For many years, marker-based systems have been used for motion analysis. However, the emergence of new technologies, such as 4D scanners provide exciting new opportunities for motion analysis. In 4D scanners, the subjects are measured as a dense mesh, which enables the use of shape analysis techniques. In this talk, we will explore how the combination of the rising new motion analysis methods and shape modelling may change the way we think about movement and its analysis

Background. New marker free motion analysis systems are being used extensively in the area of sports medicine and physiotherapy. The accuracy and validity of use in an orthopaedic setting have not been fully assessed for these newer marker free motion analysis systems. The aim of this study is to compare leg length and varus/valgus knee measurements performed by leg measurement x-ray, and performed using the new marker free motion analysis system (Organic motion biostage). Methods. Patients attending the orthopaedic department for total knee replacements were recruited. They underwent radiological leg measurement x-ray, clinical leg measurement, and finally assessment using the organic motion biostage system. These were analysed using the motion monitor software, microsoft excel and minitab 16. Results. For 23 patients assessed, all methods showed a statistically significant result (p<0.05) using paired t-tests. This rejects the null hypothesis- indicating that organic motion does not have the accuracy currently to measure leg length or knee varus/valgus angle. Conclusions. Results indicate that the organic motion biostage system- a new marker free motion analysis system, is not feasible currently as a method of accurately measuring leg-length. Given the current modelling methods used by this new system there are limitations, that if addressed may yet allow the system to become a useful clinical tool. These authors feel it still has applications in orthopaedics as a useful, quick, and easy to use method of motion analysis and functional screen in orthopaedic patients, and warrants further investigation. We also present a case of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and show how markerless motion analysis is a useful tool for assessing spinal sagittal balance, and its effect on the biomechanics of walking. Level of Evidence. IV

Assessing the efficacy of cervical orthoses in restricting spinal motion has historically proved challenging due to a poor understanding of spinal kinematics and the difficulty in accurately measuring spinal motion. This study is the first to use an 8 camera optoelectronic, passive marker, motion analysis system with a novel marker protocol to compare the effectiveness of the Aspen, Aspen Vista, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars. Restriction of cervical spine motion was assessed for physiological and functional range of motion (ROM). Nineteen healthy volunteers (12 female, 7 male) were fitted with collars by an approved physiotherapist. ProReflex (Qualisys, Sweden) infra-red cameras were used to track the movement of retro-reflective marker clusters attached to the head and trunk. 3-D kinematic data was collected from uncollared and collared subjects during forward flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation for physiological ROM and during five activities of daily living (ADLs). ROM in the three clinical planes was analysed using the Qualisys Track Manager (Qualisys, Sweden) 6 Degree of Freedom calculation to determine head orientation relative to the trunk. For physiological ROM, the Aspen and Philadelphia were more effective at restricting flexion/extension than the Vista (p<0.001), Miami-J (p<0.001 and p<0.01) and Miami-J Advanced (p<0.01 and p<0.05). The Aspen was more effective at restricting rotation compared to the Vista (p<0.001) and Miami-J (p<0.05). The Vista was least effective at restricting lateral bending (p<0.001). Through functional ROM, the Vista was less effective than the Aspen (p<0.001) and other collars (p<0.01) at restricting flexion/extension. The Aspen and Miami-J Advanced were more effective at restricting rotation than the Vista (p<0.01 and p<0.05) and Miami-J (p<0.05). All the collars were comparable when restricting lateral bending. The Aspen is superior to, and the Aspen Vista inferior to, the other collars at restricting cervical spine motion through physiological ROM. Functional ROM observed during ADLs are less than those observed through physiological ROM. The Aspen Vista is inferior to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ROM. The Aspen collar again performs well, particularly at restricting rotation, but is otherwise comparable to the other collars at restricting motion through functional ranges

