The term mid-flexion instability has entered the orthopaedic literature as a concept, but has not been confirmed as a distinct clinical entity. The term is used freely, sometimes as a synonym for flexion instability. However, the terms need to be clearly separated. A cadaver study published in 1990 associated joint line elevation with decreased stability at many angles of flexion, but that model was not typical of clinical scenarios. The literature is considered and it is proposed that the more common entity of an uncorrected flexion contracture after a measured resection arthroplasty technique is more likely to produce clinical findings that suggest instability mid-flexion. It is proposed that the clinical scenario encountered is generalised instability, with the appearance of stability in full extension from tight posterior structures. This paper seeks to clarify whether mid-flexion instability exists as an entity distinct from other commonly recognised forms of instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):84–8

Background. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgical techniques attempt to achieve equal flexion and extension gaps to produce a well-balanced knee, but unexplainable unhappy patients persist. Mid-flexion instability is one proposed cause of unhappy patients. There are multiple techniques to achieve equal flexion and extension gaps, but their effects in mid-flexion are largely unknown. Purpose of study. The purpose of the study is to determine the effects that changing femur implant size and/or adjusting the femur and tibia proximal -distal and femur anterior-posterior implant positions have on cruciate retaining (CR) TKA mid-flexion ligament balance when equal flexion and extension gaps are maintained. Methods. A computational analysis was performed simulating knee flexion of two CR TKA designs (JOURNEY II CR and LEGION HFCR; Smith & Nephew) using previously validated software (LifeMOD/KneeSim; LifeModeler). Deviations from the ideal implant position were simulated by adjusting tibiofemoral proximal-distal position and femur anterior-posterior position and size (Table 1). Positioning the femur more proximal was accompanied by equal anterior femur and proximal tibia shifts to maintain equal flexion and extension gaps. The forces in ligaments connecting the femur and tibia, which included superficial and posterior MCL, LCL, popliteal-fibular ligament complex, iliotibial band, and anterior-lateral and posterior-medial PCL, were collected. Total tibiofemoral ligament load and PCL load for 15–75° knee flexion were analyzed versus proximal-distal implant position, implant size, implant design, and knee flexion using a MANOVA in Minitab 16 (Minitab). Results. Total tibiofemoral ligament load was significantly reduced by a more proximal implant position (p<.001) (Figure 1) but was not affected by implant size (p>0.6). PCL load was not affected by implant proximal-distal position or size (p>0.9) (Figure 2). Therefore, the PCL did not contribute to changes in mid-flexion balance caused by proximal-distal implant position. Implant design and knee flexion significantly influenced total tibiofemoral ligament and PCL loads (p<.05), but the interactions with implant proximal-distal position and size were not significant (p>0.7) indicating that the effects of implant proximal-distal position applies across the studied implant designs and 15°–75° knee flexion range. Conclusions. Our results suggest that a CR TKA can be well balanced at 0° and 90° knee flexion and be too tight or loose in mid-flexion. Since placement of implant was the variable studied, when the knee is too tight in mid-flexion, our recommendation to loosen the knee is to resect more distal and posterior femur, downsizing if necessary, and increase the tibial insert thickness. The opposite could be done to guard against the knee being too loose in mid-flexion. Finally, it is recommended to gauge balance in more than simply 0° and 90° to determine overall knee balance

