Aim: Analyse the outcome of primary and revision total hip replacement using the Oxford hip score. To determine any variation in outcome when analysing for age of patient. In addition, to compare the outcome in the National Health Service compared to the Private hospital.

Method: We have used the Oxford Hip score to monitor the progress of 1441 primary and 173 revision hip replacements (THR) undertaken since the start of 1995 whose hips have been replaced, at St Helier Hospital, Carshalton and St Anthony’s Hospital, Cheam, over the last seven years. Our review programme was started in early 1999 and has generated 2286 Oxford assessments. ). A subgroup of 634 National Health Service (NHS) and 322 private patients (PP), treated by the senior author, has provided 1277 Oxford assessments.

Results: Mean pre-operative scores were 39.06 and 39.48 for primary and revision THR respectively. The mean annual scores, for primary THR, from 12 to 84 months declined to 21 points at 1 year, 21 at 2 years, 21 at 3 years, 20 at 4 years, 22 at 6 years and 21 at 7 years.

Conclusion: All postoperative reviews show a significant improvement (p≤0.0001). The 50–60 year old group scored significantly better than the over 80 year patients up to 48 months, (p< 0.01) The mean pre-operative score for the NHS patients was significantly higher than the PPs (p< 0.001). The PPs scored significantly better than the NHS group up to 36 months (p< 0.01).

The Oxford hip score (OHS) at 6 months and five years of less than 27 has previously been reported as having a 5.2% chance of requiring revision of their total hip arthroplasty (THA) within 2 years. We determined whether the OHS obtained at 10 years after surgery would be a suitable screening tool in lieu of clinic visits to detect patients requiring closer monitoring.

We reviewed data from the NZ Joint Registry between January 1999 and December 2016. OHS at 10 years was available for 5,165 non-revised THA patients. Patients were separated into four categories based on their OHS: 3,483 (67%) scored 42–48, 1,023 (20%) scored 34–41, 373 (7%) scored 27–33, and 286 (5%) scored 0–26.

For patients with a 6-month OHS, revision risk within 2 years was 1.3% in the 42–48 group, 2.5% in the 34–41 group, 4.6% in the 27–33 group, and 10.2 % in the 0–27 group. If only patients with a grading of 33 or less were offered clinical follow-up, 659/5165 patients (12.7%) would require evaluation and of these, 46/659 (7%) could be expected to require revision within two years. Of those patients with an OHS > 34 not evaluated, only a small number, 72/4506 (1.6%), might require a revision.

The OHS at 10 years of patients with a THA who have a grading less than 27 is a much stronger predictor of revision than OHS at 6 months or 5 years. Use of the 10 year OHS as a screening tool for THA requires evaluation of only one in eight patients, with the chance of missing 1 in 63 patients not followed up who might require a revision.

Aims

In metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA), large metal femoral heads have been used to increase stability and reduce the risk of dislocation. The increased size of the femoral head can, however, lead to increased taper corrosion, with the release of metal ions and adverse reactions. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the size of the femoral head and the levels of metal ions in the blood in these patients.

Aims. Femoral cement-in-cement revision is a well described technique to reduce morbidity and complications in hip revision surgery. Traditional techniques for septic revision of hip arthroplasty necessitate removal of all bone cement from the femur. In our two centres, we have been using a cement-in-cement technique, leaving the distal femoral bone cement in selected patients for septic hip revision surgery, both for single and the first of two-stage revision procedures. A prerequisite for adoption of this technique is that the surgeon considers the cement mantle to be intimately fixed to bone without an intervening membrane between cement and host bone. We aim to report our experience for this technique. Methods. We have analyzed patients undergoing this cement-in-cement technique for femoral revision in infection, and present a consecutive series of 89 patients. Follow-up was undertaken at a mean of 56.5 months (24.0 to 134.7) for the surviving cases. Results. Seven patients (7.9%) required further revision for infection. Ten patients died of causes unrelated to their infection before their two-year review (mean 5.9 months; 0.9 to 18.6). One patient was lost to follow-up at five months after surgery, and two patients died of causes unrelated to their hip shortly after their two-year review was due without attending. Of the remaining patients, 69 remained infection-free at final review. Radiological review confirms the mechanical success of the procedure as previously described in aseptic revision, and postoperative Oxford Hip Scores suggest satisfactory functional outcomes. Conclusion. In conclusion, we found that retaining a well-fixed femoral cement mantle in the presence of infection and undertaking a cement-in-cement revision was successful in 82 of the patients (92.1%) in our series of 89, both in terms of eradication of infection and component fixation. These results are comparable to other more invasive techniques and offer significant potential benefits to the patient. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):212–220

