Abstract
Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
To retrospectively review outcomes in patients who underwent vertebroplasty in Liverpool in response to recent level 1 publications claiming vertebroplasty to be no better than sham procedure assessed using 2 criteria. We reviewed cases between 2006 and 2009 looking at 5 criteria for procedure.
Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Oswestry disability index scores (ODI)
96 patients identified. 10 patients excluded (inadequate data recorded) (n=86). Operated levels n=134 (thoracic n=61, lumbar n=71, sacral n=2).
Presenting symptoms included back pain (86/86) and point tenderness was present in 90% (77/86). Average length of symptoms was 11.50 months with 28% reporting greater than 12 months. 72% recalled definite onset of symptoms with 90% being associated with a low velocity injury. Radiological findings showed an average of 54% height collapse and 91% showing high signal on STIR MRI sequences. Number of levels operated – 3 or more (n=9 VAS 5.3 ODI 10.6); 1 to 2 levels (n= 77 VAS 3.7 ODI 13.9)
Average improvement in VAS score was 3.8.and ODI 13.6
47% (40/86) of patients met all 5 current criteria recommended for operation (VAS 3.7, ODI 14). 53% (46/86) of patients met 2-5 criteria (VAS 3.8, ODI 13.4).
There was improvement in pain scores in 91% of patients with an average pre-op VAS 7.8 and post-op VAS 4.0. There was no significant difference in patients meeting all 5 criteria compared to those meeting 2-5 criteria.
