The attitudes of orthopaedic surgeons regarding radiology reporting is not well-described in the literature. We surveyed Orthopaedic Surgeons in Australia and New Zealand to assess if they routinely review formal radiology reports. An anonymized, 14 question online survey was distributed to consultant surgeons of the Australian and New Zealand Orthopaedic Associations (AOA, NZOA). Two hundred respondents completed the survey (Total number of Fellows: 283 NZOA, 1185 AOA). 18.5% of respondents always reviewed the formal Radiology report, 44.5% most of the time, 35% sometimes and 2% never. By imaging modality, MRI reports were the most frequently reviewed (92%), followed by ultrasound (74%) and nuclear medicine (63%). Only 10% of surgeons consulted formal reports for plain radiography. 55% of surgeons were still likely to disagree with the MRI report, followed by 46% for plain radiography. In cases of disagreement, only 21% of surgeons would always contact the reporting radiologist. The majority of Surgeons (85.5%) think there should be more collaboration between the disciplines, although only 50.5% had regular attendance of a Radiologist at their departmental audit. This survey reveals that the majority of orthopaedic surgeons are not routinely reading radiology reports. This points towards a need for further interdisciplinary collaboration. To our knowledge, this is the first survey directly assessing attitudes of orthopaedic surgeons towards radiology reports

To explore whether the fundamental concepts of informed consent and patient autonomy are acceptable and practical from a surgeon’s point of view. One hundred and fifty three questionnaires distributed to Orthopaedic Surgeons in NZ were analysed statistically. Seventy six percent of the surgeons guided their patients towards a particular procedure. Fifty five percent spent between 10% and 25% of their consultation time on obtaining informed consent. Forty eight percent of the surgeons felt that the patient did not have sufficient autonomy to choose to undergo a particular procedure, while 76% felt that it was impractical to offer all necessary information needed for that patient to choose the procedure. Although the length of time that a surgeon had been in practice did not influence the practice of obtaining consent or his/her opinion of the patient’s self autonomy, the degree of his/her specialisation did (P< 0.05). There was no correlation between the time spent on obtaining consent and the degree of specialisation. There was a very strong correlation between the surgeon’s belief in patient autonomy, the practicality of offering all the necessary information and the method of obtaining consent (P< 0.0001). The majority of Orthopaedic Surgeons in NZ do not believe it was practical to offer all the necessary information to a patient and to expect that patient to be fully autonomous in choosing to undergo a particular procedure. This indicates that it is time for re-evaluation of the practice of modern day informed consent based on its original concept

Drug Free Sport New Zealand (DFSNZ) aims to maintain New Zealand Sport as a drug free environment and thereby enhance our proud and successful sporting culture. New Zealand is bound into the World Anti-Doping Code and must therefore adhere to World Anti-Doping rules. Detection of doping violations is one of the functions of DFSNZ. An aim of DFSNZ is to eliminate the risk of athletes failing a sports anti-doping test as a result of using legitimately prescribed medication as treatment without a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE). This can create major problems for the athlete who may then have to appear before the Sports Tribunal. Some substances on the prohibited list are used by Orthopaedic Surgeons as part of regular management. “National level” athletes require a TUE to be completed prior to use of these medications or immediately following use in emergency situations. Examples are:. Narcotics and Intravenous Corticosteroids perioperatively. Probenecid to enhance antibiotic concentrations in treating infections. Other athletes who are not in this category but may be tested do not require a TUE immediately but still have to be able to provide evidence that the medication was used for therapeutic use if they were subsequently to fail a test. It is the athlete’s responsibility to notify the surgeon and obtain the appropriate documentation. Athletes in the Testing Pools will carry a card with reference to MIMS Resources, the DFSNZ website and Hot-line. From time to time athletes stressed by the situation of their injury may forget to notify the surgeon, prior to surgery, of anti-doping requirements. Surgeon (and anaesthetist) awareness and support for the programme will enhance the overall care of the patient and limit subsequent demands on both the patient and medical staff. The aim of this presentation is to enlighten NZOA members regarding the correct procedures to follow should a prohibited substance be required when treating an athlete who is subject to drug testing in sport

