Abstract
Purpose of study
The management of developmental hip dysplasia requiring open reduction between 12 and 18 months of age is controversial. We compare the outcome of medial approach open reduction (MAOR) versus anterior open reduction with Salter osteotomy (delayed until the child is of sufficient size) in such patients.
Patients and methods
19 consecutive patients who underwent MAOR aged 12-22 months were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range: 1.0-6.2). This group was compared to 14 patients who underwent anterior reduction and Salter osteotomy aged 18-23 months (mean follow-up 4.1 years).
Results
There was 1 mild subluxation and 1 re-dislocation in the MAOR group. The anterior reduction group had 2 mild subluxations. 14 of the 19 (74%) MAOR patients required subsequent Salter osteotomy at a mean of 22 months post-reduction, with another 2 patients under follow-up being likely to require one. There were 4 cases (21%) of post-operative avascular necrosis in the MAOR group (Kalamchi and MacEwen grade I) and 7 cases (50%) in the anterior reduction group. All patients had good or excellent clinical results according to the McKay criteria. Acetabular index at last follow-up was within normal limits in 16 of 19 (84%) MAOR patients; 2 of the 3 with abnormal acetabular indices had not (yet) undergone Salter osteotomy. All patients in the anterior reduction group had acetabular indices (or centre-edge angles of Wiberg) within the normal range.
Conclusion
This study suggests that MAOR is a reasonable treatment for children presenting with developmental dysplasia of the hip between the ages of 12 and 18 months requiring open reduction. However, the majority are likely to require a subsequent Salter osteotomy.