Our unit historically performed total hip replacement (THR) through either posterior or anterolateral approaches. In November 2020 a group of 5 consultants transitioned to utilising the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA). Appropriate training was undertaken and cases were performed as dual consultant procedures with intraoperative radiography or robotic assistance. Outcomes were collated prospectively. These included basic demographics, intraoperative details, complication rates and Oxford Hip Scores. A total of 48 patients underwent DAA THR over 1 year. Mean age was 67 and ASA 2. Over this time period 140 posterior approach and 137 anterolateral approach THR's were performed with available data. Propensity score matching was performed on a 1:1 basis using BMI, Age, Sex and ASA as covariates to generate a matched cohort group of conventional approach THR (n=37). Length of stay was significantly reduced at 1.95 days (p<0.001) with DAA compared to Anterolateral and Posterior approach. There was no significant difference with length of surgery, blood loss, Infection, dislocation and periprosthetic fracture rate. There was no significant difference in Oxford Hip Score between any approach at 3 months or 1 year. The transition to this approach has not made a negative impact despite its associated steep learning curve, and has improved efficiency in elective surgery. From our experience we would suggest those changing to this approach receive appropriate training in a high-volume centre, and perform cases as dual consultant procedures

There is some evidence to suggest that outcomes of THA in patients with minimal radiographic osteoarthritis may not be associated with predictable outcomes. The aim of this study was to:. Assess the outcome of patients with hip pain who underwent THA with no or minimal radiographic signs of osteoarthritis,. Identify patient comorbidities and multiplanar imaging findings which are predictive of outcome,. Compare the outcome in these patients to the expected outcome of THA in hip OA. A retrospective review of 107 hips (102 patients, 90F:12M, median age 40.6, IQR 35.1–45.8 years, range 18–73) were included for analysis. Plain radiographs were evaluated using the Tonnis grading scale of hip OA. Outcome measures were all-cause revision; iHOT12; EQ-5D; Oxford Hip Score; UCLA Activity Scale; and whether THA had resulted in the patient's hip pain and function being Better/Same/Worse. The median Oxford Hip Score was 33.3 (IQR 13.9, range 13–48), and 36/107 (33.6%) hips achieved an OHS≥42. There was no association between primary hip diagnosis and post-operative PROMs. A total of 91 of the 102 patients (89.2%, 93 hips) reported that their hip pain and function was Better than prior to THA and would have the surgery again, 7 patients (6.8%, 10 hips) felt the Same, and 4 patients (3.9%, 4 hips) felt Worse and would not have the surgery again. Younger patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with no or minimal radiographic osteoarthritis had lower postoperative Oxford Hip Scores than the general population; though most felt symptomatically better and knowing what they know now, would have surgery again. Those with chronic pain syndrome or hypermobility were likely to benefit less. Those with subchondral cysts or joint space narrowing on CT imaging were more likely to achieve higher functional scores and satisfaction

