Introduction

Robotic TKA allows for quantifiable precision performing bone resections for implant realignment within acceptable final component and limb alignments. One of the early steps in this robotic technique is after initial exposure and removal of medial and lateral osteophytes, a “pose-capture” is performed with varus and valgus stress applied to the knee in near full extension and 90° of flexion to assess gaps. Component alignment adjustments can be made on the preoperative plan to balance the gaps. At this point in the procedure any posterior osteophytes will still be present, which could after removal change the flexion and extension gaps by 1–3mm. This must be taken into consideration, or changes in component alignment could result in over-correction of gaps can occur.

Background. Osteophytes in the posterior compartment of the knee pose a challenge in achieving soft tissue balance during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous investigations have demonstrated the importance of various factors involved in obtaining flexion and extension gap balance, including the precision of femoral and tibial bone cuts as well as tensioning of the supporting pericapsular soft tissue structures (ligaments, capsule, etc.). However, the role of posterior compartment osteophytes has not been well studied. We hypothesize that space-occupying posterior structures affect soft tissue balance, especially in lesser degrees of flexion, in a cadaveric TKA model. Methods. Five cadaveric limbs were acquired. CT scans were obtained of each specimen to define the osseous contours. 3D printed specimen-specific synthetic osteophytes were fabricated in two sizes (10mm and 15mm). Posterior-stabilized TKAs were performed. Medial and lateral contact forces were measured during a passive range of motion using OrthoSensor ® (Dania Beach, FL) technology. For each specimen, trials were completed without osteophytes, and with 10mm and 15mm osteophytes applied to the posterior medial femur, with iterations at 0°, 10°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. These were recorded across each specimen in each condition for three trials. Tukey post hoc tests were used with a repeated measures ANOVA for statistical data analysis. Results. The presence of posterior medial osteophytes increased asymmetric loading from 0°– 45° of flexion. The 25–75% bounds of variability in the contact force was less than 3.5lbs. Conclusions. In this cadaveric TKA model, posterior femoral osteophytes caused an asymmetric increase in contact forces from full extension continuing into mid-flexion. To avoid unnecessary soft tissue releases, we recommend early removal of posterior femoral osteophytes prior to performing ligament releases to obtain desired soft tissue balance during TKA

INTRODUCTION. In total hip arthroplasty, preoperative planning is almost indispensable. Moreover, 3-dimensional preoperative planning became popular recently. Anteversion management is one of the most important factors in preoperative planning to prevent dislocation and to obtain better function. In arthritic hip patients osteophytes are often seen on both femoral head and acetabulum. Especially on femoral head, osteophytes are often seen at posterior side and its surface creates smooth round contour that assumes new joint surface. (Fig. 1). We can imagine new femoral head center tracing that new joint surface. OBJECTIVES. In the present study, the posterior osteophytes are compared in osteoarthritic patients and other patients. MATERIALS & METHODS. Anteversion and new anteversion which was reduced by osteophyte formation were assessed in 28 hip CAT scans, (22 arthritic hips, 6 avascular necrotic hips). RESULTS. Only in arthritic patients, osteophytes on posterior side were observed. The anteversion was 33.7+/− 13.0 degree in arthritic patients, which was reduce to 29.7+/−13.1 degree. The mean difference was 4.0+/−4.7 degree reduction. In AVN patients the mean anteversion was 21.4 +/− 9.40 in AVN patients. No reduction was observed in AVN patients. DISCUSSION. Osteophytes are often created to make the biomechanical situation better. This phenomenon is possiblly explained that those posterior osteophytes have been formed for proper reduction of excessive anteversion

