Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 190
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 6 | Pages 267 - 271
12 Jun 2020
Chang J Wignadasan W Kontoghiorghe C Kayani B Singh S Plastow R Magan A Haddad F

Aims. As the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic passes, the challenge shifts to safe resumption of routine medical services, including elective orthopaedic surgery. Protocols including pre-operative self-isolation, COVID-19 testing, and surgery at a non-COVID-19 site have been developed to minimize risk of transmission. Despite this, it is likely that many patients will want to delay surgery for fear of contracting COVID-19. The aim of this study is to identify the number of patients who still want to proceed with planned elective orthopaedic surgery in this current environment. Methods. This is a prospective, single surgeon study of 102 patients who were on the waiting list for an elective hip or knee procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline characteristics including age, ASA grade, COVID-19 risk, procedure type, surgical priority, and admission type were recorded. The primary outcome was patient consent to continue with planned surgical care after resumption of elective orthopaedic services. Subgroup analysis was also performed to determine if any specific patient factors influenced the decision to proceed with surgery. Results. Overall, 58 patients (56.8%) wanted to continue with planned surgical care at the earliest possibility. Patients classified as ASA I and ASA II were more likely to agree to surgery (60.5% and 60.0%, respectively) compared to ASA III and ASA IV patients (44.4% and 0.0%, respectively) (p = 0.01). In addition, patients undergoing soft tissue knee surgery were more likely to consent to surgery (90.0%) compared to patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty (68.6%), primary knee arthroplasty (48.7%), revision hip or knee arthroplasty (0.0%), or hip and knee injections (43.8%) (p = 0.03). Conclusion. Restarting elective orthopaedic services during the COVID-19 pandemic remains a significant challenge. Given the uncertain environment, it is unsurprising that only 56% of patients were prepared to continue with their planned surgical care upon resumption of elective services. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:267–271


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 11 | Pages 951 - 957
16 Nov 2021
Chuntamongkol R Meen R Nash S Ohly NE Clarke J Holloway N

Aims. The aim of this study was to surveil whether the standard operating procedure created for the NHS Golden Jubilee sufficiently managed COVID-19 risk to allow safe resumption of elective orthopaedic surgery. Methods. This was a prospective study of all elective orthopaedic patients within an elective unit running a green pathway at a COVID-19 light site. Rates of preoperative and 30-day postoperative COVID-19 symptoms or infection were examined for a period of 40 weeks. The unit resumed elective orthopaedic services on 29 June 2020 at a reduced capacity for a limited number of day-case procedures with strict patient selection criteria, increasing to full service on 29 August 2020 with no patient selection criteria. Results. A total of 2,373 cases were planned in the 40-week study period. Surgery was cancelled in 59 cases, six (10.2%) of which were due to having a positive preoperative COVID-19 screening test result. Of the remaining 2,314, 996 (43%) were male and 1,318 (57%) were female. The median age was 67 years (interquartile range 59.2 to 74.6). The median American Society of Anesthesiologists grade was 2. Hip and knee arthroplasties accounted for the majority of the operations (76%). Six patients tested positive for COVID-19 preoperatively (0.25%) and 39 patients were tested for COVID-19 within 30 days after discharge, with only five patients testing positive (0.22%). Conclusion. Through strict application of a COVID-19 green pathway, elective orthopaedic surgery could be safely delivered to a large number of patients with no selection criteria. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):951–957


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 158 - 158
1 Sep 2012
Reed J Davies J Clarke N Blake E Jackson A
Full Access

