Introduction

Cementless tapered wedge stems have shown excellent results over the last decade. Distal potting with inadequate proximal fit, as well as failure to achieve biologic fixation has led to thigh pain, loosening and implant failure. To support a variety of patient morphologies a novel tapered wedge stem was designed with reduced distal morphology, maximizing the proximal contact of the grit blasted surface. The objective of the study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of this stem design.

Purpose

Introduce an Integrated Approach for Orthopedic-Sports Medicine Practice and Patient Care Management that

Is built around effective and efficient surgical techniques, and patient care management processes

Integrates Operations and Service Excellence best practices with patient care management processes

Integrates orthopedic care delivery between outpatient clinic, pre-surgery, surgery, inpatient, (acute care) and post acute care settings

Delivers exceptional clinical, patient satisfaction and financial outcomes as validated by independent national healthcare benchmarking organization

Helps position Ortho-Sports medicine services for strategic growth

Is replicable to develop Ortho-Sports Medicine Centers of Excellence

Presentation illustrates the ‘Ten Elements’ approach to implement the Ortho-Sports Medicine Centers of Excellence and demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach with an outcomes study from over 1000 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. During the presentation, the speakers would share the key clinical, patient satisfaction, and financial outcomes achieved by the implementation of the best practices defined in our ‘Ten Elements’ approach. All performance data elements are collected, validated and analyzed by an independent third party, national healthcare benchmarking company.

During the presentation Dr. Bramlett would elaborate on the surgical protocol, and the key differentiating steps in procedure technique from traditional approach that significantly enhances procedure effectiveness, efficiency and lowers the patient complication rate as demonstrated by benchmarking data. Speakers would further present the key elements of Total Knee Arthoplasty procedure that focus on patient education, patient participation in pre-surgical weight loss and pre-habilitation program, anesthesia approach, avoiding tourniquet use and deep veen thrombosis (DVT) risk reduction, early post operative patient ambulation and weight bearing, and post operative patient management approach. On average the ortho-sports medicine clinical of Alabama TKA patients are disharged from the hospital in 2.6 days, and experience 65 percent less complications than expected for a similar patient population and assume early control of their independent functionality.

There is a lack of evidence as to the best way to deliver rehabilitation following TKA. Previous work has suggested that postoperative physiotherapy applied to all patients is not effective at improving one-year post-surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to target physiotherapy to those at risk of poor outcome following TKA, and to determine if a therapist-led intervention offered superior results compared to a home-exercise based protocol in this ‘at risk’ group. The Targeted Rehabilitation to Improve Outcomes (TRIO) study was a prospective randomised controlled trial run at 15-centres in the UK. Patients were identified as ‘potential poor outcome’ based on an Oxford Knee Score (OKS) classification at 6-weeks post-surgery and randomised to either therapist-led or home-exercise based protocols. Patients were reviewed by a physiotherapist and commenced 18-exercise sessions over 6-weeks. The therapist-led group undertook a progressive functional protocol (modified weekly in 1-1 contact sessions) in contrast to the static home-exercise based regime. Evaluation took place following rehabilitation intervention, then at 6-months and 1-year post-surgery. Primary outcome was comparative group OKS at 1-year. Secondary outcomes included, ‘worst’ and ‘average’ pain scores, OXS and EQ-5D, and satisfaction questionnaire. Health economic (cost-utility) analysis was undertaken from NHS perspective up to 1-year post-surgery. Incremental cost per Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were calculated from intervention costs, patient reported primary and secondary care usage, and EQ-5D data. 4264 patients were screened, 1296 were eligible, 334 patients were randomised, 8 were lost to follow-up, therapy compliance was >85%. Clinically meaningful improvement in OKS (between baseline and 1-year) was seen in both arms (p < 0 .001). Between group difference in 1-year OKS was 1.91 (95%CI, −0.17–3.99) points favouring the therapist-led arm (p=0.07). Incorporating all time point data, between group difference in OKS was 2.25 points (95%CI, 0.61–3.90, p=0.008). Small, non-significant reductions (< 5 %) in both worst and average pain scores were observed favouring the therapist-led group. Enhanced satisfaction with pain relief (OR 1.65, p < 0 .02), ability to perform daily functional tasks (OR 1.66, p < 0 .02), and perform heavy functional tasks (OR 1.6, p=0.04) was reported in the therapist-led group. There was a small non-significant difference of 0.02 points (95%CI −0.02–0.06) between groups in EQ-5D, resulting in a £12,125 cost per QALY of delivering the therapist led intervention with a 57% chance of being cost-effective at the standard UK policy threshold of £20,000 per QALY. TRIO is the largest randomised trial of physiotherapy following TKA, and the first to target rehabilitation to patients at risk of poor outcomes. Both therapist-led and home-exercise based rehabilitation groups made clinically meaningful improvements in outcome by 1-year. We observed a modest difference in OKS in favour of therapist-led rehabilitation compared to the home-exercises which was not statistically significant. The relatively tight confidence intervals suggests that any difference which might exist is too small to be clinically relevant. Patient satisfaction with outcome was however higher in those that received greater physiotherapist contact. While cost per QALY estimates were below UK policy threshold, this result is uncertain and insufficient to make accept-decline recommendations