The open blast fracture of the pelvis is considered to be the most severe injury within the spectrum of battlefield trauma. We report our experience of 29 consecutive patients who had sustained this injury in Afghanistan between 2008 and 2010. Their median new injury severity score (NISS) was 41 (8 to 75), and mean blood requirement in the first 24 hours was 60.3 units (0 to 224). In addition to their orthopaedic injury, six had an associated vascular injury, seven had a bowel injury, 11 had a genital injury and seven had a bladder injury. In all, eight fractures were managed definitively with external fixation and seven required internal fixation. Of those patients who underwent internal fixation, four required removal of metalwork for infection. Faecal diversion was performed in nine cases. The median length of hospital stay following emergency repatriation to the United Kingdom was 70.5 days (5 to 357) and the mean total operating time was 29.6 hours (5 to 187). At a mean follow-up of 20.3 months (13.2 to 29.9), 24 patients (82.8%) were able to walk and 26 (89.7%) had clinical and radiological evidence of stability of the pelvic ring.

As a result of the increase in terrorism, injuries that were previously confined exclusively to warfare can now occur anywhere, with civilian surgeons who are involved in trauma care potentially required to manage similar injuries. Our study demonstrates that the management of this injury pattern demands huge resources and significant multidisciplinary input. Given the nature of the soft-tissue injury, we would advocate external fixation as the preferred management of these fractures. With the advent of emerging wound and faecal management techniques, we do not believe that faecal diversion is necessary in all cases.

Aim/Purpose

Review our unique experience in the management of 29 consecutive casualties who survived open pelvic fractures following a blast mechanism.

The aim of this study is to review our unique experience in the management of 29 consecutive casualties who survived open pelvic fractures following a blast mechanism, in order to determine the injury pattern, clinical management and outcome of these devastating injuries.

All patients were serving soldiers who were injured whilst on operations in Afghanistan. The median New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was 41. Mean blood requirement in the 1^st 24 hours was 60.3 units. In addition to their orthopaedic injury, 6 (21%) had an associated vascular injury, 7(24%) had a bowel injury, 11 (38%) had a genital injury and 7(24%) had a bladder injury. 8 (28%) fractures were managed definitively with external fixation, and 7 (24%) fractures required ORIF. Of those patients who underwent ORIF, 4 (57%) required removal of metalwork for infection. Faecal diversion was performed on 9 (31%) casualties. Median length of stay was 70.2 days, and mean total operative time was 29.6 hours. At a mean 20.3 months follow-up, 24 (83%) were able to ambulate, and 26 (90%) had clinical and radiological evidence of pelvic ring stability.

The “Global War on Terror” has resulted in incidents that were previously confined exclusively to conflict areas can now occur anywhere, and surgeons who are involved in trauma care may be required to manage similar injuries from terrorist attacks. Our study clearly demonstrates that the management of this injury pattern is extremely resource intensive with the need for significant multi-disciplinary input. Given the nature of the soft tissue injury, we would advocate an approach of minimal internal fixation in the management of these fractures. With the advent of emerging wound and faecal management techniques, we do not believe that faecal diversion is mandated in all cases.

Introduction: To assess the effectiveness of a regional basic external fixation trauma course. Methods: Effectiveness of an annual, low-cost, Royal College of Surgeons of England approved, regional basic ex-fix course, led by consultant trauma experts from Yorkshire, UK, covering anatomy, surgical techniques, biomechanics, early management of open fractures and temporary external fixation placement was assessed. Pre- and post-course questionnaires asking grade, current hospital, previous experience, and a mini-test to design a temporary ex-fix construct for four fracture patterns (IIIb open tibia, open book pelvis, Schatzker 6, and total articular pilon) were used. Designs were assessed for stability, safe corridors and plastics assess. Results:. - 10/22 participants had not previously attended an ex-fix course. - Pre- vs. post-course score (out of 4) = 2.5 vs. 3.7 (p< 0.001, Mann-Whitney U). - All participants Teaching Hospitals vs. DGHs:. - Pre-course scores = 2.9 vs. 1.9 (p< 0.01). - Post-course scores = 3.6 vs. 3.8 (not significant). - Pre-course scores by grade of participant:. - SHO vs. Senior SHO = 2.6 vs. 1.5 (p< 0.05). - SpR vs. Senior SHO = 3.0 vs. 1.5 (p< 0.05). - SpR vs. SHO = 3.0 vs. 2.6 (not significant). - Post-course scores by grade:. - SpR vs. Senior SHO vs. SHO = 4.0 vs. 3.8 vs. 3.3 (not significant). Discussion: Recently Pearse and Naique reported a 48% fixation revision rate in open tibial fractures transferred for tertiary care, suggesting that improved core skills are required to ensure appropriate packaging of patients prior to transfer with open, complex articular and pelvic fractures. Participation in a simple ex-fix course improves knowledge of ex-fix design. Retention of knowledge must be reassessed after several months. This course fills a gap in education of basic external fixation for orthopaedic trainees. We recommend every region with a tertiary referral system for complex trauma utilises this course