Introduction. Ankle fractures in the elderly have been increasing with an ageing but active population and bring with them specific challenges. Medical co-morbidities, a poor soft tissue envelope and a requirement for early mobilisation to prevent morbidity and mortality, all create potential pitfalls to successful treatment. As a result, different techniques have been employed to try and improve outcomes. Total contact casting, both standard and enhanced open reduction internal fixation, external fixation and most recently tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing have all been proposed as suitable treatment modalities. Over the past five years popular literature has begun to herald TTC nailing as an appropriate and contemporary solution to the complex problem of high-risk ankle fragility fractures. We sought to assess whether, within our patient cohort, the outcomes seen supported the statement that TTC has equal outcomes to more traditional open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) when used to treat the high-risk ankle fragility fracture. Materials & Methods. Results of ORIF versus TTC nailing without joint preparation for treatment of fragility ankle fractures were evaluated via retrospective cohort study of 64 patients with high-risk fragility ankle fractures without our trauma centre. We aimed to assess whether results within our unit were equal to those seen within other published studies. Patients were matched 1:1 based on gender, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and ASA score. Patient demographics, AO/OTA fracture classification, intra-operative and post-operative complications, discharge destination, union rates, FADI scores and patient mobility were recorded. Results. There were 32 patients within each arm. Mean age was 78.4 (TTC) and 78.3 (ORIF). The CCI was 5.9 in each group respectively with mean ASA 2.9 (TTC) and 2.8 (ORIF). There were two open fractures within each group. Median follow up duration was 26 months. Time to theatre from injury was 8.0 days (TTC) versus 3.3 days (ORIF). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day, one year or overall mortality at final follow up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis did however demonstrate that of those patients who died post-operatively the mean time to mortality was significantly shorter in those treated with TTC nailing versus ORIF (20.3 months versus 38.2 months, p=0.013). There was no statistical difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups (46.9% versus 25%, p=0.12). The re-operation rate was twice as high in patients treated with TTC nailing however this was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in the FADI scores at final follow up, 72.1±12.9 (TTC) versus 67.9±13.9 (ORIF) nor post-operative mobility status. Conclusions. Within our study TTC nailing with an unprepared joint demonstrated broadly equivalent results to ORIF in the management of high-risk ankle fragility fractures; this replicates findings of previous studies. We did however observe that mean survival was significantly shorter in the TTC group than those treated with ORIF. We believe this may have been contributed to by a delay to theatre due to TTC stabilisation being treated as a sub-specialist operation in our unit at the time. We propose that both TTC and ORIF are satisfactory techniques to stabilise the frail ankle fracture however, similarly to the other fragility fractures, the priority should be on an emergent operation in a timely fashion in order to minimise the associated morbidity and mortality. Further randomised control studies are needed within the area to establish definitive results and a working consensus