Knee replacements may be unstable in the: 1. Plane of motion instability, due to recurvatum or buckling (in flexion). 2. Coronal plane or varus-valgus instability and 3. Flexed position. The third, flexion instability, has been well described and is characterised clinically by early, easy, superior flexion that is then compromised by difficulties with ascending and descending stairs, recurrent effusions and peri-articular tenderness. This “flexion instability” results generally from a flexion gap that is more spacious than the extension gap, where the polyethylene insert has been selected to permit full extension. The term “mid-flexion” instability should not be used as a synonym for “flexion instability”. The concept of mid-flexion instability implies that the knee is stable in extension and stable in flexion (90 degrees) but unstable at points in between. The most common error in assessment probably occurs when surgeons observe stability to varus-valgus stress with the knee locked in full extension, where it is not appreciated that the posterior structures are tight and stabilising the knee. Once the knee if flexed enough to relax these structures, the true “flexion instability is revealed. This is not “mid-flexion” instability. It is conceivable, that an arthroplasty might be designed where the geometry of the femoral condylar curve is such a large, recessed radius that the collateral ligaments are tight in both full extension and 90 degrees of flexion, but unstable in between. There have been marketing allegations that one product or another has been designed in a way to result in “mid-flexion instability. The only published information is based on finite element analysis models. There is scant literature on “mid-flexion” instability”. Laboratory investigations with cadavers, concluded that proximal elevation of the joint line may create “mid-flexion” instability as a result of altering collateral ligament function. Computer models have questioned this effect. One clinical report describes “mid-flexion” (rotational) instability in a revision arthroplasty. So-called “anatomic alignment”, posterior stabilization and resection of distal femur to correct flexion contractures have been alleged to cause “mid-flexion” instability

Aims. Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture, which leads to femoral joint line elevation. There is a paucity of data describing the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion stability and knee kinematics. Thus, the goal of this study was to quantify the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion laxity. Methods. Six computational knee models with cadaver-specific capsular and collateral ligament properties were implanted with a posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was created in each model to simulate a capsular contracture. Distal femoral resections of + 2 mm and + 4 mm were then simulated for each knee. The knee models were then extended under a standard moment. Subsequently, varus and valgus moments of 10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at baseline and repeated after each of the two distal resections. Coronal laxity (the sum of varus and valgus angulation with respective maximum moments) was measured throughout flexion. Results. With + 2 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by a mean of 3.1° (SD 0.18°) (p < 0.001) and 2.7° (SD 0.30°) (p < 0.001), respectively. With + 4 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° (SD 0.56°) (p < 0.001) and 5.5° (SD 0.72°) (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum increased coronal laxity for a + 4 mm resection occurred at a mean 15.7° (11° to 33°) of flexion with a mean increase of 7.8° (SD 0.2°) from baseline. Conclusion. With joint line elevation in primary PS TKA, coronal laxity peaks early (about 16°) with a maximum laxity of 8°. Surgeons should restore the joint line if possible; however, if joint line elevation is necessary, we recommend assessment of coronal laxity at 15° to 30° of knee flexion to assess for mid-flexion instability. Further in vivo studies are warranted to understand if this mid-flexion coronal laxity has negative clinical implications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):87–93

The June 2023 Knee Roundup. 360. looks at: Cementless total knee arthroplasty is associated with early aseptic loosening in a large national database; Is cementless total knee arthroplasty safe in females aged over 75 years?; Could novel radiological findings help identify aseptic tibial loosening?; The Attune cementless versus LCS arthroplasty at introduction; Return to work following total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Complications and downsides of the robotic total knee arthroplasty; Mid-flexion instability in kinematic alignment better with posterior-stabilized and medial-stabilized implants?; Patellar resurfacing does not improve outcomes in modern knees

Abstract. Introduction. Mid-flexion instability may cause poor outcomes following TKA. Surgical technique, patient-specific factors, and implant design could all contribute to it, with modelling and fluoroscopy data suggesting the latter may be the root cause. However, current implants all pass the preclinical stability testing standards, making it difficult to understand the effects of implant design on instability. We hypothesized that a more physiological test, analysing functional stability across the range of knee flexion-extension, could delineate the effects of design, independent of surgical technique and patient-specific factors. Methods. Using a SIMvitro-controlled six-degree-of-freedom robot, a dynamic stability test was developed, including continuous flexion and reporting data in a trans-epicondylar axis system. 3 femoral geometries were tested: gradually reducing radius, multi-radius and single-radius, with their respective tibial inserts. 710N of compression force (body weight) was applied to the implants as they were flexed from 0–140° with three levels of anterior/posterior (AP) tibial force applied (−90N,0N,90N). Results. While in static tests, the implants performed similarly, functional stability testing revealed different paths of motion and AP laxities throughout the flexion cycle. Some designs exhibited mid-flexion instability, while others did not: the multi-radius design allowed increased AP laxity as it transitioned to each arc of reduced femoral component radius; the single-radius design had low tibial bearing conformity, allowing 16mm difference in the paths of mid-flexion versus extension motion. Conclusions. Preclinical lab testing reveals functional differences between different design philosophies. Implant design impacts kinematics and mid-flexion stability, even before factoring in surgical technique and patient-specific factors