Background. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative, chronic disease of the articular cartilage that affects more than 150 million people [1]. In the knee, OA can begin as either isolated medial OA or isolated lateral OA. Previous research [2,3] shows medial OA and lateral OA have characteristic cartilage lesion locations and progression patterns as well as flexion angles associated with lesion development, indicating strong involvement of mechanical factors in disease initiation. Therefore, it is important to investigate these mechanical factors. Previous studies combined data sets (geometry, motion, load) from separate sources. The aim of the current work was to use a consistent multi-modal approach. Method. A finite element (FE) model of a healthy knee in full extension was created using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and motion analysis data from the same subject (female, 24 yrs). MRI data was obtained using a 3T MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems/Achieva). Surface geometries of the tibia, femur, and associated cartilage were then semi-automatically segmented and processed (Mimics 12.5; Geomagic Studio 11; SolidWorks 2009). Motion data was collected at 100 Hz (Vicon 612) during level walking and subsequently applied to a lower limb model (AnyBody Version 3.0) to calculate muscle forces. Both sets of data were then combined to create a subject-specific FE model (ANSYS 11.0) which was solved to determine relative contact areas, pressures, and deformations in the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments. Results. Contact area in the medial tibiofemoral compartment was approximately twice as large as in the lateral compartment. Medially, tibiofemoral contact occurred anteriorly and centrally; maximum cartilage deformation also occurred in these regions. Laterally, contact occurred centrally in both the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions with maximum deformation gradients occurring anteriorly and posteriorly. Overall, cartilage deformation was larger in the medial (1.73 mm) than in the lateral compartment (1.50 mm). Contact pressure was also larger medially (111 kN) than laterally (83 kN) with equal pressure gradients extending in all directions from the centre of medial tibiofemoral contact but concentrated posterior to the lateral compartment's contact area. Discussion. The current results match previous literature. Contact areas for tibiofemoral cartilage at full extension correlate well with lesion locations described in medial OA, commonly associated with small flexion angles. Concentrated pressure gradient locations also agree with cartilage lesion progression directions cited in the literature. Future work will involve creating more subject-specific models and including higher flexion angles. J Boyd was funded by the Clarendon Fund, National Science Foundation and Whitaker International Fellowship

Abstract. Objectives. Spinal disorders such as back pain incur a substantial societal and economic burden. Unfortunately, there is lack of understanding and treatment of these disorders are further impeded by the inability to assess spinal forces in vivo. The aim of this project is to address this challenge by developing and testing a novel image-driven approach that will assess the forces in an individual's spine in vivo by incorporating information acquired from multimodal imaging (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biplane X-rays) in a subject-specific model. Methods. Magnetic resonance and biplane X-ray imaging are used to capture information about the anatomy, tissues, and motion of an individual's spine as they perform a range of everyday activities. This information is then utilised in a subject-specific computational model based on the finite element method to predict the forces in their spine. The project is also utilising novel machine learning algorithms and in vitro, six-axis mechanical testing on human, porcine and bovine samples to develop and test the modelling methods rigorously. Results & Discussion. MRI sequences have been identified that provide high-quality image data and information on different tissue types which will be used to predict subject-specific disc properties. In-vivo protocols to capture motion analysis, EMG muscle activity, and video X-rays of the spine have been designed with planned data collection of 15 healthy volunteers. Preliminary modelling work has evaluated potential machine learning approaches and quantified the sensitivity of the models developed to material properties. Conclusion. The development and testing of these image-driven subject-specific spine models will provide a new tool for determining forces in the spine. It will also provide new tools for measuring and modelling spine movement and quantifying the properties of the spinal tissues. Acknowledgments. Funding from the EPSRC: EP/V036602/1 (Meakin, Holsgrove & Javadi) and EP/V032275/1 (Holt & Williams). Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

To investigate differences in the drop vertical jump height in female adolescents with an ACL injury and healthy controls and the contribution of each limb in this task. Forty female adolescents with an ACL injury (ACLi, 15.2 ± 1.4 yrs, 164.6 ± 6.0 cm, 63.1 ± 10.0 kg) and thirty-nine uninjured (CON, 13.2 ± 1.7 yrs, 161.7 ± 8.0 cm, 50.6 ± 11.0 kg) were included in this study. A 10-camera infrared motion analysis system (Vicon, Nexus, Oxford, UK) tracked pelvis, thigh, shank, and foot kinematics at 200Hz, while the participants performed 3 trials of double-legged drop vertical jumps (DVJ) on two force plates (Bertec Corp., Columbus, USA) sampled at 2000Hz.The maximum jump height normalised by dominant leg length was compared between groups using independent samples t-test. The maximum vertical ground reaction force (GRFz) and sagittal ankle, knee and hip velocities before take-off were compared between limbs in both groups, using paired samples t-test. The normalised jump height was 11% lower in the ACLi than in the CON (MD=0.04 cm, p=0.020). In the ACLi, the maximum GRFz (MD=46.17N) and the maximum velocities of ankle plantar flexion (MD=79.83°/s), knee extension (MD=85.80°/s), and hip extension (MD=36.08°/s) were greater in the non-injured limb, compared to the injured limb. No differences between limbs were found in the CON. ACL injured female adolescents jump lower than the healthy controls and have greater contribution of their non-injured limb, compared to their injured limb, in the DVJ task. Clinicians should investigate differences in the contribution between limbs during double-legged drop vertical jump when assessing patients with an ACL injury, as this could help identify asymmetries, and potentially improve treatment, criteria used to clear athletes to sport, and re-injury prevention