Management of acetabular fractures in the elderly population remains somewhat controversial in regards to when to consider is open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus acute primary total hip. study aims to (1) describe outcome of this complex problem and investigate predictors of successful outcome. This retrospective study analyzes all acetabular fractures in patients over the age of 60, managed by ORIF at a tertiary trauma care centre between 2007 and 2018 with a minimum follow up of one year. Of the 117 patients reviewed, 85 patients undergoing ORIF for treatment of their acetabular fracture were included in the analysis. The remainder were excluded based management option including acute ORIF with THA (n=10), two-stage ORIF (n=2), external fixator only (n=1), acute THA (n=1), and conservative management (n=1). The remainder were excluded based on inaccessible medical records (n=6), mislabelled diagnosis (n=6), associated femoral injuries (n=4), acetabular fracture following hemiarthroplasty (n=1). The mean age of the cohort is 70±7 years old with 74% (n=62) of patients being male. Data collected included: demographics, mechanism of injury, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), ASA Grade, smoking status and reoperations. Pre-Operative Radiographs were analyzed to determine the Judet and Letournel fracture pattern, presence of comminution and posterior wall marginal impaction. Postoperative radiographs were used to determine Matta Grade of Reduction. Outcome measures included morbidity-, mortality- rates, joint survival, radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at follow-up. A poor outcome in ORIF was defined as one of the following: 1) conversion to THA or 2) the presence of radiographic OA, combined with an OHS less than 34 (findings consistent with a hip that would benefit from a hip replacement). The data was analyzed step-wise to create a regression model predictive of outcome following ORIF. Following ORIF, 31% (n=26) of the cohort had anatomic reduction, while 64% (n=54) had imperfect or poor reduction. 4 patients did not have adequate postoperative radiographs to assess the reduction. 31 of 84 patients undergoing ORIF had a complication of which 22.6% (n=19) required reoperation. The most common reason being conversion to THA (n=14), which occurred an average of 1.6±1.9 years post-ORIF. The remainder required reoperation for infection (n=5). Including those converted to THA, 43% (n=36) developed radiographic OA following acetabular fracture management. The mean OHS in patients undergoing ORIF was 36 ± 10; 13(16%) had an OHS less than 34. The results of the logistic regression demonstrate that Matta grade of reduction (p=0.017), to be predictive of a poor outcome in acetabular fracture management. With non-anatomic alignment following fixation, patients had a 3 times greater risk of a poor outcome. No other variables were found to be predictive of ORIF outcome. The ability to achieve anatomic reduction of fracture fragments as determined by the Matta grade, is predictive of the ability to retain the native hip with acceptable outcome following acetabular fracture in the elderly. Further research must be conducted to determine predictors of adequate reduction in order to identify candidates for ORIF

Introduction. Lateral humeral condyle fractures account for 17% of the distal humeral condyle fractures. They affect children between 5 and 10 years of age. Recent reports advocate closed reduction and internal fixation for the less displaced fractures. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed children treated with open reduction internal fixation of these fractures at a single institution over a period of 13 years. All cases of lateral humeral condyle fractures treated with ORIF were identified through the trauma register. Case notes and radiographs were retrieved. Fracture classification, mode of fixation, time to union, and clinical examination at latest follow up were reviewed. Results. 105 lateral condyle fractures were identified. 76 (72%) in boys and 29 (28%) in girls. Average age was 6.2 years. 92 were Milch type 2 and 13 Milch type 1. According to the Jacobs classification for displacement 9 were type I, 33 Type II and 63 type III. All fractures were treated with open reduction and fixation with K-wires. Average time to union (radiologic) was 34 days. Mean follow up was 39 months. Hypertrophy of the lateral condyle in follow up radiographs was documented in 45 cases (42%). Cubitus Varus was documented in 7 cases (7%). None of the children complained of painful range of movement at latest follow up. There was one case of superficial infection of the K-wires and one case of delayed union. Discussion. Open reduction internal fixation is the established management of lateral humeral condyle fractures. This series confirms the consistently good results of open reduction. Compared to recent reports of closed reduction internal fixation, this series demonstrates good results with no complications directly relating to the open reduction technique

Background. Outcome of Type II and III (Sander's CT classification) fracture of the calcaneum who underwent open reduction and internal fixation was assessed. Methods. Thirty-three type II and III fractures of the calcaneum (all unilateral) underwent open reduction and internal fixation using the ‘extensile lateral approach’. There were twelve Type II and twenty-one Type III fractures. Patients were followed up for a mean of 40.81 months (Range 28 to 62 months). Patients were assessed clinically by the Creighton Nebraska Health foundation score for assessment of fractures of the calcaneum. Radiologically assessment was done comparing the pre and post operativeBohler's and Gissane angles and measuring the calcaneal width on the axial xrays. Results. Nineteen patient were classified as excellent and 14 as good. There were no poor or fair results. The mean correction of Bohler's angle was 5.6 +/− 7.2 and the Gissane'sanglecorrected by 7.8 +/−5.8 °. Superficial skin necrosis was the most common complication encountered (3 patients). Two patients preferred removal of the implant after fracture union due to prominent hardware. Conclusion. Open reduction Type II and III intra – articular calcaneal fractures is associated with minimal complications and gives reproducible results, especially in young adults