This work aims to quantitatively assess the current opinions of foot and ankle surgery provision by podiatric surgeons within the UK. Three groups were targeted by postal questionnaire; Orthopaedic surgeons with membership to BOFAS, Orthopaedic surgeons not affiliated to the specialist foot and ankle society and surgical Podiatrists. In addition we aim to identify areas of conflict and suggestions for future integration. A postal questionnaire was sent to all Fellows of the Faculty of Podiatric Surgery, College of Podiatrists (136), members of the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, (156), and a randomly selected number of Fellows of the British Orthopaedic Association, who are not members of BOFAS (250). We have received replies from 99 (73%) of the Podiatric Surgical group, 77 (49%) of the Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgeons and 66 (26%) from non-Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgeons. Respondents were asked to detail their present practice and issues that they considered to restrict closer working between Orthopaedic Surgeons and Podiatric surgeons. Additionally, each surgeon was given a range of surgical procedures and asked to identify the most appropriate surgical profession to undertake the procedure. The good response rate amongst Foot and Ankle Practitioners (both Podiatric and Orthopaedic) reflects the interest in these issues compared to Orthopaedic Surgeons from other sub-specialties. Poor understanding of Podiatric surgical training, impact on private practice and medical protectionism were areas identified by podiatric respondents. Conflicts over job-title, concerns over training, role boundaries and responsibilities were identified by Orthopaedic respondents as being significant restrictors to further integration. The paper will present the full results of the survey and discuss the suitability and feasibility of closer working practices between Orthopaedic and Podiatric surgeons

The Use of bone allograft in orthopaedic Surgery has been predicted to increase particularly in joint revision surgery. This has led to a potential problem with supply. Questionnaires were distributed to all 146 Consultant orthopaedic Surgeons working in Scotland in 2000. They were asked to indicate their current usage of bone and tissue allograft, any problems encountered with supply and if alternatives to allograft such as processed bone, might be used. The questions asked were very similar to those asked in a survey by the author (GG) in 1995 to enable comparisons to be made. 74% of all bone issued by the SNBTS in 2000 –2001 was used in revision hip arthroplasy. This compares with only 66% of bone issued in 1998–1999. Replies were received from 125 consultants (87%) of whom 93 reported using bone allograft. 41 consultants (46%) predicted an increase in their requirement for bone allograft, and 23 (26%) felt they could currently use more bone if this became available. Sixty percent of Surgeons would consider using processed bone as an alternative. In comparison with figures from a previous study in 1995, an increasing number of surgeons are prepared to use processed bone as an alternative to fresh frozen allograft. As the number of revision THR’ s continues to increase the amount of bone required is likely to continue to increase. The need to increase efficiency in harvest and supply of bone is therefore great. The use of more SNBTS nurses in selection of patients and collection of bone may increase efficiency. More surgeons may have to use processed bone, which would allow more bone to be released. Also processing may help reduce transmission of infective particles such as HIV and new variant CJD. With rising public and medical concerns over these issues this seems most desirable

Venous thrombo-embolism is a common complication following hip replacement. The recently-published pulmonary embolism prevention study reported that aspirin decreased the fatal pulmonary embolism rate in patients with femoral neck fractures. In addition, new products (synthetic factor X-inhibitor Fondaparinux and direct thrombin-inhibiter Desirudin) have been reported to be more effective than low-molecular-weight heparin in preventing asymptomatic DVT. We thought it important to update the 1997 survey on thrombo-embolism prophylaxis by British Orthopaedic Surgeons. A single page questionnaire was sent to 1308 members of the British Orthopaedic Association who are consultant orthopaedic surgeons. Those who did not respond received a reminder. We had a 72% response rate. All surgeons use some form of prophylaxis, with 85% using pharmacological agents. Low-molecular-weight heparin is used by 55% of surgeons, while 20% use only aspirin. Fewer than 1% (five consultants) use early mobilisation and nearly 2% (13 consultants) use graded stockings and early mobilisation as their only prophylactic measures. Unit policies govern 74% of surgeons. In the last 3 years, 30% have changed their regime. Most British orthopaedic surgeons still use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. The use of aspirin has increased from 5% to 30%. Aspirin is often combined with a mechanical prophylactic. The use of intermittent calf compression has increased from 3% to 22% and of foot pumps from 12% to 19%. The use of low-molecular-weight heparin has fallen by 10%

