Background. Clinical guidelines recommend epidural steroid injection (ESI) for severe sciatica but there is uncertainty of effectiveness. The POiSE study aims to identify factors, routinely collected in clinical practice that predict outcome in patients who have ESI. This presentation describes characteristics and early clinical outcomes of POiSE participants. Methods. Prospective cohort study in 19 NHS spinal services in England, inviting patients with sciatica listed for an ESI. Participant baseline characteristics and 6-week follow-up outcomes are presented.
It has become increasingly important to conduct studies assessing clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, and revision rates to better define the indications and efficacy of lumbar spinal procedures and its association with symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (sASD). Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is defined as the radiographic change in the intervertebral discs adjacent to the surgically treated spinal level. SASD represents adjacent segment degeneration which causes pain or numbness due to post-operative spinal instability or nerve compression at the same level. The most common reason for early reoperation and late operation is sASD, therefore is in our best interest to understand the causes of ASD and make steps to limit the occurrence. A comprehensive literature search was performed selecting Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or prospective studies published up to December 2023. Meta-analysis was performed on 38 studies that met the inclusion criteria and included data of clinical outcomes of patients who had degenerative disc disease, disc herniation, radiculopathy, and spondylolisthesis and underwent lumbar fusion or motion-preservation device surgery; and reported on the prevalence of ASD, sASD, reoperation rate, visual analogue score (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) improvement.Background
Method
As the treatment of low back pain (LBP) continues to evolve, there is greater recognition of the importance of optimising the therapeutic relationship to better deliver improved patient outcomes. Contextual effects, such as communication, have been shown to influence the therapeutic relationship, but it is not known how these factors evolve over time. This study analysed interviews from two studies (one cross-sectional and one longitudinal) to explore patients’ and physiotherapists’ perspectives of treatment outcomes and experiences in episodes of LBP in the same dialogic space. The objective was to explore the alignment between these perceptions to identify factors that influence the therapeutic relationship over time. Two secondary thematic analyses were undertaken, one analysing cross-sectional data and the other analysing longitudinal data, from an existing data set from the programme: “Exploring the relationship between communication and clinical decision-making in physiotherapy consultations for back pain”. All data were thematically analysed and organised using a framework approach. Six themes emerged from the cross-sectional data reporting consistency of opinion in the initial consultation stages, but highlighting inadequate patient involvement in shared decision making. Four main themes emerged from the longitudinal data, all of which reported interactional fears and anxieties identified on both the parts of the patient and the physiotherapist.Statement of purpose of study and background
Summary of methods used and results
The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after growth-friendly treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) between patients with skeletal dysplasias versus those with other syndromes. We retrospectively identified 20 patients with skeletal dysplasias and 292 with other syndromes (control group) who had completed surgical growth-friendly EOS treatment between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2018. We compared radiological parameters, complications, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at mean follow-up of 8.6 years (SD 3.3) in the dysplasia group and 6.6 years (SD 2.6) in the control group.Aims
Methods
To determine the factors that influences the clinical outcomes in surgical correction of thoracic AIS. There are conflicting data regarding the effects of back shape and radiologic parameters on the self-reported outcomes of surgery in AIS. Prospective, cohort study; mean follow-up 29 months (range 9-88). 30 patients (5 males);. Rib hump 17 ° corrected to 7 °. Thoracic Cobb 66 ° corrected to 25 ° (63%). Lumbar Cobb 42 ° corrected to 17°. Thoracic apical vertebral translation (AVT) 48mm corrected to 18mm. Lumbar AVT 34mm corrected to 19mm. Thoracic kyphosis 29° preoperatively 23° postoperatively. Lumbo-sacral lordosis 57° preoperatively 49° postoperatively. Modified SRS