Purpose. Limited information is available regarding the functional outcomes of radial head fractures managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcomes of radial head fractures treated with ORIF. Method. Fifty-two patients, with a mean age of 4412 years, who were treated with radial head ORIF were evaluated at a mean of 4.42.4 years. Thirty were isolated radial head fractures (Group A), 13 (Group B) were associated with a complex fracture-dislocation (terrible triad variants), and 5 (Group C) were associated with a proximal ulnar fracture (Monteggia/trans-olecranon variants). Fourty-four were partial articular fractures and 8 were complete articular fractures. Outcomes were assessed with physical and radiographic examination, and validated self-reported questionnaires. Results. The average PREE score (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) for Groups A, B, and C were 7.613.1, 12.313.4, and 108.5, respectively. The average MEPI (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) for Groups A, B, and C were 8913, 8511, and 918, respectively. For Groups A, B, and C respectively, the prevalence of radiographic radiocapitellar arthritis was 30%, 46%, and 20%. The average flexion/extension arc for Groups A, B, and C were 7 to 132, 6 to 134, and 10 to 132 respectively. Secondary surgery was performed in 17% of cases, most commonly for decreased motion. Three comminuted fractures failed ORIF and required conversion to radial head arthroplasty. Conclusion. Patients with radial head fractures, including those associated with complex fracture-dislocations, can achieve excellent functional outcomes with low self reported pain and disability when treated with ORIF, despite radiographic evidence of mild post-traumatic arthritis

Despite the variety of implants or techniques that exist to treat displaced distal radial fractures, the majority fail to provide sufficient stability to permit early functional recovery. However, locking plates have the advantage over other implants in that locking screws add considerably to the overall stability. The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcome of patients with displaced distal radial fractures treated with a volar distal radial locking plate (Synthes). During a two year period, details of 98 patients admitted to our unit with inherently unstable dorsally displaced distal radial fractures treated with volar locking plates were collected prospectively. For the purpose of this analysis, only those patients (55) with unilateral fracture, able to attend the study clinic at 6 months post-injury were considered. Patients were immobilised in wool and crepe for a 2 week period. The group consisted of 15 males and 40 females with an average age of 54 (28 to 83). At 6 months, patients' perceived functional recovery averaged 80%. Objective assessment was considered in relation to the uninjured side: grip strength 73%; pinch strength 83%; palmarflexion 77%, dorsiflexion 80%; radial deviation 74%; ulnar deviation 74%; pronation 93%, and supination 92%. Seven patients complained of symptoms relating to prominent metalwork. Good/excellent early subjective and objective functional recovery was made following open reduction and internal fixation using volar locking plates of dorsally displaced distal radial fractures. We suggest that objective assessment of grip strength and dorsiflexion can be used as a measure of patient perception of function

BACKGROUND

In our institution we use the Winklestabile volar locking plate for operative fixation of distal radius fractures. This study aims to assess subjective and objective outcomes using this method of treatment.

Introduction. The condition of the soft tissues surrounding an ankle fracture influences timing and treatment of injuries. Conventional treatment used an open approach to facilitate anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation. Intramedullary devices for fibular fractures provide a safe alternative in patients in which the condition of the soft tissue envelope or the patient's co-morbidities may benefit from a less invasive approach. We compared outcomes for patients treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with those undergoing treatment with fibular nails (FN). Methods. 13 consecutive patients treated with fibular nails (FN) were compared with 13 age-matched patients that underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). All patients were followed to union. Study outcomes were time from admission to surgery, length of stay, wound failure, implant failure, revision surgery, OMAS and SF-36. Results. There was no difference in age or sex distribution between groups. There was no difference in OMAS at 1 year (83 ± 9 in FN group; 80± 21 in ORIF group) and SF-36 (94 ± 11 and 90 ± 20). There were 2 implant failures in the ORIF group and none in the FN group. There was one wound failure in the ORIF group and none in the FN group. Patients treated with FN had a shorter time to surgery (1 day ± 24 hours vs 3 days ± 24 hours) and shorter length of stay (1 day ± 24 hours vs 4 days ± 96 hours). Conclusion. FN is a safe method to treat patients with displaced distal fibular fractures that may have a poor soft tissue envelope and risk factors for wound healing. FN reduces the time to surgery and overall length of stay compared with similar patients treated with conventional ORIF