We report on the 5 year results of a randomized study comparing TKR performed using conventional instrumentation versus electromagnetic computer-assisted surgery. This study analysed patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 5 years utilising the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Short Form 36 score and range of motion (ROM). Of the 200 patients enrolled 125 completed 5 year follow up, 62 in the navigated group and 63 in the conventional group. There were 28 deceased patients, 29 withdrawals and 16 lost to follow-up. There was improvement in clinical function in most PROMs from 1-5 year follow up across both groups. OKS improved from a mean of 26.6 (12–55) to 35.1 (5–48). AKSS increased from 75.3 (0–100) to 78.4 (−10–100), SF36 from 58.9 (2.5–100) to 53.2 (0–100). ROM improved by an average 7 degrees from 110 degrees to 117 degrees (80–135). There was no statistically significant difference in PROMs between the groups at 5 years. Patients undergoing revision surgery were identified from the dataset and global PACS. There were no revisions within 5 years in the navigated group and 3 revisions in the conventional group, two for infection and one for mid-flexion instability, giving an all cause revision rate of 3.06% at 5 years for this group. There appears to be no significant advantage in clinical function for patients undergoing TKR for OA of the knee with electromagnetic navigation when compared to conventional techniques. There may be an advantage in reducing early revision rates using this technology

Introduction/Aim. Mid-flexion instability is a well-documented, but often poorly understood cause of failure of TKA. NAVIO robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) offers a novel, integrative approach as a planning, execution as well as an evaluation tool in TKA surgery. RA-TKA provides a hybrid planning technique of measured resection and gap balancing- generating a predictive soft-tissue balance model, prior to making cuts. Concurrently, the system uses a semi-active robot to facilitate both the execution and verification of the plan, as it pertains to both the static and dynamic anatomy. The goal of this study was to assess the ability of the NAVIO RA-TKA to plan, execute and deliver an individualized approach to the soft-tissue balance of the knee, specifically in the “mid-flexion” arc of motion. Materials and Methods. Between May and September 2018, 50 patients underwent NAVIO RA-TKA. Baseline demographics were collected, including age, gender, BMI, and range of motion. The NAVIO imageless technique was used to plan the procedure, including: surface-mapping of the static anatomy; objective assessment of the dynamic, soft-tissue anatomy; and then application of a hybrid of measured-resection and gap-balancing technique. Medial and lateral gaps as predicted by the software were recorded throughout the entire arc of motion at 15° increments. After executing the plan and placing the components, actual medial and lateral gaps were recorded throughout the arc of motion. Results. In the assessment of coronal-plane balance, the average deviation from the predicted plan between 0–90° was 0.9mm in both the medial and lateral compartments (range 0.5–1.2mm). In the mid-flexion arc (15–75°), final soft-tissue stability was within 1.0mm of the predictive plan (range 0.9–1.2mm). Discussion/Conclusions. In this study, NAVIO RA-TKA demonstrated a highly accurate and reproducible surgical technique to plan, execute and verify a balanced a soft-tissue envelope in TKA. Objective soft-tissue balancing of the TKA can now be performed, including the mid-flexion arc of motion. Further analysis can determine if these objective measurements will translate into improved patient-reported outcome scores

