Aims. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the influence of patellar resurfacing following cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the incidence of anterior knee pain, knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and reoperation rates. Methods. A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to search criteria. Search terms used included: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, and patellar retaining. RCTs that compared patellar resurfacing versus unresurfaced in primary TKA were included for further analysis. Studies were evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network assessment tool for quality and minimization of bias. Data were synthesized and meta-analysis performed. Results. There were 4,135 TKAs (2,068 resurfaced and 2,027 unresurfaced) identified in 35 separate cohorts from 33 peer-reviewed studies. Anterior knee pain rates were significantly higher in unresurfaced knees overall (odds ratio (OR) 1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 2.83; p = 0.006) but more specifically associated with CR implants (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.52; p = 0.030). There was a significantly better Knee Society function score (mean difference (MD) -1.98; 95% CI -1.1 to -2.84; p < 0.001) and Oxford Knee Score (MD -2.24; 95% CI -0.07 to -4.41; p = 0.040) for PS implants when patellar resurfacing was performed, but these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference for these scores. There were no significant differences in complication rates or infection rates according to implant design. There was an overall significantly higher reoperation rate for unresurfaced TKA (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.06); p = 0.030) but there was no difference between PS or CR TKA. Conclusion. Patellar resurfacing, when performed with CR implants, resulted in lower rates of anterior knee pain and, when used with a PS implant, yielded better knee-specific functional outcomes. Patellar resurfacing was associated with a lower risk of reoperation overall, but implant type did not influence this. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):622–634

Introduction. Early complication post total knee replacement reported to be higher in obese patient in general. Also the outcome of cruciate retaining and PS knee has been fully discussed before and there was no major difference in the outcome. However, the purpose of this paper is to find out if early complication postTKR such as fracture and instability is more common in PS implant than in CR knee. This is a retrospective study comparing two groups of obese patients. The first using PS implant and the other using CR implant. These two groups were matched for age, body mass and severity of deformity. We clearly showed that there is significant increase in peri-prosthetic fracture and instability in the group that use PS implant. Materials & Methods. At our institution we have been using Persona implant which has the option of using PS insert or a CR. The decision to proceed with CR or PS mainly depends on the availability of the implant and also the ability to well balance the knee in patients. In most patients we try to proceed with CR implant. However, the flow of implant sometime sometimes limit us from using CR or the imbalance in the ligament force us to process with PS implant. We have reviewed a chart of over 200 patients in each group of obese patient they were done within the last three years. All cases had a minimum follow up of 6 months. Those groups were matched for body mass, age and severity of deformity. After matching the groups we documented knee score, blood loss, post – operative pain and complications. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. Results. We had 7 cases of per-prosthetic fracture in the PS group and non in the CR implant. We had 3 revisions in the PS group for instability and MCL insufficiency. We had non in the CR implant. Infection, wound complication, blood loss, knee score and patient satisfaction were same in both groups. Discussion. Our study clearly show that the decrease incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture in the CR implant which could be easily explained by the fact that a good cortical bone is resected in order to make room for the PS spine. Also, the fact that resecting the posterior cruciate ligament might cause more stress on the implant versus the CR. Instability also were more common in the PS group. We believe this has to do with the fact that the PCL serve as a secondary constraint to the MCL. The presence of the PCL help maintain the stability in case of incidental injury to the MCL during surgery which was reported to be higher in obese patients. Practically the same in both group shows there is no apparent advantage of either implant. Conclusion. There is clear advantage of decreasing the early postoperative complications in obese patient using CR knee and we strongly recommend using CR implant in obese patients in order to reduce the incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture and the revision for instability

Aims. We have previously reported the mid-term outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for flexion instability. At a mean of four years, there were no re-revisions for instability. The aim of this study was to report the implant survivorship and clinical and radiological outcomes of the same cohort of of patients at a mean follow-up of ten years. Methods. The original publication included 60 revision TKAs in 60 patients which were undertaken between 2000 and 2010. The mean age of the patients at the time of revision TKA was 65 years, and 33 (55%) were female. Since that time, 21 patients died, leaving 39 patients (65%) available for analysis. The cumulative incidence of any re-revision with death as a competing risk was calculated. Knee Society Scores (KSSs) were also recorded, and updated radiographs were reviewed. Results. The cumulative incidence of any re-revision was 13% at a mean of ten years. At the most recent-follow-up, eight TKAs had been re-revised: three for recurrent flexion instability (two fully revised to varus-valgus constrained implants (VVCs), and one posterior-stabilized (PS) implant converted to VVC, one for global instability (PS to VVC), two for aseptic loosening of the femoral component, and two for periprosthetic joint infection). The ten-year cumulative incidence of any re-revision for instability was 7%. The median KSS improved significantly from 45 (interquartile range (IQR) 40 to 50) preoperatively to 70 (IQR 45 to 80) at a mean follow-up of ten years (p = 0.031). Radiologically, two patients, who had not undergone revision, had evidence of loosening (one tibial and one patellar). The remaining components were well fixed. Conclusion. We found fair functional outcomes and implant survivorship at a mean of ten years after revision TKA for flexion instability with a PS implant. Recurrent instability and aseptic loosening were the most common indications for re-revision. Components with increased constraint, such as a VVC or hinged, should be used in these patients in order to reduce the risk of recurrent instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1126–1131