Olecranon fractures are common injuries representing roughly 5% of pediatric elbow fractures. The traditional surgical management is open reduction and internal fixation with a tension band technique where the pins are buried under the skin and tamped into the triceps. We have used a modification of this technique, where the pins have been left out of the skin to be removed in clinic. The purpose of the current study is to compare the outcomes of surgically treated olecranon fractures using a tension-band technique with buried k-wires (PINS IN) versus percutaneous k-wires (PINS OUT). We performed a retrospective chart review on all pediatric patients (18 years of age or less) with olecranon fractures that were surgically treated at a pediatric academic center between 2015 to present. Fractures were identified using ICD-10 codes and manually identified for those with an isolated olecranon fracture. Patients were excluded if they had polytrauma, metabolic bone disease, were treated non-op or if a non-tension band technique was used (ex: plate/screws). Patients were then divided into 2 groups, olecranon fractures using a tension-band technique with buried k-wires (PINS IN) and with percutaneous k-wires (PINS OUT). In the PINS OUT group, the k-wires were removed in clinic at the surgeon's discretion once adequate fracture healing was identified. The 2 groups were then compared for demographics, time to mobilization, fracture healing, complications and return to OR. A total of 35 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 28 patients in the PINS IN group with an average age of 12.8 years, of which 82% male and 43% fractured their right olecranon. There were 7 patients in the PINS OUT group with an average age of 12.6 years, of which 57% were male and 43% fractured their right olecranon. All patients in both groups were treated with open reduction internal fixation with a tension band-technique. In the PINS IN group, 64% were treated with 2.0 k-wires and various materials for the tension band (82% suture, 18% cerclage wire). In the PINS OUT group, 71% were treated with 2.0 k-wires and all were treated with sutures for the tension band. The PINS IN group were faster to mobilize (3.4 weeks (range 2-5 weeks) vs 5 weeks (range 4-7 weeks) p=0.01) but had a significantly higher complications rate compared to the PINS OUT group (6 vs 0, p =0.0001) and a significantly higher return to OR (71% vs 0%, p=0.0001), mainly for hardware irritation or limited range of motion. All fractures healed in both groups within 7 weeks. Pediatric olecranon fractures treated with a suture tension-band technique and k-wires left percutaneously is a safe and alternative technique compared to the traditional buried k-wires technique. The PINS OUT technique, although needing longer immobilization, could lead to less complications and decreased return to the OR due to irritation and limited ROM

To identify the demographics, mechanisms of injury and treatment modalities of patients presenting at CHBAH with calcaneal fractures. A retrospective study of all admitted patients with calcaneal fractures from 01 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. The data collected includes age, gender, side of injury, mechanism of injury, isolated injury versus polytrauma, open and close fractures, different treatment modalities and time to surgery. The descriptive data will be analysed, with results presented as frequency charts, histograms, and percentages. A total of 98 patients showed a male predominance of 90.8% compared to 9.2% of females. The median age was 38 years, the commonest mechanism was from falls from height, accounting for 67.3% with gunshot injuries accounting for 5%. Bilateral fractures were observed in 5 patients, with similar total numbers between those isolated to the left (47) as compared to the injuries isolated to the right side (46). Calcaneus fractures associated with other injuries in polytrauma cases were observed in 17.4%, and open fractures were observed in 7 patients with 5 having occurred post gunshot injury. A total of 48 patient required surgical treatment with the average time to surgery found to be 15 days. The surgical management varied, with open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws in 68.7%, followed by 16.7% of patients who were treated with open reduction and internal screw fixation. Calcaneal fractures occurred frequently amongst male patients secondary to fall from height. Half of the total patient number admitted had require a surgical intervention to treat the fracture, with open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws being the frequent mode of fixation in this population group

