Purpose

Students attend operating room sessions throughout their medical school training and are often given the opportunity to scrub and assist during the surgery. Many students have no or very little formal teaching in operating room etiquette, which leads to last minute on the job training from operating room staff. This study aimed to identify if there was any difference between the students knowledge, technique and competency in operating room etiquette skills between two groups of students who received different methods of teaching.

According to Webster's Dictionary, efficiency is defined as the capacity to produce desired results with a minimal expenditure of energy, money, time, and materials. For a surgeon performing an operative procedure this would mean “skillfulness in avoiding wasted time and effort.” (. www.webster-dictionary.org. ) The essential ingredient to becoming efficient is to promote a culture of efficiency. There are 10 elements: 1) proactive surgeon perspective; 2) effective utilization of preoperative holding area; 3) preoperative planning / templating; 4) development of preference cards; 5) operating room set-up protocols; 6) operating room team concept; 7) streamlined instrument sets; 8) consistent operative workflow; 9) standardised closure / dressings; and 10) prompt and meticulous room turnover. Efficient performance of an operative procedure requires skillfulness in avoiding wasted time and effort. Perioperative efficiencies are optimised by development of “swing,” “flip,” or “double occupancy” criteria, understanding of timing of when to initiate the anesthetic block for the next case, skin closure routine by physician assistant/nurse practitioner/private scrub, and marking the operative site of your first two patients upon arrival to the hospital or surgery center. Utilise a pro-active approach to prepare case carts the day before surgery. The operating room team turns over their own rooms, with a “clean as you go” mentality. Develop a formalised communication process for patient flow issues, such as real-time push-to-talk group calling phones. Determine in advance the number of instrument sets required for the day's caseload to mitigate flash sterilization and decrease room turnover time. The goal of the surgeon is to be out of the operating room for 5 minutes in between cases before the next incision, utilizing that time to enter orders, communicate with the family, dictate, and mark the operative site of the patient who will follow the one in the case about to start. Implant selection can help if consistent. Everyone must know the instrument trays including surgeon, scrubs, and nurses. Minimise both the number of trays and the redundancy of instrumentation. Templating should be done in advance of the day of surgery. Keep your surgery consistent and always deliver your best product. The workflow for inpatient and outpatient surgeries should be the same: same implant, same approach, and same closure. The culture of efficiency requires buy-in by all involved in the operative procedure. Every one entering the operating theatre should have proper body coverage – no hair visible, no nose visible. There should be a strict limit to needless activity: minimum opening of doors, no changing of personnel during an operation, and use of intercom/telephone to request equipment. As the surgeon and the team begin to embrace efficiency, surgical times will decrease. Multiple studies have demonstrated that increased surgical time is associated with a higher incidence of infection. This is secondary to time-dependent contamination of the surgical wound and field. The take home message is to develop and embrace efficiency. Operating room efficiency is the product of multiple factors including preoperative preparation, skilled anesthesia team, motivated operating room staff, choreographed surgery, and well-designed instrumentation. The surgeon is the captain of the ship and the staff follows his or her lead. Your operating room days will flow smoothly. Your operations will proceed with minimal stress. You will spend less time drinking coffee between cases and have more free time at the end of the day. However, most importantly, you will deliver a quality product to your patient

Background. Intraoperative blood loss is a known potential complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative transfusion in patients undergoing TKA. While there are numerous studies demonstrating the efficacy of intravenous and topical TXA in patients undergoing TKA, there are comparatively few demonstrating the effectiveness and appropriate dosing recommendations of oral formulations. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of 2230 TKA procedures at a single institution identified 3 treatment cohorts: patients undergoing TKA without the use of TXA (no-OTA, n=968), patients undergoing TKA with administration of a single-dose of oral TXA (single-dose OTA, n=164), and patients undergoing TKR with administration of preoperative and postoperative oral TXA (two-dose OTA, n=1098). The primary outcome was transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes included maximum postoperative decline in hemoglobin, number of blood units transfused, length of hospital stay, total drain output, cell salvage volume, and operating room time. Results. Transfusion rates decreased from 24.1% in the no-OTA group to 13.6% in the single-dose OTA group (p<0.001) and 11.1% in the two-dose OTA group (p<0.001), with no significant difference in transfusion rates between single- and two-dose OTA groups (p=0.357). Operating room time was reduced from 154 minutes in the no-OTA group to 144 minutes in the one-dose OTA group and 144 minutes in the two-dose OTA group (p<0.01). Additionally, maximum postoperative decline in hemoglobin was reduced from 4.3 g/dL in the no-OTA group to 3.5 g/dL in the single-dose OTA group (p<0.01) and 3.4 g/dL in the two-dose OTA group (p<0.01), without a significant difference between the single- and two-dose regimens (p=0.233). Conclusions. OTA reduces transfusions and operating room time, with the potential advantages of greater ease of administration and improved cost effectiveness relative to other routes of administration. Further study such as a randomized clinical trial is needed to verify the effectiveness of OTA and further optimize dosing regimens in the TKA setting. Level of Evidence. Therapeutic Level III

Knee arthroscopy with meniscectomy is the third most common Orthopaedic surgery performed after TKA and THA, comprising up to 16.6% of all procedures. The efficiency of Orthopaedic care delivery with respect to waiting times and systemic costs is extremely concerning. Canadian Orthopaedic patients experience the longest wait times of any G7 country, yet perioperative surgical care constitutes a significant portion of a hospital's budget.

In-Office Needle Arthroscopy (IONA) is an emerging technology that has been primarily studied as a diagnostic tool. Recent evidence shows that it is a cost-effective alternative to hospital- and community-based MRI with comparable accuracy. Recent procedure guides detailing IONA medial meniscectomy suggest a potential node for OR diversion. Given the high case volume of knee arthroscopy as well as the potential amenability to be diverted away from the OR to the office setting, IONA has the potential to generate considerable improvements in healthcare system efficiency with respect to throughput and cost savings. As such, the purpose of this study is to investigate the cost savings and impact on waiting times on a mid-sized Canadian community hospital if IONA is offered as an alternative to traditional operating room (OR) arthroscopy for medial meniscal tears.

In order to develop a comprehensive understanding and accurate representation of the quantifiable operations involved in the current state for medial meniscus tear care, process mapping was performed that describes the journey of a patient from when they present with knee pain to their general practitioner until case resolution. This technique was then repeated to create a second process map describing the hypothetical proposed state whereby OR diversion may be conducted utilizing IONA. Once the respective process maps for each state were determined, each process map was translated into a Dupont decision tree. In order to accurately determine the total number of patients which would be eligible for this care pathway at our institution, the OR booking scheduling for arthroscopy and meniscectomy/repair over a four year time period (2016-2020) were reviewed. A sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the effect of the number of patients who select IONA over meniscectomy and the number of revision meniscectomies after IONA on 1) the profit and profit margin determined by the MCS-Dupont financial model and 2) the throughput (percentage and number) determined by the MCS-throughput model.

Based on historic data at our institution, an average of 198 patients (SD 31) underwent either a meniscectomy or repair from years 2016-2020. Revenue for both states was similar (p = .22), with the current state revenue being $ 248,555.99 (standard deviation $ 39,005.43) and proposed state of $ 249,223.86 (SD $ 39,188.73). However, the reduction in expenses was significant (p < .0001) at 5.15%, with expenses in the current state being $ 281,415.23 (SD $ 44,157.80) and proposed state of $ 266,912.68 (SD $ 42,093.19), representing $14,502.95 in savings. Accordingly, profit improvement was also significant (p < .0001) at 46.2%, with current state profit being $ (32,859.24) (SD $ 5,153.49) and proposed state being $ (17,678.82) (SD $ 2,921.28). The addition of IONA into the care pathway of the proposed state produced an average improvement in throughput of 42 patients (SD 7), representing a 21.2% reduction in the number of patients that require an OR procedure. Financial sensitivity analysis revealed that the proposed state profit was higher than the current state profit if as few as 10% of patients select IONA, with the maximum revision rate needing to remain below 40% to achieve improved profits.

The most important finding from this study is that IONA is a cost-effective alternative to traditional surgical arthroscopy for medial meniscus meniscectomy. Importantly, IONA can also be used as a diagnostic procedure. It is shown to be a cost-effective alternative to MRI with similar diagnostic accuracy. The role of IONA as a joint diagnostic-therapeutic tool could positively impact MRI waiting times and MRI/MRA costs, and further reduce indirect costs to society. Given the well-established benefit of early meniscus treatment, accelerating both diagnosis and therapy is bound to result in positive effects.

In computer assisted orthopaedic surgery, intraoperative registration is commonly performed by fitting features acquired from the exposed bone surface to a preoperative virtual model of the bone geometry. In cases where the acquired spatial measurements are unreliable or have been inappropriately chosen, the registration result can degenerate. Current performance indicators, such as the root mean squared (RMS) error and the spatial distribution of the registered feature errors may not be sufficient to warn the surgeon of such a case.

In this study, statistical analysis is applied to the registration outcomes of perturbed variants of a collected point set. In this way, it is possible to assess the ability of the original set to represent the underlying surface, taking into account the distribution of the points as well as errors introduced during the acquisition process. Confidence measures are calculated to predict the reliability of the original registration result and therefore the robustness of the point set itself.

For proof of concept, this method has been tested in simulation with a CT-generated tibia model. The algorithm was used to identify the 10 best performing of a population of 1000 randomly generated point sets. All registration outcomes produced by these point sets were found to be superior to those resulting from sets of the same size produced manually using an optimised point-acquisition protocol. Preliminary results suggest that this method, alongside the standard RMS and residual point error distribution, may be used to provide the surgeon with a reliable indication of registration outcome in the operating room.

Background

Obtaining accurate alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a concern. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) created using preoperative 3D modelling was developed to offer surgeons a simplified, reliable, efficient and customised TKA procedure.

Purpose

Surgical training is based on an apprenticeship model. This training can be divided broadly into three main categories: practical skills, knowledge and decision making. The operating room is the nexus of a large part of surgical teaching. The supervising surgeon imparts both practical teaching as well as didactic information to the trainee during surgical procedures. A large amount of decision making skills are also acquired in the OR. Indeed, a large part of the surgical teams time is spent in the operating room which makes it an ideal educational environment.

Bench model training is one teaching modality whereby the novice surgeon is taught surgical skills on life-like models. This practice enhances and accelerates the ability of the trainee to acquire fundamental, technical and surgical skills in the operating room. Whether bench model training provides an advantage on the ability of the trainee to acquire knowledge and decision making skills is unknown. Based on the motor learning theories, it is hypothesized that bench-model training will allow junior residents to be more interactive than trainees lacking similar active hands-on training. In this study, we examined whether bench model training provides an advantage on the ability of the trainee to acquire knowledge and decision making skills.

Aim

The aim of this study was to validate the information on operating room ventilation reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) and to assess the influence of this ventilation on the risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

The aim of this study was to validate the information on operating room ventilation reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR). We then wanted to assess the influence of operating room ventilation on the rate of revision due to infection after primary THA performed in operating rooms with conventional ventilation, “greenhouse”–ventilation and Laminar Airflow ventilation (LAF).

We identified cases of THA revisions due to deep infection and the type of ventilation system reported to the NAR from the primary THA. We included 5 orthopaedic units reporting 17947 primary THAs and 136 (0.8%) revisions due to infection during the 28 year inclusion period from 1987 to 2014. The hospitals were visited and the current and previous ventilation systems were evaluated together with the hospitals head engineer, and the factual ventilation on the specific operating rooms was thereby assessed. The association between revision due to infection and operating room ventilation was estimated by calculating relative risks (RR) in a Cox regression model.

73% of the primary THAs were performed in a room with LAF, in contrast to the reported 80 % of LAF. There was similar risk of revision due to infection after THA performed in operating rooms with laminar air flow compared to conventional ventilation (RR=0.7, 95 % CI: 0.2–2.3) and after THA performed in operating rooms with “greenhouse”-ventilation compared to conventional ventilation (RR=1.2, 0.1–11).

Surgeons are not fully aware of what kind of ventilation there is in the operating room. This study may indicate that, concerning reduction in incidence of THA infection, LAF does not justify the substantial installation cost. The numbers in the present study are too small to conclude strongly. Therefore, the study will be expanded to include all hospitals reporting to the NAR.

Aim

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the true operating room (OR) ventilation on the risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR).

INTRODUCTION

Adult reconstructive orthopedic surgery in the United States is facing an imminent logjam due to the increasing divergence of the demand for services and the ability for the community to supply those services. In combination with several other factors, a perfect storm is brewing that may leave the system overtaxed and the patient population suffering from either a lack of treatment, or treatment by less qualified providers. A key component to improving the overall efficiency of surgical care is to introduce enabling technologies that can effectively increase the throughput while simultaneously improving the quality of care. One such enabling technology that has proven itself in many industries is robotics, which has recently been introduced in surgery with even more recent applications in orthopedic surgery. A surgeon interactive robotic arm has been developed for partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aims to analyse the efficiency of a new robotic technology for use in orthopaedic surgery.

Nowadays, foot switches are used in almost every operating theatre to support the interaction with medical devices. Foot switches are especially used to release risk-sensitive functions of e.g. the drilling device, the high-frequency device or the X-ray C-arm. In general, the use of foot switches facilitates the work, since they enable the surgeon to use both hands exclusively for the manipulation within the operation procedures. Due to the increasing number of (complex) devices controlled by foot switches, the surgeons face a variety of challenges regarding usability and safety of these human-machine-interfaces.

In the future, the approach of integrated medical devices in the OR on the basis of the open communication standard IEEE 11073 gives the opportunity to provide a central surgical cockpit with a universal foot switch for the surgeon, enabling the interaction with various devices different manufacturers. In the framework of the ongoing OR.NET initiative founded on the basis of the OR.NET research project (2012–2016) a novel concept for a universal foot switch (within the framework of a surgical workstation) has been developed in order to optimise the intraoperative workflow for the OR-personnel.

Here, we developed three wireless functional models of a universal foot switch together with a standardised modular interface for visual feedback via a central surgical cockpit display. Within the development of our latest foot switch, the requirements have been inter alia to provide adequate functionalities to cover the needs for the interventions in the medical disciplines orthopaedic surgery, neurosurgery and ENT.

The evaluation has been conducted within an interaction-centered usability analysis with surgeons from orthopaedics, neurosurgery and ENT. By using the Thinking Aloud technique in a Wizard-of-Oz experiment the usability criteria effectiveness, learnability and user satisfaction have been analysed.

Regarding learnability 83.25% of the subjects stated that the usage of the universal foot switch is easy to learn. An average of 77,2% of users rated the usability of the universal foot switch between good and excellent on the SUS scale. The intuitiveness of the graphical user interface has been approved with 91.75% and the controllability with 83.25%. Finally, 86% of the subjects stated a high user satisfaction.

Purpose

Surgical complications are common and frequently preventable. The introduction of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has improved surgical outcomes. WHO guidelines reduce, but do not prevent errors. Successful arthroplasty surgery requires strict infection control measures. We observed a single surgical team to see if errors caused by operating room personnel were covered by the WHO Checklist.

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective procedure to improve the quality of life in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. The number of these procedures are expected to grow 174% by 2030. This growth rate is expected to economically strain the health care system. A potential solution to alleviate this problem is the utilization of single use instruments (SUI). Potential advantages of SUI include: improved operating room efficiencies, decreased costs associated with traditional instrument management (sterile processing, shipping), and decreased infection risk. The present study examines the clinical results of SUI compared to standard instrumentation. Furthermore, economic modeling is performed to examine the cost savings that is potentially realized with their use. Materials and Methods. 51 patients receiving a TKA with use of SUI were prospectively compared to 49 patients utilizing standard instrumentation. Knee Society Scores and Radiographic alignment will be evaluated. Adverse events will be recorded. Economic modeling of SUI will be performed in 4 different areas: 1. Decreased infection burden; 2. Operating room logistics; 3. Sterile processing savings; and 4. Instrument logistical savings. Results. The average Pre-operative KSS (Objective/Functional) scores were 48.7/41.6 for the SIU patients compared to 50.2/38.7 for the standard instrumentation patients. Post-operative improvements measured 84.0/72.8 and 83.9/76.4 for the 2 groups respectively. The Pre-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle was 176.2 and 177.0 for the 2 groups. The SUI HKA improved to 179.3 while the standard improved to 178.9. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups. Furthermore, there were no cases of subsidence, migration, loosening, or infection in either group. There were no SUI procedure abandonments. Economic analysis revealed a decreased risk of Infection burden of $28.08/case. Operating room efficiencies include reduced set-up/take-down time and case efficiency savings/case. This averages $348.14/case. Instrument sterilization savings occur by bypassing the central sterile-processing department completely and models to $700/case. Finally, instrument logistics savings include time and money spent organizing/turning over/shipping instrument sets for cases. This estimate is $112.88/case for a total economic value of $1, 189.10/case. Discussion. In summary, the present study confirms that SUI provides similar clinical and radiographic results to standard instrumentation for TKA. Furthermore, SUI offers significant cost savings/case via potential benefits of reduced risk of infection, increased operating room productivity, and significant tray sterilization and loaner instrumentation cost savings

This work refers to a male patient, 25 years of age, admitted in the Emergency Department following a bicycle accident, of which resulted an open fracture of the right forearm bones – Gustillo & Anderson I. With this work, the authors have as objective the description of the patient's clinical condition – starting with the fracture, over to the osteomyelitis – as well as the surgical procedures and remaining treatments he was submitted to. The authors used the patient's records from Hospital's archives, namely records from the Emergency Department, Operating Room, Infirmary and Consultation, and also the diagnostic exams performed throughout the patient's clinical evolution. This clinical case began in May 2013, when the patient suffered an open fracture of the right forearm bones – Gustillo & Anderson I – due to a bicycle accident. At the time, the exposure site was thoroughly rinsed, a cast immobilization was made, and antibiotics were prescribed. In the fifth day following the trauma, the patient was submitted to an open reduction with internal fixation with plate and screws of both forearm bones. In the following period, the distal segment of the suture suffered necrosis, exposing the radial plate and the tendons of the first dorsal compartment. The Plastic Surgery team was then contacted, proposing the execution of a graft over the exposed area, which was made in August 2013. In the postoperative period, about half the graft lost its viability and it was noted that a radial pseudoarthrosis had developed – in the context of osteomyelitis – with a defect of about 9 centimeters. This condition prompted the extraction of the osteosynthesis material, about 4 months after its application, and at the same time the first stage of a Masquelet Technique was performed. The second stage of the aforementioned procedure was carried out two months later. Currently, the patient is clinically stable, with right hand mobility acceptable for his daily living activities. Analyzing the patient's clinical evolution, we concluded that, even though the adequate therapeutic decisions have been made in each stage, the development of osteomyelitis was inevitable. This realization, in association with the patient's young age, raises debatable questions of therapeutic order

The clinical case refers to a male patient, 34 years old, admitted at the Emergency Department after a fall of 2 meters. Of that trauma, resulted an exposed Monteggia fracture type III – Gustillo & Anderson IIA – on his left arm. With this work, the authors intend to describe the evolution of the patient's clinical condition, as well as the surgical procedures he was submitted to. The authors used the patient's records from Hospital's archives, namely from the Emergency Department, Operating Room, Infirmary and Consultation, and also the diagnostic exams performed throughout the patient's clinical evolution. The clinical case began in December 2011, when the patient suffered a fall of 2 meters in his workplace. From the evaluation in the Emergency Department, it was concluded that the patient presented, at the left forearm, an exposed Monteggia type III fracture – Gustillo & Anderson IIA – combined with a comminuted fracture of the radial head. At the admission day, the wound site was thoroughly rinsed, the fracture was reduced and immobilized with an above-the-elbow cast, and antibiotics were initiated. Six days after admission, the patient was submitted to open reduction with internal fixation with plate and screws of the fracture of the ulna and radial head arthroplasty. The postoperative period was uneventful. Two months after the surgical procedure, inflammatory signals appeared with purulent secretion in the ulnar suture. Accordingly, the patient was submitted to fistulectomy, rinsing of the surgical site and a cycle of antibiotics with Vancomycin, directed to the S. aureus isolated from the purulent secretion. The clinical evolution was unfavorable, leading to the appearance of a metaphyseal pseudarthrosis or the ulna and dislocation of the radial head prosthesis. The previously implanted material was therefore removed, 4 months after the traumatic event; at the same time an external fixation device was applied and the first part of a Masquelet Technique was conducted. The second part of the aforementioned procedure was carried out in December 2012. The patient was discharged from the consultation after a 2 years follow-up, with a range of motion of the left elbow acceptable for his daily living activities. In spite of the multiple surgical rinsing procedures and directed antibiotics, the development of a metaphyseal pseudarthrosis of the ulna was inevitable. This clinical case illustrates how the Masquelet Technique presents itself as a good solution for the cases of non-union of fractures in the context of infection

Aims

Tissue adhesives (TAs) are a commonly used adjunct to traditional surgical wound closures. However, TAs must be allowed to dry before application of a surgical dressing, increasing operating time and reducing intraoperative efficiency. The goal of this study is to identify a practical method for decreasing the curing time for TAs.

During the pandemic of COVID-19, some patients with COVID-19 may need emergency surgeries. As spine surgeons, it is our responsibility to ensure appropriate treatment to the patients with COVID-19 and spinal diseases. A protocol for spinal surgery and related management on patients with COVID-19 has been reviewed. Patient preparation for emergency surgeries, indications, and contraindications of emergency surgeries, operating room preparation, infection control precautions and personal protective equipments (PPE), anesthesia management, intraoperative procedures, postoperative management, medical waste disposal, and surveillance of healthcare workers were reviewed. It should be safe for surgeons with PPE of protection level 2 to perform spinal surgeries on patients with COVID-19. Standardized and careful surgical procedures should be necessary to reduce the exposure to COVID-19.

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to assess the independent association of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative mortality for patients undergoing orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The secondary aim was to identify factors that were associated with developing COVID-19 during the postoperative period.

Aims

Elective operating was halted during the COVID-19 pandemic to increase the capacity to provide care to an unprecedented volume of critically unwell patients. During the pandemic, the orthopaedic department at the Aneurin Bevan University Health Board restructured the trauma service, relocating semi-urgent ambulatory trauma operating to the isolated clean elective centre (St. Woolos’ Hospital) from the main hospital receiving COVID-19 patients (Royal Gwent Hospital). This study presents our experience of providing semi-urgent trauma care in a COVID-19-free surgical unit as a safe way to treat trauma patients during the pandemic and a potential model for restarting an elective orthopaedic service.