Introduction. Early complication post total knee replacement reported to be higher in obese patient in general. Also the outcome of cruciate retaining and PS knee has been fully discussed before and there was no major difference in the outcomes for all the patients overall regardless of their weight. However, the purpose of this paper is to find out if the CR knee has superiority over PS knee in terms of clinical and functional outcomes and if early complication postTKR such as fracture and instability is more common in PS implant than in CR knee. This is a retrospective study comparing two groups of obese patients. The first using PS implant and the other using CR implant. These two groups were matched for age, body mass and severity of deformity. Materials & Methods. At our institution we have been using Persona implant which has the option of using PS insert or a CR. The decision to proceed with CR or PS mainly depends on the availability of the implant and also the ability to well balance the knee in patients. In most patients we try to proceed with CR implant. However, the flow of implant sometime sometimes limit us from using CR or the imbalance in the ligament force us to process with PS implant. We have reviewed a chart of over 200 patients in each group of obese patient they were done within the last three years. All cases had a minimum follow up of 6 months. Those groups were matched for body mass, age and severity of deformity. After matching the groups we documented Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), blood loss, post – operative pain and complications. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. Results. Our study showed that the clinical scores (KSS) in both groups were very close while significant differences were observed in functional scores (KSFS) for the CR knee. We had 8 cases of per-prosthetic fracture in the PS group and one in the CR implant. We had 4 revisions in the PS group for instability and MCL insufficiency and non in the CR implant. Infection, wound complication, blood loss, and patient satisfaction were same in both groups. Discussion. This study suggests a significant difference in functional outcomes, especially walking, stair climbing and the use of walking aids, between CR and PS that favors CR implant which may be related to the CR knee retaining proprioception and ligaments tension with balance. In addition, PS knee have more varus-valgus and mid-flexion laxity than CR knee throughout the range of motion which appear clearly in obese patient. On the other hand, the study clearly shows that the decrease incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture in the CR implant which could be easily explained by the fact that a good cortical bone is resected in order to make room for the PS spine. Also, the fact that resecting the posterior cruciate ligament might cause more stress on the implant versus the CR. Instability also were more common in the PS group. We believe this has to do with the fact that the PCL serve as a secondary constraint to the MCL. The presence of the PCL help maintain the stability in case of incidental injury to the MCL during surgery which was reported to be higher in obese patients. Conclusion. There is clear advantage of improving the outcomes or knee scores and decreasing the early postoperative complications in obese patient using CR knee and we strongly recommend using CR implant in obese patients in order to restore functionality faster and reduce the incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture and the revision for instability

Background. In this study, we assessed implant survivorship, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes at two years for patients implanted with a customized, posterior stabilized knee replacement system. Methods. Ninety-three patients (100 knees) with the customized PS TKR were enrolled at two centers. Patients’ length of hospitalization and preoperative pain intensity were assessed. At a single time point follow-up, we assessed patient reported outcomes utilizing the KOOS Jr., satisfaction rates, implant survivorship, patients’ perception of their knee and their overall preference between the two knees, if they had their contralateral knee replaced with an off-the-shelf (OTS) implant. Results. At an average of 1.9-years implant survivorship was found to be 100%. From pre-op until time of follow-up, we observed an average decrease of 5.4 on the numeric pain rating scale. Satisfaction rate was found to be high with 90% of patients being satisfied or very satisfied and 88% of patients reporting a “natural” perception of their knee some or all the time. Patients with bilateral implants mostly (12/15) stated that they preferred their customized implant over the standard TKR. The evaluation of KOOS Jr. showed an average score of 90 at the time of the follow up. Conclusion. Based on our results, we believe that the customized PS implant provides patients with excellent outcomes post-surgery. Moreover, a subset of patients with an OTS implant in one knee and a customized PS implant in the other, we observed a trend in patients preferring the customized PS device over their OTS counterparts

