The attitudes of orthopaedic surgeons regarding radiology reporting is not well-described in the literature. We surveyed Orthopaedic Surgeons in Australia and New Zealand to assess if they routinely review formal radiology reports. An anonymized, 14 question online survey was distributed to consultant surgeons of the Australian and New Zealand Orthopaedic Associations (AOA, NZOA). Two hundred respondents completed the survey (Total number of Fellows: 283 NZOA, 1185 AOA). 18.5% of respondents always reviewed the formal Radiology report, 44.5% most of the time, 35% sometimes and 2% never. By imaging modality, MRI reports were the most frequently reviewed (92%), followed by ultrasound (74%) and nuclear medicine (63%). Only 10% of surgeons consulted formal reports for plain radiography. 55% of surgeons were still likely to disagree with the MRI report, followed by 46% for plain radiography. In cases of disagreement, only 21% of surgeons would always contact the reporting radiologist. The majority of Surgeons (85.5%) think there should be more collaboration between the disciplines, although only 50.5% had regular attendance of a Radiologist at their departmental audit. This survey reveals that the majority of orthopaedic surgeons are not routinely reading radiology reports. This points towards a need for further interdisciplinary collaboration. To our knowledge, this is the first survey directly assessing attitudes of orthopaedic surgeons towards radiology reports

Background. There has been widespread interest in medical errors since the publication of ‘To Err is Human’ by the Institute of Medicine in 1999. The Patient Safety Committee of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has compiled results of a member survey to identify trends in orthopaedic errors that would help direct quality assurance efforts. Methods. Surveys were sent to 5,540 Academy fellows; 917 were returned (response rate 16.6%) with 53% (483/917) reporting an observed medical error in the last 6 months. Results. A general classification of errors showed equipment (29.0%) and communication (24.7%) errors with the highest frequency. Medication errors (11.4%) and wrong site surgery (5.6%) represented serious potential patient harm. Two deaths were reported, both involving narcotic administration errors. By location, 78% of errors occurred in the hospital (surgery suite 54%, patient room/floor 10%). The reporting orthopaedic surgeon was involved in 60% of the errors, nurses in 37%, another orthopaedic surgeon in 19%, other physicians in 16% and housestaff in 13%. Wrong site surgeries involved the wrong side 59%, another wrong site (e.g. wrong digit on the correct side) 23%, the wrong procedure 14%, on the wrong patient 4% of the time. The most frequent anatomic location was the knee and fingers/hand (both 35%), the foot/ankle 15%, followed by distal femur 10% and the spine 5%. Conclusion. Medical errors continue to occur and therefore represent a threat to patient safety. Quality assurance efforts and more refined research can be addressed towards areas with higher error occurrence (equipment, communication) and high risk (medication, wrong site surgery)

Escalating health care expenditure worldwide is driving the need for effective resource decision-making, with medical practitioners increasingly making complex resource decisions within the context of patient care. Despite raising serious legal and ethical issues in practice, this has attracted little attention in Australia, or internationally. In particular, it is unknown how orthopaedic surgeons perceive their obligations to the individual patient, and the wider community, when rationing care, and how they reconcile competing obligations. This research explores legal and ethical considerations, and resource allocation by Australian orthopaedic surgeons, as a means of achieving public health cost containment driven by macro-level policy and funding decisions.

This research found that Australian orthopaedic surgeon's perceptions, and resource allocation decision making, can be explained by understanding how principles of distributive justice challenge, and shift, the traditional medical paradigm. It found that distributive justice, and challenges of macro level health policy and funding decisions, have given rise to two new medical paradigms. Each which try to balance the best interests of individual patients with demands in respect of the sustainability of the health system, in a situation where resources may be constrained. This research shows that while bedside rationing has positioned the medical profession as the gate keepers of resources, it may have left them straddling an increasingly irreconcilable void between the interests of the individual patient and the wider community, with the sustainability of the health system hanging in the balance.