Scoliosis surgery is a life-changing procedure, but not devoid of perioperative complications. Often patients' scoring systems do not cover their real-life needs, including return to pre-surgery activity. Return to school, physical education (PE) is an important indirect marker of recovery. Although anterior spinal fusion (ASF) may have advantages, compared to posterior spinal fusion (PSF), because of motion-saved segments, there is a paucity of literature about post-operative return to school/PE in the compared groups. To determine the recovery time for patients with scoliosis who underwent anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF)Introduction
Aim
To report the outcome of spinal deformity correction through anterior spinal fusion in wheelchair-bound patients with myelomeningocele. We reviewed 12 consecutive patients (7M:5F; mean age 12.4 years (9.2 to 16.8)) including demographic details, spinopelvic parameters, surgical correction, and perioperative data. We assessed the impact of surgery on patient outcomes using the Spina Bifida Spine Questionnaire and a qualitative questionnaire.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment ouctomes of severe idiopathic scoliosis (IS) (>90 degrees) using the staged surgery with initial limited internal distraction and typical IS treated using segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. We hypothesized that staged surgical treatment of severe scoliosis would improve more HRQoL and pulmonary function (PF) as compared with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for typical IS curves. It was a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 60 IS, severe group (SG) vs. moderate group (MG) with min. 2 years of follow up (FU). The mean preoperative major curve (MC) was 120° and thoracic kyphosis (TK) was 80° for the SG and 54° and 17° for the MG, respectively (p<0.001). The MC was corrected to 58° and TK to 32° for the SG; the MC to 26° and TK to 14°, for the MG, respectively (p<0.001). The mean preoperative AVT was 8.9 cm and improved to 2.8 cm at the final FU for the SG and from 6.5 cm to 2.2 cm at the final FU for the MG (p<0.001). At baseline, the FVC% & FEV1% values were significant different between the two groups (41.5% vs. 83%, p <0.001) & (41.6% vs. 77%, p <0.001). Compared the baseline for SG vs. the values at 2-year FU the FVC % values were (41.5% vs. 66.5%, p <0.001), and the baseline for MG vs. the values at 2-year FU, the FEV1 values were (77% vs. 81%, NS). At last FU, no complications were reported. Gradual traction with complicity of multilevel Ponte's osteotomies and neuromonitoring followed by staged pedicle screws instrumentation in severe IS proved to be a safe and effective method improving spinal deformity (52% correction), PF (improved percentage of predicted forced vital capacity by 49%), and health-related quality and allows to achieve progressive curve correction with no neurologic complications associated to more aggressive one-stage surgeries.
The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of surgery
using growing rods in patients with severe A review of a multicentre EOS database identified 107 children
with severe EOS (major curve ≥ 90°) treated with growing rods before
the age of ten years with a minimum follow-up of two years and three
or more lengthening procedures. From the same database, 107 matched
controls with moderate EOS were identified.Aims
Patients and Methods
The Fear Avoidance Model is used to explain why some patients with acute low back pain develop chronic low back pain (CLBP). Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) targeting dysfunctional behavioural cognitions (pain catastrophizing and fear of movement) is recommended. Purpose: to investigate whether a two-week CBT-based pain management program results in improvement in dysfunctional behavioural cognitions and whether these improved cognitions improve functional outcomes. Cohort study including 524 consecutive CLBP-patients. Main outcome: functioning (ODI). Secondary outcomes: pain severity (NRS), pain catastrophizing (PCS), fear of movement (TSK). Assessments: pre- and post-treatment, 1 and 12-months follow-up (FU). Improvement over time was analysed with repeated measures ANOVA. Path analyses were used to examine the influence of pain catastrophizing and fear of movement on functional disability and pain severity. Multiple imputation was used to complete missing data. Participants with incomplete data (12.8%) did not differ from those with complete data (n= 457). 59% were females, mean age 46 (± 9.5) years, mean CLBP-duration 12 (± 10.8) years. All outcomes significantly improved at post-treatment and a slight significant improvement between post-treatment and 12 months FU was observed. Path analyses showed a direct effect for catastrophizing on post-treatment functioning and an indirect effect for catastrophizing through fear of movement on post-treatment functioning. Comparable results with pain severity as outcome.Background and purpose
Methods and Results