This study aimed to quantify self-reported outcomes and walking gait biomechanics in patients following primary and revision THA. The specific goals of this study were to investigate: (i) if primary and revision THA patients have comparable preoperative outcomes; and (2) if revision THA patients have worse postoperative outcomes than primary THA patients. Forty-three patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis and 23 patients undergoing revision THA were recruited and followed longitudinally for their first 12 postoperative months. Reasons for revision were loosening (73%), dislocation (9%), and infection (18%). Patients completed the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and underwent gait analysis preoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. A 10 camera motion analysis system (V5 Vantage, Vicon, UK) recorded marker trajectories (100 Hz) during walking at self- selected speeds. A generic lower-body musculoskeletal model (Gait2392) was scaled using principal component analysis [1] and the inverse kinematics tool in Opensim 3.3 was used to compute joint angles for the lower limbs in the sagittal plane. Independent samples t-test were used to compare patient reported outcomes between the primary and revision groups at each timepoint. Statistical parametric mapping was used to compare gait patterns between the two groups at each timepoint. Preoperatively, patients undergoing primary THA reported significantly worse pain (p<0.001), symptoms (p<0.001), function (p<0.001), and quality of life (p=0.004). No differences were observed at 3 and 12 months postoperatively between patients who had received a primary or revision THA. The only observed difference in gait pattern was that patients with a revision THA had reduced hip extension at 3 months, but no differences were observed preoperatively and 12 months. Despite the suggestions in the literature that revision THA is bound to have worse outcomes compared to primary THA, we found no differences in in patient-reported outcomes and gait patterns at 12 months postoperatively. This suggests that it may be possible, in some circumstances, for patients following revision THA to achieve similar outcomes to their peers undergoing primary THA

Tibial shaft fractures require surgical stabilization preferably by intramedullary nailing. However, patients often report functional limitations even years after the injury. This study investigates the influence of the surgical approach (transpatellar vs. parapatellar) on gait performance and patient reported outcome six months after surgery. Twenty-two patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing through a transpatellar approach (TP: n=15, age 41±15, BMI 24±3) or a parapatellar approach (PP: n=7, age 34±15, BMI 23±2) and healthy, matched controls (n=22, age 39±13, BMI 24±2) were assessed by instrumented motion analysis six months after intramedullary nailing. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA) as well as kinematic and kinetic gait data were collected during level walking. Comparisons among approach methods and control group were performed by analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney test. Six months after surgery, knee kinetics in both groups differed significantly compared to controls (p <.04). The approach method affected gait speed (TP: p = .002; PP: p = .08) and knee kinematics in the early stance phase (TP: p = .011; PP: p = .082), with the parapatellar approach showing a more favorable outcome. However, the difference between patient groups was not significant for any of the assessed gait parameters (p > .2). Also, no differences could be found in the bother index (BI) or function index (FI) of SMFA between surgical approach methods (BI: TP: Mdn = 7.2, PP: Mdn = 9.4; FI: TP: Mdn = 10.3, PP: Mdn = 9.2, p > .7). Our study demonstrates, that six months after surgery for tibial shaft fractures functional limitations remain. These limitations appear not to be different for either a trans- or a parapatellar approach for the insertion of the intramedullary nail. The findings of this study are limited by the relatively short follow up time period and small number of patients. Future studies should investigate the source of the functional limitation after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures

To investigate if the countermovement jump height differs between ACL injured and uninjured female adolescents and to explore kinematic differences between limbs. Additionally, the association between isometric knee extension strength and jump height was investigated. Thirty-one ACL injured female adolescents (ACLi, 15.3 ± 1.4yrs, 163.9 ± 6.6cm, 63.0 ± 9.3kg) and thirty-eight uninjured (CON, 13.2±1.7yrs, 161.7 ± 8.1cm, 50.6 ± 11.1kg) participated in this study. All participants performed a countermovement jump task, with 3D kinematics collected using a motion analysis system (Vicon, Nexus, Oxford, UK) at 200Hz, and a maximum isometric knee extension task on an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, New York, USA) for three trials. The peak torque was extracted from the isometric trials. Independent samples t-test compared the maximum jump height normalised by the dominant leg length between groups, paired samples t-test compared the maximum hip and knee extension and ankle plantar flexion velocities before take-off between limbs in both groups, and a Pearson's correlation test investigated the association between the isometric knee extension strength and jump height. The ACLi jumped 13% lower compared to the CON (p=0.022). In the ACLi, the maximum hip and knee extension and ankle plantar flexion velocities were greater in the non-injured limb, compared to the injured limb; however, no differences between limbs were found in the CON. The isometric knee extension strength of both limbs was positively correlated with jump height (limb 1: r=0.329; p=0.006, and limb 2: r=0.386; p=0.001; whereas limb 1 corresponds to the ACLi injured limb and CON non-dominant limb, and limb 2 to the ACLi non-injured limb and CON dominant limb). ACL injured female adolescents present lower jump height than controls and greater contribution of their non-injured limb, compared to their injured limb, during a countermovement jump task. Also, current results indicate that jump height is positively related to isometric knee extension strength measure