Introduction and Aims: Venous Thromboembolism is a common complication following a hip replacement. Recently the pulmonary embolism prevention study was published. It reported that aspirin decreased the fatal pulmonary embolism rate in patients admitted with a fracture neck of femur. In addition, new products (synthetic factor X inhibitor-Fondaparinux, and a direct thrombin inhibiter-Desirudin) have been reported to be more effective than low molecular weight heparin in preventing asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis. We felt it was important to repeat a survey, done in 1997, on the use of thromboembolism prophylaxis among British Orthopaedic Surgeons. Method: A single page questionnaire was sent out to all 1308 consultants – orthopaedic surgeons who were members of the British Orthopaedic Association. Those who did not respond were sent a reminder letter. Results: We achieved a 72% response rate. All surgeons use some form of prophylaxis. Eighty-five percent of surgeons use pharmacological prophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin is used by 55% of surgeons. Twenty percent of surgeons use aspirin as their only form of pharmacological prophylaxis. Less than 1% (five consultants) use early mobilisation alone and nearly 2% (13 consultants) use graded stockings and early mobilisation as their only form of prophylaxis. Seventy-four percent of surgeons have a unit policy. Thirty percent have changed their regime in the last three years. Conclusion: The majority of British orthopaedic surgeons still use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. There has been a significant increase in the use of Aspirin, from 5% to 30%. Aspirin is often combined with a mechanical prophylaxis. This has led to an increase in the use of intermittent calf compression (3% to 22%), and foot pumps (12% to 19%). Low molecular weight heparin use has fallen by 10%

Background. There has been widespread interest in medical errors since the publication of ‘To Err is Human’ by the Institute of Medicine in 1999. The Patient Safety Committee of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has compiled results of a member survey to identify trends in orthopaedic errors that would help direct quality assurance efforts. Methods. Surveys were sent to 5,540 Academy fellows; 917 were returned (response rate 16.6%) with 53% (483/917) reporting an observed medical error in the last 6 months. Results. A general classification of errors showed equipment (29.0%) and communication (24.7%) errors with the highest frequency. Medication errors (11.4%) and wrong site surgery (5.6%) represented serious potential patient harm. Two deaths were reported, both involving narcotic administration errors. By location, 78% of errors occurred in the hospital (surgery suite 54%, patient room/floor 10%). The reporting orthopaedic surgeon was involved in 60% of the errors, nurses in 37%, another orthopaedic surgeon in 19%, other physicians in 16% and housestaff in 13%. Wrong site surgeries involved the wrong side 59%, another wrong site (e.g. wrong digit on the correct side) 23%, the wrong procedure 14%, on the wrong patient 4% of the time. The most frequent anatomic location was the knee and fingers/hand (both 35%), the foot/ankle 15%, followed by distal femur 10% and the spine 5%. Conclusion. Medical errors continue to occur and therefore represent a threat to patient safety. Quality assurance efforts and more refined research can be addressed towards areas with higher error occurrence (equipment, communication) and high risk (medication, wrong site surgery)