Multiple joint registries have reported better implant survival for patients aged >75 years undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with cemented implant combinations when compared to hybrid or uncemented implant combinations. However, there is considerable variation within these broad implant categories, and it has therefore been suggested that specific implant combinations should be compared. We analysed the most common contemporary uncemented (Corail/Pinnacle), hybrid (Exeter V40/Trident) and cemented (Exeter V40/Exeter X3) implant combinations in the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) for patients aged >75 years. All THAs performed using the selected implants in the NZJR for patients aged >75 years between 1999 and 2018 were included. Demographic data, implant type, and outcome data including implant survival, reason for revision, and post-operative Oxford Hip Scores were obtained from the NZJR, and detailed survival analyses were performed. Primary outcome was revision for any reason. Reason for revision, including femoral or acetabular failure, and time to revision were recorded. 5427 THAs were included. There were 1105 implantations in the uncemented implant combination group, 3040 in the hybrid implant combination group and 1282 in the cemented implant combination group. Patient reported outcomes were comparable across all groups. Revision rates were comparable between the cemented implant combination (0.31 revisions/100 component years) and the hybrid implant combination (0.40 revisions/100 component years) but were statistically significantly higher in the uncemented implant combination (0.80/100 component years). Femoral-sided revisions were significantly greater in the uncemented implant combination group. The cemented implant and hybrid implant combinations provide equivalent survival and functional outcomes in patients aged over 75 years. Caution is advised if considering use of the uncemented implant combination in this age group, predominantly due to a higher risk of femoral sided revisions. The authors recommend comparison of individual implants rather than broad categories of implants

It is unclear whether patients with early radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) but severe hip symptoms benefit from total hip replacement (THR). We aimed to assess which factors were associated with successful THR in this patient group. From a consecutive series of 1,935 patients undergoing THR we identified 70 (3.6%) patients with early OA (Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grades 0-2). These were compared with 200 patients with advanced OA (KL grades 3–4). Outcomes were Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), EQ5D and EQ-VAS scores; compared pre-operatively with one year post-operatively. We investigated which clinical and radiographic (plain x-ray, CT, MRI) features predicted successful THR in the early OA group. Success was defined as reaching a postoperative OHS≥42. The early OA group were significantly younger (61 vs 66 years; P=0.0035). There were no significant differences in body mass index, ASA grade or gender. After adjusting for confounders, the advanced OA group had a significantly greater percentage of possible change (PoPC) in OHS (75.8% versus 50.4%; P<0.0001) and improvement in EQ5D (0.151 versus 0.002; P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in complication, revision or readmission rates. In the early OA group, we identified 16/70 (22.9%) patients who had a ‘successful’ THR. Of those with early OA, 38 patients had pre-operative CT or MRI scans. Patients who had a ‘successful’ THR were significantly more likely to have subchondral cysts on CT/MRI (91.7% versus 57.7%; P=0.0362). The presence of cysts on CT/MRI was associated with a significantly greater PoPC in OHS (61.6% versus 38.2%; P=0.0353). The combination of cysts and joint space width (JSW) <1mm was associated with a PoPC of 68%. Plain radiographs were found to significantly underestimate the narrowest JSW compared to CT/MRI (2.4mm versus 1.0mm; P<0.0001). We advise caution in performing THRs in patients with early OA (KL grades 0-2) on plain radiographs. We advocate pre-operative cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) in these patients. In the absence of cysts on cross-sectional imaging, a THR seems unlikely to provide a satisfactory outcome

Aims. The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) was introduced in 1997 to address the needs of young active patients using a historically proven large-diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing. A single designer surgeon’s consecutive series of 130 patients (144 hips) was previously reported at five and ten years, reporting three and ten failures, respectively. The aim of this study was to extend the follow-up of this original cohort at 25 years. Methods. The study extends the reporting on the first consecutive 144 resurfacing procedures in 130 patients for all indications. All operations were undertaken between August 1997 and May 1998. The mean age at operation was 52.1 years (SD 9.93; 17 to 76), and included 37 female patients (28.5%). Failure was defined as revision of either component for any reason. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Routine follow-up with serum metal ion levels, radiographs, and Oxford Hip Scores (OHSs) was undertaken. Results. Overall implant survival was 83.50% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 0.90) at 25 years, and the number at risk was 79. Survival in male patients at 25 years was 89.5% (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96) compared to 66.9% for female patients (95% CI 0.51 to 0.83). Ten additional failures occurred in the period of ten to 25 years. These involved an adverse reaction to metal debris in four patients, a periprosthetic femoral neck fracture affecting five patients, and aseptic loosening in one patient. The median chromium levels were 49.50 nmol/l (interquartile range (IQR) 34 to 70), and the median cobalt serum levels were 42 nmol/l (IQR 24.50 to 71.25). The median OHS at last follow-up was 35 (IQR 10 to 48). During the 25-year study period, 29 patients died. Patient survival at 25 years was 75.10% (95% CI 0.67 to 0.83). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that MoM hip resurfacing using the BHR provides a durable alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly in younger male patients with osteoarthritis wishing to maintain a high level of function. These results compare favourably to the best results for THAs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):540–547