Abstract. Objectives. While spinal fusion is known to be associated with adjacent disc degeneration, little is known on the role of the facet joints in the process, and whether their altered biomechanics following fusion plays a role in further spinal degeneration. This work aimed to develop a model and method to sequentially measure the effects of spinal fusion on lumbar facet joints through synchronisation of both motion analysis, pressure mapping and mechanical analysis. Methods. Parallel measurements of mature ovine lumbar facet joints (∼8yr old, n=3) were carried out using synchronised load and displacement measurements, motion capture during loading and pressure mapping of the joint spaces during loading. Functional units were prepared and cemented in PMMA endcaps. Displacement-controlled compression measurements were carried out using a materials testing machine (3365, Instron, USA) at 1 mm/min up to 950 N with the samples in a neutral position, while motion capture of the facet joints during compression was carried out using orthogonal HD webcams (Logitech, Switzerland) to measure the displacement of key facet joint features. The pressure mapping of load transfer during displacement was carried out using a flexible pressure sensor (6900 series, Tekscan, USA). Each sample was imaged at an isotropic resolution of 82 microns using a μCT scanner (XtremeCT, Scanco, Switzerland) to quantify the curvature within the facet joints. Results. Relative facet joint displacement under load, in a neutral position, showed more displacement (2.36 ±1.68 mm) compared to the cross-head when under compression (2.06 ±1.19 mm). Motion capture indicated the relative displacement of the facet joints was more posterior with some lateral motion. For five of the six facet joints, pressure measurement was possible only on 24±7 % of the surface due to the large change in curvature. Partially measured loads through the facets was 10.5 ±1.1 N. Conclusions. The relative displacement of the lumbar facet joints compared to the crosshead displacement was consistent with previous studies of cervical facet joints, despite the differences in anatomical geometry between cervical and lumbar joints. The difficulties in accurately measuring the load transfer through the facet joints was due to the age of the tissue and the degree of curvature of the facet joints. Synchronisation of the biomechanical data will provide a setup to assess the effect of interventions such as spinal fusion, with curvature-related issues unlikely to occur in human spines. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Abstract. Objectives. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a useful method for analysing human motion data. The objective of this study was to use PCA to quantify the biggest variance in knee kinematics waveforms between a Non-Pathological (NP) group and individuals awaiting High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) surgery. Methods. Thirty knees (29 participants) who were scheduled for HTO surgery were included in this study. Twenty-eight NP volunteers were recruited into the study. Human motion analysis was performed during level gait using a modified Cleveland marker set. Subjects walked at their self-selected speed for a minimum of 6 successful trials. Knee kinematics were calculated within Visual3D (C-Motion). The first three Principal Components (PCs) of each input variable were selected. Single-component reconstruction was performed alongside representative extremes of each PC to aid interpretation of the biomechanical feature reconstructed by each component. Results. Pre-operatively patient demographics included (age: 50.70 (8.71) years; height: 1.75 (.11) m; body mass: 90.57 (20.17) kg; mTFA: 7.75 (3.72) degrees varus; gait speed: 1.06 (0.23) m/s). The HTO cohort was significantly older and had a higher mass than the NP control participants. For knee kinematics the first three PCs explained 88%, 95% and 89% of the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes, respectively. The main variances can be explained by sagittal plane magnitude differences, peak swing is associated with toe-off, a reduced knee flexion angle is associated with a longer time spent in stance, pre-HTO remain adducted during stance and pre-HTO patients remain more externally rotated during stance and latter part of swing. Conclusions. This study has introduced PCA in trying to better understand the biomechanical differences between a control group and a cohort with medial knee osteoarthritis varus deformity awaiting HTO. Further analysis will be undertaken using PCA comparing pre- and post-surgery which will be of importance in clinical decision making

