Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 121
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 4 | Pages 271 - 277
1 Apr 2021
Flatman M Barkham BH Ben David E Yeo A Norman J Gelfer Y

Aims. Open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is regularly performed despite screening programmes, due to failure of treatment or late presentation. A protocol for open reduction of DDH has been refined through collaboration between surgical, anaesthetic, and nursing teams to allow same day discharge. The objective of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of performing open reduction of DDH as a day case. Methods. A prospectively collected departmental database was visited. All consecutive surgical cases of DDH between June 2015 and March 2020 were collected. Closed reductions, bilateral cases, cases requiring corrective osteotomy, and children with comorbidities were excluded. Data collected included demographics, safety outcome measures (blood loss, complications, readmission, reduction confirmation), and feasibility for discharge according to the Face Legs Activity Cry Consolidability (FLACC) pain scale. A satisfaction questionnaire was filled by the carers. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results. Out of 168 consecutive DDH cases, 16 patients fit the inclusion criteria (age range 10 to 26 months, 13 female). Intraoperative blood loss ranged from "minimal" to 120 ml, and there were no complications or readmissions. The FLACC score was 0 for all patients. The carers satisfaction questionnaire expressed high satisfaction from the experience with adequate information and support provided. Conclusion. Open reduction in DDH, without corrective osteotomy, is safe and feasible to be managed as a day case procedure. It requires a clear treatment pathway, analgesia, sufficient counselling, and communication with carers. It is even more important during the COVID-19 pandemic when reduced length of hospital stay is likely to be safer for both patient and their parents. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2021;2(4):271–277


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 2 | Pages 212 - 218
1 Feb 2024
Liu S Su Y

Aims. Medial humeral epicondyle fractures (MHEFs) are common elbow fractures in children. Open reduction should be performed in patients with MHEF who have entrapped intra-articular fragments as well as displacement. However, following open reduction, transposition of the ulnar nerve is disputed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the need for ulnar nerve exploration and transposition. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study. The clinical data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of MHEF in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2022 were collected. The patients were allocated to either transposition or non-transposition groups. Data for sex, age, cause of fracture, duration of follow-up, Papavasiliou and Crawford classification, injury-to-surgery time, preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, intraoperative exploration of ulnar nerve injury, surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, complications, persistent ulnar neuropathy, and elbow joint function were analyzed. Binary logistic regression analysis was used for statistical analysis. Results. A total of 124 patients were followed up, 50 in the ulnar nerve transposition group and 74 in the non-transposition group. There were significant differences in ulnar nerve injury (p = 0.009), incision length (p < 0.001), and blood loss (p = 0.003) between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.012) were risk factors for postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms. In addition, ulnar nerve transposition did not affect the occurrence of postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.468). Conclusion. Ulnar nerve transposition did not improve clinical outcomes. It is recommended that the ulnar nerve should not be transposed when treating MHEF operatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(2):212–218


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1117 - 1124
1 Aug 2018
Eamsobhana P Chalayon O Kaewpornsawan K Ariyawatkul T

Aims. Delayed diagnosis is a well-known complication of a Monteggia fracture-dislocation. If left untreated, the dislocated radial head later becomes symptomatic. The purposes of this study were firstly, to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of open reduction of the radial head and secondly, to identify the factors that may affect the outcome of this procedure. Materials and Methods. This retrospective study evaluated 30 children with a chronic Monteggia lesion. There were 18 boys and 12 girls with a mean age of 7.4 years (4 to 13) at the time of open reduction. The mean interval to surgery, after the initial fracture, was 23.4 months (6 to 120). Clinical grading used a Kim modified elbow score: radiological outcome was recorded. The effect of the patient’s age, gender, duration from initial injury, Bado classification, and annular ligament reconstruction were analyzed. The mean follow-up was 42.2 months (15 to 20). Results. The Kim elbow scores evaluated at the last clinic visit were excellent in 23 patients, good in three, fair in two, and poor in two. A majority of the patients were found to have significant improvement of elbow flexion (p < 0.001). Six met the criteria of a fair radiological outcome; four of these were operated on more than 24 months after the initial injury, and three had surgery after the age of 11. Univariate analysis failed to find any factor that was significantly associated with a fair or poor outcome. Conclusion. Good clinical and radiological outcomes can be expected in most patients. Osteoarthritic changes were associated with age > 11 years and/or a delay of treatment of > 24 months. However, no statistically significant factor could be identified which correlated with an unfavourable outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1117–24