Aims. There are limited long-term studies reporting on outcomes of the Zimmer Modular Revision (ZMR) stem, and concerns remain regarding failure. Our primary aim was to determine long-term survival free from all-cause revision and stem-related failure for this modular revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Secondary aims included evaluating radiological and functional outcomes. Methods. We retrospectively identified all patients in our institutional database who underwent revision THA using the ZMR system from January 2000 to December 2007. We included 106 patients (108 hips) with a mean follow-up of 14.5 years (2.3 to 22.3). Mean patient age was 69.2 years (37.0 to 89.4), and 51.9% were female (n = 55). Indications for index revision included aseptic loosening (73.1%), infection (16.7%), fracture (9.3%), and stem fracture (0.9%). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the all-cause and stem-related failure revision-free survival. At most recent follow-up, Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) were collected, and radiological stem stability was determined using the Engh classification. Results. A total of 17 hips (15.7%) underwent re-revision of any component. Indications for re-revision were stem failure (35.3%; n = 6), infection (29.4%; n = 5), instability (29.4%; n = 5), and acetabular aseptic loosening (5.9%; n = 1). The five- and 15-year all-cause survival was 89.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.7 to 92.7) and 83.3% (95% CI 79.6 to 87.0), respectively. There were six re-revisions (5.6%) for stem failure; five for stem fracture and one for aseptic loosening. The five- and 15-year survival free from stem-related failure was 97.2% (95% CI 95.6 to 98.8) and 94.0% (95% CI 91.6 to 96.4), respectively. At final follow-up, the mean OHS was 36.9 (8.0 to 48.0) and 95.7% (n = 66) of surviving modular revision stems were well-fixed in available radiographs. Conclusion. Femoral revision with the ZMR offers satisfactory long-term all-cause revision-free survival, good survival free of stem-related failure, and favourable clinical outcomes. Stem fracture was the most common reason for stem-related failure and occurred both early and late. This highlights the importance of both early and long-term surveillance for stem-related failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):112–117

Aims. The aim of this study was to estimate the clinical and economic burden of dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in England. Methods. This retrospective evaluation used data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink database. Patients were eligible if they underwent a primary THA (index date) and had medical records available 90 days pre-index and 180 days post-index. Bilateral THAs were excluded. Healthcare costs and resource use were evaluated over two years. Changes (pre- vs post-THA) in generic quality of life (QoL) and joint-specific disability were evaluated. Propensity score matching controlled for baseline differences between patients with and without THA dislocation. Results. Among 13,044 patients (mean age 69.2 years (SD 11.4), 60.9% female), 191 (1.5%) had THA dislocation. Two-year median direct medical costs were £15,333 (interquartile range (IQR) 14,437 to 16,156) higher for patients with THA dislocation. Patients underwent revision surgery after a mean of 1.5 dislocations (1 to 5). Two-year costs increased to £54,088 (IQR 34,126 to 59,117) for patients with multiple closed reductions and a revision procedure. On average, patients with dislocation had greater healthcare resource use and less improvement in EuroQol five-dimension index (mean 0.24 (SD 0.35) vs 0.44 (SD 0.35); p < 0.001) and visual analogue scale (0.95 vs 8.85; p = 0.038) scores, and Oxford Hip Scores (12.93 vs 21.19; p < 0.001). Conclusion. The cost, resource use, and QoL burden of THA dislocation in England are substantial. Further research is required to understand optimal timing of revision after dislocation, with regard to cost-effectiveness and impact on QoL. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):811–819