Practice variation may occur when there is no standardised approach to specific clinical problems and there is a lack of scientific evidence for alternative treatments. Practice variation suggests that a segment of the patient population may be managed sub-optimally, and indicates a need for further research in order to establish stronger evidence-based practice guidelines. We surveyed Australian orthopaedic surgeons to examine practice variation in common orthopaedic presentations. In February 2009, members of the Australian Orthopaedic Association were emailed an online survey, which collected information regarding experience level (number of years as a consultant), sub-specialty interests, state where the surgeon works, on- call participation, as well as five common (anecdotally controversial) orthopaedic trauma cases with a number of management options. Surgeons were asked to choose their one most likely management choice from the list provided, which was either surgical or non-surgical in nature. A reminder was sent two weeks later. Exploratory regression was modeled to examine the predictors of choosing surgical management for each case and overall. Of 760 surgeons, 358 (47%) provided responses. For undisplaced scaphoid fractures, respondents selected short-arm cast (53%), ORIF (22%), percutaneous screw (22%) and long-arm cast (3%). Less experienced (0 to 5 years) (p=0.006) and hand surgeons (p=0.008) were more likely to operate. For a displaced mid-shaft clavicle fracture, respondents selected non-operative (62%), plating (31%) and intramedullary fixation (7%). Shoulder surgeons were more likely to operate (p<0.001). For an undisplaced Weber B lateral malleolus fracture, respondents selected plaster cast or boot (59%), lateral plating (31%), posterior plating (9%) and no splinting (2%). For a displaced Colles fracture in an older patient, respondents selected plating (47%), Kirschner wires (28%), cast/splint (23%) and external fixation (1%). Less experienced (p<0.001) and hand surgeons (p=0.024) were more likely to operate. For a two-part neck of humerus fracture in an older patient, respondents selected non-operative (74%), locking plate (14%), and hemiarthroplasty (7%). Shoulder surgeons were more likely to operate (p<0.001). Accounting for all answers in multiple regression modeling, it was found that more experienced surgeons (>15 years) were 25% less likely to operate (p=0.001). Overall, there was no difference among sub-specialties, or whether a surgeon participated in an on-call roster. Considerable practice variation exists among orthopaedic surgeons in the approach to common orthopaedic problems. Surgeons who identify with a sub-specialty are more likely to manage conditions in their area of interest operatively, and more experienced surgeons are less likely to recommend surgical management

There is growing interest in the peri-operative management of patients with indications for hip and knee arthroplasty in the setting of modifiable risk factors such as morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and smoking. A recent survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) found that 95% of respondents address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery. The aim of this study was to poll Australian arthroplasty surgeons regarding their approach to patients with modifiable risk factors.

The survey tool used in the AAHKS study was adapted for use in the Australian context and distributed to the membership of the Arthroplasty Society of Australia via Survey Monkey.

Seventy-seven survey responses were received, representing a response rate of 64%. The majority of respondents were experienced, high volume arthroplasty surgeons. Overall, 91% of respondents restricted access to arthroplasty for patients with modifiable risk factors. Seventy-two percent of surgeons restricted access for excessive body mass index, 85% for poor diabetic control, and 46% for smoking. Most respondents made decisions based on personal experience or literature review rather than hospital or departmental pressures.

Despite differences in healthcare systems, our findings were similar to those of the AAHKS survey, although their responses were more restrictive in all domains. Differences were noted in responses concerning financial considerations for potentially underprivileged populations. The survey is currently being administered by arthroplasty societies in six other countries, allowing comparison of orthopaedic practice across different healthcare systems around the world.

In conclusion, over 90% of Australian arthroplasty surgeons who responded to the survey address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery.

Complex proximal humerus fractures account for 10% of fractures in patients over 65 years of age. With the emergence of new implants, there is growing trend towards surgical management of these types of fractures, despite the lack of clinical evidence of its superiority over a conservative option. Orthopaedic surgeons' perception plays a large role in the surgical decision making for complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. No studies have been conducted to date to examine factors that influence the surgical decision-making in orthopaedic surgeons in regards to these types of fractures.

A self-administered questionnaire was sent to orthopaedic surgeons. It included demographic questions as well as clinical vignettes assessing the risk / benefit perception of orthopaedic surgeons in different situations. Orthopaedic surgeons self-reported the proportion of proximal humerus fractures that were treated surgically in patients during the last year. Univariate analyzes were conducted to identify the factors that influenced the operation rates.

A total of 127 orthopaedic surgeons completed the questionnaire. The response rate was 37%. The risk / benefit perception of surgical management varied according to the type of practice, year of training, operation rate as well as the ease of the surgeon in performing shoulder procedures (p < 0.05). According to the queried surgeons, the most important factors affecting their decision-making were patient's age, the type of fracture, co-morbidities, level of independence and potential for rehabilitation. The type of surgery proposed varied depending on the training and familiarity of the surgeon with the procedure.

The risk / benefit perception of orthopaedic surgeons regarding surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients appears to vary widely. The decision to opt for surgical management is influenced by the surgeon's familiarity with the procedure, their year of training and their subspecialty. This study demonstrates the need to establish a decision-making tool to assist orthopaedic surgeons and patients with this clinical decision.