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 6 | Pages 846 - 850
1 Jun 2013
Price KR Dove R Hunter JB

Most centres in the United Kingdom adopt a selective screening programme for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) based on repeated clinical examination and selective ultrasound examination. The Newborn Infant Physical Examination protocol implemented in 2008 recommends a first examination at birth and then a second and final examination at six to ten weeks of age. Due to concerns over an increase in late presentations we performed a retrospective review of our 15-year results to establish if late presentation increases treatment requirements. Of children presenting before six weeks of age, 84% were treated successfully with abduction bracing, whereas 86% of children presenting after ten months eventually required open reduction surgery. This equates to a 12-fold increase in relative risk of requiring open reduction following late presentation. Increasing age at presentation was associated with an increase in the number of surgical procedures, which are inevitably more extensive and complex, with a consequent increased in cost per patient. The implementation of an opportunistic examination at three to five months could help to reduce the unintended consequences of the Newborn Infant Physical Examination programme. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:846–50


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 2 | Pages 279 - 286
1 Feb 2014
Gardner ROE Bradley CS Howard A Narayanan UG Wedge JH Kelley SP

The incidence of clinically significant avascular necrosis (AVN) following medial open reduction of the dislocated hip in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) remains unknown. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all clinical studies reporting the results of medial open reduction surgery. A total of 14 papers reporting 734 hips met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 10.9 years (2 to 28). The rate of clinically significant AVN (types 2 to 4) was 20% (149/734). From these papers 221 hips in 174 children had sufficient information to permit more detailed analysis. The rate of AVN increased with the length of follow-up to 24% at skeletal maturity, with type 2 AVN predominating in hips after five years’ follow-up. The presence of AVN resulted in a higher incidence of an unsatisfactory outcome at skeletal maturity (55% vs 20% in hips with no AVN; p < 0.001). A higher rate of AVN was identified when surgery was performed in children aged < 12 months, and when hips were immobilised in ≥ 60°of abduction post-operatively. Multivariate analysis showed that younger age at operation, need for further surgery and post-operative hip abduction of ≥ 60° increased the risk of the development of clinically significant AVN. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:279–86


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 6 | Pages 822 - 827
1 Jun 2018
Pollet V Van Dijk L Reijman M Castelein RMC Sakkers RJB

Aims. Open reduction is required following failed conservative treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The Ludloff medial approach is commonly used, but poor results have been reported, with rates of the development of avascular necrosis (AVN) varying between 8% and 54%. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the long-term radiographic and clinical outcome of dislocated hips treated using this approach. Patients and Methods. Children with a dislocated hip, younger than one year of age at the time of surgery, who were treated using a medial approach were eligible for the study. Radiographs were evaluated for the degree of dislocation and the presence of an ossific nucleus preoperatively, and for the degree of AVN and residual dysplasia at one and five years and at a mean of 12.7 years (4.6 to 20.8) postoperatively. Radiographic outcome was assessed using the Severin classification, after five years of age. Further surgical procedures were recorded. Functional outcome was assessed using the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) or the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), depending on the patient’s age. Results. A total of 52 children (58 hips) were included. At the latest follow-up, 11 hips (19%) showed signs of AVN. Further surgery was undertaken in 13 hips (22%). A total of 13 hips had a poor radiological outcome with Severin type III or higher. Of these, the age at the time of surgery was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in those with a good Severin type (I or II). The patient-reported outcomes were significantly worse (p < 0.05) in children with a poor Severin classification. Conclusion. This retrospective long-term follow-up study shows that one in five children with DDH who undergo open reduction using a medial surgical approach has poor clinical and/or radiological outcome. The poor outcome is not related to the presence of AVN (19%), but due to residual dysplasia. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:822–7


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 1 | Pages 113 - 118
1 Jan 2009
Zamzam MM Khosshal KI Abak AA Bakarman KA AlSiddiky AMM AlZain KO Kremli MK

The outcome of one-stage bilateral open reduction through a medial approach for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children under 18 months was studied in 23 children, 18 girls and five boys. Their mean age at operation was 10.1 months (6 to 17) and the mean follow-up was 5.4 years (3 to 8). Acceptable clinical and radiological results were achieved in 44 (95.7%) and 43 (93.5%) of 46 hips, respectively. Excellent results were significantly evident in patients younger than 12 months, those who did not require acetabuloplasty, those whose ossific nucleus had appeared, and in those who did not develop avascular necrosis. One-stage bilateral medial open reduction avoids the need for separate procedures on the hips and has the advantages of accelerated management and shorter immobilisation and rehabilitation than staged operations


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 3 | Pages 380 - 383
1 Mar 2005
Baki C Sener M Aydin H Yildiz M Saruhan S

We treated 15 hips (15 patients) with developmental dysplasia by a single-stage combination of open reduction through a medial approach and innominate osteotomy. The mean age of the patients at the time of operation was 20 months (13 to 30). The mean follow-up period was 9.6 years (4 to 14). At the final follow-up, 14 hips were assessed clinically as excellent and one hip as good. Radiologically, ten hips were rated as class I, four as class II and one as class III according to the criteria of Severin. No avascular necrosis was seen. No patient required subsequent surgery. Our results indicate that satisfactory results can be obtained with the single-stage combination of open reduction by the medial approach and innominate osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip in a selected group of children older than 12 months. To our knowledge, no similar combined technique has been previously reported


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_24 | Pages 2 - 2
1 May 2013
Price K Dove R Hunter JB
Full Access

Aim. The objective was to assess whether late presentation of DDH leads to an increase in treatment magnitude and cost. Method. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from our hip instability clinic database. All patients presenting to our hip instability clinic that required any form of treatment for DDH between 1990 and 2005 were included. Children were grouped according to age at presentation and then treatment requirements were reviewed. Average costs were calculated based on procedures performed. Results. 84% of children presenting before 6 weeks were treated successfully with abduction bracing, versus none after the age of 10 months. The need for open reduction increased from 8% if presenting before 6 weeks to 86% for those over 10 months. This equates to a 12-fold increase in relative risk of requiring open reduction surgery. Increasing age at presentation was associated with an increase in the number of procedures required, increased magnitude of procedure and increased financial cost per patient. Conclusion. The loss of repeated screening for DDH will lead to an increase in late presentations. This work has demonstrated that increased age of presentation leads to a concomitant increase in open reduction and other operative procedures. Implementation of an additional opportunistic mandatory screening examination at 3–5 months could help to reduce the unintended effects of the new guidelines


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_24 | Pages 4 - 4
1 May 2013
Gardner ROE Sharma OP Feng L Shin M Howard A Kelley S Wedge JH
Full Access

Aim. To compare the rate and severity of avascular necrosis following medial open and closed reduction in developmental hip dysplasia and the resulting influence on femoral and acetabular development. Method. The radiographs and hospital records of 118 patients with dislocation of the hip were reviewed. 57 patients (66 hips) underwent medial open reduction and 61 patients (75 hips) underwent closed reduction. Mean follow-up was 10.9 years (5 years to 17.4 years). Avascular necrosis (AVN) was recorded according to the Bucholz and Ogden classification. The acetabular index was measured pre-operatively, at 1 and 4 years following surgery. The final radiograph was assigned a Severin grade. Sharp and centre-edge angles were recorded at final follow-up. A Severin grade I or II was considered a satisfactory result and a grade III to V an unsatisfactory result. Initial non-operative measures, such as Pavlik harness treatment and traction were documented. Additional surgical interventions were noted. Results. The rate of clinically significant AVN (types 2, 3, 4) following medial open reduction was 28.7% versus 17.3% following closed reduction. The rate of Type 2 AVN was 22.7% versus 10.6% respectively. Early acetabular development was similar in both groups. Long-term follow-up showed an unsatisfactory outcome (Severin grade III-V) following medial open reduction in 32% versus 8% in the closed reduction group. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that medial open reduction is associated with a higher rate of AVN than closed reduction. Type 2 AVN was twice as common in the medial open reduction group. More unsatisfactory results were seen in the medial open reduction group at long term follow up


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXV | Pages 4 - 4
1 Jul 2012
Shears E Chan S Bache C
Full Access

Purpose of study. The management of developmental hip dysplasia requiring open reduction between 12 and 18 months of age is controversial. We compare the outcome of medial approach open reduction (MAOR) versus anterior open reduction with Salter osteotomy (delayed until the child is of sufficient size) in such patients. Patients and methods. 19 consecutive patients who underwent MAOR aged 12-22 months were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range: 1.0-6.2). This group was compared to 14 patients who underwent anterior reduction and Salter osteotomy aged 18-23 months (mean follow-up 4.1 years). Results. There was 1 mild subluxation and 1 re-dislocation in the MAOR group. The anterior reduction group had 2 mild subluxations. 14 of the 19 (74%) MAOR patients required subsequent Salter osteotomy at a mean of 22 months post-reduction, with another 2 patients under follow-up being likely to require one. There were 4 cases (21%) of post-operative avascular necrosis in the MAOR group (Kalamchi and MacEwen grade I) and 7 cases (50%) in the anterior reduction group. All patients had good or excellent clinical results according to the McKay criteria. Acetabular index at last follow-up was within normal limits in 16 of 19 (84%) MAOR patients; 2 of the 3 with abnormal acetabular indices had not (yet) undergone Salter osteotomy. All patients in the anterior reduction group had acetabular indices (or centre-edge angles of Wiberg) within the normal range. Conclusion. This study suggests that MAOR is a reasonable treatment for children presenting with developmental dysplasia of the hip between the ages of 12 and 18 months requiring open reduction. However, the majority are likely to require a subsequent Salter osteotomy


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 82-B, Issue 1 | Pages 17 - 27
1 Jan 2000
Zadeh HG Catterall A Hashemi-Nejad A Perry RE

After open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), a pelvic or femoral osteotomy may be required to maintain a stable concentric reduction. We report the clinical and radiological outcome in 82 children (95 hips) with DDH treated by open reduction through an anterior approach in which a test of stability was used to assess the need for a concomitant osteotomy. The mean age at the time of surgery was 28 months (9 to 79) and at the latest follow-up, 17 years (12 to 25). All patients have been followed up until closure of the triradiate cartilage with a mean period of 15 years (8 to 23). At the time of open reduction before closure of the joint capsule, the position of maximum stability was assessed. A hip which required flexion with abduction for stability was considered to need an innominate osteotomy. If only internal rotation and abduction were required, an upper femoral derotational and varus osteotomy was carried out. For a ‘double-diameter’ acetabulum with anterolateral deficiency, a Pemberton-type osteotomy was used. A hip which was stable in the neutral position required no concomitant osteotomy. Overall, 86% of the patients have had a satisfactory radiological outcome (Severin groups I and II) with an incidence of 7% of secondary procedures for persistent dysplasia including one hip which redislocated. The results were better (p = 0.04) in children under the age of two years. Increased leg length on the affected side was associated with poor acetabular development and recurrence of joint dysplasia (p = 0.01). The incidence of postoperative avascular necrosis was 7%. In a further 18%, premature physeal arrest was noted during the adolescent growth spurt (Kalamchi-MacEwen types II and III). Both of these complications were also associated with recurrence of joint dysplasia (p = 0.01). Studies with a shorter follow-up are therefore likely to underestimate the proportion of poor radiological results


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 6 | Pages 924 - 929
1 Nov 1996
Koizumi W Moriya H Tsuchiya K Takeuchi T Kamegaya M Akita T

We reviewed 33 patients (35 hips) after open reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip using Ludloff’s medial approach. The mean age at the time of operation was 14 months (5 to 29) and at the time of final follow-up 20.1 years (15 to 24) giving a mean duration of follow-up of 19.4 years (14 to 23). We evaluated the radiological results by the Severin classification and the extent of avascular necrosis using the criteria of Kalamchi. At the latest review 16 hips (45.7%) were in Severin groups I or II (acceptable results) and 19 (54.3%) in Severin groups III, IV or V (unacceptable results). There was evidence of avascular necrosis in 15 hips (42.9%). The radiological results began to become worse at about the age of ten years when type-II avascular changes presented. We conclude that Ludloff’s medial approach for open reduction is unsatisfactory for the treatment of congenital dislocation since about half of our patients required additional operations


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 86-B, Issue 3 | Pages 430 - 433
1 Apr 2004
Kiely N Younis U Day J Meadows T

The results of the Ferguson medial approach for open reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) were reviewed for 49 hips with a follow-up of more than 48 months. The mean age at operation was 12.3 months (6 to 23). The mean length of clinical and radiological follow-up was 82 months (48 to 148). Three redislocations occurred. Group I avascular necrosis according to the classification of Kalamchi and MacEwen was seen in four hips, group II in two hips and group III in one hip; 92% of the hips were classified as Severin class I and II. The acetabular index and centre edge (CE) angles were within normal limits at final follow-up, but were still significantly different from the unaffected side. We conclude that the Ferguson procedure is safe and reliable for low dislocations in children aged six to 18 months


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_24 | Pages 5 - 5
1 May 2013
Gardner ROE Bradley CS Narayanan UG Wedge JH Kelley SP
Full Access

Aim. To establish the incidence of clinically significant avascular necrosis (AVN) and the resultant influence on radiological outcome following medial open reduction for DDH. Method. A systematic review of the literature was performed using Medline and Embase, from 1946 to 2012, to identify all relevant clinical studies. We excluded papers with a mean follow-up under 5 years. The effect of length of follow-up, outcome according to Severin, age at surgery, and type of growth disturbance were reviewed. Results. 2439 citations were identified. 17 papers reporting 734 hips met the inclusion criteria. These were submitted for data extraction. Mean follow-up was 10.9 years (2–28 years). The rate of clinically significant AVN (types 2–4) was 20%. From these papers 221 hips had sufficient information to permit more detailed analysis. The AVN incidence increased with follow-up to 24% at skeletal maturity. Type 2 AVN predominated after 5 years follow-up. The presence of AVN resulted in a higher incidence of unsatisfactory outcome (55% vs 20% in hips without AVN, p <0.01). There was a greater rate of AVN when surgery was performed under 12 months of age (22.5% vs 12.9% >12 months, p 0.022). However, more subsequent surgery was performed in the older group (18.3% vs 35.6%, p 0.004). Conclusion. Medial open reduction is associated with a 24% incidence of AVN at skeletal maturity. The rate of AVN increases with longer follow-up with type 2 predominating. AVN results in a significantly higher rate of unsatisfactory outcomes. When surgery is performed under 12 months of age the rate of AVN is higher, however the overall need for subsequent surgery is less


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 3 | Pages 471 - 476
1 May 1996
Haidar RK Jones RS Vergroesen DA Evans GA

We have studied retrospectively 37 hips in 36 children at an average of 91 months after simultaneous open reduction and Salter innominate osteotomy for developmental hip dysplasia. At the latest review 97.3% were clinically and 83.8% radiologically good or excellent. In three hips (8%) there were signs of avascular necrosis, but only one had been symptomatic. There were no cases of recurrent posterior displacement


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 3 | Pages 406 - 413
1 Mar 2014
Tarassoli P Gargan MF Atherton WG Thomas SRYW

The medial approach for the treatment of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in whom closed reduction has failed requires minimal access with negligible blood loss. In the United Kingdom, there is a preference for these children to be treated using an anterolateral approach after the appearance of the ossific nucleus. In this study we compared these two protocols, primarily for the risk of osteonecrosis.

Data were gathered prospectively for protocols involving the medial approach (26 hips in 22 children) and the anterolateral approach (22 hips in 21 children) in children aged <  24 months at the time of surgery. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was assessed with validated scores. The acetabular index (AI) and centre–edge angle (CEA) were also measured.

The mean age of the children at the time of surgery was 11 months (3 to 24) for the medial approach group and 18 months (12 to 24) for the anterolateral group, and the combined mean follow-up was 70 months (26 to 228). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was evident or asphericity predicted in three of 26 hips (12%) in the medial approach group and four of 22 (18%) in the anterolateral group (p = 0.52). The mean improvement in AI was 8.8° (4° to 12°) and 7.9° (6° to 10°), respectively, at two years post-operatively (p = 0.18). There was no significant difference in CEA values of affected hips between the two groups.

Children treated using an early medial approach did not have a higher risk of developing osteonecrosis at early to mid-term follow-up than those treated using a delayed anterolateral approach. The rates of acetabular remodelling were similar for both protocols.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:406–13.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 1 | Pages 88 - 94
1 Jan 2005
Hasler CC Von Laer L Hell AK

We reviewed 15 patients, nine girls and six boys, with chronic anterior dislocation of the radial head which was treated by ulnar osteotomy, external fixation and open reconstruction of the elbow joint but without repair of the annular ligament. Their mean age was 9.5 years (5 to 15) and the mean interval between the injury and reconstruction was 22 months (2 months to 7 years).

All radial heads remained reduced at a mean follow-up of 20 months (6 months to 5 years). Normal ranges of movement for flexion, extension, pronation and supination were unchanged in 96.1% (49/51) and worse in 3.9% (2/51). Limited ranges of movement were improved in 77.8% (7/9), unchanged in 11% (1/9) and further decreased in 11% (1/9).There were two superficial pin-track infections and two cases of delayed union but with no serious complications. Reconstruction of the radiocapitellar joint is easier using external fixation since accurate correction of the ulna can be determined empirically and active functional exercises started immediately. Only patients with a radial head of normal shape were selected for treatment by this method.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 7 | Pages 902 - 908
1 Jul 2022
Hsu P Lee C Lin S Kuo KN Wu K Wang T

Aims. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of guided growth and varus osteotomy in treating Kalamchi type II avascular necrosis (AVN) after open reduction and Pemberton acetabuloplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods. This retrospective study reviewed patients undergoing guided growth or varus osteotomy for Kalamchi type II AVN between September 2009 and January 2019. All children who had undergone open reduction and Pemberton acetabuloplasty for DDH with a minimum two-year follow-up were enrolled in the study. Demographic and radiological data, which included the head-shaft angle (HSA), neck-shaft angle (NSA), articulotrochanteric distance (ATD), Sharp angle (SA), and lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) at baseline, two years, and at the extended follow-up, were compared. Revision rates were evaluated. Clinical outcomes using the Harris Hip Score were assessed two years postoperatively. Results. A total of 24 patients underwent guided growth and 19 underwent varus osteotomy, over a mean period of 3.3 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8 to 3.8) and 5.2 years (95% CI 4.5 to 6.0), respectively. There were no differences in demographic and preoperative radiological data, except for a younger age at time of acetabuloplasty and larger ATD for the osteotomy group. The HSA did not differ at two years and the extended follow-up because of postoperative rebound in the osteotomy group. The NSA of the osteotomy group remained smaller postoperatively. There were no significant differences in the follow-up ATD, SA, and LCEA, except for a smaller two-year ATD of the osteotomy group. Seven patients (29.2%) in the guided growth group underwent revision surgery and none in the osteotomy group. The Harris Hip Score was similar between groups. Conclusion. Guided growth and varus osteotomy had comparable results in improving caput valgum deformity, given the rebound of lateral tilting of the physis after osteotomy correction. There were no differences in clinical outcomes at two years postoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):902–908


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 4 | Pages 519 - 528
1 Apr 2022
Perry DC Arch B Appelbe D Francis P Craven J Monsell FP Williamson P Knight M

Aims. The aim of this study was to inform the epidemiology and treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Methods. This was an anonymized comprehensive cohort study, with a nested consented cohort, following the the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study (IDEAL) framework. A total of 143 of 144 hospitals treating SCFE in Great Britain participated over an 18-month period. Patients were cross-checked against national administrative data and potential missing patients were identified. Clinician-reported outcomes were collected until two years. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected for a subset of participants. Results. A total of 486 children (513 hips) were newly affected, with a median of two patients (interquartile range 0 to 4) per hospital. The annual incidence was 3.34 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.01 to 3.67) per 100,000 six- to 18-year-olds. Time to diagnosis in stable disease was increased in severe deformity. There was considerable variation in surgical strategy among those unable to walk at diagnosis (66 urgent surgery vs 43 surgery after interval delay), those with severe radiological deformity (34 fixation with deformity correction vs 36 without correction) and those with unaffected opposite hips (120 prophylactic fixation vs 286 no fixation). Independent risk factors for avascular necrosis (AVN) were the inability of the child to walk at presentation to hospital (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 11.4)) and surgical technique of open reduction and internal fixation (aOR 7.5 (95% CI 2.4 to 23.2)). Overall, 33 unaffected untreated opposite hips (11.5%) were treated for SCFE by two-year follow-up. Age was the only independent risk factor for contralateral SCFE, with age under 12.5 years the optimal cut-off to define ‘at risk’. Of hips treated with prophylactic fixation, none had SCFE, though complications included femoral fracture, AVN, and revision surgery. PROMs demonstrated the marked impact on quality of life on the child because of SCFE. Conclusion. The experience of individual hospitals is limited and mechanisms to consolidate learning may enhance care. Diagnostic delays were common and radiological severity worsened with increasing time to diagnosis. There was unexplained variation in treatment, some of which exposes children to significant risks that should be evaluated through randomized controlled trials. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):519–528