INTRODUCTION. Applying the proper amount of tension to knees collateral ligaments during surgery is a prerequisite to achieve optimal performance after TKA. It must be taken into account that lower values of ligament tension could lead to an instable joint while higher values could induce over-tensioning thus leading to problems at later follow-up: a “functional stability” must then be defined and achieved to guarantee the best results. In this study, an experimental cadaveric activity was performed to measure the minimum tension required to achieve functional stability in the knee joint. METHODS. Ten cadaveric knee specimens were investigated; each femur and tibia was fixed with polyurethane foam in specific designed 3D-printed fixtures and clamped to a loading frame. A constant displacement rate of 0.05 mm/s was applied to the femoral clamp in order to achieve joint stability and the relative force was measured by the machine: the lowest force guaranteeing joint stability was then determined to be the one corresponding to the slope change in the force/displacement curve, representing the activation of the elastic region of both collateral ligaments. The force span between the slack region and the found point was considered to be the tension required to reach the functional stability of the joint. This methodology was applied on intact knee, after ACL-resection and after further PCL-resection in order to simulate the knee behavior in CR and PS implants. The test was performed at 0, 30, 60 and 90° of flexion using a specifically designed device. Each configuration was analyzed three times for the sake of repeatability. RESULTS. Results demonstrated that an overall tension of 40–50N is sufficient to reach stability in native knee with intact cruciate ligaments. Similar values appear to be sufficient in an ACL-resected knee, while higher tension is required (up to 60N) for stability after ACL and PCL resection. Moreover, the tension required for stabilization was slightly higher at 60° of flexion compared to the one required at the other angles, reflecting thus the mid-flection instability behavior. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The results are in agreement to other experimental studies. 1,2. and show that the tensions necessary to stabilize a knee joint in different ligament conditions are way lower than the ones usually applied via tensioners nowadays. To reach functional stability, surgeons should consider such results intraoperatively to avoid laxity, mid-flexion instability or ligament over-tension

Metal Ion Levels Not Useful in Failed M-O-M Hips: Systematic Review; Revision of Failed M-O-M THA at a Tertiary Center; Trunnionosis in Metal-on-Poly THA?; Do Ceramic Heads Eliminate Trunnionosis?; Iliopsoas Impingement After 10 THA; Pain in Young, Active Patients Following THA; Pre-operative Injections Increase Peri-prosthetic THA Infection; Debridement and Implant Retention in THA Infection; THA after Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion; Lumbar Back Surgery Prior to THA Associated with Worse Outcomes; Raising the Joint Line Causes Mid-Flexion Instability in TKA; No Improvement in Outcomes with Kinematic Alignment in TKA; Botox For TKA Flexion Contracture; Intra-operative Synovitis Predicts Worse Outcomes After TKA for OA; When is it Safe for Patients to Drive After Right TKA?; Alpha-Defensin for Peri-prosthetic Joint Infection; Medial Tibia Overhang and Pain Score After TKA

In years past, the most common reason for revision following knee replacement was polyethylene wear. A more recent study indicates that polyethylene wear is relatively uncommon as a cause for total knee revision counting for only 10% or fewer of revisions. The most common reason for revision currently is aseptic loosening followed closely by instability and infection. The time to revision was surprisingly short. In a recent series only 30% of knees were greater than 5 years from surgery at the time of revision. The most common time interval was less than 2 years. This is likely because of the higher incidence of infection and instability that occurs most commonly at a relatively early time frame. Evaluation of a painful total knee should take into account these findings. All total knees that are painful within 5 years of surgery should be assumed to be infected until proven otherwise. Therefore, virtually all should be aspirated for cell count, differential, and culture. Alpha-defensin is also available in cases in which a patient may have been on antibiotics within a month or less, as well as cases in which diagnosis is a challenge for some reason. Instability can be diagnosed with physical exam focusing on mid-flexion instability which can be usually determined with the patient seated and the knee in mid-flexion, with the foot flat on the floor at which point sagittal plane laxity can be discerned. This is also frequently associated with symptoms of giving way and recurring effusions and difficulty descending stairs. A new phenomenon of tibial de-bonding has been described, which can be a challenge to diagnose. Radiographs can appear normal when loosening occurs between the implant and the cement mantle. This seems to be more common with the use of higher viscosity cement. Obviously this is technique dependent since good results have been reported with the use of high viscosity cement. Component malposition can cause stiffness and pain and relatively good results have been reported by component revision when malrotation has been confirmed with CT scan. When infection, instability and loosening are not present, extra-articular causes should be ruled out including lumbar spine, vascular compromise, complex regional pain syndromes and fibromyalgia, and peri-articular causes such as bursitis, tendonitis, tendon impingement among others. One of the most common causes of pain following total knee is unrealistic patient expectations. Performing total knee replacement in early stages of arthritis with only mild to moderate symptoms and radiographic changes has been associated with persistent pain and dissatisfaction. It may be prudent to obtain the immediate preoperative x-rays to determine if early intervention was undertaken and patients have otherwise normal appearing total knee x-rays and a negative work up. A recent study indicated that this was likely a cause or a major contributing factor to persistent pain following otherwise a well performed knee replacement. A national multicenter study of the appropriateness of indications for TKA also indicated that early intervention was a major cause of persistent pain, dissatisfaction, and failure to improve following total knee replacement