Introduction. Large variations in knee kinematics existed after conventional TKA. Different design of TKA showed different intra-operative kinematics with navigation system. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematics of the three different types of prosthesis in navigation-based in vivo simulation. (Material and Method) Studies were carried out on 15 osteoarthritis Knees using the CT-free navigation system (Kolibri Knee, Brain LAB). Fourteen patients were female and one patient was male with mean age of 72 years. Five knees were implanted with the CR knee, 5 knees were implanted with the PS knee and 5 knees were implanted with PS mobile knee by navigated measured resection technique (PFC-sigma knee system, DePuy, Warsaw, IN). Intra-operative knee kinematics during passive range of motion from full extension to 130 degrees of knee flexion was measured after implantation while patella reduced and tourniquet released. While supporting the foot with one hand, the surgeon used his opposite hand to gently lift the thigh, flexing the hip and knee. Three types of prosthesis were compared for following factors: Presence of condylar lift-off (the gap difference greater than 1mm between medial gap and lateral gap) and anterior-posterior (AP) displacement of the center of femur relative to the tibia. Results. Lateral condylar lift-off was found in patients with the PS implant between 120° and 130° of flexion. Remaining two types of implant did not show the condyar lift-off (Fig. 1). The pattern of AP displacement showed the same manner in three implants. Femur moved anterior side form extension to 50∼55° of flexion, after that, femur moved posterior side to full flexion. The mean maximum anterior movement and angle in CR implant was 14mm @ 55°, PS implant was 17mm ï¼ 50° and PS-mobile implant was 17mm @ 55°. The mean maximum posterior movement @ 130°, CR implant was −10.5mm, PS implant was −8.3mm and PS-mobile implant was −6.9mm. There was no significant difference among three groups. Discussion. In CR implant, the function of PCL could influence to prevent the condyar lift-off. In PS-mobile implant, the mechanism of rotation platform might have contributed to prevent the condylar lift-off. The paradoxical anterior slide of the femoral condyles during mid flexion was observed in all types of implant. We could not find any difference in AP displacement of these 3 types of prosthesis

Introduction. Femoral periprosthetic fractures above TKA are commonly treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing (IMN). This study determined if TKA design and liner type affect the minimum knee flexion required for retrograde nailing through a TKA. Methods. Twelve cadaveric specimens were prepared for six single radius (SR) TKAs and six asymmetric medial pivot (MP) TKAs. Trials with 9mm polyethylene liners were tested with cruciate retaining (CR), cruciate substituting (CS) and posterior stabilizing (PS) types. The knee was extended to identify the minimum knee flexion required to allow safe passage of the opening reamer while maintaining an optimal fluoroscopic starting point for retrograde nailing. Furthermore, the angle of axis deviation between the reamer and the femoral shaft was calculated from fluoroscopic images. Results. In all specimens, the reamer entry point was posterior to Blumensaat's line. In the SR TKA, the average flexion required was 70, 71 and 82 degrees for CR, CS and PS respectively. The required flexion in PS was significantly greater than the other designs (p=0.03). In the MP TKA, the average flexion required was 74, 84 and 123 degrees for CR, CS and PS respectively. The required flexion was significantly greater in CS and PS designs (p<0.0001). Femoral component size did not affect the minimum flexion required. Furthermore, the entry reamer required 9.2 (SR) and 12.5 (MP) degrees of posterior axis deviation from the femur. Conclusions. Our study illustrates four novel factors to consider when performing retrograde nailing through TKA. First, significant knee flexion is required to obtain an ideal radiographic starting point when retaining the liner. Second, PS implants require more flexion with both TKA designs. Third, femoral component size does not affect the flexion required. Fourth, there is a consistent posterior axis deviation of the entry reamer from the femoral shaft, explaining the commonly created extension deformity