The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities.

Two questionnaires were developed through the Delphi process for this cross-sectional survey of surgical preference. The first questionnaire was sent out before the publication of a RCT and the second questionnaire was sent out after publication. The RCT investigated repair or non-repair of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle during volar locked plating of distal radial fractures (DRFs). Overall, 380 orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate in the first questionnaire, of whom 115 replied. One hundred surgeons were invited to participate in the second questionnaire. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons for whom a treatment change was warranted, who then reported a change of treatment preference following the RCT. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for repair or non-repair, reasons for and against following the RCT results, and difference of preferred treatment of the PQ muscle between surgeons of different nationalities, qualifications, years of training, and number of procedures performed per year.

Of the 100 surgeons invited for the second questionnaire, 74 replied. For the primary outcome, 6 of 32 surgeons (19%), who usually repaired the PQ muscle and therefore a change of treatment preference was warranted, reported a change of treatment preference based on the RCT publication. Of the secondary outcomes, restoring anatomy was the most common response for repairing the PQ muscle.

The majority of the orthopaedic surgeons, where a change of treatment preference was warranted based on the results and conclusion of a RCT, did not report willingness to change their treatment preference.

This fiducial role implies special duties imposed where one person (the fiduciary) must act in the best interest of the other (the beneficiary), even if it is in the fiduciary's detriment to do so.

While a doctor/patient relationship is not generally a fiduciary relationship, part of the relationship may involve a fiduciary role for the surgeon.

The fiduciary duties include:

Keeping a patient's medical information confidential.

While the doctor–patient relationship requires a duty of care, a fiduciary duty implies a duty of loyalty and honesty. As per using navigation techniques in hip and knee surgery, the surgeon can use the above fiducials (markers) to navigate his way through his fiduciary role in managing patients; whether it is disclosing emergent risks arising during treatment, with new products or during clinical trials.

Fiduciary roles are independent of informed consent, which occurs before the event, but mitigate a risk that occurs after the event. It is an inbuilt quality assurance mechanism in risk management.

Abstract

Introduction

At present, orthopaedic surgeons utilize either CT, MRI or X-ray for imaging a joint. Unfortunately, CT and MRI are quite expensive, non weight-bearing and the orthopaedic surgeon does not receive revenue for these procedures. Although x-rays are cheaper, similar to CT scans, patients incur radiation. Also, all three of these imaging modalities are static. More recently, a new ultrasound technology has been developed that will allow a surgeon to image their patients in 3D. The objective of this study is to highlight the new opportunity for orthopaedic surgeons to use 3D ultrasound as alternative to CT, MRI and X-rays.

Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a subject of considerable debate. A recent study questioned the need for tourniquets based on associated risks. However, the study omitted analysis of crucial tourniquet-related parameters which have been demonstrated in numerous studies to be associated with safe tourniquet use and reduction of adverse events. The current utilization and preferences of tourniquet use in Canada remain unknown. Our primary aim was to determine the current practices, patterns of use, and opinions of tourniquet use in TKA among members of the Canadian Arthroplasty Society (CAS). Additionally, we sought to determine the need for updated best practice guidelines to inform optimal tourniquet use and to identify areas requiring further research.

A self-administered survey was emailed to members of the CAS in October 2021(six-week period). The response rate was 57% (91/161). Skip logic branching was used to administer a maximum of 59 questions related to tourniquet use, beliefs, and practices. All respondents were staff surgeons and 88% were arthroplasty fellowship trained. Sixty-five percent have been in practice for ≥11 years and only 16% for 50 TKA/year, 59% have an academic practice, and >67% prefer cemented TKA.

Sixty-six percent currently use tourniquets, 25% no longer do but previously did, and 9% never used tourniquets. For those not using tourniquets, the most common reasons are potential harm/risks and publications/conferences. Among current users, 48% use in all cases and an additional 37% use in 76-99% of cases. The top reason for use was improved visualization/bloodless field (88%), followed by performing a cemented TKA, used in training, and faster operative times. The main patient factor influencing selective tourniquet use was peripheral vascular disease and main surgical factors were operative duration and cementless TKA. The most frequent adverse events reported were bruising/pinching under the tourniquet and short-term pain, which majority believed were related to improper tourniquet use (prolonged time, high-pressures, poor cuff fit), yet only 8% use contoured tourniquets and 32% don't use limb protection. Despite substantial evidence in literature that tourniquet safety and probability of harm are affected by tourniquet time and pressure, only 83% and 72% of respondents believe reducing tourniquet time and pressure respectively reduce the probability of harm. In addition, no surgeon utilizes personalized limb occlusion pressure which has been demonstrated to substantially reduce tourniquet pressure while being safe and effective. Furthermore, 62% always use fixed pressure and 37% will modify the pressure based on patient parameters, most often systolic blood pressure and limb size. Almost all (88%) were interested in new evidence-based guidelines regarding these parameters.