Conventional fracture courses utilise prefabricated sawbones that are not realistic or patient specific. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of creating 3D fracture models and utilising them in fracture courses to teach surgical technique. We selected an AO type 2R3C2 fracture that underwent open reduction internal fixation. De-identified CT scan images were converted to a stereolithography (STL) format. This was then processed using Computer Aided Design (CAD) to create a virtual 3D model. The model was 3D printed using a combination of standard thermoplastic polymer (STP) and a porous filler to create a realistic cortical and cancellous bone. A case-based sawbone workshop was organised for residents, unaccredited registrars, and orthopaedic trainees comparing the fracture model with a prefabricated T-split distal radius fracture. Pre-operative images aided discussion of fixation, and post-operative x-rays allowed comparison between the participants fixation. Participants were provided with identical reduction tools. We created a questionnaire for participants to rate their satisfaction and experience using a Likert scale. The 3D printed fracture model aided understanding and appreciation of the fracture pattern and key fragments amongst residents and unaccredited trainees. Real case-based models provided a superior learning experience and environment to aid teaching. The generic sawbone provided easier drilling and inserting of screws. Preliminary results show that the cost of 3D printing can be comparable to generic sawbones. It is feasible to create a fracture model with a real bone feel. Further research and development is required to determine the optimum material to use for a more realistic feel. The use of 3D printed fracture models is feasible and provides an alternative to generic sawbone fracture models in providing surgical training to residents

Abstract. Introduction. We aimed to compare the outcomes of elderly patients with periarticular distal femur or supracondylar periprosthetic fractures treated with either open reduction internal fixation or distal femoral replacement. Methods. A retrospective review of patients over 65 years with AO Type B and C fractures of the distal femur or Su type I and II periprosthetic fractures treated with either a DFR or ORIF was undertaken. Outcomes including Length of Stay, PROMs (Oxford Knee Score and EQ 5D), infection, union, mortality, complication and reoperation rates were assessed. Data on confounding variables were also collected for multivariate analysis. Patients below 65 years and extra articular fractures were excluded. Results. 23 patients (11 in DFR group and 12 in ORIF group) fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. There was no difference between the DFR and ORIF groups with respect to SDI, demographic variables, ASA grade, FCI, preoperative Hb and renal function. There was no difference in 30 day mortality, reoperation rates, 30 day readmission rates and LOS between the two groups. Mean follow up was 12.7 and 15.9 months respectively in the DFR and ORIF groups. At final follow up after accounting for all confounding variables on multivariate analysis, functional outcomes using OKS (adjusted mean: 29.5 vs 15.8) and Health related Quality of Life outcomes using EQ 5D (adjusted mean: 0.453 vs −0.07) were significantly better in the DFR group. Conclusion. DFR for periarticular and periprosthetic distal femoral fractures in the elderly are associated with better patient reported outcomes

It has been established that a dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) provides significant clinical and organizational benefits to the management of trauma patients. After-hours care is associated with surgeon fatigue, a high risk of patient complications, and increased costs related to staffing. However, hesitation due to concerns of the associated opportunity cost at the hospital leadership level is a major barrier to wide-spread adoption. The primary aim of this study is to determine the impact of dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) implementation on operating room efficiency. Secondly, we sought to evaluate the associated financial impact of the DOTR, with respect to both after-hours care costs as well as the opportunity cost of displaced elective cases. This was a retrospective cost-analysis study performed at a single academic-affiliated community hospital in Toronto, Canada. All patients that underwent the most frequently performed orthopedic trauma procedures (hip hemiarthroplasty, open reduction internal fixation of the ankle, femur, elbow and distal radius), over a four-year period from 2016-2019 were included. Patient data acquired for two-years prior and two-years after the implementation of a DOTR were compared, adjusting for the number of cases performed. Surgical duration and number of day-time and after-hours cases was recorded pre- and post-implementation. Cost savings of performing trauma cases during daytime and the opportunity cost of displacing elective cases by performing cases during the day was calculated. A sensitivity analysis accounting for varying overtime costs and hospital elective case profit was also performed. 1960 orthopaedic cases were examined pre- and post-DOTR. All procedures had reduced total operative time post-DOTR. After accounting for the total number of each procedure performed, the mean weighted reduction was 31.4% and the mean time saved was 29.6 minutes per surgery. The number of daytime surgical hours increased 21%, while nighttime hours decreased by 37.8%. Overtime staffing costs were reduced by $24,976 alongside increase in opportunity costs of $22,500. This resulted in a net profit of $2,476. Our results support the premise that DOTRs improve operating room efficiency and can be cost efficient. Through the regular scheduling of a DOTR at a single hospital in Canada, the number of surgeries occurring during daytime hours increased while the number of after-hours cases decreased. The same surgeries were also completed nearly one-third faster (30 minutes per case) on average. Our study also specifically addresses the hesitation regarding potential loss of profit from elective surgeries. Notably, the savings partially stem from decreased OR time as well as decreased nurse overtime. Widespread implementation can improve patient care while still remaining financially favourable