Aims. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using functional alignment aims to implant the components with minimal compromise of the soft-tissue envelope by restoring the plane and obliquity of the non-arthritic joint. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of TKA with functional alignment on mediolateral soft-tissue balance as assessed using intraoperative sensor-guided technology. Methods. This prospective study included 30 consecutive patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA using the Stryker PS Triathlon implant with functional alignment. Intraoperative soft-tissue balance was assessed using sensor-guided technology after definitive component implantation; soft-tissue balance was defined as intercompartmental pressure difference (ICPD) of < 15 psi. Medial and lateral compartment pressures were recorded at 10°, 45°, and 90° of knee flexion. This study included 18 females (60%) and 12 males (40%) with a mean age of 65.2 years (SD 9.3). Mean preoperative hip-knee-ankle deformity was 6.3° varus (SD 2.7°). Results. TKA with functional alignment achieved balanced medial and lateral compartment pressures at 10° (25.0 psi (SD 6.1) vs 23.1 psi (SD 6.7), respectively; p = 0.140), 45° (21.4 psi (SD 5.9) vs 20.6 psi (SD 5.9), respectively; p = 0.510), and 90° (21.2 psi (SD 7.1) vs 21.6 psi (SD 9.0), respectively; p = 0.800) of knee flexion. Mean ICPD was 6.1 psi (SD 4.5; 0 to 14) at 10°, 5.4 psi (SD 3.9; 0 to 12) at 45°, and 4.9 psi (SD 4.45; 0 to 15) at 90° of knee flexion. Mean postoperative limb alignment was 2.2° varus (SD 1.0°). Conclusion. TKA using the functional alignment achieves balanced mediolateral soft-tissue tension through the arc of knee flexion as assessed using intraoperative pressure-sensor technology. Further clinical trials are required to determine if TKA with functional alignment translates to improvements in patient satisfaction and outcomes compared to conventional alignment techniques. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):507–514

INTRODUCTION. Applying the proper amount of tension to knees collateral ligaments during surgery is a prerequisite to achieve optimal performance after TKA. It must be taken into account that lower values of ligament tension could lead to an instable joint while higher values could induce over-tensioning thus leading to problems at later follow-up: a “functional stability” must then be defined and achieved to guarantee the best results. In this study, an experimental cadaveric activity was performed to measure the minimum tension required to achieve functional stability in the knee joint. METHODS. Ten cadaveric knee specimens were investigated; each femur and tibia was fixed with polyurethane foam in specific designed 3D-printed fixtures and clamped to a loading frame. A constant displacement rate of 0.05 mm/s was applied to the femoral clamp in order to achieve joint stability and the relative force was measured by the machine: the lowest force guaranteeing joint stability was then determined to be the one corresponding to the slope change in the force/displacement curve, representing the activation of the elastic region of both collateral ligaments. The force span between the slack region and the found point was considered to be the tension required to reach the functional stability of the joint. This methodology was applied on intact knee, after ACL-resection and after further PCL-resection in order to simulate the knee behavior in CR and PS implants. The test was performed at 0, 30, 60 and 90° of flexion using a specifically designed device. Each configuration was analyzed three times for the sake of repeatability. RESULTS. Results demonstrated that an overall tension of 40–50N is sufficient to reach stability in native knee with intact cruciate ligaments. Similar values appear to be sufficient in an ACL-resected knee, while higher tension is required (up to 60N) for stability after ACL and PCL resection. Moreover, the tension required for stabilization was slightly higher at 60° of flexion compared to the one required at the other angles, reflecting thus the mid-flection instability behavior. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The results are in agreement to other experimental studies. 1,2. and show that the tensions necessary to stabilize a knee joint in different ligament conditions are way lower than the ones usually applied via tensioners nowadays. To reach functional stability, surgeons should consider such results intraoperatively to avoid laxity, mid-flexion instability or ligament over-tension

Introduction. The Flexible Nichidai Knee (FNK) System (Nakashima Medical, Japan) was designed to fit Asian knees. Especially, the posterior stabilized(PS) prosthesis was designed as semi-constrained posterior stabilized system that had a large tibial post and femoral articulation. We hypothesized that the semi-constrained PS implant design would have a positive influence on vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods. A total of 16 patients (21 knees) who had undergone TKA using PS implant were randomly recruited from our database. Of the 16 patients, all patients were women. Fourteen patients had osteoarthritis and 2 patients had rheumatoid arthritis. The average age was 72.3± 9.5 years, and the average postoperative duration was 23.4 ± 19.3 months. The subject performed sequential deep knee bends under WB from 0° to maximum flexion under fluoroscopic monitoring in the sagittal plane. Conversely, under NWB, the patient sat on a chair and was asked to perform active assisted knee flexion. To estimate spatial position and orientation of the artificial knee prosthesis, a 2D to 3D registration technique was used. We evaluated knee range of motion, femoral axial rotation relative to the tibial component, and anteroposterior translation of the femorotibial contact point for both medial and lateral sides. Closest distances between femoral cam and tibial post engagement were measured,. Results. Range of Motion. The mean full extension angle between femoral and tibial components, was −8.1±8.8°and −7.5±5.5°in WB and NWB, respectively. The mean maximum-flexion angle was 110.0±18.1°and 119.3±8.9°in WB and NWB, respectively. Femoral Axial Rotation. Fig.1 shows the mean degree of femoral axial rotation relative to the tibial components in WB and NWB. The femur was externally rotated 0.7±3.9°and 0.3±4.7°at 0° degree in WB and NWB, respectively. The external rotation increased to 4.8±5.2°and 6.2±5.9°at 120°flexion in WB and NWB, respectively. Anteroposterior Translation. The mean femorotibial contact point under WB and NWB was shown in Fig.2 for medial contact and Fig. 3 for lateral contact. Under WB, the mean medial contact point moved posteriorly from −1.6±2.0mm at 0° flexion. The point then moved gradually anteriorly with flexion to −9.3±1.5mm at 120°flexion. The mean lateral contact point moved posteriorly from −1.9±1.7mm at 0° flexion, and then moved anteriorly to at −8.9±2.7mm 120° flexion. Under NWB conditions, the mean medial contact point moved posteriorly from −1.1±1.8mm at 0° flexion. The point then moved gradually posteriorly with flexion to −6.6±2.8mm at 120° flexion. The mean lateral contact point in PS TKA moved posteriorly from −4.4±3.3mm at 0° flexion, and then moved posteriorly to −12.3±3.6mm at 120°flexion. Post-Cam Engagement. The mean knee flexion angle at initial post-cam engagement was 61.9 ± 15.9° under WB and 57.5 ± 16.0° under NWB. Discussion. Our study showed external rotation and bycondylar posterior rollback pattern in the entire range of knee flexion. The reason for this might be that the post cam design was high(20mm), which does not allow for high external rotation. The in vivo kinematics of the semi-constrained PS FNK prosthesis showed similar kinematic patterns due to the development concept of the implant design