Constrained acetabular inserts provide a solution for both complex primary and revision hip arthroplasty, but there have been ongoing concerns for high risk of failure and their longevity. The Stryker® Trident acetabular insert is pre-assembled with its constrained ring. We believe this to be the largest series of constrained acetabular inserts with a minimum of 5 year follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed all Stryker® Trident ‘All-Poly’ constrained acetabular inserts cemented into bone in our unit between 2008 and 2016. We collated demographic details and reviewed all patients’ radiographs and clinical notes. Indications for surgery, latest Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) and clinical and radiographic complications were identified. 117 consecutive Stryker® Trident ‘All-Poly’ constrained inserts were cemented into bone in 115 patients during the study period with a mean age of 80 (47–97). Most common indications for surgery were recurrent dislocation (47), complex primary arthroplasty (23), revision arthroplasty (19) and failed hemiarthroplasty (12). 41 patients required revision of the acetabular component only. Follow-up was a minimum of 5 years (mean 8.6, range 5–13). There were three 30-day mortalities and six 1-year mortalities. The mean latest OHS was 37 (24–45). Four cups failed in three patients, one at the cement-bone interface, two at the cement-prosthesis interface and one at the bipolar interface. These were treated conservatively in three patient and with excision arthroplasty in one patient. There were four peri-prosthetic fractures, one Vancouver C distal femur fracture treated conservatively and three Vancouver B1 fractures, two treated conservatively and one treated with open reduction internal fixation. There was breakage of one constrained ring with no adverse effects and one superficial wound infection requiring oral antibiotics only. This series demonstrated that despite the elderly and complex nature of these patients’ clinical situations, constrained acetabular inserts offer a useful and pragmatic solution, with relatively low complications, including in our series a cup failure rate of 3% and peri-prosthetic fracture rate of 3%

To estimate the clinical and economic burden of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation in England. Retrospective propensity score-matched evaluation of patients with and without dislocation following primary THA using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked and Hospital Episode Statistics datasets with a 2-year follow-up. 13,044 patients with total hip replacements met the inclusion criteria (mean age 69.2, 60.9% female) of which 154 (1.18%) suffered at least one postoperative hip dislocation. The mean number of dislocations per patient was 1.44 with a maximum of 4. Approximately one-third of the patients with dislocation (32.5%) had more than one dislocation. Among patients with a hip dislocation 148 patients (96.7%) had at least one closed reduction and 20 patients (13.1%) had revision surgery. Two-year median direct medical costs were £14,748 (95% confidence interval [CI] £12,028 to £20,638) higher with vs. without dislocation (+227%). On average, patients with a dislocation had significantly greater healthcare resource utilization and significantly less improvement in EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) index (0.24 vs. 0.45; p<0.001) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (1.58 vs. 11.23; p=0.010) scores and Oxford Hip Scores (13.02 vs. 21.98; p<0.001). This is the first study to estimate the economic burden of dislocation in the UK throughout the entire patient pathway. Dislocation following total hip replacement is a costly complication, both in terms of economic costs and to the functional quality of life of the patient. Efforts to reduce the risks of dislocation should remain at the forefront of hip research