Abstract. Skeletal kinematics are traditionally measured by motion analysis methods such as optical motion capture (OMC). While easy to carry out and clinically relevant for certain applications, it is not suitable for analysing the ankle joint due to its anatomical complexity. A greater understanding of the function of healthy ankle joints could lead to an improvement in the success of ankle-replacement surgeries. Biplane video X-ray (BVX) is a technique that allows direct measurement of individual bones using highspeed, dynamic X-Rays. Objective. To develop a protocol to quantify in-vivo foot and ankle kinematics using a bespoke High-speed Dynamic Biplane X-ray system combined with OMC. Methods. Two healthy volunteers performed five level walks and step-down trials while simultaneous capturing BVX and synchronised OMC. participants undertook MR imaging (Magnetom 3T Prisma, Siemens) which was manually segmented into 3D bone models (Simpleware Scan IP, Synopsis). Bone position and orientation for the Talus, Tibia and Calcaneus were calculated by manual matching of 3D Bone models to X-Rays (DSX Suite, C-Motion, Inc.). OMC markers were tracked (QTM, Qualisys) and processed using Visual 3D (C-motion, Inc.). Results. Initial results for level walking showed that OMC overestimated the rotational range of motion (ROM) in all three planes for the tibiotalar joint compared with BVX (Sagittal: OMC 30°/BVX 20°, Frontal: OMC 16°/BVX 15° and Transverse: OMC 20°/BVX 17°). For the subtalar joint, OMC (22°) over-estimated sagittal ROM compared with BVX (14°) and underestimated the ROM in the other planes (Frontal: OMC 8°/BVX 15° and Transverse: OMC 18°/BVX 20°). Conclusions. The results highlight the discrepancy between OMC and BVX methods. However, the BVX results are consistent with previous literature. The protocol developed here will form the foundation of future patient-based studies to investigate in-vivo ankle kinematics. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Abstract. Optical motion capture (OMC) is the current gold standard for motion analysis, however measuring patellofemoral kinematics is not possible using the technique. One approach to measuring in-vivo kinematics is to use biplane video X-ray (BVX) and 3D models generated from MRI to track the movement of the patellar. Understanding how the patellar is moving during different loaded dynamic activities can help with understanding the effects of different interventions when treating disease or injury. Objective. To develop a protocol and compare patellofemoral kinematics for different activities using biplane video X-ray (BVX). Methods. Two healthy volunteers performed level walk, lunge, and stair ascent activities while simultaneous capturing BVX and synchronised OMC. Participants undertook MR imaging (Magnetom 3T Prisma, Siemens) which was manually segmented into 3D bone models (Simpleware Scan IP, Synopsis). Bone position and orientation for the patellar and femur were calculated by manual matching of 3D Bone models to X-Rays (DSX Suite, C-Motion, Inc.). Patellofemoral kinematics were calculated using Visual 3D (C-Motion, Inc.). Results. Initial results show that patellar flexion(+) (PF) was greatest during lunge (52.1º) compared with stair ascent (49.4º) and stance phase of gait (5.4º), however stair ascent had the largest PF range of motion (ROM) of 48.8º. The lunge activity had the greatest ROM for patellar lateral rotation (12.8º) compared with stair ascent (8.7º) and gait (3.7º). Patellar lateral (+) tilt was found to be greatest during gait (8.4º) compared with stair ascent (6.7º) and lunge (6.8º). Conclusions. These results highlight the variability of patellofemoral kinematics between different loaded dynamic activities. When considering the influence and efficacy of patellofemoral interventions it is important to investigate different activities to fully understand their effects. Future work will look at more dynamic activities and to investigate further the effect of different activities on patellofemoral tracking. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Osteoarthritis is one of the major causes of immobility. Most commonly, osteoarthritis manifests at the knee joint. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (KNOA) increases with age. Another important risk factor for KNOA is obesity. Research has shown that obese subjects have almost four times the risk of developing KNOA, which may be explained by both an increased knee loading. In medial compartment KNOA, the knee adduction moment (KAM) during gait is considered a marker for disease severity. KAM is dependent of the magnitude of the ground reaction force and its moment arm relative to the knee joint centre. In addition, obesity has been reported to augment KAM during gait. However, after removal of the direct contributions of body weight, KAM parameters may be different due to obesity-related gait adaptations to limit knee loading. While KAM has been thoroughly investigated during gait, little is known about KAM during stair negotiation, during which knee loads are higher compared to gait. The aim of the current study is therefore to compare normalized KAM during the stance phase of stair negotiation between lean KNOA patients, obese KNOA patients, and healthy controls. This case control study included 20 lean controls, 14 lean KNOA patients, and 16 obese KNOA patients. All subjects ascended and descended a two-step staircase at a self-selected, comfortable speed. Radiographic imaging and MRI were used to evaluate knee cartilage and KNOA status. Motion analysis was performed with a three-dimensional motion capture system. Kinetic data were obtained by one force platform. The parameters of study included: stance phase duration, toe-out angle, KAM peaks and KAM impulse. During stair ascent obese KNOA patients showed a longer stance phase than healthy controls (P 0.050). Despite high between-subject variability, KAM impulse was found 45% higher in the obese KNOA group during stair descent, when compared to healthy controls (P =0.012). The absence of a significant effect of groups on the normalized KAM during stair negotiation may be explained by a lower ambulatory speed in the obese KNOA group, that effectively lowers GRFz. Decreasing ambulatory speed may be an effective strategy to lower KAM during stair negotiation