Aim: To examine the flexion stability of posterior stabilised (PS) vs deep dished (DD) tibial inserts, in PCL sacrificing total knee arthroplasty using posterior stress radiography. Methods: A simple jig was designed to allow kneeling posterior stress radiographs (at 90 degrees flexion) to be taken. This method was used to take pre and post-operative radiographs in 36 knees undergoing primary arthroplasty with PCL resection (26 DD and 10 PS implants). Sagittal plane tibial translation was measured. Results: The DD inserts all showed posterior displacement (mean: −5.1 mm, range: −2 to −12mm). The PS implants were all displaced anteriorly (mean: +6.7mm, range: +3 to +12mm). The difference in translation was highly significant (P< 0.0001). There was a strong correlation between implant and position of the tibia (R=0.86). In 7 patients, comparison was possible between a DD component in one knee and a PS implant in the other. There was a mean post-operative side-to-side difference of 11mm (range: 5 to 21mm). Conclusions: This study validates a simple new method for flexion stress x-rays (by accurately discriminating between the two implant types). The posterior tibial displacement in the DD group suggests that this implant does not provide enough posterior flexion stability to compensate for the PCL resection. The anterior translation in the PS group has implications for the design and wear of the post, as well as advice to patients about possibly avoiding kneeling in this PS design

Patellofemoral complaints are the common and nagging problem after total knee arthroplasty. Crepitus occurs in 5% to over 20% of knee arthroplasty procedures depending on the type of implant chosen. It is caused by periarticular scar formation with microscopic and gross findings indicating inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia. Crepitus if often asymptomatic and not painful, but in some cases can cause pain. Patella “Clunk Syndrome” is less common and represents when the peripatella scarring is abundant and forms a nodule which impinges and “catches” on the implant's intercondylar notch. Patella Clunk was more common with early PS designs due to short trochlear grooves with sharp transition into the intercondylar notch. Clunks are very infrequent with modern PS implants. This syndrome has been reported in CR implants as well. Thorough debridement of the synovium and scarring at the time of arthroplasty is thought to reduce the occurrence of crepitus and clunks. Larger patella with better coverage of the cut bone may also be helpful. The diagnosis can be made on history and physical exam. X-rays are also helpful to assess patella tracking. MRI or ultrasound can be used to identify and confirm the diagnosis, but this is not mandatory. Painful crepitus and clunk syndrome that fail conservative management of NSAIDS and physical therapy may require surgery. Both crepitus and clunk can be treated with arthroscopic removal of the peripatella scar. Patella maltracking should also be assessed and treated. While recurrence may occur, it is uncommon