Venous Thromboembolism is a common complication following a hip replacement. Recently the pulmonary embolism prevention study was published. It reported that aspirin decreased the fatal pulmonary embolism rate in patients admitted with a fracture neck of femur. In addition new products (synthetic factor X inhibitor -Fondaparinux, and a direct thrombin inhibiter-Desirudin) have been reported to be more effective than low molecular weight heparin in preventing asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis. We felt it was important to repeat a survey, done in 1997, on the use thromboembolism prophylaxis among British Orthopaedic Surgeons. A single page questionnaire was sent out to all 1308 consultants Orthopaedic surgeons who were members of the British Orthopaedic Association. Those who did not respond were sent a reminder letter. We achieved a 72% response rate. All surgeons use some form of prophylaxis. Eighty five percent of surgeons use pharmacological prophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin is used by 55% of surgeons. Twenty percent of surgeons use aspirin as their only form of pharmacological prophylaxis. Less than 1% (5 consultants) use early mobilisation alone and nearly 2% (13 consultants) use graded stockings and early mobilisation as their only form of prophylaxis. Seventy four percent of surgeons have a unit policy. Thirty percent have changed their regime in the last 3 years. The majority of British Orthopaedic surgeons still use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. There has been a significant increase in the use of Aspirin from 5% to 30%. Aspirin is often combined with a mechanical prophylaxis. This has led to an increase in the use of intermittent calf compression (3% to 22%), and foot pumps (12% to 19%). Low molecular weight heparin use has fallen by 10%. The majority of British Orthopaedic surgeons still use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. There has been a significant increase in the use of Aspirin from 5% to 30%. Aspirin is often combined with a mechanical prophylaxis. This has led to an increase in the use of intermittent calf compression (3% to 22%), and foot pumps (12% to 19%). Low molecular weight heparin use has fallen by 10%

A retrospective audit to evaluate the effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in reducing blood transfusion requirements in primary total knee and hip joint replacements operated on by a single surgeon (SMD). A survey is being sent to all Fellows of the New Zealand Orthopaedic Association who are currently in clinical practice to evaluate the strategies currently in use for reducing blood transfusion requirements in joint replacement surgery. All primary total knee and hip joint replacements are included in this trial since February 2003. Two doses of TXA (Cyclokapron) are given at a dose of 10mg/kg intravenously. The first dose is given 10 minutes before the skin incision and the second dose 10 minutes before wound closure in the case of hip replacements and just before tourniquet release in total knee replacements. Haemostasis is secured by diathermy in the case of total knee joint replacements after tourniquet release. One deep suction drain is used. The use of Tranexamic acid was continued until September when the numbers were collated and compared to a six-month period prior to the use of TXA. Blood loss (both measured and calculated ) and the need for transfusion were the major outcome measures. Complications related to the use of TXA were recorded. The response rate was 89%. Various strategies to reduce blood loss were used. The mean calculated blood loss in the control group and TXA group were 1196 and 948 ml respectively. The mean measured blood loss in the control group and TXA were 595 ml and 468 ml respectively. This small number of cases – (control 8 and TXA 13) did not reach statistical significance but there was a trend in favour of reduced blood loss with the use of TXA. There was one wound haematoma in the TXA group. A wide variety of blood conservation strategies are used by New Zealand Orthopaedic Surgeons. The use of TXA in knee joint replacements is a promising strategy

Escalating health care expenditure worldwide is driving the need for effective resource decision-making, with medical practitioners increasingly making complex resource decisions within the context of patient care. Despite raising serious legal and ethical issues in practice, this has attracted little attention in Australia, or internationally. In particular, it is unknown how orthopaedic surgeons perceive their obligations to the individual patient, and the wider community, when rationing care, and how they reconcile competing obligations. This research explores legal and ethical considerations, and resource allocation by Australian orthopaedic surgeons, as a means of achieving public health cost containment driven by macro-level policy and funding decisions.

This research found that Australian orthopaedic surgeon's perceptions, and resource allocation decision making, can be explained by understanding how principles of distributive justice challenge, and shift, the traditional medical paradigm. It found that distributive justice, and challenges of macro level health policy and funding decisions, have given rise to two new medical paradigms. Each which try to balance the best interests of individual patients with demands in respect of the sustainability of the health system, in a situation where resources may be constrained. This research shows that while bedside rationing has positioned the medical profession as the gate keepers of resources, it may have left them straddling an increasingly irreconcilable void between the interests of the individual patient and the wider community, with the sustainability of the health system hanging in the balance.