Differences at motor control strategies to provide dynamic balance in various tasks in diabetic polyneuropatic (DPN) patients due to losing the lower extremity somatosensory information were reported in the literature. It has been stated that dynamics of center of mass (CoM) is controlled by center of pressure (CoP) during human upright standing and active daily movements. Indeed analyzing kinematic trajectories of joints unveil motor control strategies stabilizing CoM. Nevertheless, we hypothesized that imbalance disorders/CoM destabilization observed at DPN patients due to lack of tactile information about the base of support cannot be explained only by looking at joint kinematics, rather functional foot usage is proposed to be an important counterpart at controlling CoM. In this study, we included 14 DPN patients, who are diagnosed through clinical examination and electroneuromyography, and age matched 14 healthy subjects (HS) to identify control strategies in functional reach test (FRT). After measuring participants’ foot arch index (FAI) by a custom-made archmeter, they were tested by using a force plate, motion analysis system, surface electromyography and pressure pad, all working in synchronous during FRT. We analyzed data to determine effect of structural and functional foot pathologies due to neuropathy on patient performance and postural control estimating FAI, reach length (FR), FR to height (H) ratio (FR/H; normalized FR with respect to height), displacement of CoM and CoP in anteroposterior direction only, moment arm (MA, defined as the difference between CoP and CoM at the end of FRT), ankle, knee and hip joint angles computed at the sagittal plane for both extremities. Kinematic metrics included initial and final joint angles, defined with respect to start and end of reaching respectively. Further difference in the final and initial joint angles was defined as Δ. FAI was founded significantly lower in DPN patients (DPN: 0.3404; HS: 0.3643, p= <0.05). The patients’ FR, FR/H and absolute MA and displacement of CoM were significantly shorter than the control group (p= <0.05). Displacement of CoP between the two groups were not significant. Further we observed that CoM was lacking CoP in DPN patients (mean MA: +0.88 cm), while leading CoP in HS (mean MA: −1.59 cm) at the end of FRT. All initial angles were similar in two groups, however in DPN patients final right and left hip flexion angle (p=0.016 and p=0.028 respectively) and left ankle plantar flexion angle (p=0.04) were smaller than HS significantly. DPN patients had significantly less (p=0.029) hip flexion (mean at right hip angle, Δ=25.0°) compared to HS (Δ=33.53°) and ankle plantar flexion (DPN mean at right ankle angle, Δ=6.42°, HS mean Δ=9.07°; p=0.05). The results suggest that movement of both hip and ankle joints was limited simultaneously in DPN patients causing lack of CoM with respect to CoP at the end of reaching with significantly lower FAI. These results lead to the fact that cutaneous and joint somatosensory information from foot and ankle along with the structure of foot arch may play an important role in maintaining dynamic balance and performance of environmental context. In further studies, we expect to show that difference at control strategies in DPN patients due to restricted functional foot usage might be a good predictor of how neuropathy evolves to change biomechanical aspects of biped erect posture

Introduction. Following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patients experience pain relief and report improved physical function and activity. However, there is paucity of evidence that patients are truly more active in daily life after TKA. The aims of this study were: 1) to prospectively measure physical activity with a wearable motion sensor before and after TKA; 2) to compare patient-reported levels of physical activity with objectively assessed levels of physical activity before and after TKA; 3) to investigate whether differences in physical activity after TKA are related to levels of physical function. Methods. 22 patients (age=66.6 ±9.3yrs; m/f= 12/11; BMI= 30.6 ±6.1) undergoing primary TKA (Vanguard, ZimmerBiomet), were measured preoperatively and 1–3 years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included KOOS-PS and SQUASH for assessment of perceived physical function and activity resp. Physical activity was assessed during 4 consecutive days in patients” home environments while wearing an accelerometer-based activity monitor (AM) at the thigh. All data were analysed using semi-automated algorithms in Matlab. AM-derived parameters included walking time (s), sitting time (s) standing time (s), sit-to-stand transfers, step count, walking bouts and walking cadence (steps/min). Objective physical function was assessed by motion analysis of gait, sit-to-stand (STS) transfers and block step-up (BS) transfers using a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) worn at the pelvis. IMU-based motion analysis was only performed postoperatively. Statistical comparisons were performed with SPSS and a per-protocol analysis was applied to present the results at follow-up. Results. Data were available for 17 of 22 patients at follow-up. PROMs demonstrated significant improvement of perceived physical function (KOOS-PS=68±21 vs. 34±26; p<0.001) and physical activity (SQUASH=2584 ±1945 vs. 3038 ±2228; p<0.001) following TKA. AM-based parameters of physical activity demonstrated no significant differences between pre- and postoperative quantitative outcomes. Only the qualitative outcome of walking cadence significantly changed after TKA (81.41 ±10.86 (steps/min) vs. 94.24 ±7.20 resp.; p<0.001). There were moderate correlations between self-reported and objectively assessed levels of physical activity after TKA (Pearson”s r=0.36–0.43; p<0.05). Outcomes of physical activity after TKA were moderately correlated to IMU-based functional outcome measures (Pearson”s r = 0.31 – 0.48; p<0.05). Conclusion. 1–3 years after TKA, patients demonstrate improved function. However, the self-perceived higher activity level (+18%) after TKA is not supported by any objective data obtained by wearable motion sensors such as steps, transfers or time-on-feet. This may have implications for general health and requires further investigation into patient communication, expectation management or motivational intervention