Background. Vitamin D deficiency may increase predisposition to a number of paediatric orthopaedic conditions and the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is increasing in children in developed countries. The aim of this study was to determine the epidemiology of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in children presenting to a regional paediatric orthopaedic service. We also examined the relationships between vitamin D status, social deprivation and ethnicity. Methods. Individuals, age < 18 years, presenting to the regional paediatric orthopaedic service at Southampton, UK from 2008 to 2010 were investigated. Deprivation index scores were calculated from indices of deprivation. Results. 187 children (97 male, 90 female, mean age 7.1 years) underwent serum 25-(OH) D level measurement. 82% were white British and 11% of Asian ethnicity. The calculation of the total depravation index for the whole cohort showed 34 (18%) of subjects were in quartile 1 (least deprived), 54 (29%) in quartile 2, 49 (26%) in quartile 3 and 50 (27%) in quartile 4 (Most deprived). 60 (32%) had vitamin D insufficiency with 25-(OH) levels < 50nmol/l and 15 (8%) had vitamin D deficiency. No relation ship was identified between vitamin D level and social depravation score. Conclusions. There is a need for awareness of the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the paediatric orthopaedic population presenting with bone pain and lower limb deformity before commencing ‘observation or orthopaedic surgical treatment’


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_VII | Pages 11 - 11
1 Mar 2012
Ayodele O Simms V Kuper H Rischewski D Lavy C
Full Access

This study aimed to determine the major diagnoses and needs of children in Rwanda with musculoskeletal conditions to enable the Rwandan government to begin to plan orthopaedic and rehabilitation services. BACKGROUND. When faced with developing orthopaedic services for children in Sub-Saharan Africa, there is little objective evidence-based data on the magnitude and type of services needed. Rwanda is a small country that is in the process of developing orthopaedic and rehabilitation services, and its Ministry of Health supported a survey that would provide information necessary for planning such services. METHODS. A national survey of musculoskeletal impairment (MSI) prevalence was undertaken. Of a population of 8.4 million, 8368 people were enumerated. Four thousand one hundred thirty-four were aged 16 years or less. Cases who failed a screening test for MSI were examined, allocated a diagnostic category, and assessed as to treatment needed. RESULTS. Of 4134 people aged 16 years or less who were enumerated, 3526 (85%) were screened and 91 had MSI, giving a prevalence of MSI among children of 2.58% (95% confidence interval; 2.06-3.10). Twenty-three percent of MSIs were a result of congenital deformity, 14% neurologic conditions, 12% trauma, 3% infection, and 46% other acquired pathology. Of the MSIs, 56.7% were mild, 37.8% moderate, and 5.6% severe. Extrapolated treatment needs suggest that 2% of Rwandan children (approximately 80,000) need orthopaedic physical therapy, 1.2% (50,000) need orthopaedic surgery, and approximately 10,000 need orthopaedic appliances. CONCLUSIONS. These results will be of use in planning future paediatric orthopaedic services in Rwanda, and for comparative studies in other low-income countries


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 150 - 150
1 Jul 2014
Yiasemidou M Teanby D Munir U
Full Access

Summary Statement. This study assesses the service provision of viscosupplementation within an NHS (British National Health System) hospital. The results of this study show long term efficacy of the treatment, when provided by a dedicated, orthopaedic unit. Introduction. The service provision of viscosupplementation for osteoarthritis within the National Health System (NHS) remains controversial. The treatment was recommended in the 2007 NICE guidelines but support was withdrawn the following year. Furthermore, whether it should be provided by orthopaedic surgeons or in primary care is also a matter of debate. St Helens and Knowsley Trust, runs an orthopaedic outpatient clinic dedicated to the administration of viscosupplementation to patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. This study aims to assess the efficacy of viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis when that is provided by a highly specialised, orthopaedic, dedicated service. Patients and Methods. Between January 2011 and June 2011, 103 patients underwent Ostenil® intra articular knee injections in our clinic. The viscosupplement used is Ostenil®, a 20mg/2ml sodium hyaluronate as an isotonic solution contained in a single syringe. Patients are given a regimen of 3 × 20mg/2ml Ostenil® injections. The time interval between injections is two weeks. They were all given a “pain diary” and were asked to document their pain score on a Visual Analogue Scale (from 0 to 10), prior to the treatment, the day of procedure and up to 3 months after the procedure. 72 patients (M:F 34:38, Mean age: 60.3 years) participated in the study (Right knee 31, Left 22 and Bilateral 19). Mean pre treatment and post treatment score amongst all patients were calculated up to three months post treatment. Results. Results show a continuous decreasing trend in pain scores up to three months after the procedure. Indicatively, mean pre treatment pain score was 6.88, mean pain score on day 3 (2 days post first injection) is 4.89, mean pain score on Day 31 (2 days after 3rd injection) is 4.37. Pain levels are maintained low at Week 6 after treatment (4.43) and Month 3 (4.37). A small peak in pain score was identified up to 48hrs after the injections but that has been already identified in current literature as a result of short term inflammation due to the injection process. Conclusion. Viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis is an efficient treatment when provided by an orthopaedic, dedicated service. The duration of the reduction in pain with a three injection course is at least 3 months. This study also demonstrates that an overall 3 injection course with a time interval of 2 weeks between injections is sufficient to produce long lasting results