Purpose. The effects of Acetabular Rim Osteophytes (ARO) in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), has not been quantified. During THA their presence and location is variable, and the effect on post-operative Range of Motion (ROM) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ROM of a modern hip implant in five cadaver models utilizing computerized virtual surgery, and to analyze the effect of AROs given their location on the acetabulum, and position of the prosthesis during motion. Method. CT scans of five cadaveric pelvises and femurs were used to create 3-D Models. Surgery, using virtual Stryker components was then performed to restore the natural anatomic offset and leg length. ROM to impingement was evaluated for each model in eight vectors: flexion/extension, internal/external rotation, abduction/adduction, and 90 degrees of flexion with internal/external rotation. An Osteophyte Impingement Model was then created by elevating the natural acetabular rim by 10 millimeters circumferentially in each virtual cadaver pelvis. Using the same THA components, ROM was then evaluated in this pelvic model and compared to the cadaveric models. Results. ROM in the Osteophyte Impingement Model yielded a statistically significant decrease in five of the eight vectors tested, when compared to the Cadaveric Model: Flexion, Extension, External Rotation, Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation, and Flexion to 90 degrees with External Rotation. Only 3 of these 5 vectors were within normal human physiological ROM: Flexion, External Rotation, and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation. The osteophyte model yielded a decrease in absolute ROM in the following: Flexion to 101 vs 113 degrees (p= 0.03), External Rotation to 30.4 vs 49.5 degrees (p= 0.01), and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation 16.7 vs 31.6 degrees (p=0.01). When mapped on the acetabulum of right-sided hip, with the 12 o'clock position as the superior pole of the acetabulum, impingement on the osteophyte was noted at the following locations: with Flexion, and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation, impinged was noted between 1 and 2 o'clock on the acetabulum. In External Rotation impinged occurred between 7 and 8 o'clock on the acetabulum. Conclusion. This study showed that a 10 millimeter osteophyte can potentially decrease range of motion and lead to impingement in THA in certain planes of motions: Flexion, External Rotation and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation. The location of this impingement is between the 1 and 2 o'clock in Flexion, and Flexion to 90 degrees with Internal Rotation. In External Rotation, the impingement will occur between the 7 and 8 o'clock. The above applies to a right-sided acetabulum, the left side will demonstrate the mirror image of this impingement: Between the 10 to 11 o'clock, and 4 to 5 o'clock positions respectively. Osteophytes 10 millimeters or more in height at these positions should be carefully evaluated intra-operatively and removed safely if possible

We present to you a match-controlled study assessing co-existing arthroscopic findings during hip arthroscopy in patients with an intraoperative diagnosis of a central acetabular osteophyte (CAO). We feel that this manuscript is both pertinent and timely.

Recent literature has described the entity of central acetabular impingement, in which an osteophyte of the cotyloid fossa impinges against the superomedial femoral head and fovea. The technique for central acetabular decompression has also been described to treat this entity. The primary purpose of this study was to report the prevalence of femoral head articular damage in a matched cohort of patients with and without central acetabular osteophyte (CAO) that was identified during hip arthroscopy. A secondary purpose was to identify the rates of co-existing intraarticular pathology in both patient groups.

Intraoperative data was collected prospectively on all patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at our institution between February 2008 to March 2015,. The inclusion criteria for this study were the presence of a CAO identified during hip arthroscopy for a labral tear and/or femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Exclusion criteria were revision surgeries, Tönnis grade 1 and higher, and previous hip conditions such as Legg-Calves-Perthes disease, avascular necrosis, and prior surgical intervention. The matched cohort control group was selected based on gender, age within 5 years, body mass index (BMI), and workers' compensation claim, on a 1:3 ratio to patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for a labral tear and/or FAI and did not have a CAO.

The CAO group consisted of 126 patients, which were matched to 378 patients in the control group. The grades of femoral and acetabular chondral damage were significantly different between the two groups (p<0.01).

This study showed that patients with CAO had a significantly higher prevalence of femoral and acetabular chondral damage, size of articular defects on both surfaces and the prevalence of LT tears compared to matched controls.

Osteophytes are bony spurs on normal bone that develop as an adaptive reparative process due to excessive stress at/near a joint. As osteophytes develop from normal bone, they are not always well depicted in common imaging techniques (e.g. CT, MRI). This creates a challenge for preoperative planning and image-guided surgical methods that are commonly incorporated in the clinical routine of orthopaedic surgery. The study examined the accuracy of osteophyte detection in clinical CT and MRI scans of varying types of joints. The investigation was performed on fresh-frozen ex-vivo human resected joints identified as having a high potential for presentation of osteophytes. The specimens underwent varying imaging protocols for CT scanning and clinical protocols for MRI. After dissection of the joint, the specimens were subjected to structured 3D light scanning to establish a reference model of the anatomy. Scans from the imaging protocols were segmented and their 3D models were co-registered to the light scanner models. The quality of the osteophyte images were evaluated by determining the Root Mean Square (RMS) error between the segmented osteophyte models and the light scan model. The mean RMS errors for CT and MRI scanning were 1.169mm and 1.419mm, respectively. Comparing the different CT parameters, significance was achieved with scanning at 120kVp and 1.25mm slice thickness to depict osteophytes; significance was also apparent at a lower voltage (100kVp). Preliminary results demonstrate that osteophyte detection may be dependent on the degree of calcification of the osteophyte. They also illustrate that while some imaging parameters were more favourable than others, a more accurate osteophyte depiction may result from the combination of both MRI and CT scanning