Posterior cruciate ligament deficiency (PCLD) leads to structural and proprioceptive impairments of the knee, affecting the performance of daily activities including obstacle-crossing. Therefore, identifying the biomechanical deficits and/or strategies during this motor task would be helpful for rehabilitative and clinical management of such patients. A safe and successful obstacle-crossing requires stability of the body and sufficient foot clearance of the swing limb. Patients with PCLD may face demands different from normal when negotiating obstacles of different heights. The objective of this study was thus to identify the biomechanical deviations/strategies of the lower limbs in unilateral PCLD during obstacle-crossing using motion analysis techniques. Twelve patients with unilateral PCLD and twelve healthy controls participated in the current study with informed written consent. They were asked to walk and cross obstacles of heights of 10%, 20% and 30% of their leg lengths at self-selected speeds. The PCLD group was asked to cross the obstacles with each of the affected and unaffected limb as the leading limb, denoted as PCLD-A and PCLD-U, respectively. The kinematic and kinetic data were measured with a 7-camera motion analysis system (Vicon, Oxford Metrics, U.K.) and two force plates (AMTI, U.S.A.). The angles of the stance and swing limbs (crossing angles) and the moments of the stance limbs (crossing moments) for each joint in the sagittal plane when the leading limb was above the obstacle were calculated for statistical analysis. A 3 by 2, 2-way mixed-model analysis of variance with one between-subject factor (PCLD-A vs. Control, and PCLD-U vs. Control) and one within-subject factor (obstacle height) was performed (α=0.05). Paired t-test was used to compare the variables between PCLD-A and PCLD-U (α=0.05). SAS version 9.2 was used for all statistical analysis. When the leading toe was above the obstacle, the PCLD group showed significantly greater hip flexion in the swing limb but decreased dorsiflexion in the stance limb, both in PCLD-A and PCLD-U (P<0.05). Greater knee flexion and greater ankle dorsiflexion were found in the leading limb in PCLD-A (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the PCLD group showed significantly decreased ankle plantarflexor but increased knee extensor crossing moments in the stance limb compared with the Control (P<0.05). None of the calculated variables were found to be significantly different between PCLD-A and PCLD-U (P>0.05). When crossing the obstacle, patients with PCLD reduced ankle plantarflexor moments that were mainly produced by the gastrocnemius. This may help reduce the posterior instability of the affected knee. Greater knee extensor crossing moments may also help reduce the posterior instability of the standing knee when the leading toe was above the obstacle. The changed joint kinetics as a result of PCLD were not only seen on the affected side but also on the unaffected side during obstacle-crossing. This symmetrical pattern may be necessary in performing functional activities that may require either the affected side or the unaffected side leading. These results suggest that rehabilitative intervention, including muscular strengthening, on both affected and unaffected sides are necessary in patients with unilateral PCLD