Introduction & aims. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is a useful tool to execute pre-operatively planned surgical cuts and reduce the number of trays in surgery. Debate currently exists around improved accuracy, efficacy and patient outcomes when using PSI cutting guides compared to conventional instruments. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) revision to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) represents a complex scenario in which traditional bone landmarks, and patient specific axes that are routinely utilised for component placement may no longer be easily identifiable with either conventional instruments or navigation. PSI guides are uniquely placed to solve this issue by allowing detailed analysis of the patient morphology outside the operating theatre. Here we present a tibia and femur PSI guide for TKA on patients with UKA. Method. Patients undergoing pre-operative planning received a full leg pass CT scan. Images are then segmented and landmarked to generate a patient specific model of the knee. The surgical cuts are planned according to surgeon preference. PSI guide models are planned to give the desired cut, then 3D printed and provided along with a bone model in surgery. PSI-bone and PSI-UKA contact areas are modified to fit the patient anatomy and allow safe placement and removal. The PSI-UKA contact area on the tibia is defined across the UKA tibial tray after the insert has been removed. Further contact is planned on the tibial eminence if it can be accurately segmented in the CT and the anterior superior tibia on the contralateral compartment, see example guide in Figure 1. Contact area on the femur is defined on the superior trochlear groove, native condyle, femur centre and femoral UKA component if it can be accurately segmented in the CT. Surgery was performed with a target of mechanical alignment using OMNI APEX PS implants (Raynham, MA). The guide was planned such that the OMNI cut block could be placed on the securing pins to translate the cut. Component alignment and resections values were calculated by registering the pre-operative bones and component geometries to post-operative CT images. Results. Four UKA to TKA surgeries have been performed using revision PSI guides. The maximum difference from planned to achieved component alignments are: Femoral valgus = 2.4â□°, Tibial varus = 2.5â□°, Femoral internal rotation = 3.6â□°, Femoral flexion = 5.1â□° and tibial slope = 2.9â□°, see boxplot of results in Figure 2. All median values are within 2.5â□° of the planned alignment. A further five cases are to be analysed. Conclusions. A PSI guide designed for UKR to TKR revision surgery has been successfully used in surgery with acceptable errors. A larger study must be performed to determine the reliability and reproducibility of the design and method over a wide range of patient anatomy and UKA imaging flare

Posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), wherein mechanical engagement of the femoral cam and tibial post prevents abnormal anterior sliding of the knee, is a proven surgical technique. However, many patients complain about abnormal clicking sensation, and several reports of severe wear and catastrophic failure of the tibial post have been published. In addition to posterior cam-post engagement during flexion, anterior engagement with femoral intercondylar notch can also occur during extension. The goal of this study was to use dynamic simulations to explore sensitivity of tibial post loading to implant design and alignment, across different activities. LifeModeler KneeSIM software was used to calculate tibial post contact forces for four contemporary PS implants (Triathlon PS, Stryker; Journey BCS and Legion PS, Smith & Nephew; LPS Flex, Zimmer Biomet). An average model of the knee, including cartilage and soft tissue insertion locations, created from MRI data of 40 knees was used to mount and align the component. The Triathlon femoral component was mounted with posterior and distal condylar tangency at: a) both medial and lateral condylar cartilage (anatomic alignment), b) at the medial condylar cartilage and perpendicular to mechanical axis (mechanical alignment with medial tangency), and c) at lateral condylar cartilage and perpendicular to mechanical axis (mechanical alignment with lateral tangency). The influence of implant design was assessed via simulations for the other implant systems with the femoral components aligned perpendicular to mechanical axis with lateral tangency. Five different activities were simulated. The anterior contact force was significantly smaller than the posterior contact force, but it varied noticeably with tibial insert slope and implant design. For Triathlon PS, during most activities anatomic alignment of the femoral component resulted in greater anterior contact force compared to mechanical alignment, but absolute magnitude of forces remained small (<100N). Mechanical alignment with medial tangency resulted in greater posterior contact force for deep knee bend and greater anterior force for chair sit activity. For all implants, peak posterior contact forces were greater for activities with greater peak knee flexion. The magnitude of posterior contact forces for the various implants was comparable to other reports in literature. Overall activity type, implant design and slope had greater impact on post loading than alignment method. Tibial insert slope was shown to be important for anterior post loading, but not for posterior post loading. Anatomic alignment could increase post loading with contemporary TKA systems. In the case of the specific design for which effect of alignment was evaluated, the changes in force magnitude with alignment were modest (<200N). Nonetheless, results of this study highlight the importance of evaluating the effect of different alignment approaches on tibial post loading