The etiology of the flexion contracture is related to recurrent effusions present in a knee with end-stage degenerative joint disease secondary to the associated inflammatory process. These recurrent effusions cause increased pressure in the knee causing pain and discomfort. Patients will always seek a position of comfort, which is slight flexion. Flexion decreases the painful stimulus by reducing pressure in the knee and relaxing the posterior capsule. Unfortunately, this self-perpetuating process leads to a greater degree of contracture as the disease progresses. Furthermore, patients rarely maintain the knee in full extension. Even during the gait cycle the knee is slightly flexed. As their disease progresses, patients limit their ambulation and are more frequently in a seated position. Patients often report sleeping with a pillow under their knee or in the fetal position. All of these activities increase flexion contracture deformity. Patients with excessive deformity >40 degrees should be counseled regarding procedural complexity and that increasing constraint may be required. Patients are seen preoperatively by a physical therapist and given a pre-arthroplasty conditioning program. Patients with excessive flexion contracture are specifically instructed on stretching techniques, as well as quadriceps rehabilitation exercises. The focus in the postoperative physiotherapy rehabilitation program continues toward the goal of full extension. Patients are instructed in appropriate stretching regimes. Patients are immobilised for the first 24 hours in full extension with plaster splints, such as with a modified Robert Jones dressing. This dressing is removed on postoperative day one. The patient is then placed in a knee immobiliser and instructed to wear it at bed rest, during ambulation and in the evening, only removing for ROM exercises. In cases of severe flexion deformity >30 degrees, patients are maintained in full extension for 3–4 weeks until ROM is begun. Patients are encouraged to use a knee immobiliser for at least the first 6 weeks postoperatively. Treating patients with flexion contracture involves a combination of bone resection and soft tissue balance. One must make every effort to preserve both the femoral and tibial joint line. In flexion contracture the common error is to begin by resecting additional distal femur, which may result in joint line elevation and mid-flexion instability. The distal femoral resection should remove that amount of bone being replaced with metal. Attention should be directed at careful and meticulous balance of the soft tissues and release of the contracted posterior capsule with re-establishment of the posterior recess, which will correct the majority of flexion contractures. Inability to achieve ROM after TKA represents a frustrating complication for both patient and surgeon. Non-operative treatments for the stiff TKA include shoe lift in contralateral limb, stationery bicycle with elevated seat position, extension bracing, topical application of hand-held instruments to areas of soft tissue-dysfunction by a trained physical therapist over several outpatient sessions, and use of a low load stretch device. Manipulation under anesthesia is indicated in patients after TKA having less than 90 degrees ROM after 6 weeks, with no progression or regression in ROM. Other operative treatments range from a downsizing exchange of the polyethylene bearing to revision with a constrained device and low-dose irradiation in cases of severe arthrofibrosis

