.05). Four patients had a revision (1 vs 3, n.s.). Once corrected for demographics, capsule preservation had significant worse PROs: +0.24 COMI (p<.001) and −1.6 OHS points (p<.05), however, effects were much smaller than the minimal clinically important difference (0.95 and 5 respectively). The date of surgery (i.e. surgeon's age) was not a significant factor. In this large retrospective study, we observed statistically significant, but probably clinically not relevant, worse PROs with capsule preservation. It might be speculated that the not resected hypertrophied capsule could have caused this difference