Many patients who undergo a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) wish to return to a more active lifestyle. The implant must be able to restore adequate muscle strength and function. However, this may not be a reality for some patients as quadriceps and hamstrings muscle activity may remain impaired following surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare muscle activity between patients implanted with a medial pivot (MP) or posterior stabilized (PS) implant and controls (CTRL) during ramp walking tasks. Fifteen patients were assigned to either a MP (n=9) or PS (n=6) TKA operated by the same surgeon. Nine months following surgery, the 15 patients along with nine CTRL patients completed motion and EMG analysis during level, ramp ascent & descent walking tasks. Wireless EMG electrodes were placed on six muscles: vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF), semimembranosus (SM) muscles, gastrocnemius medial head (GM), and gastrocnemius lateral head (GL). Participants completed three trials of each condition. EMG data were processed for an entire gait cycle of the operated limb in the TKA groups, and for the dominant limb in the CTRL group. The maximum muscle activity achieved with each muscle during the level trial was used to normalize the ramp trials. The onset and offset of each muscle was determined using the approximated generalized likelihood ratio. Peak muscle activity (PeakLE), total muscle activity (iEMG), and muscle onsets/offsets were determined for each muscle for the ramp ascent and descent trials. Non-parametric Kruskal Wallace tests were used to test for statistical significance between groups with α=0.05. During the ramp up task, both MP and PS groups had significantly greater PeakLE and iEMG for the hamstring muscles compared to the CTRL, whereas the PS group had significantly greater PeakLE compared with the MP group for the SM muscle. During the ramp down task, both MP and PS groups had significantly greater PeakLE and iEMG for the SM and GL muscles compared to the CTRL. The PS group also had significantly greater iEMG for the BF and VM muscles compared to the CTRL. The MP group had a significantly earlier offset for the SM muscle compared to the CTRL. Stability in a cruciate removing TKA is partially controlled by the prosthetic design. During the ramp up task, the TKA groups compensated the tibial anterior translation by activating their hamstrings more and for a longer duration. The MP group required less hamstrings activation than the PS group. During the ramp down task, TKA patients stiffened their knee in order to stabilize the joint. The quadriceps, hamstrings and GL muscle were activated more and for a longer duration than the CTRL group to protect the tibial posterior translation. The PS group required greater BF and VM iEMG than the MP group. Even if surgery reduced pain, differences in muscle activity exist between TKA patients and healthy controls. The prosthetic design provides some stability to the knee, and the MP implant required less muscle activation than the PS implant to stabilize the knee joint

Aims

The mean age of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has reduced with time. Younger patients have increased expectations following TKA. Aseptic loosening of the tibial component is the most common cause of failure of TKA in the UK. Interest in cementless TKA has re-emerged due to its encouraging results in the younger patient population. We review a large series of tantalum trabecular metal cementless implants in patients who are at the highest risk of revision surgery.

Introduction. John Insall described medial release to balance the varus knee; the release he described included releasing the superficial MCL in severe varus cases. However, this release can create instability in the knee. Furthermore, this conventional wisdom does not correct the actual pathology which normally exists at the joint line, and instead it focuses on the distal end of the ligament where there is no pathology. We have established a new protocol consisting of 5 steps to balance the varus knee without releasing the superficial MCL and we tried this algorithm on a series of 115 patients with varus deformity and compared it to the outcome with a similar group that we have performed earlier using the traditional Insall technique. Material and method. 115 TKR were performed by the same surgeon using Zimmer Persona implant in varus arthritic knees. The deformities ranged from 15 to 35 degrees. First, the bony resection was made using Persona instrumentation as recommended by the manufacturer. The sequential balancing was divided into 5 steps (we will show a short video demonstrating the surgical techniques for each step) as follows:. Step 1: Releasing of deep MCL Step 2: Excising of osteophyte. Step 3: Excising of scarred tissue in the posteromedial corner soft phytes Step 4: Excision of the posteromedial capsule in case of flexion contracture Step 5: Releasing the semi-membranous (in gross deformity). We used soft tissue tensioner to balance the medial and lateral gaps. When the gaps are balanced at early step, there was no need to carry on the other steps. We used only primary implant and we did not have to use any constrained implant. We have compared this group with a similar group matched for deformity from previous 2 years where the conventional medial release as described by Insall. Results. We could balance all knees without releasing the superficial MCL ligament as follows:. -In[H1] 31 cases, we were able to balance the knees performing step 1 and step 2 only. -In 35 cases, we had to do step three in addition to 1 and 2 to achieve balance of cases. -In 25 cases, we performed step 4- those cases had pre-operative flexion contracture. -We had to proceed to step 5 only in 14 cases. These patients had the worst deformity in the group. We have used primary TKR in all cases; in 83 cases, we used a CR implant and in the rest, we used PS implant. Comparing this to the earlier conventional release we had to use 11 CCK implant on severe cases. Patient satisfaction was better with the new algorithm group when compared with the traditional release. Preserving the superficial MCL allowed us to maintain stability post-operatively and allowed us to use minimum constraint such as CR in severe deformity. Discussion. Many literatures have confirmed that cutting superficial MCL causes major medial instability after TKA. Releasing or pie crusting the superficial MCL can cause MCL insufficiency. Our protocol enable the surgeon to tackle the pathology rather than take a short-cut and releasing the superficial MCL. Reserving the superficial MCL allowed us to use minimal constraint even in severe deformity of 40 degrees of varus deformity. The conventional release has resulted in some cases instability, forcing us to use higher constraint such as CCK. Conclusion. Although releasing the superficial MCL has been described in different ways in multiple literature, little attention has been paid to the pathology of the posteromedial corner. This paper clearly shows that the complex anatomy of the posteromedial corner require us to pay better attention and this paper present better algorithm reserving the superficial MCL and enabling us to correct the deformity and balancing the soft tissue without instability. We strongly recommend surgeons not to release the superficial MCL because this will create instability in some cases