The etiology of the flexion contracture is related to recurrent effusions present in a knee with end-stage degenerative joint disease secondary to the associated inflammatory process. These recurrent effusions cause increased pressure in the knee causing pain and discomfort. Patients will always seek a position of comfort, which is slight flexion. Flexion decreases the painful stimulus by reducing pressure in the knee and relaxing the posterior capsule. Unfortunately, this self-perpetuating process leads to a greater degree of contracture as the disease progresses. Furthermore, patients rarely maintain the knee in full extension. Even during the gait cycle the knee is slightly flexed. As their disease progresses, patients limit their ambulation and are more frequently in a seated position. Patients often report sleeping with a pillow under their knee or in the fetal position. All of these activities increase flexion contracture deformity. Patients with excessive deformity >40 degrees should be counseled regarding procedural complexity and that increasing constraint may be required. Patients are seen pre-operatively by a physical therapist and given a pre-arthroplasty conditioning program. Patients with excessive flexion contracture are specifically instructed on stretching techniques, as well as quadriceps rehabilitation exercises. Avoiding Pitfalls and Complications: Treating patients with flexion contracture involves a combination of bone resection and soft tissue balance. One must make every effort to preserve both the femoral and tibial joint line. In flexion contracture the common error is to begin by resecting additional distal femur, which may result in joint line elevation and mid-flexion instability. The distal femoral resection should remove that amount of bone being replaced with metal. Attention should be directed at careful and meticulous balance of the soft tissues and release of the contracted posterior capsule with re-establishment of the posterior recess, which will correct the majority of flexion contractures. Residual Flexion Contracture: Inability to achieve ROM after TKA represents a frustrating complication for both patient and surgeon. Non-operative treatments for the stiff TKA include shoe lift in contralateral limb, stationery bicycle with elevated seat position, extension bracing, topical application of hand-held instruments to areas of soft tissue-dysfunction by a trained physical therapist over several outpatient sessions, and use of a low load stretch device. Manipulation under anesthesia is indicated in patients after TKA having less than 90 degrees ROM after 6 weeks, with no progression or regression in ROM. Other operative treatments range from a downsizing exchange of the polyethylene bearing to revision with a constrained device and low-dose irradiation in cases of severe arthrofibrosis