Aims. “Get It Right First Time” (GIRFT) and NHS England’s Best Practice Tariff (BPT) have published directives advising that patients over the ages of 65 (GIRFT) and 69 years (BPT) receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) should receive cemented implants and have brought in financial penalties if this policy is not observed. Despite this, worldwide, uncemented component use has increased, a situation described as a ‘paradox’. GIRFT and BPT do, however, acknowledge more data are required to support this edict with current policies based on the National Joint Registry survivorship and implant costs. Methods. This study compares THA outcomes for over 1,000 uncemented Corail/Pinnacle constructs used in all age groups/patient frailty, under one surgeon, with identical pre- and postoperative pathways over a nine-year period with mean follow-up of five years and two months (range: nine months to nine years and nine months). Implant information, survivorship, and regular postoperative Oxford Hip Scores (OHS) were collected and two comparisons undertaken: a comparison of those aged over 65 years with those 65 and under and a second comparison of those aged 70 years and over with those aged under 70. Results. Overall revision rate was 1.3% (13/1,004). A greater number of revisions were undertaken in those aged over 65 years, but numbers were small and did not reach significance. The majority of revisions were implant-independent. Single component analysis revealed a 99.9% and 99.6% survival for the uncemented cup and femoral component, respectively. Mean patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) improvement for all ages outperformed the national PROMs and a significantly greater proportion of those aged over 65/69 years reached and maintained a meaningful improvement in their OHS earlier than their younger counterparts (p < 0.05/0.01 respectively). Conclusion. This study confirms that this uncemented THA system can be used safely and effectively in patient groups aged over 65 years and those over 69 years, with low complication and revision rates. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(5):293–300

Aim: To compare outcomes in patients who suffered a severe slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) treated by either a modified Dunn or Imhauser Osteotomy. Method: A consecutive group of patients were identified retrospectively from the operative records of a single surgeon at two hospitals since 2003. Patient Notes were used to extract age at presentation, duration of symptoms, stability, and time to surgery. Radiographs were examined to determine: the slip angle; and the degree of correction achieved. Patients were assessed using the Harris and Oxford Hip Scores. Results: Seven patients had a modified Dunn osteotomy and 11 patients an Imhauser osteotomy. Of those only 6 of the Dunn patients and 7 of the Imhauser patients could be recalled for clinical assessment. The average time to clinical assessment from osteotomy was 13.5 months for the Dunn group and 32 months for the Imhauser group. Post-operative lateral radiographs showed a mean angle of deformity correction of 63 degrees in the Dunn and 36 degrees in the Imhauser groups. There were no postoperative complications in either group, specifically no avascular necrosis. In the Dunn group the Harris Hip Score ranged from 78 to 100, mean 92 (excellent) and the Oxford Hip scores from 12 to 21, mean 17. The Harris Hip Score for the Imhauser group ranged from 50 to 98, mean 76 (fair), and the Oxford scores from 13 to 34, mean 25. Range of motion was similar for both groups in all directions. Conclusions: The Dunn and Imhauser osteotomies both give good clinical results in the severe SUFE patient. However the Dunn Osteotomy group had better Harris and Oxford Hip Scores, reflecting improved functional outcome

It has been suggested that minimal incision surgery for hip arthroplasty allows earlier mobilisation and reduces hospital stay. Intensive post-op physiotherapy may also have the same effect. This study aimed to assess which was the more important factor. The study compared 45 patients (26 NHS and 19 private) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty using a standard posterior approach to 51 patients (29 NHS and 22 private) with a minimal incision of 10cm or less. Physiotherapy involved once daily weekday sessions with the NHS patients (five sessions per week) versus twice daily with the private patients (14 per week). We compared demographics, incision length, post-operative stay, complication rates and Oxford Hip Scores between the four groups. Results showed no significant difference in age, sex and BMI between the groups. There was a significant difference (p = 0.0002) in mean scar length between the mini and standard incision groups (15.3 vs. 8.3 cm). There was no significant difference in post-op stay between the mini and standard incision NHS patients or the mini and standard incision private patients. There was a significant difference (p = 0.003) in stay between NHS and private patients (11.4 vs. 7.9 days) regardless of the incision used. There were four (4%) early dislocations, three in the mini incision group. Eleven patients received prophylactic antibiotics compared to five in the standard groups for prolonged wound ooze (> 5 days); only one patient had a proven superficial infection. There was no significant difference in the change in the Oxford Hip Scores between any of the groups. This study suggests that intensive physiotherapy can significantly reduce in-patient stay but minimal incision surgery itself does not. The higher dislocation rate in the mini incision group demonstrates the learning curve for this technique