Tourniquet use in TKA remains prevalent among arthroplasty surgeons in the CAS; however tremendous practice variability regarding several key parameters required for optimal use exists. Current best practices of tourniquet use regarding personalized pressures, time, and type are not being utilized across Canada. There is considerable interest and need for further research and updated guidelines regarding key parameters of safe tourniquet usage to optimize tourniquet use in TKA.

Abstract

An anaesthetist recently remarked that orthopaedic surgeons are ‘twice as strong as an ox but half as smart’. We set out to ascertain if this had any evidence basis by conducting an observational study.

We compared 36 male orthopaedic surgeons to 40 male anaesthetists across 3 hospitals to ascertain if there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and strength. We tested the IQ of each doctor using an official MENSA IQ test. We assessed the strength as reflected by the grip strength using a hand-grip dynamometer. Un-paired t-tests were used to assess statistical significance.

Orthopaedic surgeons had a significantly greater mean grip strength 47.25Kg (SD=6.95) compared to anaesthetists 43.83Kg (SD=7.57) (p=0.04). The mean IQ of orthopaedic surgeons was also significantly greater at 105.19 (SD=10.85) than anaesthetists at 98.38 (SD=14.45) (p=0.02). Furthermore, the IQ of orthopaedic surgeons seems to increase with increasing age and seniority (an IQ jump of 5 IQ points from Registrar to Consultant).

We have concluded that this proverb should be revised to orthopaedic surgeons are as strong as an ox and twice as smart, although further studies are advocated to ascertain the IQ of Ox.

Females and other minority groups including the LGBTQ community are largely under represented orthopaedics, with their negative experience of the work space being cited as a possible contributing factor. The aim of this systematic review was to a evaluate the literature for the prevalence of gender transgressions, homophobia, transphobia and bullying within the orthopaedic work space.

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was used with 2 independent reviewers.

A search was conducted using Pubmed and Scopus which identified 973 articles, 94 of which were duplicates. 18 of these were retained after review, the majority of which were surveys. The prevalence of discriminatory behaviour was found to range from 53% to 74.5%, with males in positions of seniority being the most common perpetrators.

Gender transgressions, homophobia, transphobia and bullying appears to be a prevalent issue in the orthopaedics, and this is bound to impact the emotional state of these minority groups, thereby impacting their retention in the work space.

Introduction:

Total Hip Replacement (THR) is a proven and effective surgical procedure. One of the main limiting factors of the longevity of THR is the performance of the bearing surface. The optimum bearing surface choice, however, remains controversial. We wanted to understand what influenced the choice of bearing surfaces amongst South African orthopaedic surgeons. We also wanted to know if there was any consensus between surgeons and the orthopaedic trade.

The literature contains limited and contradictory information regarding the amount of physical effort and/or emotional stress needed to perform surgery. We therefore investigated cardiovascular response to psychophysical stress in orthopaedic surgeons while they were performing surgery. We monitored 29 male orthopaedic surgeons from four university centers while they performed total hip arthroplasties. Changes in their cardiovascular parameters were recorded by ambulatory monitoring methods. Exercise stress testing of each participant was used as a control state. We compared the cardiovascular response during surgery to energy requirements of everyday activities. Preoperative and postoperative testing showed lower values of cardiovascular parameters than during physically less difficult parts of the operation; physically more difficult phases of the operation additionally increased the values of parameters. We concluded performing total hip arthroplasty increases surgeons’ cardiovascular parameters because of psychologic stress and physical effort. Excitement of the cardiovascular system during total hip arthroplasty appears similar to the excitement during moderate-intensity daily activities, such as walking the dog, leisurely bicycling, or climbing stairs.

Background

Presentations at national meetings provide an important forum to relay research findings in all areas of Orthopaedic surgery. Orthopaedic surgical trainees are encouraged throughout the training process to participate, present and ultimately publish their research. Indeed the well known mantra ‘Publish or Perish’ signifies the pressure trainees are sometimes placed under in order to achieve professional success. The number of original published papers is often the yardstick by which professional appointments are made. We aimed to determine the overall publication rates of presentations from the 2001 and 2002 Irish Orthopaedic Association meetings and to determine whether publication rates differed among other national Orthopaedic meetings and amongst the subspecialties.