Purpose. To compare the clinical and radiological results between internal fixation using the proximal femoral nail system and bipolar hemiarthroplasty in reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fracture in elderly patients. Materials and Methods. From January 2005 to July 2012, we reviewed 53 patients who had been treated surgically for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fracture and been followed up on for a minimum of 2 years. The patients, all over 70 years old, were divided into two groups for retrospective evaluation: one group was treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the proximal femoral nail system (31 cases), and the other group was treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (22 cases). Results. Early ambulation postoperatively and less pain at postoperative three months were significantly superior in the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group. However, by 24 months postoperatively, the open reduction and internal fixation group had higher Harris scores and correspondingly less pain than the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group. There were no significant differences in union rate, duration of hospitalization or lateral wall fracture healing between the two groups. Four patients in the open reduction and internal fixation group underwent reoperation. Conclusions. In the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the reverse oblique type, if the patient's health and bone quality are good, open reduction and internal fixation is considered to be the better choice. However, in cases of severe communition of fracture and poor bone quality along with high risk of early reduction failure, bipolar hemiarthroplasty is an alternative offering advantages in terms of early ambulation, less pain at early stages, and lower risk of reoperation

The purpose of this study was to evaluate total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of post-traumatic arthritis following acetabular fracture and to compare the long-term outcome of THA after previous open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or conservative treatment of the acetabular fracture. Thirty-four patients (thirty-six hips) underwent total hip arthroplasty for arthritis resulting from acetabular fractures. There were twenty-six males (27 hips) and eight females (9 hips). The mean age at the time of hip arthroplasty was 49 years (range, 25-78 years). The mean follow-up was eight years and nine months (range, 4-17 years). The mean interval from fracture to arthroplasty was 7.5 years (range, 5 months-29 years). Two patients died of unrelated causes and two patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty patients (32 hips) were available for latest follow-up. Twenty-one hips had been previously treated by open reduction internal fixation and 11 hips had conservative treatment. Sixteen patients achieved and maintained a good to excellent result over the course of the follow-up. There was no difference in improvement of mean Harris Hip Score between both groups (p>0.05). Ten out of 32 hips required revision; 9 acetabular components were revised because of aseptic loosening (3), osteolysis/excessive wear (4), instability (1) and infection (1) with a total revision rate of 28%. Eight patients needed acetabular revision alone, one femoral revision alone and one revision of both components. There was no significant difference in bone grafting, heterotopic bone formation, revision rate, operative time and blood loss between the two groups (p> 0.05). Those patients initially treated conservatively had similar long term results compared to those treated primarily by open reduction internal fixation. At long term follow-up the main problem identified was osteolysis and acetabular wear