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 6 | Pages 287 - 292
19 Jun 2020
Iliadis AD Eastwood DM Bayliss L Cooper M Gibson A Hargunani R Calder P

Introduction

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a rapidly implemented restructuring of UK healthcare services. The The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, became a central hub for the provision of trauma services for North Central/East London (NCEL) while providing a musculoskeletal tumour service for the south of England, the Midlands, and Wales and an urgent spinal service for London. This study reviews our paediatric practice over this period in order to share our experience and lessons learned. Our hospital admission pathways are described and the safety of surgical and interventional radiological procedures performed under general anaesthesia (GA) with regards to COVID-19 in a paediatric population are evaluated.

Methods

All paediatric patients (≤ 16 years) treated in our institution during the six-week peak period of the pandemic were included. Prospective data for all paediatric trauma and urgent elective admissions and retrospective data for all sarcoma admissions were collected. Telephone interviews were conducted with all patients and families to assess COVID-19 related morbidity at 14 days post-discharge.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 3, Issue 1 | Pages 42 - 53
14 Jan 2022
Asopa V Sagi A Bishi H Getachew F Afzal I Vyrides Y Sochart D Patel V Kader D

Aims

There is little published on the outcomes after restarting elective orthopaedic procedures following cessation of surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, the reported perioperative mortality in patients who acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection while undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery was 18% to 20%. The aim of this study is to report the surgical outcomes, complications, and risk of developing COVID-19 in 2,316 consecutive patients who underwent elective orthopaedic surgery in the latter part of 2020 and comparing it to the same, pre-pandemic, period in 2019.

Methods

A retrospective service evaluation of patients who underwent elective surgical procedures between 16 June 2020 and 12 December 2020 was undertaken. The number and type of cases, demographic details, American society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, BMI, 30-day readmission rates, mortality, and complications at one- and six-week intervals were obtained and compared with patients who underwent surgery during the same six-month period in 2019.


Aims

Hip fracture patients are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 illness, and admission into hospital puts them at further risk. We implemented a two-site orthopaedic trauma service, with ‘COVID’ and ‘COVID-free’ hubs, to deliver urgent and infection-controlled trauma care for hip fracture patients, while increasing bed capacity for medical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A vacated private elective surgical centre was repurposed to facilitate a two-site, ‘COVID’ and ‘COVID-free’, hip fracture service. Patients were screened for COVID-19 infection and either kept at our ‘COVID’ site or transferred to our ‘COVID-free’ site. We collected data for 30 days on patient demographics, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores (NHFS), time to surgery, COVID-19 status, mortality, and length of stay (LOS).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 179 - 179
1 Feb 2003
Hunter C Irwin D Aitken D Stinson M Gormley G Bleakley N Nixon J Beverland D Rankin G
Full Access