INTRODUCTION. Motion analysis is routinely used in the clinical and research sectors to quantify joint biomechanics. It plays an important role in clinical assessments by aiding the physician to distinguish between primary movement abnormalities and any secondary compensatory mechanisms that may overshadow the cause of the problem. During a data collection session, a wealth of biomechanical data regarding joint and segment kinematics and kinetics are collected from patients performing daily activities. Objective classification can be used to automate a diagnosis from this data and has been used previously to analyse measurements of level gait [1]. It is of interest to assess the knee during stair-gait as this activity involves greater range of motion (ROM) of the lower limbs, larger forces and moments acting at the knee. AIM. The aim of the current study is to explore the use of an objective classifier [1] to characterise knee osteoarthritis (OA) and monitor functional recovery following a total knee replacement (TKR) using measurements from stair-gait. METHODS. Motion analysis techniques were used to quantify knee OA kinematics and kinetics during stair-gait for six patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and nine subjects without pathology (NP). One OA subject, forming a TKR sample, was also assessed at 4, 8 and 12 post-operatively. Each subject performed three trials of stair ascent and descent. 3D motion capture was performed using 8 Qualisys MCUs, capturing at 60Hz and a 1000Hz force plate (Bertec Corporation). Forces were measured from the first step of the staircase [2]. Independent t-tests were performed on biomechanical measures to compare the NP and OA cohorts (p<0.05). This identified the adaptations associated with knee OA. Principal components of salient kinematic and kinetic waveforms were used as inputs to train the classifier and subsequently characterise recovery of the TKR sample. RESULTS. The OA cohort adapted their stair-gait by reducing their peak: (i) external flexion moment in stance during both stair ascent and descent; (ii) medial ground reaction force (GRF) (iii) vertical GRF during stair descent and increasing their external adduction moment during stair ascent. The classifier was used to characterise knee function of the OA and NP subjects with 100% classification accuracy, defined using a Leave-one-out cross-validation. The TKR sample was classified as having dominant OA functional characteristics pre-operatively. At all subsequent measurements the subject was classified as having NP stair-gait characteristics. These changes correlated significantly with Knee Outcome Survey and Oxford Knee scores. CONCLUSION. Classification is a powerful tool for characterising data into two groups where a simplex plot provides a simple clinical interpretation of the results from a motion analysis assessment. This study demonstrates the use of objective classification to quantify NP, OA and TKR function from stair-gait. It also demonstrates its capability to monitor functional changes during a subject's recovery

Several authors have used 3D motion analysis to measure upper limb kinematics, but none have focused solely on wrist movements, in six degrees of freedom, during activities of daily living (ADL). This study aimed to determine the role of the different planar wrist movements during three standardised tasks, which may be affected by surgical procedures. Nine volunteers (age range 22-45) were recruited and each participant performed three simulated ADLs: using a door lever, a door knob and opening/closing a jam jar. The ADLs were simulated using a work-sim kit on an isokinetic dynamometer. Motion analysis was performed by a 10-camera Oqus system (Qualisys Medical AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). All raw kinematic data were exported to Visual3D (C-Motion Inc.), where the biomechanical model was defined and joint kinematics calculated. Table 1 shows a similar range of radial-ulnar deviation and flexion-extension as previous studies. However a substantial amount of wrist rotation also occurred in all tasks. This was significantly greater when using the door lever compared with the door knob and jam jar tasks. Previous studies have stated that a negligible degree of rotation occurs at the wrist. This study found a maximum mean of 31.7 degrees of wrist rotation. This indicates that considerable rotational movement occurs at the wrist during certain functional tasks. Surgical approaches and clinical pathology may disrupt structures responsible for rotational stability. Further investigation of this rotational component of carpal movement during additional ADLs is proposed in both normal and clinical subjects, to explore the potential relationship between carpal surgery and rotational laxity

Background. Technical skill is an essential domain of surgical competency. Arthroscopic surgery forms a particularly challenging subset of these skills. The innate ability to acquire these skills is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the innate arthroscopic skills and learning curve patterns of medical students - our future surgeons. Methods. Two arthroscopic tasks (one shoulder and one knee) were set up in a bioskills laboratory to represent core skills required for arthroscopic training. Twenty medical students with no previous arthroscopic surgery experience were recruited and their performance assessed whilst undertaking each task on 30 occasions. The primary outcome variable was success or failure. Individuals were assessed as ‘competent’ if they stabilised their learning curve within 20 episodes. The secondary outcome measure was an objective assessment of technical dexterity using a validated Motion Analysis system (time taken to complete tasks, total path length of the subject's hands, and number of hand movements). Results. There was variability in the performance of the students. Seven students in the shoulder task and four students in the knee task were unable to achieve competence. Motion analysis data demonstrated that students who achieved task competence had better objective technical dexterity and therefore better innate arthroscopic ability. For the shoulder task, these differences were statistically significant for ‘path length’ and ‘hand movement’ (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). For the knee task, the differences were statistically significant for ‘path length’ (P<0.05, Mann-Whitney U test). Conclusion. Variation in innate arthroscopic skill exists in our future surgeons with some individuals being unable to achieve competence at basic arthroscopic tasks despite sustained practice. It may be of great value to identify individuals who lack innate arthroscopic skills early in their career in order to provide them with focused training and relevant career guidance