The April 2023 Knee Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Does bariatric surgery reduce complications after total knee arthroplasty?; Mid-flexion stability in total knee arthroplasties implanted with kinematic alignment: posterior-stabilized versus medial-stabilized implants; Inflammatory response in robotic-arm-assisted versus conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty; Journey II bicruciate stabilized (JII-BCS) and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty: the CAPAbility, blinded, randomized controlled trial; Lifetime risk of revision and patient factors; Platelet-rich plasma use for hip and knee osteoarthritis in the USA; Where have the knee revisions gone?; Tibial component rotation in total knee arthroplasty: CT-based study of 1,351 tibiae.

Aims

Obtaining solid implant fixation is crucial in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) to avoid aseptic loosening, a major reason for re-revision. This study aims to validate a novel grading system that quantifies implant fixation across three anatomical zones (epiphysis, metaphysis, diaphysis).

The most recent Australian registry has a database of 547,407 knee arthroplasties, having added over 52,000 in 2016. Total knee arthroplasties (TKA) comprise 83.8%, revisions (RevTKA) 8.1% and “partials of all types” 8.1%. Since 2003, the percent of TKA has increased from 76.7%, RevTKA has stayed stable and partial replacements have declined from 14.5%. In the last year, however, TKA declined slightly. There is a slightly higher percentage of women (56.1%) undergoing TKA and this has remained very stable since 2003. Revision rates are slightly higher for men. Percentages of the youngest (<55) and oldest (>85) are small and stable. The 75–84 year olds have declined as 55–74 year olds have increased. This represents a gradual shift to earlier TKA surgery. More patella are resurfaced and this is a gradual trend with a cross over in 2010 when half were resurfaced. Computer navigation is progressively more popular and now accounts for almost 30% of cases. Cement fixation is also increasing and accounts for about 65% of cases. Crosslinked polyethylene is gradually replacing non crosslinked and in 2014 was used in 50% of cases. Revisions are performed most commonly for loosening and infection. Revision rates correlate directly with age. Loosening is the most common indication for revision in both genders, but males have a distinctly higher revision rate due to infection. Revision rates are slightly higher in all forms of mobile bearing than fixed bearing. Minimally constrained (cruciate retaining) devices are used in the majority of TKAs. Posterior stabilised implants are in slight decline, having peaked in about 2008–2010. Minimally constrained implants are in slight decline as medial pivot/medial congruent devices have been used more frequently. Revision rates are similar amongst all three implant types: PS implants are revised at a slightly higher rate. When an early Medial Pivot (MP) implant is excluded the newer version has better results. The reasons for revision are similar amongst all 3 groups with slightly higher loosening rates for PS designs. (Could this represent backside wear with older locking mechanisms, surface finish and non crosslinked poly?) The MP designs had slightly higher revision rates for “pain”, which is not recognised as a reasonable indication for revision. Revision rates are steadily higher for TKAs without patella resurfacing over 16 years, but the questions as to whether: i. the surgeries were secondary resurfacings or full revisions or ii. if secondary resurfacings eliminated pain are unknown. The combinations at greatest risk of revision were a posterior stabilised or medial pivot arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Cementless fixation leads to a higher revision rate. If age and computer navigation are evaluated in terms of revision rates, young patients with and without computer navigated arthroplasties failed at the highest rates, distinct from patients >65. However, if failure rates due only to loosening are evaluated, then computer navigation leads to a lower revision rate in the <65 group. This has been interpreted as the protective effect of better component position that only shows up in patients who use the arthroplasty more aggressively. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) or Individual Designed Instrumentation (IDI) were revised at marginally higher rates than conventional instrumentation. Crosslinked polyethylene appears to be superior at 12 years (CRR= 4%) versus non crosslinked polyethylene (CRR>7%). This is the result of fewer failures due to loosening with crosslinked poly. The superiority of crosslinked poly was greater in the younger, more active patient