The objective of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of an X-ray based image segmentation system for patient specific instrument (PSI) design or any other surgical application that requires 3D modeling of the knee. The process requires two bilateral short film X-ray images of knee and a standing long film image of the leg including the hip and ankle. The short film images are acquired with an X-ray positioner device that is embedded with fiducial markers to correct for setup variation in source and cassette position. An automated image segmentation algorithm, based on a statistical model that couples knee bone shape and radiographic appearance, calculates 3D surface models of the knee from the bi-lateral short films (Imorphics, Manchester UK) (Figure 1). Surface silhouettes are used to inspect and refine the automatically generated segmentation; the femur and tibia mechanical axes are then calculated using automatically generated surface model landmarks combined with user-defined markups of the hip and ankle center from the standing long film (Figure 2). The accuracy of the 2D/3D segmentation system was evaluated using simulated X-ray imagery generated from one-hundred osteoarthritic, lower limb CT image samples using the Insight Toolkit (Kitware, Inc.). Random, normally distributed variations in source and cassette positions were included in the dataset. Surface accuracy was measured using root-mean-square (RMS) point-to-surface (P2S) distance calculations with respect to paired benchmark CT segmentations. Landmark accuracy was calculated by measuring angular differences between the 2D/3D generated femur and tibia mechanical tibia with respect to paired CT-generated landmark data. The paired RMS sample mean and standard deviation of femur P2S errors on the distal quarter of the femur after auto-segmentation was 1.08±0.20mm. The RMS sample mean and standard deviation of tibia P2S errors on the proximal quarter of the tibia after auto-segmentation was 1.16±0.25mm. The paired sample mean and standard deviation of the femur and tibia mechanical axis accuracy with respect to benchmark CT data landmarks were 0.02±0.42[deg] and −0.33±0.56[deg], respectively. Per surface-vertex sample RMS P2S errors are illustrated in Figure 3. Visual inspection of RMS results found the automatically segmented femur to be very accurate in the shaft, distal condyles, and posterior condyles, which are important for PSI guide fit and accurate planning. Similarly, the automatically segmented tibia was very accurate in the shaft and plateaus, which are also important for PSI guide fit. Osteophytes resulted in some RMS differences (Figure 3), as was expected due to the know limitations of osteophyte imaging with X-ray. PSI-type applications that utilize X-ray should account for osteophyte segmentation error. Overall, our results based on simulated radiographic data demonstrate that X-ray based 2D/3D segmentation is a viable tool for use in orthopaedic applications that require accurate 3D segmentations of knee bones

Stiffness after a TKA might be said to be present when reasonable functions of daily living cannot be performed or can only be performed with difficulty or pain. This will certainly be true if flexion is less than 75 degrees and/or there is a 15-degree lack of full extension. The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the causes of a stiff TKA, consider the aspects of surgical technique that are associated with the occurrence of stiffness, present post-surgical management that impacts on the development of stiffness and summarise the results of the surgical treatment of a stiff TKA. Pre-operative stiffness is strongly correlated with post-operative limitation of motion. Therefore, pre-surgical measures to optimise motion should be carried out. These include appropriate physical therapy, adequate pain management and a discussion with the patient of the issues likely to affect post-operative range of motion. It is particularly important to discuss with the patient appropriate expectations with regard to the likely range of motion that will be achieved following TKA surgery. There are a number of steps that can be taken during the performance of a TKA that have an impact on range of motion. Osteophytes must be removed. Correctly sized implants must be used to avoid over-stuffing the tibio-femoral and patello-femoral compartments. Mal-positioning implants and the extremity can adversely affect range of motion. Inadequate bone resection will also lead to a reduced range of motion. Improper soft tissue balancing in both flexion and extension may be associated with post-surgical stiffness. Post-operative management must include adequate pain management as well as appropriate rehabilitation. Close post-surgical surveillance will help identify those patients likely to achieve unsatisfactory range of motion. Manipulation of appropriate patients within the first 6 weeks following surgery is usually associated with a satisfactory final range of motion. When persistent stiffness occurs, an attempt must be made to identifying possible causes, including component mal-alignment or mal-rotation, component mis-sizing or mis-positioning and inadequate soft tissue balancing. The surgical treatment of a stiff total knee include: 1) arthroscopic debridement and manipulation; 2) arthrotomy with debridement; and 3) single or complete component revision. Although surgical intervention often results in improved range of motion, the results are variable and somewhat limited