The current study aims to find the role of Enhance Recovery Pathway (ERP) as a multidisciplinary approach aimed to expedite rapid recovery, reduce LOS, and minimize morbidity associated with Non Fusion Anterior Scoliosis Correction (NFASC) surgery. A retrospective analysis of 35 AIS patients who underwent NFASC with Lenke 1 and Lenke 5 curves with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up was done. Patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative analgesia, mobilization, length of stay (LOS), patient satisfaction survey score with respect to information and care, and 90 days complications were collected. The cohort included 34 females and 1 male with a mean age of 15.2 years at the time of surgery. There were 16 Lenke 1 and 19 Lenke 5 in the study. Mean preoperative major thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb's angle were 52˚±7.6˚ and 51˚±4.5˚ respectively. Average blood loss and surgical time were 102 ±6.4 ml and 168 ± 10.2 mins respectively. Average time to commencing solid food was 6.5±1.5 hrs. Average time to mobilization following surgery was 15.5± 4.3 hrs. The average duration to the stopping of the epidural was 42.5±3.5 hrs. The average dose of
Summary Statement. There were significant differences in the pain experience, behaviors, and perceptions on analgesics, between the Australia and Singapore cohorts, after hospital discharge following TKR. These findings may be influenced by the ethnicity and cultural differences between these two countries. Introduction. In recent years the hospital length of stay after total knee replacement (TKR) has shortened. Hence, patients have to self-manage their pain earlier after the surgery. The aim of this study was to examine if the pain experience, self-management behaviors and potential barriers to optimal analgesia after hospital discharge for TKR differed in different ethnicity groups. Patients & Methods. We administered a questionnaire to patients undergoing TKR in 10 Australian hospitals, and one large Singaporean hospital, two weeks following hospital discharge.1 We asked participants about their pain severity, use of analgesics, side-effects, perceptions of analgesics use, and satisfaction with pain relief at home. The two groups were compared using Chi-squared test with SPSS 20.0 with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results. 171 (98%) participants from the Australian centers and 105 (94%) from the Singaporean hospital completed the questionnaire. Compared with the Singaporean patients, significantly more participants in the Australian cohort reported that their worst pain period occurred during the first two weeks at home (52% vs. 20%, p < 0.0001), and that their average pain at home was ‘severe/extreme’ (23% vs. 6%, p < 0.0001). More participants in the Australian cohort consumed an opioid alone or in combination with non-opioid analgesics (69% vs. 33%, p < 0.0001). Although many in both cohorts experienced analgesic-related side-effects, the proportion was higher in the Australian cohort (84% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). A very much larger proportion of participants in the Australian cohort sought further medical help for their pain (60% vs. 3%, p < 0.0001). A much small proportion of patients in the Australian cohort perceived that analgesics could not control pain (26% vs. 44%, p = 0.002); were concerned about addiction (26% vs. 42%, p = 0.005) or developing tolerance to analgesics (28% vs. 49%, p < 0.0001); or preferred enduring pain than analgesic-related side-effects (25% vs. 42%, p < 0.002). There was no significant difference in satisfaction with analgesia between the two cohorts (64% vs. 74%, p = 0.179). Discussion/Conclusion. Following hospital discharge for TKR, there were differences in the pain experience,