In Britain 8 million people consult their general practitioner annually with musculoskeletal conditions leading to referral of 1.5 million patients to Orthopaedics/ Rheumatology. Northern Ireland has the highest waiting lists for outpatients in Britain. The demand on orthopaedics continues to rise despite past attempts to reduce waiting lists. Trauma and orthopaedics accounted for 14% of the excess waiters for outpatients at June 2002. (DHSSPS Sept 2002) Roland et al 1991, etc. demonstrated that 43% of all orthopaedic referrals were inappropriate. In Belfast, G.P.s and Physiotherapists in partnership with the Regional Orthopaedic Service decided to pilot a Primary Care Orthopaedic Triage Service. The vast majority of orthopaedic referrals relate to three main body parts: lumbar spine 28%, knees 34% and hips 25% and these were chosen to be triaged for the pilot. Approval was sought and granted from Queen’s University Belfast Ethics Committee. Phase 1 involved the training of 2 GPs and 2 physiotherapists at the Musgrave Park and Royal Victoria Hospital with the full cooperation of the orthopaedic surgeons. Phase 2 tested independently the diagnostic capability of the trained professionals and assessed the appropriateness and management of orthopaedic referrals against the consultants decision as ‘gold standard’. 95 patients participated in the study. 55.8% of referrals were deemed appropriate by the consultants, compared to 44.6% by the GP/physio team. The Kappa statistical score was 0.79 reflecting a good level of agreement and is comparable to other clinical specialties (Sackett 1991). The sensitivity of the trained professionals on orthopaedic referrals was 83% and the specificity was 97%. Kappa value for management of inappropriate referrals was 0.83. Orthopaedic referral can be acceptably triaged by primary care professionals reducing the number of onward referrals to outpatients by 40% and increasing the appropriate referrals from 56% to 97%


Reconfiguration of elective orthopaedic surgery presents challenges and opportunities to develop outpatient pathways to reduce surgical waiting times. Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a benign progressive fibroproliferative disorder of the fascia in the hand, which can be disabling. Percutaneous-needle-fasciotomy (PNF) can be performed successfully in the outpatient clinic.

The Aberdeen hand-service has over 10 years' experience running dedicated PNF clinics. NHS Grampian covers a vast area of Scotland receiving over 11749 referrals to the orthopaedic unit yearly. 250 patients undergone PNF in the outpatient department annually. 100 patients who underwent PNF in outpatients (Jan2019–Jan2020).

79M, 21F. Average age 66 years range (29–87). 95 patients were right hand dominant. DD risk factors: 6 patients were diabetic, 2 epileptic, 87 patients drank alcohol. 76 patients had a family history of DD. Disease severity, single digit 20 patients, one hand multiple digits in 15 patients, bilateral hands in 65 patients of which 5 suffered form ectopic manifestation suggestive of Dupuytren's diasthesis. Using Tubiana Total flexion deformity score pre and post fasciotomy. Type 1 total flexion deformity (TFD) between 0–45 degrees pre PNF n=60 post N= 85, Type 2 TFD 45–90 degrees pre PNF n=18 post N=9, Type 3 TFD 90–135 pre PNF n=15 post N= 5, Type 4 TFD >135 pre PNF n=1 post PNF N=1. Using Chi-square statistical test, a significant difference was found at the p<0.05 between the pre and post PNF TFD. Complication: 8 recurrence, 1 skin tear. No patients sustained digital nerve injury.

Outpatients PNF clinics are a valuable resource.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 263 - 264
1 Sep 2005
Finch MB McNally C Marsh D Byrne P Berringer T
Full Access

The burden of non vertebral fractures on the National Health Service is enormous. Osteoporotic fractures have an associated morbidity and mortality and as a consequent incur heavy financial burden with a current cost to the National Health Service of some £1.7 billion per year, hip fractures accounting for the greater part.

We know from our own local experience in the North of Ireland that this previous service had failed to target these fracture patients for secondary prevention of osteoporosis (Northern Ireland Colles Fracture Study). Although hip fractures account for only 7% of all fractures they result in the utilisation of 25% of acute orthopaedic beds. The silent nature of osteoporosis makes a diagnosis prior to fracture difficult and attendance at a fracture clinic may be the first opportunity to diagnose this condition and to intervene with anti-resportive treatment.

