Abstract
Aim: Analyse the outcome of primary and revision total hip replacement using the Oxford hip score. To determine any variation in outcome when analysing for age of patient. In addition, to compare the outcome in the National Health Service compared to the Private hospital.
Method: We have used the Oxford Hip score to monitor the progress of 1441 primary and 173 revision hip replacements (THR) undertaken since the start of 1995 whose hips have been replaced, at St Helier Hospital, Carshalton and St Anthony’s Hospital, Cheam, over the last seven years. Our review programme was started in early 1999 and has generated 2286 Oxford assessments. ). A subgroup of 634 National Health Service (NHS) and 322 private patients (PP), treated by the senior author, has provided 1277 Oxford assessments.
Results: Mean pre-operative scores were 39.06 and 39.48 for primary and revision THR respectively. The mean annual scores, for primary THR, from 12 to 84 months declined to 21 points at 1 year, 21 at 2 years, 21 at 3 years, 20 at 4 years, 22 at 6 years and 21 at 7 years.
Conclusion: All postoperative reviews show a significant improvement (p≤0.0001). The 50–60 year old group scored significantly better than the over 80 year patients up to 48 months, (p< 0.01) The mean pre-operative score for the NHS patients was significantly higher than the PPs (p< 0.001). The PPs scored significantly better than the NHS group up to 36 months (p< 0.01).
Theses abstracts were prepared by Mr Peter Kay. Correspondence should be address to him at The Hip Centre, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire WN6 9EP.
