Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

The open blast pelvis: the significant burden of management

British Orthopaedic Association 2012 Annual Congress



Abstract

The aim of this study is to review our unique experience in the management of 29 consecutive casualties who survived open pelvic fractures following a blast mechanism, in order to determine the injury pattern, clinical management and outcome of these devastating injuries.

All patients were serving soldiers who were injured whilst on operations in Afghanistan. The median New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was 41. Mean blood requirement in the 1st 24 hours was 60.3 units. In addition to their orthopaedic injury, 6 (21%) had an associated vascular injury, 7(24%) had a bowel injury, 11 (38%) had a genital injury and 7(24%) had a bladder injury. 8 (28%) fractures were managed definitively with external fixation, and 7 (24%) fractures required ORIF. Of those patients who underwent ORIF, 4 (57%) required removal of metalwork for infection. Faecal diversion was performed on 9 (31%) casualties. Median length of stay was 70.2 days, and mean total operative time was 29.6 hours. At a mean 20.3 months follow-up, 24 (83%) were able to ambulate, and 26 (90%) had clinical and radiological evidence of pelvic ring stability.

The “Global War on Terror” has resulted in incidents that were previously confined exclusively to conflict areas can now occur anywhere, and surgeons who are involved in trauma care may be required to manage similar injuries from terrorist attacks. Our study clearly demonstrates that the management of this injury pattern is extremely resource intensive with the need for significant multi-disciplinary input. Given the nature of the soft tissue injury, we would advocate an approach of minimal internal fixation in the management of these fractures. With the advent of emerging wound and faecal management techniques, we do not believe that faecal diversion is mandated in all cases.