Exercise is a complex intervention, and often has more than one treatment target. Results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) typically show small to moderate effect sizes, but these may differ where outcomes better reflect the targets of interventions. This review aimed to describe what treatment targets, outcome domains and primary outcome measures are used in exercise RCTs, and examined how well the selected outcome domains match the treatment targets used in each RCT. A computer-aided literature search was performed in eight databases, from inception to August 2018. Inclusion criteria: RCTs in CLBP, exercise compared to a non-exercise arm, sample size >60 per arm. Title and abstract review, subsequent full text review, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently undertaken by pairs of reviewers. Of 18251 initially identified titles and abstracts, 23 trials were included in the review. 30 treatment targets were extracted, and 6 primary outcome domains identified. A logic model of the treatment targets and outcomes demonstrated diverse relationships. Only 5 RCTs matched their primary outcome domain to the identified treatment targets, 12 used primary outcomes that did not match the reported treatment targets, and 6 were partially matched.Background
Methods and Results
Chronic pain is a complex condition that demonstrates better outcomes in multidisciplinary rehabilitation, typically delivered to groups of patients by tertiary healthcare teams. An inter-disciplinary pain management course for individual patients was developed to increase the scope of physical therapists working in primary care by integrating osteopathic manual therapy with psychological interventions from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a form of ‘3rd wave’ Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. A single cohort study with pre-course (n=180) and post-course (n=79) self-report measures (44% response rate) evaluated six week interventions which combined individual manual therapy with self-management, delivered by teams of qualified and student osteopaths. Data included: quality of life (European Quality of Life Questionnaire); pain, mood and coping (Bournemouth Questionnaire); psychological flexibility (Revised Acceptance and Action Questionnaire); and mindfulness (Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory). Participants were predominantly female (68%), unemployed (59%), with an average age of 49 and pain duration of more than 12 months (86%). Commonly reported symptoms were low back pain (82%), neck pain (60%) and multiple sites (86%). At six months, there were statistically significant improvements in all four outcome measures (p<0.0005), with promising effect sizes in quality of life and pain coping (r=0.52) which appeared to be mediated by changes in psychological flexibility.Background
Method and Results
Complex interventions, such as exercise for LBP, often have many treatment targets. Matching a primary outcome to the target(s) of exercise interventions may provide greater standardized mean differences (SMDs) than using an unmatched primary outcome. We aimed to explore whether the conclusions of exercise trials for LBP might differ with i) improved matching of outcomes to treatment targets and ii) the use of composite outcome measures. We investigated i) matching in five trials (n=1033) that used an unmatched primary outcome but included some of their matched outcomes as secondary outcomes; ii) composite outcomes in four trials (n=864). The composite consisted of standardised averaged matched outcomes. All analyses replicated the primary outcome analysis, applied to the matched or composite outcome in each dataset. When not possible, SMDs were calculated for the primary and matched outcomes. i) Of five trials, three had greater SMDs and increased statistical significance with matched outcomes (pooled effect SMD 0.35 (95% CI 0.16, 0.54), p=0.0003) compared to an unmatched primary outcome (pooled effect SMD 0.13 (95% CI 0.04, 0.23) p=0.007). ii) Of four composite outcomes: two matched trials had greater SMDs and improved statistical precision in the primary outcome than the composite outcome; two unmatched trials had greater SMDs and improved statistical precision in the composite compared to the primary outcome.Background
Methods and Results
To investigate whether the duration of pain has an influence on the clinical outcomes of patients with low back pain (LBP) managed through the North East of England Regional Back Pain and Radicular Pain Pathway (NERBPP). The NERBPP is a clinical pathway based upon NICE guidelines (2009) for LBP. Patients with LBP referred onto the NERBPP by their General Practitioner (GP) between May 2015 and January 2017 were included in this evaluation. Data from 635 patients, who provided pre and post data for pain (Numerical rating scale [NRS]), function (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) and quality-of-life (EuroQol [EQ5D]), were analysed using a series of covariate adjusted models in SPSS. Patients were categorised into four groups based upon pain duration: <3months, ≥3 to <6months, ≥6months to <12months, ≥12months.Aims
Patients and Methods