An osteoporosis service commenced in Greenpark Health Care Trust in 1996. In 2001, guidelines (Crest guidelines) for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis were established and in April 2003 a pilot study for the fracture liaison service commenced with the appointment of a Fracture Liaison Nursing Sister. The responsibility of this Nurse included:

Liaison and attendance at Out-Patient Fracture Clinic to ensure that all patients presenting with a low trauma fragility fracture were assessed and referred appropriately for bone densitometry.

An education and awareness role for patients regarding osteoporosis and fall prevention.

To conduct additional nurse led osteoporosis clinic at Green Park Healthcare Trust for patients referred from the Out-Patient Fracture Service at the Royal Victoria Hospital.

Current activity levels include 18 fracture clinics per week at the Royal Victoria Hospital site with approximately 35 patients per clinic. To date, the Fracture Liaison Nurse has been able to attend 54% of these clinics. The patients were identified by Fracture Clinic chart reviews to identify those greater than fifty years of age with a low trauma fracture and approximately 115 charts were reviewed weekly.

At risk patients were interviewed with approximately 35 interviews carried out weekly. Patients were then recruited first for assessment and dexa scanning, measurements were made at both lumbar spine L1-L4 and at the femoral neck with approximately 22 patients weekly recruited. An assessment of osteoporosis risk was made, a plain bed dexa scanner (lunar prodigy scanner) and treatment options were decided depending on the patients T score and according to the CREST Guidelines. The patients were given bone health advice at their scanning visit. Clinic activity was recorded on a database (Gismo) and a computer generated letter to the GP was produced.

Provisional outcomes included arrangements to rescan after 24 months, referral to falls assessment and referral to a Consultant Specialist Osteoporosis Clinic.

Results: To date, 198 patients have been scanned. 28 were male and 170 were female. BMD results were as follows (T score at hip or spine):

- Normal (0 to −1 SD) 16.6%

- Osteopenic (−1 to −2.5 SD) 46.7%

- Osteoporotic (> −2.5 SD) 36.7%

The mean age for those scanned was 66 years and 3 months.

Osteoporotic risk factors identified include a previous fracture (18%).

Early menopause (19%), fall history (12%), Back pain and height loss (18%), smokers (11%), family history of osteoporosis (13%), alcohol excess (5%).

Outcome – no treatment recommended 26%, 13% were already on treatment, 17% were prescribed treatment, 43% were prescribed Calcium and Vitamin D, 27% a Bisphosphonate, 20% a Bisphosphonate and Calcium and Vitamin D and 12% Evista (serm).

Patient follow-up outcome included a follow-up of dexa scan at 24 months 20%, no hospital review planned 74%, 7% referred to a Specialist Osteoporosis Clinic and 6% were referred for a FALLS assessment.

Conclusion: This service has highlighted the high prevalence of osteoporosis in patients attending a Fracture Clinic. An osteoporosis fracture increases significantly the risk of future fracture. Our current programme for evaluation and managing a patient with osteoporosis fractures is currently being audited to measure quality of service, treatment outcome and trends.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 8 | Pages 500 - 507
18 Aug 2020
Cheruvu MS Bhachu DS Mulrain J Resool S Cool P Ford DJ Singh RA