Aims. This study aims to describe the pre- and postoperative self-reported health and quality of life from a national cohort of patients undergoing elective total conventional hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Australia. For context, these data will be compared with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data from other international nation-wide registries. Methods. Between 2018 to 2020, and nested within a nationwide arthroplasty registry, preoperative and six-month postoperative PROMs were electronically collected from patients before and after elective THA and TKA. There were 5,228 THA and 8,299 TKA preoperative procedures as well as 3,215 THA and 4,982 TKA postoperative procedures available for analysis. Validated PROMs included the EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L; range 0 to 100; scored worst-best health), Oxford Hip/Knee Scores (OHS/OKS; range 0 to 48; scored worst-best hip/knee function) and the 12-item Hip/Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12/KOOS-12; range 0 to 100; scored best-worst hip/knee health). Additional items included preoperative expectations, patient-perceived improvement, and postoperative satisfaction. Descriptive analyses were undertaken. Results. For THA and TKA patients respectively, the patient profile was 2,850 (54.5%) and 4,684 (56.4%) female, mean age 66.8 years (SD 10.6) and 67.5 (SD 8.8), and mean BMI 29.9 kg/m. 2. (SD 7.7) and 32.5 kg/m. 2. (SD 7.0). The proportion of THA and TKA patients who reported their joint as ‘much better’ was 2,946 (92.6%) and 4,020 (81.6%) respectively, and the majority of patients were ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ with their procedure (2,754 (86.5%) and 3,981 (80.8%)). There were 311 (9.7%) of THA patients and 516 (10.5%) of TKA patients who reported ‘dissatisfied’ or ‘very dissatisfied’ with their surgery. Conclusion. Large improvements in pain, function, and overall health were evident following primary THA and TKA. Approximately 10% of patients reported dissatisfaction with their surgery. Future analyses will focus on factors contributing to dissatisfaction after arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(6):422–432

Introduction. We investigated predictors of poor outcomes following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (MoMHA) revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD), to help inform the revision threshold and type of reconstruction. Patients and Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 346 MoMHAs revised for histologically confirmed ARMD at two specialist centres (245=hip resurfacing, 101=total hip arthroplasty). Numerous preoperative (blood metal ions and imaging) and intraoperative (findings, and components removed/implanted) factors were used to predict poor outcomes. Poor outcomes were postoperative complications (including re-revisions), 90-day mortality, and poor Oxford Hip Scores (<27/48). Multivariable logistic regression models for predicting poor outcomes were developed using stepwise selection methods. Results. Cumulative implant survival rate seven-years after ARMD revision was 87.0% (95% CI=81.0%-91.2%). Poor outcomes occurred in 39% (n=135). Shorter time (under four-years) from primary to revision surgery (odds ratio (OR)=2.12, CI=1.00–4.46) was the only preoperative predictor of poor outcomes. Pre-revision metal ions and imaging did not influence outcomes. Single-component revisions increased the risk of poor outcomes (acetabular or femoral vs. all component revisions; OR=2.99, CI=1.50–5.97). Intraoperative factors reducing the risk of poor outcomes included the posterior approach (OR=0.22, CI=0.10–0.49), revision head sizes ≥36mm (vs. <36mm: OR=0.37, CI=0.18–0.77), ceramic-on-polyethylene (OR vs. ceramic-on-ceramic=0.30, CI=0.14–0.66) and metal-on-polyethylene revision bearings (OR vs. ceramic-on-ceramic=0.37, CI=0.17–0.83). Discussion. This large cohort study demonstrated 39% of patients experience poor outcomes following MoMHA revision for ARMD. This information will help surgeons when counselling patient's pre-revision about the expected prognosis. No threshold exists for recommending ARMD revision, therefore surgeons must make decisions on an individual case basis. However, surgeons can make intraoperative decisions that influence outcomes following ARMD revision. Conclusion. We recommend optimal outcomes following ARMD revision may be achieved if surgeons use the posterior approach, revise all MoMHA components, and use ≥36mm ceramic-on-polyethylene or metal-on-polyethylene articulations