Practice variation may occur when there is no standardised approach to specific clinical problems and there is a lack of scientific evidence for alternative treatments. Practice variation suggests that a segment of the patient population may be managed sub-optimally, and indicates a need for further research in order to establish stronger evidence-based practice guidelines. We surveyed Australian orthopaedic surgeons to examine practice variation in common orthopaedic presentations. In February 2009, members of the Australian Orthopaedic Association were emailed an online survey, which collected information regarding experience level (number of years as a consultant), sub-specialty interests, state where the surgeon works, on- call participation, as well as five common (anecdotally controversial) orthopaedic trauma cases with a number of management options. Surgeons were asked to choose their one most likely management choice from the list provided, which was either surgical or non-surgical in nature. A reminder was sent two weeks later. Exploratory regression was modeled to examine the predictors of choosing surgical management for each case and overall. Of 760 surgeons, 358 (47%) provided responses. For undisplaced scaphoid fractures, respondents selected short-arm cast (53%), ORIF (22%), percutaneous screw (22%) and long-arm cast (3%). Less experienced (0 to 5 years) (p=0.006) and hand surgeons (p=0.008) were more likely to operate. For a displaced mid-shaft clavicle fracture, respondents selected non-operative (62%), plating (31%) and intramedullary fixation (7%). Shoulder surgeons were more likely to operate (p<0.001). For an undisplaced Weber B lateral malleolus fracture, respondents selected plaster cast or boot (59%), lateral plating (31%), posterior plating (9%) and no splinting (2%). For a displaced Colles fracture in an older patient, respondents selected plating (47%), Kirschner wires (28%), cast/splint (23%) and external fixation (1%). Less experienced (p<0.001) and hand surgeons (p=0.024) were more likely to operate. For a two-part neck of humerus fracture in an older patient, respondents selected non-operative (74%), locking plate (14%), and hemiarthroplasty (7%). Shoulder surgeons were more likely to operate (p<0.001). Accounting for all answers in multiple regression modeling, it was found that more experienced surgeons (>15 years) were 25% less likely to operate (p=0.001). Overall, there was no difference among sub-specialties, or whether a surgeon participated in an on-call roster. Considerable practice variation exists among orthopaedic surgeons in the approach to common orthopaedic problems. Surgeons who identify with a sub-specialty are more likely to manage conditions in their area of interest operatively, and more experienced surgeons are less likely to recommend surgical management

There is growing interest in the peri-operative management of patients with indications for hip and knee arthroplasty in the setting of modifiable risk factors such as morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and smoking. A recent survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) found that 95% of respondents address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery. The aim of this study was to poll Australian arthroplasty surgeons regarding their approach to patients with modifiable risk factors.

The survey tool used in the AAHKS study was adapted for use in the Australian context and distributed to the membership of the Arthroplasty Society of Australia via Survey Monkey.

Seventy-seven survey responses were received, representing a response rate of 64%. The majority of respondents were experienced, high volume arthroplasty surgeons. Overall, 91% of respondents restricted access to arthroplasty for patients with modifiable risk factors. Seventy-two percent of surgeons restricted access for excessive body mass index, 85% for poor diabetic control, and 46% for smoking. Most respondents made decisions based on personal experience or literature review rather than hospital or departmental pressures.

Despite differences in healthcare systems, our findings were similar to those of the AAHKS survey, although their responses were more restrictive in all domains. Differences were noted in responses concerning financial considerations for potentially underprivileged populations. The survey is currently being administered by arthroplasty societies in six other countries, allowing comparison of orthopaedic practice across different healthcare systems around the world.

In conclusion, over 90% of Australian arthroplasty surgeons who responded to the survey address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery.

