Abstract
Posterior cruciate ligament deficiency (PCLD) leads to structural and proprioceptive impairments of the knee, affecting the performance of daily activities including obstacle-crossing. Therefore, identifying the biomechanical deficits and/or strategies during this motor task would be helpful for rehabilitative and clinical management of such patients. A safe and successful obstacle-crossing requires stability of the body and sufficient foot clearance of the swing limb. Patients with PCLD may face demands different from normal when negotiating obstacles of different heights. The objective of this study was thus to identify the biomechanical deviations/strategies of the lower limbs in unilateral PCLD during obstacle-crossing using motion analysis techniques.
Twelve patients with unilateral PCLD and twelve healthy controls participated in the current study with informed written consent. They were asked to walk and cross obstacles of heights of 10%, 20% and 30% of their leg lengths at self-selected speeds. The PCLD group was asked to cross the obstacles with each of the affected and unaffected limb as the leading limb, denoted as PCLD-A and PCLD-U, respectively. The kinematic and kinetic data were measured with a 7-camera motion analysis system (Vicon, Oxford Metrics, U.K.) and two force plates (AMTI, U.S.A.). The angles of the stance and swing limbs (crossing angles) and the moments of the stance limbs (crossing moments) for each joint in the sagittal plane when the leading limb was above the obstacle were calculated for statistical analysis. A 3 by 2, 2-way mixed-model analysis of variance with one between-subject factor (PCLD-A vs. Control, and PCLD-U vs. Control) and one within-subject factor (obstacle height) was performed (α=0.05). Paired t-test was used to compare the variables between PCLD-A and PCLD-U (α=0.05). SAS version 9.2 was used for all statistical analysis.
When the leading toe was above the obstacle, the PCLD group showed significantly greater hip flexion in the swing limb but decreased dorsiflexion in the stance limb, both in PCLD-A and PCLD-U (P<0.05). Greater knee flexion and greater ankle dorsiflexion were found in the leading limb in PCLD-A (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the PCLD group showed significantly decreased ankle plantarflexor but increased knee extensor crossing moments in the stance limb compared with the Control (P<0.05). None of the calculated variables were found to be significantly different between PCLD-A and PCLD-U (P>0.05).
When crossing the obstacle, patients with PCLD reduced ankle plantarflexor moments that were mainly produced by the gastrocnemius. This may help reduce the posterior instability of the affected knee. Greater knee extensor crossing moments may also help reduce the posterior instability of the standing knee when the leading toe was above the obstacle.
The changed joint kinetics as a result of PCLD were not only seen on the affected side but also on the unaffected side during obstacle-crossing. This symmetrical pattern may be necessary in performing functional activities that may require either the affected side or the unaffected side leading. These results suggest that rehabilitative intervention, including muscular strengthening, on both affected and unaffected sides are necessary in patients with unilateral PCLD.