Aim. We report the results of 60 patients who were assessed using the Oxford Hip Score following surgery for revision of ASL XL and ASR Resurfacing systems at our institution. We included preoperative metal ion levels, surgical approach, revision implant, and post op histology and complications to determine variables for improved outcomes. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of consecutive series patients who underwent revision surgery between 2007 – 2015. We collected and analysed data from 60 patients regarding time between surgery, surgical technique including approach and anaesthesia, estimated blood loss (EBL), revision implant, post op complications, histology, and length of post-operative stay. We correlated these findings to the patients reported outcomes measures using the Oxford Hip Score, which were obtained by post. Results. Our data shows a reduction in values for Oxford Hip Scores in at least 24 patients as compared to an improvement in values for 22 patients. 6 patients could not be contacted, 4 patients refused to participate, and 4 patients did not have pre-op Oxford Hip Score values for comparison. Our main findings from 46 patients are summarized in table 2. Conclusion(s). Age, Sex, Ion Level, Surgical Approach, and Implant choice may be useful variables in predicting patient satisfaction following revision surgery. Implications. The major practical implication of this study is that we may be able to predict Outcomes of Revision surgery based on variables mentioned above. This has major implication in suitable patient selection for surgery, and appropriate implant choice

INTRODUCTION. Additive manufacturing (3D printing) is used to create porous surfaces that promote bone ingrowth in an effort to improve initial stability and optimize long-term biological fixation. The acetabular cup that was studied is manufactured with titanium alloy powder via electron beam melting. Electron beam melting integrates the porous and solid substrate rather than sintering a porous coating to a solid surface. The 3D-printed acetabular cup's high surface coefficient of friction (up to 1.2), combined with its geometry, creates a predictable press-fit in the acetabulum, improving initial mechanical stability and ultimately leading to reproducible biologic fixation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early clinical outcomes and implant fixation of this 3D-printed acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS. Four hundred twenty-eight subjects from 8 US and international research sites underwent primary THA with the 3D-printed acetabular cup. All sites received IRB approval prior to conducting the study, and all participants signed the informed consent. Screw usage and number used during surgery were used as a surrogate measurement for initial implant fixation. Clinical performance outcomes included pre- and post-operative Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), patient satisfaction, and revision assessment. 215 patients had a minimum 1-year post-operative follow-up visit. Student t-tests were used to identify significant mean differences (p<0.05). RESULTS. Acetabular screws were used in 206 of 428 cases (48.1%); 85.9% used 1 screw, 12.6% used 2 screws, and 1.5% used 3 screws. For patients with a 1-year post-operative visit, the HHS improved by 49.8 points to 91.9 from 42.1, and the OHS improved by 27.7 points to 44.4 from16.7. Patient satisfaction scores at the 1-year post-operative visit were 9.7±0.7 (n=94). There was no significant difference between genders with regard to BMI, the 1-year post-operative HHS, OHS, or patient satisfaction scores. However, the males were significantly younger (59.8 vs. 62.9 years) and had significantly higher pre-operative HHS (45.7 vs. 37.9) and OHS scores (17.8 vs. 15.3). There were 9 revisions reported. DISCUSSION. For initial implant fixation, compared to a similar, non-3D-printed acetabular cup in the same product line, the 3D-printed cup used significantly fewer screws per case (n=1 for 85.9% cases vs. n=2 for 85.7% of cases) in a fewer percentage of cases (48.1% vs. 70.4%), suggesting greater initial stability and “scratch fit”. The 3D-printed acetabular cup also displayed positive early clinical results as evidenced by the pronounced improvement in clinical outcome scores from the pre-operative visit to the 1-year post-operative visit. These 1-year improvements are better than moderate clinically important improvements reported in the literature (40.1 points for HHS). Patient satisfaction scores were also excellent (9.7/10). There were nine revisions; however, four of these were due to patient falls and one was due to infection. SIGNIFICANCE. The 3D-printed acetabular cup evaluated in this study demonstrated improved implant fixation and positive early clinical outcomes for THA