Complex proximal humerus fractures account for 10% of fractures in patients over 65 years of age. With the emergence of new implants, there is growing trend towards surgical management of these types of fractures, despite the lack of clinical evidence of its superiority over a conservative option. Orthopaedic surgeons' perception plays a large role in the surgical decision making for complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. No studies have been conducted to date to examine factors that influence the surgical decision-making in orthopaedic surgeons in regards to these types of fractures.

A self-administered questionnaire was sent to orthopaedic surgeons. It included demographic questions as well as clinical vignettes assessing the risk / benefit perception of orthopaedic surgeons in different situations. Orthopaedic surgeons self-reported the proportion of proximal humerus fractures that were treated surgically in patients during the last year. Univariate analyzes were conducted to identify the factors that influenced the operation rates.

A total of 127 orthopaedic surgeons completed the questionnaire. The response rate was 37%. The risk / benefit perception of surgical management varied according to the type of practice, year of training, operation rate as well as the ease of the surgeon in performing shoulder procedures (p < 0.05). According to the queried surgeons, the most important factors affecting their decision-making were patient's age, the type of fracture, co-morbidities, level of independence and potential for rehabilitation. The type of surgery proposed varied depending on the training and familiarity of the surgeon with the procedure.

The risk / benefit perception of orthopaedic surgeons regarding surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients appears to vary widely. The decision to opt for surgical management is influenced by the surgeon's familiarity with the procedure, their year of training and their subspecialty. This study demonstrates the need to establish a decision-making tool to assist orthopaedic surgeons and patients with this clinical decision.

The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities.

Two questionnaires were developed through the Delphi process for this cross-sectional survey of surgical preference. The first questionnaire was sent out before the publication of a RCT and the second questionnaire was sent out after publication. The RCT investigated repair or non-repair of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle during volar locked plating of distal radial fractures (DRFs). Overall, 380 orthopaedic surgeons were invited to participate in the first questionnaire, of whom 115 replied. One hundred surgeons were invited to participate in the second questionnaire. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons for whom a treatment change was warranted, who then reported a change of treatment preference following the RCT. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for repair or non-repair, reasons for and against following the RCT results, and difference of preferred treatment of the PQ muscle between surgeons of different nationalities, qualifications, years of training, and number of procedures performed per year.

Of the 100 surgeons invited for the second questionnaire, 74 replied. For the primary outcome, 6 of 32 surgeons (19%), who usually repaired the PQ muscle and therefore a change of treatment preference was warranted, reported a change of treatment preference based on the RCT publication. Of the secondary outcomes, restoring anatomy was the most common response for repairing the PQ muscle.

The majority of the orthopaedic surgeons, where a change of treatment preference was warranted based on the results and conclusion of a RCT, did not report willingness to change their treatment preference.

Study aim

There is an ever increasing demand for quality clinical trials in surgery. Surgeons' co-operation and enthusiasm to participate are important, if not crucial in success of such studies, especially if they are multi-centred. Clinician's individual uncertainty (equipoise) about a case has been often cited as an ethical basis for inviting a patient to take part in a clinical trial. This study aims to establish current attitudes of surgeons participating in a national multi-centred randomised controlled trial and explores an on line tool for instant assessment of collective uncertainty (equipoise) for individual clinical cases eligible for a trial.

This fiducial role implies special duties imposed where one person (the fiduciary) must act in the best interest of the other (the beneficiary), even if it is in the fiduciary's detriment to do so.

While a doctor/patient relationship is not generally a fiduciary relationship, part of the relationship may involve a fiduciary role for the surgeon.

The fiduciary duties include:

Keeping a patient's medical information confidential.

While the doctor–patient relationship requires a duty of care, a fiduciary duty implies a duty of loyalty and honesty. As per using navigation techniques in hip and knee surgery, the surgeon can use the above fiducials (markers) to navigate his way through his fiduciary role in managing patients; whether it is disclosing emergent risks arising during treatment, with new products or during clinical trials.

Fiduciary roles are independent of informed consent, which occurs before the event, but mitigate a risk that occurs after the event. It is an inbuilt quality assurance mechanism in risk management.

Abstract

Abstract