The treatment of proximal humerus fractures remains controversial. The literature is full of articles and commentary supporting one method over another. Options include open reduction and internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Treatment options in an active 65-year-old are exceptionally controversial given the fact that people in this middle-aged group still wished to remain active and athletic in many circumstances. A hemiarthroplasty offers the advantage of a greater range of motion, however, this has a high incidence of tuberosity malunion or nonunion and this is a very common reason for revision of that hemiarthroplasty for fracture to a reverse shoulder replacement. One recent study showed a 73% incidence of tuberosity malunion or nonunion in shoulders that had a revised hemiarthroplasty to a reverse shoulder replacement. Progressive glenoid wear and erosion is also a risk after a hemiarthroplasty in the younger patient, especially someone who is young and active. In addition, studies show shorter operative time in hemiarthroplasty. The range of motion is highly dependent on proper tuberosity healing and this is often one of the most challenging aspects of the surgical procedure as well as the healing process. A reverse shoulder replacement in general has less range of motion compared to a hemiarthroplasty with anatomically healed tuberosities, however, the revision rate is lower compared to a hemiarthroplasty. (This is likely related to few were options for revision). The results after a reverse shoulder replacement may not be as dependent on tuberosity healing, however, importantly the tuberosities do need to be repaired and the results are significantly better if there is healing of the greater tuberosity, giving some infraspinatus and/or teres minor function to the shoulder. Complete lack of tuberosity healing forces the shoulder into obligate internal rotation with attempted elevation and this can be functionally disabling. Academic discussion is beginning surrounding the use of a reverse shoulder replacement in the setting of glenohumeral joint arthritis in a primary setting as it is believed that the glenosphere and baseplate may have greater longevity than a polyethylene glenoid. Along with this discussion, we will likely see greater application of the use of a reverse shoulder replacement in the setting of fracture for younger patients. In general, open reduction internal fixation should still remain the treatment of choice in the setting of a fracture that can be fixed. However, a strong argument can be made that if an arthroplasty is necessary, a reverse shoulder replacement is the implant of choice

Periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures are a significant complication of total hip arthroplasty. Plate osteosynthesis with or without onlay strut allograft has been the mainstay of treatment around well-fixed stems. Nonunions are a rare, challenging complication of this fixation method. The number of published treatment strategies for periprosthetic femoral nonunions are limited. In this series, we report the outcomes of a novel orthogonal plating surgical technique for addressing nonunions in the setting of Vancouver B1 and C-type periprosthetic fractures that previously failed open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). A retrospective chart review of all patients from 2010 to 2014 with Vancouver B1/C total hip arthroplasty periprosthetic femoral nonunions was performed. All patients were treated primarily with ORIF. Nonunion was defined as no radiographic signs of fracture healing nine months post-operatively, with or without hardware failure. Exclusion criteria included open fractures and periprosthetic infections. The technique utilised a mechanobiologic strategy of atraumatic exposure, resection of necrotic tissue, bone grafting with adjuvant recombinant growth factor and revision open reduction internal fixation. Initially, compression was achieved using an articulated tensioning device and application of an anterior plate. This was followed by locked lateral plating. Patients remained non-weight bearing for eight weeks. Six Vancouver B1/C periprosthetic femoral nonunions were treated. Five patients were female with an average age of 80.3 years (range 72–91). The fractures occurred at a mean of 5.8 years (range 1–10) from their initial arthroplasty procedure. No patients underwent further revision surgery; there were no wound dehiscence, hardware failures, infections, or surgical complications. All patients had a minimum of nine months follow up (mean 16.6, range 9–36). All fractures achieved osseous union, defined as solid bridging callus over at least two cortices and pain free, independent ambulation, at an average of 24.4 weeks (range 6.1–39.7 weeks). To our knowledge, this is the first case series describing 90–90 locked compression plating using modern implants for periprosthetic femoral nonunions. This is a rare but challenging complication of total hip arthroplasty and we present a novel solution with satisfactory preliminary outcomes. Orthogonal locked compression plating utilising an articulated tensioning device and autograft with adjuvant osteoinductive allograft should be considered in periprosthetic femur fractures around a well-fixed stem. Further biomechanical and clinical research is needed to improve our treatment strategies in this population