Aims

Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient-reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient-reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. We aim to assess the face validity of this score in a pilot study.

Aim. Pelvic osteomyelitis following pressure ulceration results in substantial patient morbidity. Previous studies have reported a heterogenous approach to diagnosis and medical management by physicians, suggesting equipoise on key clinical questions. This study hypothesised that the same equipoise exists amongst Orthopaedic surgeons. Method. An 18-question multiple-choice questionnaire was designed through an iterative feedback process until the final version was agreed by all authors. Likert-type scale responses were used with graded responses (e.g., never/fewer than half of patients/around half of patients/more than half of patients/every patient). The online survey was sent to members of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the ESCMID Study Group for Implant-Associated Infections (ESGIAI). No incentive for participation was provided. Results. Amongst respondents, 22/41 were based in Europe and 10/41 from the USA. The majority (29/41) had been in clinical practice between 5—24 years. There was a high priority placed on bone biopsy histology, culture-positive bone sampling, and palpable bone without periosteal covering for diagnosis. Multidisciplinary team approach with plastic surgery involvement at the index procedure was advocated. The strongest indications for surgical intervention were source control for sepsis, presence of an abscess/collection, and prevention of local osteomyelitis progression. Physiological/psychological optimisation and control of acute infection were the primary determinants of surgical timing. There was low utilisation of adjunctive surgical therapies. Local/regional primary tissue transfer or secondary healing with/without VAC were the preferred techniques for wound closure. Recurrent osteomyelitis was the most common reason for prolonged antimicrobial therapy. The majority received bedside advice from an infectious disease-specialist but a quarter of respondents preferred telephone advice. Conclusions. Amongst an international cohort of Orthopaedic Surgeons there was a heterogenous diagnostic and therapeutic approach to pressure-related pelvic osteomyelitis

Introduction. Although multiple studies have consistently demonstrated that orthopaedic surgeons receive greater transfers of value than other specialties, the industry payments of providers involved in practice guideline formation have not been explored. Therefore, the purpose of our analysis was to evaluate the industry payments among authors of the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Methods. The publicly available web portal (. OrthoGuidelines.org. ) from the AAOS was queried for all AUCs released over the past decade for the management of musculoskeletal pathologies. For each AUC available through this portal, information related to the AUC and its respective voting members were recorded. We used this information to conduct a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the CMS Open Payments Database. This information was utilized to determine the number of total value of industry payments to AUC voting committee members during the year of voting for AUC criteria. The total amount of industry payment to AUC voting members was calculated, per each AUC, annually, as well as per orthopaedic subspecialty. The average total industry payment per voting member was calculated for each AUC and compared with the average total industry payment per orthopaedic surgeon nationally, in the same year. All descriptive data analyses were performed in Microsoft Excel 2016 (MicrosoftCorp). Results. A total of 18 different AUCs were included in our analysis. Among the 214 voting members of these AUCs, there was a mean (± standard deviation) of 16.23 (± 39.80) payments totaling USD$20,886.30 (± $123,268.95). Combined industry payments for the voting authors of each guideline ranged from $1,432.53 (Carpal Tunnel Syndrome guideline) to $2,757,444.88 (Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis guideline) (Table 1). Notably, the average payment per voting member was less than the average for all orthopaedic providers in the respective year for a majority (16/18) of AUCs (Table 1). Only average payments of voting members for the Non-Surgical Management Knee Osteoarthritis guideline (13,089.38 vs. $8,183.93) and Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis ($250,676.81 vs. $16,477.55) exceeded yearly averages among all orthopaedic surgeons with payment disclosures. Although authors for AUCs related to osteoarthritis management received the largest quantity of payments (n=491; Figure 1), the AUCs for spine related pathologies received the largest amount of industry payments ($2,757,444.88; Figure 2). Discussion and Conclusion. Our analysis demonstrated that authors on current AAOS appropriate use criteria voting panels collectively received low amounts of industry payments. Specifically, a majority of authors declared industry payments lower than the average value reported among all orthopadic providers per respective year. Therefore, our analysis suggests that there has been limited industry influence in the formation of these practice guidelines. This information should provide peace of mind for invested parties and encourage providers engaged in the formation of future guidelines to limit and fully disclose relationships with industry. Future analyses are needed to evaluate if and how industry relationships among individual providers and the boards of orthopaedic societies shape practice decisions. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly