Introduction. Locking compression plate (LCP) fixation is an established method of treatment of distal third tibial fractures. No biomechanical data exists in the literature regarding their use. Additionally no data exists on the biomechanical advantage of locking screw fixation over non-locking screw fixation for these fractures. In this study the axial and torsional stiffness, axial load to failure and fatigue performance of a 3.5 mm LCP medial distal tibia Synthes plate was evaluated for the stabilisation of distal third tibial fractures. Additionally the performance of the plate in uni and bicortical locked mode as well as non-locked mode was evaluated. Methods. A standardized oblique fracture pattern was created in the tibial metaphysis of 3rd generation composite tibias, 40 mm from the distal end of the tibia (AO 43-A2.3). A 10mm fracture gap was used to model a comminuted metaphyseal fracture. A 3.5 mm medial distal tibia LCP was applied with bi or unicortical locking or bicortical non-locking screws to 5 tibias respectively. All the bio-mechanical tests were performed on a Bose 3510 Electroforce material testing machine. A ramp to load, loading profile was used to determine the static axial and torsional performance of the construct. Fatigue testing simulated a 6 week gradual weight bearing régime with the load increasing every two weeks by 400N until either 250,000 cycles were completed or the construct failed. Results. The non-locked plate demonstrated a significantly higher load to failure than both the bicortical and unicortical locked plates, 683N vs. 575N vs. 483N respectively(p<0.01). The non locked plate also demonstrated significantly higher mean axial stiffness than the bicortical locked plate and unicortical locked plate 632±13 N/mm, 337±12N/mm and 266±6 N/mm respectively (p <0.01). The non locked plate demonstrated the highest torsional stiffness followed by the bi and unicortical locking plates 1.16 ±.08 Nmm vs. 0.79 ± .06 Nmm vs.0.40 ± 0.02 Nmm respectively (p < 0.01). The non locked plate demonstrated higher endurance than the bi and unicortical locking plates over a 6 week simulated fatigue cycle with 1.75mm, 2.10mm and 2.3mm residual displacement at 1600N respectively (p < 0.01). Discussion. This is the first study that has examined the biomechanical properties of the LCP when used for distal third tibial fractures. A review of the literature suggests LCPs outperform dynamic compression plates in osteoporotic bone but demonstrates no clear biomechanical advantage in using a locking construct in non-osteoporotic bone. In our study the non locked construct outperformed the locked constructs in all parameters assessed. We conclude there is no advantage in using a locking construct for distal third tibial fractures in good quality bone

Objectives. We aimed to further evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of two locking screws versus three standard bicortical screws in synthetic models of normal and osteoporotic bone. Methods. Synthetic tubular bone models representing normal bone density and osteoporotic bone density were used. Artificial fracture gaps of 1 cm were created in each specimen before fixation with one of two constructs: 1) two locking screws using a five-hole locking compression plate (LCP) plate; or 2) three non-locking screws with a seven-hole LCP plate across each side of the fracture gap. The stiffness, maximum displacement, mode of failure and number of cycles to failure were recorded under progressive cyclic torsional and eccentric axial loading. Results. Locking plates in normal bone survived 10% fewer cycles to failure during cyclic axial loading, but there was no significant difference in maximum displacement or failure load. Locking plates in osteoporotic bone showed less displacement (p = 0.02), but no significant difference in number of cycles to failure or failure load during cyclic axial loading (p = 0.46 and p = 0.25, respectively). Locking plates in normal bone had lower stiffness and torque during torsion testing (both p = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in rotation (angular displacement) (p = 0.84). Locking plates in osteoporotic bone showed lower torque and rotation (p = 0.008), but there was no significant difference in stiffness during torsion testing (p = 0.69). Conclusions. The mechanical performance of locking plate constructs, using only two screws, is comparable to three non-locking screw constructs in osteoporotic bone. Normal bone loaded with either an axial or torsional moment showed slightly better performance with the non-locking construct

Compression and absolute stability are important in the management of intra-articular fractures. We compared tension band wiring with plate fixation for the treatment of fractures of the olecranon by measuring compression within the fracture. Identical transverse fractures were created in models of the ulna. Tension band wires were applied to ten fractures and ten were fixed with Acumed plates. Compression was measured using a Tekscan force transducer within the fracture gap. Dynamic testing was carried out by reproducing cyclical contraction of the triceps of 20 N and of the brachialis of 10 N. Both methods were tested on each sample. Paired t-tests compared overall compression and compression at the articular side of the fracture.

The mean compression for plating was 819 N (sd 602, 95% confidence interval (CI)) and for tension band wiring was 77 N (sd 19, 95% CI) (p = 0.039). The mean compression on the articular side of the fracture for plating was 343 N (sd 276, 95% CI) and for tension band wiring was 1 N (sd 2, 95% CI) (p = 0.038).

During simulated movements, the mean compression was reduced in both groups, with tension band wiring at −14 N (sd 7) and for plating −173 N (sd 32). No increase in compression on the articular side was detected in the tension band wiring group.

Pre-contoured plates provide significantly greater compression than tension bands in the treatment of transverse fractures of the olecranon, both over the whole fracture and specifically at the articular side of the fracture. In tension band wiring the overall compression was reduced and articular compression remained negligible during simulated contraction of the triceps, challenging the tension band principle.

We investigated a new intramedullary locking nail that allows the distal interlocking screws to be locked to the nail. We compared fixation using this new implant with fixation using either a conventional nail or a locking plate in a laboratory simulation of an osteoporotic fracture of the distal femur. A total of 15 human cadaver femora were used to simulate an AO 33-A3 fracture pattern. Paired specimens compared fixation using either a locking or non-locking retrograde nail, and using either a locking retrograde nail or a locking plate. The constructs underwent cyclical loading to simulate single-leg stance up to 125 000 cycles. Axial and torsional stiffness and displacement, cycles to failure and modes of failure were recorded for each specimen. When compared with locking plate constructs, locking nail constructs had significantly longer mean fatigue life (75 800 cycles (sd 33 900) vs 12 800 cycles (sd 6100); p = 0.007) and mean axial stiffness (220 N/mm (sd 80) vs 70 N/mm (sd 18); p = 0.005), but lower mean torsional stiffness (2.5 Nm/° (sd 0.9) vs 5.1 Nm/° (sd 1.5); p = 0.008). In addition, in the nail group the mode of failure was either cut-out of the distal screws or breakage of nails, and in the locking plate group breakage of the plate was always the mode of failure. Locking nail constructs had significantly longer mean fatigue life than non-locking nail constructs (78 900 cycles (sd 25 600) vs 52 400 cycles (sd 22 500); p = 0.04).

The new locking retrograde femoral nail showed better stiffness and fatigue life than locking plates, and superior fatigue life to non-locking nails, which may be advantageous in elderly patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:114–21.

The ideal form of fixation for displaced, extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia remains controversial. In the UK, open reduction and internal fixation with locking-plates and intramedullary nailing are the two most common forms of treatment. Both techniques provide reliable fixation but both are associated with specific complications. There is little information regarding the functional recovery following either procedure.

We performed a randomised pilot trial to determine the functional outcome of 24 adult patients treated with either a locking-plate (n = 12) or an intramedullary nailing (n = 12). At six months, there was an adjusted difference of 13 points in the Disability Rating Index in favour of the intramedullary nail. However, this was not statistically significant in this pilot trial (p = 0.498). A total of seven patients required further surgery in the locking-plate group and one in the intramedullary nail group.

This study suggests that there may be clinically relevant, functional differences in patients treated with nail versus locking-plate fixation for fractures of the distal tibia and differences in related complications. Further trials are required to confirm the findings of this pilot investigation.