One of the most important sequelae to ageing is osteoporosis and subsequently hip fractures. Hip fractures are associated with major morbidity, mortality and costs. Most patients require surgery to restore mobility. Provision of surgery and its complications is poorly understood in South Africa. Our aim was to collect and report current hip fracture care at four centres in South Africa, as well as reporting surgical and general patient outcomes. A three year retrospective cohort at four centres will be described, focussing on provision of surgical care, mortality, types of surgery and complications. We identified 562 patients who had surgical intervention for fragility fractures, 66% were females. Forty nine percent had open reduction and internal fixation, 28% had hemi-arthroplasty replacement whilst 23% had total hip replacements. Twenty percent of patients had operative intervention within 36 hours of presentation to the emergency department. Mortality was 9% at 30 days. The most common complications were lower respiratory infections (29%), urinary tract infections (21%) and surgical site infections (9%). This is the largest cohort of surgically treated hip fracture from South Africa. Proportions of patients receiving different surgical interventions such as THR are comparable to the broader literature. However a number of key performance indicators such as surgery within 36 hours are challenging to meet. Given the changing demographics of South Africa, this study provides an early insight to contemporary care and may help provide direction for broader national strategies for reporting and improving hip fracture care

Ankle fractures represent the third most common fragility fracture seen in elderly patients following hip and distal radius fractures. Non-operative management of these see complication rates as high as 70%. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has complication rates of up to 40%. With either option, patients tend to be managed with a non-weight bearing period of six weeks or longer. An alternative is the use of a tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nail. This provides a percutaneous treatment that enables the patient to mobilise immediately. This case-series explores the efficacy of this device in a broad population, including the highly comorbid and cognitively impaired. We reviewed patients treated with TTC nail for acute ankle fractures between 2019 and 2022. Baseline and surgical data were collected. Clinical records were reviewed to record any post-operative complication, and post-operative mobility status and domicile. 24 patients had their ankle fracture managed with TTC nailing. No intra-operative complications were noted. There were six (27%) post-operative complications; four patients had loosening of a distal locking screw, one significant wound infection necessitating exchange of nail, and one pressure area from an underlying displaced fracture fragment. All except three patients returned to their previous domicile. Just over two thirds of patients returned to their baseline level of mobility. This case-series is one of the largest and is also one of the first to include cognitively impaired patients. Our results are consistent with other case-series with a favourable complication rate when compared with ORIF in similar patient groups. The use of a TTC nail in the context of acute, geriatric ankle trauma is a simple and effective treatment modality. This series shows acceptable complication rates and the majority of patients are able to return to their baseline level of mobility and domicile

Fractures of the ankle are common, and they mostly affect young adults. Wound complications are not uncommon following the fixation of these fractures. This study evaluated the impact of HIV on wound healing after plate osteosynthesis in patients with closed ankle fractures. This is an observational retrospective study of patients operated on at a tertiary level hospital. We reviewed hospital records for patients above 18 years of age who presented with wound breakdown following ankle open reduction and internal fixation. The patients’ hospital records were retrieved to identify all the patients treated for closed ankle fractures and those who developed wound breakdown. Patients with Pilon fractures were excluded. The National Health Laboratory System (NHLS) database was accessed to retrieve the CD4 count, viral load, haematology study results, and biochemistry results of these patients at the time of surgery and subsequent follow-up. The x-rays were retrieved from the electronic picture archiving system (PACS) and were assessed for fracture union at a minimum of 3 months follow-up. We reviewed the medical records of 172 patients with closed ankle fractures treated from 2018 to 2022. Thirty-one (18.0%) developed wound breakdown after surgery, and they were all tested for HIV. Most of the patients were male (58.0%), and the average age of the cohort was 43.7 years (range: 21 years to 84 years). Ten of these patients (32.2%) were confirmed HIV positive, with CD4 counts ranging from 155 to 781. Viral load levels were lower than detectable in 40% of these patients. All patients progressed to fracture union at a minimum of 3 months follow-up. We observed no difference between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients in terms of wound breakdown and bone healing post-plate osteosynthesis for closed ankle fractures