A distinction has been posited between cognitive (informational) and affective (emotional) reassurance, with a suggestion that affective reassurance may negatively affect patient outcomes by reducing patients' motivation to engage with information conducive to recovery. Cognitive reassurance, though, provides explanations and information to help patients self-manage, and so aids recovery. However, research is lacking on how each actually affects patient outcomes in primary care. To develop a valid measure of practitioner reassurance, and assess the impact of different reassurance strategies on patients' outcomes.Background:
Purpose of the Study:
The STarT Back risk-stratification approach uses the STarT Back Tool to categorise patients with low back pain (LBP) at low, medium or high-risk of persistent disabling pain, in order to match treatments. The MATCH trial (NCT02286141) evaluated the effect of implementing an adaptation of this approach in a United States healthcare setting. This was a pragmatic cluster randomised trial with a pre-intervention baseline period. Six primary care clinics were pair-randomised, three to an intensive stratified care quality improvement intervention and three as controls. LBP patients were invited to provide outcomes two weeks after their primary care visit, and two and six months later. Primary outcomes were physical function (RMDQ) and pain (0–10 NRS), and secondary outcomes including healthcare use and treatments provided received. Analysis was intention-to-treat.Purpose & Background
Methods
In the majority of low back pain (LBP) patients a definitive cause for back pain cannot be established; consequently, many patients report feeling uncertain about their diagnosis. They also experience pain-related guilt, which can be divided into: social guilt, managing pain guilt and verification of pain guilt. This study aimed to test a theoretical (causal) model, which proposed that diagnostic uncertainty leads to pain-related guilt, which leads to depression, anxiety and finally to disability. Structural equation modelling was employed to test this model on 438 participants with LBP. The model demonstrated an adequate to good fit with the data. Diagnostic uncertainty predicts all three types of guilt. Verification of pain guilt predicts disability, managing pain guilt predicts anxiety, while social guilt was the strongest predictor of negative outcomes, predicting depression, anxiety and disability.Purpose of the study and background
Summary of the methods used and the results
The outcome of surgery for recurrent lumbar disc
herniation is debatable. Some studies show results that are comparable
with those of primary discectomy, whereas others report worse outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of revision
lumbar discectomy with that of primary discectomy in the same cohort
of patients who had both the primary and the recurrent herniation
at the same level and side. A retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data was undertaken
in 30 patients who had undergone both primary and revision surgery
for late recurrent lumbar disc herniation. The outcome measures
used were visual analogue scales for lower limb (VAL) and back (VAB)
pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). There was a significant improvement in the mean VAL and ODI scores
(both p <
0.001) after primary discectomy. Revision surgery also
resulted in improvements in the mean VAL (p <
0.001), VAB (p
= 0.030) and ODI scores (p <
0.001). The changes were similar
in the two groups (all p >
0.05). Revision discectomy can give results that are as good as those
seen after primary surgery. Cite this article:
The use of all pedicle screw constructs for the management of spinal deformities has gained widespread popularity. However, the placement of pedicle screws in the deformed spine poses unique challenges for the spinal surgeon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications and radiological outcomes of surgery in 124 consecutive patients with spinal deformity. These patients underwent correction of coronal and sagittal imbalance with segmental pedicle screw fixation only. All pedicle screw constructs have been associated with improved correction in all three planes. In patients with severe deformity, such constructs can obviate the need for anterior surgeries, and the higher implant cost is offset by the avoidance of dual anterior and posterior approaches. Pedicle screw fixation enables enhanced correction of spinal deformities, but the technique is still not widely applied for thoracic deformities for fear of neurological complications. This is a retrospective study that was carried out on 124 patients who underwent segmental screw fixation for coronal and sagittal spinal deformities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications and outcomes of this technique and also assess the evidence of enhanced correction.Objective
Background
The use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) is being increasingly advocated but data are still being collected using paper systems. This is costly and environmentally challenging. New innovations are required to balance the challenges of capturing PROM data while considering budgets, and access to IT, and patient choice. To develop and test a mobile phone and web app for collecting patient reported outcomes about musculoskeletal symptoms.Background to the study:
Purpose of the study:
