Aim:. To investigate the clinical outcomes of elbows with post-traumatic stiffness treated by open surgical release. Methods:. A retrospective review was completed on thirty-five consecutively managed patients who underwent an open elbow release for post-traumatic stiffness between 2007 and 2012. Pre-operative and post-operative range of motion (ROM), pain scores and functional outcomes were recorded. Results:. Mean follow-up was 31 months (6–84). The cohort consisted of 20 male and 15 female patients with an average age at time of surgery of 34 years (17–59). The interval from injury to time of release was 26 months (6–180). An improvement in mean ROM from 49° (0°–105°) to 102° (55°–150°) was obtained. The improvement in ROM in patients with pre-operative heterotopic bone was 61° compared to 45° in patients without heterotopic bone. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 44 pre-operatively to 82 at most recent follow-up. Mean VAS scores improved from 5.9 pre-operatively to 2.8 at most recent follow-up. Patients rated the affected elbow a mean of 73% as compared to the contralateral/normal side (50–100%). Apart from a 10% incidence of transient ulnar nerve neurapraxia in patients who had a medial or combined approach, complication rates and functional outcomes were comparable between medial, lateral and combined approaches. Conclusion:. Open release for post-traumatic elbow stiffness results in satisfactory functional outcomes in the majority of cases, with no significant differences between medial, lateral or combined approaches

Outcomes following carpal tunnel release are generally favorable. Understanding factors that contribute to inferior outcomes may allow for strategies targeted at improving results in these patients. Our purpose was to determine if patients' underlying personality traits, specifically resiliency and catastrophization, impact their post-operative outcomes following carpal tunnel release. A prospective case series was performed. Based on our power analysis, 102 patients were recruited. Patients completed written consent, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Brief Resiliency Scale (BRS). A single surgeon, or his resident under supervision, then performed an open carpal release under local anaesthetic. Our primary outcome measure was a repeat BCTQ at three- and six-months. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to assess the correlation between PCS and BRS scores and final BCTQ scores. Forty-three and sixty-three participants completed the BCTQ at three and six months respectively. All patients showed improvement in their symptoms (p = 0.001). There was no correlation between patients PCS or BRS and the amount of improvement. There was also no correlation between PCS or BRS and the patients' raw scores at baseline or follow-up. Patients self-assessed resiliency and degree of pain catastrophization has no correlation with the amount of improvement they have three or six months post-operatively. Most patients improved following carpal tunnel release, and patients with low resiliency and high levels of pain catastrophization should expect comparable outcomes to patients without these features

The process by which pathologic scar tissue forms after TKA and restricts functional range of motion is relatively poorly understood. Arthrofibrosis may develop in patients who have normal intra-operative range of motion (ROM). However, passive flexion, extension, or both can become restricted and painful, sometimes several weeks after surgery following an early post-operative period of normal motion. The response to both nonsurgical and surgical treatment is often unsatisfactory. Arthrofibrotic scar contains dense fibrous tissue with abundant fibroblasts. Heterotopic bone is frequently found in patients with arthrofibrosis. Stiffness may result from inadequate postsurgical pain management or rehabilitation or from a biologic process that causes rapid proliferation of scar tissue. Genetic factors also may play a role, although it is difficult to predict which patients are at increased risk for arthrofibrosis after TKA. Surgical technique also can contribute; oversizing the femoral component, overstuffing the patella, or rotational malalignment can play a role. Manipulation can be helpful, particularly during the first three months after surgery. However, maintaining motion long term also requires an effective pain management and physical therapy program after manipulation. Arthroscopy may also have a role to remove scar tissue in the suprapatellar pouch and medial and lateral gutters usually between six months and one year after TKA. After one year following TKA, open surgical release or revision surgery is the most effective method to increase motion. However, only modest gains are likely to be achieved and pain may not be improved

Percutaneous A1 pulley release is being increasingly used as an alternative to open surgical release and injection of local steroids for the treatment of the trigger digit. We treated 43 patients, average age 57 years (range12-78). All trigger digits were grade III-IV (Quinnell classification). A mean duration of pre-operative symptoms was 7.3 months (range 2-13 months). A percutaneous release was performed with a 19-gauge hypodermic needle under local anaesthesia in the outpatient setting. All patients were evaluated with respect to clinical resolution of symptoms and general satisfaction. We report a 97% successful release and only one case of incomplete release. A result in terms of abolishing triggering was immediate and patient acceptance was excellent. By two weeks, all the patients had no pain at the operative site. After a mean follow-up of 30.2 months (range12-50), there had been no recurrences. There were no digital nerve injuries, flexor tendon injuries, and infections. The percutaneous release is a safe and effective technique, which provides significant cost savings. The time from onset of symptoms and grading prognostically is significant and affects the treatment outcome. We recommend the percutaneous technique for typical cases of trigger finger with a palpable nodule and reproducible mechanical triggering. This technique can be the treatment of choice for the established trigger finger (grade III and IV) with symptoms of more than few months' duration. The open technique is reserved for complicated cases such as florid tenosynovitis, locked digit, failed percutaneous release or those involving the thumb

Patellofemoral unicompartmental joint replacement is a controversial subject with a relatively small evidence base. Of the 50,000 total knee arthroplasties performed each year in the UK, approximately 10% are performed for predominantly patellofemoral arthritis. There are several patellofemoral unicompartmental prostheses on the market with the National Joint Registry recording 745 such prostheses used in 2007. Most evidence in favour of this procedure comes from experience with the Avon prosthesis (Stryker) predominantly from designer-surgeons. The FPV patellofemoral joint replacement (Wright Medical) has been in use in Europe for several years. The instruments have recently been redesigned and the device marketed in the UK. In 2007 the FPV had 5.9% market share (n=44). We present our early experience with the FPV patellofemoral joint replacement, which to our knowledge, is the first clinical outcome series for this prosthesis. 33 consecutive FPV joint replacements in 29 patients were performed between April 2007 and September 2009 for unicompartmental patellofemoral OA. All cases were performed or directly supervised by the senior author. Results are presented with a minimum follow-up of six months. Oxford and American Knee Society scores (AKSS) were obtained on all patients preoperatively and at subsequent outpatient visits. Mean preoperative AKSS knee score was 49.7 points and postoperative scores at 6 months and 1 year were 82.5 and 86.4 respectively. Mean Oxford score preoperatively was 30.4 (37%) and at 6 months and 1 year were 21.3 (56%) and 11.2 (77%) respectively. There were no complications related to the implant. One knee required a secondary open lateral release due to inadequate balancing at the index procedure. Further medium to long-term follow up data are required, but our initial experience with this device is encouraging