Aims. Our rural orthopaedic service has undergone service restructure during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to sustain hip fracture care. All adult trauma care has been centralised to the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital for assessment and medical input, before transferring those requiring operative intervention to the Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital. We aim to review the impact of COVID-19 on hip fracture workload and service changes upon management of hip fractures. Methods. We reviewed our prospectively maintained trust database and National Hip Fracture Database records for the months of March and April between the years 2016 and 2020. Our assessment included fracture pattern (intrascapular vs extracapsular hip fracture), treatment intervention, length of stay and mortality. Results. We treated 288 patients during March and April between 2016 and 2020, with a breakdown of 55, 58, 53, 68, and 54 from 2016 to 2020 respectively. Fracture pattern distribution in the pre-COVID-19 years of 2016 to 2019 was 58% intracapsular and 42% extracapsular. In 2020 (COVID-19 period) the fracture patterns were 65% intracapsular and 35% extracapsular. Our mean length of stay was 13.1 days (SD 8.2) between 2016 to 2019, and 5.0 days (6.3) days in 2020 (p < 0.001). Between 2016 and 2019 we had three deaths in hip fracture patients, and one death in 2020. Hemiarthroplasty and dynamic hip screw fixation have been the mainstay of operative intervention across the five years and this has continued in the COVID-19 period. We have experienced a rise in conservatively managed patients; ten in 2020 compared to 14 over the previous four years. Conclusion. There has not been a reduction in the number of hip fractures during COVID-19 period compared to the same time period over previous years. In our experience, there has been an increase in conservative treatment and decreased length of stay during the COVID -19 period. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:500–507



Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 296 - 296
1 May 2006
Brewster M Power D Carter S Abudu A Grimer R Tillman R
Full Access

Aims: To establish the frequency and demographics of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) presenting in the lower limb.

Methods: Patients presenting to a tertiary referral orthopaedic oncology unit over a 10-year period were prospectively entered into a computerised database. The site of primary STS and demographic details were also recorded.

Results: 1519 STS in all body regions were treated. 1067 (70.2%) within the lower limb. 57.0% thigh, 13.0% calf, 8.2% foot and ankle, 7.7% buttock, 5.7% knee, 4.6% pelvis and 3.8% in the groin. There was a male predominance (56.2%). M:F ratio was 2.5:1 for the groin and 1.3:1 for the thigh with the other body regions approximately equal.

Conclusion: The majority of STS are found in the lower limb. In this large series there was a male predominance most marked in groin presentations.




Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 84 - 84
1 Jun 2012
Newsome R Reddington M Breakwell L Chiverton N Cole A Michael A
Full Access

Purpose

To evaluate the competencies of spinal extended scope physiotherapists (ESP) following the introduction of requesting rights for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) one year later.

Methods

From September 2009 to August 2010 each MRI scan requested by the 2 spinal ESPs within the orthopaedic clinic was recorded along with their clinical diagnosis to ascertain why the scan was requested. This was indicated on a four point scale of likelihood of pathology which had been introduced to give evidence for MRI requesting rights. This was then audited to determine the total number of scans requested along with the accuracy or justification of the request.




Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 8 | Pages 655 - 660
2 Aug 2021
Green G Abbott S Vyrides Y Afzal I Kader D Radha S

Aims. Elective orthopaedic services have had to adapt to significant system-wide pressures since the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019. Length of stay is often recognized as a key marker of quality of care in patients undergoing arthroplasty. Expeditious discharge is key in establishing early rehabilitation and in reducing infection risk, both procedure-related and from COVID-19. The primary aim was to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty at a high-volume, elective orthopaedic centre. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients undergoing primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty over a six-month period, from 1 July to 31 December 2020, were compared to the same period in 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic. Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, wait to surgery, COVID-19 status, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Results. A total of 1,311 patients underwent hip or knee arthroplasty in the six-month period following recommencement of elective services in 2020 compared to 1,527 patients the year before. Waiting time to surgery increased in post-COVID-19 group (137 days vs 78; p < 0.001). Length of stay also significantly increased (0.49 days; p < 0.001) despite no difference in age or ASA grade. There were no cases of postoperative COVID-19 infection. Conclusion. Time to surgery and length of hospital stay were significantly higher following recommencement of elective orthopaedic services in the latter part of 2020 in comparison to a similar patient cohort from the year before. Longer waiting times may have contributed to the clinical and radiological deterioration of arthritis and general musculoskeletal conditioning, which may in turn have affected immediate postoperative rehabilitation and mobilization, as well as increasing hospital stay. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):655–660