Introduction. Mid-flexion stability is believed to be an important factor influencing successful clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. The post of a posterior-stabilizing (PS) knee engages the cam in >60° of flexion, allowing for the possibility of paradoxical mid-flexion instability in less than 60° of flexion. Highly-conforming polyethylene insert designs were introduced as an alternative to PS knees. The cruciate-substituting (CS) knee was designed to provide anteroposterior stability throughout the full range of motion. Methods. As part of a prospective, randomized, five-year clinical trial, we performed quantitative stress x-rays on a total of 65 subjects in two groups (CS and PS) who were more than five years postoperative with a well-functioning total knee. Antero-posterior stability of the knee was evaluated using stress radiographs in the lateral position. A 15 kg force was applied anteriorly and posteriorly with the knee in 45° and 90° of flexion. Measurements of anterior and posterior displacement were made by tracing lines along the posterior margin of the tibial component and the posterior edge of the femoral component, which were parallel to the posterior tibial cortex. (Figures 1–4). Results. In both 45° and 90° of flexion, the PS group demonstrated significantly less total anterior/posterior displacement compared to the CS group, (45°: 7.33 mm vs 12.44 mm, p ≤ 0.0001, 90°: 3.54 mm vs. 9.74 mm, p ≤ 0.0001). (Figures 5,6) The only statistically significant outcomes score difference was seen with the KSS function score in the female subset, with the CS score lower (81.8) compared to the PS score (94.7). (Figure 7) All of the other scores, KSS pain/motion and KSS function scores, as well as the LEAS and FJS scores, were all similar statistically, as was the range of motion and the long axis x-ray alignment. Discussion & Conclusion. The post and cam posterior-stabilized knee has traditionally been thought to be the best choice for providing stability for knee replacement with PCL-insufficiency or sacrifice. However, this difference in stability as measured with stress xrays did not correlate with any detectible differences in any of the clinical outcomes measurements collected (Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, Lower Extremity Activity Scale) or in the range of motion or coronal alignment, with the exception of the female subgroup KSS function score. In summary, the CS knee demonstrates greater total antero-posterior laxity compared to the PS knee, as measured by stress radiographs, but there is not a strong correlation with clinical outcomes measurements. A greater number of subjects and/or a younger, higher demand population studied with this protocol might produce greater differences in the outcomes, especially in the FJS score. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Clinical observations suggest mid-flexion instability may occur more commonly with rotating platform (RP) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including increased revision rates and patient-reported instability and pain. We propose that increased gap laxity leads to liftoff of the lateral femoral condyle with decreased conformity between the femoral component and polyethylene (PE) insert surface leading to PE subluxation or dislocation. The objectives of this study were to define “at risk” loading conditions that predispose patients to PE insert subluxation or spinout, and to quantify the margin of error for flexion/extension gap laxity in preventing these adverse events under physiologic loading conditions. Methods. Biomechanical testing was performed on six fresh frozen cadaveric knees implanted with a posterior stabilized RP TKA using a gap balancing technique. Rotational displacement and torque were measured over time, while stiffness, yield torque, max torque and displacement were calculated using a post-processing, custom MatLab code. Revision with varying size femoral components (size 3–6) and PE insert thicknesses (10–15mm), by downsizing one step, were used to create a spectrum of flexion/extension gap mismatch. Each configuration was subjected to three loaded testing conditions (0°, 30° and 60° flexion) in balanced and eccentric varus loading, known to represent daily clinical function and “at risk” circumstances. Results. PE insert rotational instability was primarily determined by conformity and contact area between the femoral condyle and the upper surface of the PE insert. In this RP design, contact area is known to decrease with flexion greater than 35°, which predisposed to abnormal motion of the femur on PE insert (Figure 1). Under all flexion/extension gap testing conditions, PE insert rotational displacement significantly decreased with increasing knee flexion (differences ranged from 0.42 to 1.01cm, p<0.05), confirming that decreased conformity allows unintended motion to occur on the upper rather than the lower insert surface, as kinematically designed. This decrease in insert rotation was further exacerbated with eccentric medial-sided loading (differences ranged from 0.77 to 1.18cm, p<0.05). Yield torque (19.66±6.79N-m, p=0.033) and max torque (19.76±5.93N-m, p=0.014) significantly increased with increasing flexion from 0° to 60° under gap balanced conditions. Yield torque significantly decreased with greater flexion gap laxity at 60° of flexion (−24.82±5.96N-m, p=0.004). The depth of the lateral PE insert concavity (1.7–3.6mm) varied with insert size and thickness and determined femoral condylar capture. The lateral insert concavity defines a narrow margin of error in flexion/extension gap asymmetry leading to rotational insert instability, especially in smaller sized knees (size 3) where the jump height (1.7mm) is less than the insert sizing increment of 2.5mm. Conclusions. Contact area is known to decrease with flexion greater than 35° in this TKA-RP design. Flexion gap laxity further increased the risk of unintended top-side rotation of the femur on the insert, especially with increasing flexion and smaller components. In RP-TKA, in addition to medial-lateral gap symmetry and flexion-extension balance, a snug flexion gap with less than 2mm lateral laxity is critical to avoid insert instability and condylar escape with insert subluxation. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

The natural knee allows multi-planar freedoms of rotation and translation, while retaining stability in the antero-posterior direction. It allows flexion with roll back, and medial, lateral and central rotation movements. The natural femoral condyles of the knee are spiral, therefore inducing a side to side translatory movement during flexion and extension. Incorporating all these features is vital in successful knee replacement design. The different knee designs currently in use demonstrate different deficiencies in knee function. A study of 150 Posterior Cruciate (PCL) Retaining Total Knee Replacements [1] has shown that in 72% of knees direct impingement of the tibial insert posteriorly against the back of the femur was responsible for blocking further flexion. The mean pre-operative range of flexion was 105° and post-operative was 105.9°. For every 2mm decrease in posterior condylar offset, the maximum flexion was reduced by 12.2°. The major disadvantage of the Posterior Stabilised (PS) Total Knee Replacement is gross anterior to posterior mid-flexion instability [2]. The Medial Rotation Total Knee Replacement is good in mid-flexion but not in high flexion where the femur slides forward on the tibia leading to impingement. The Birmingham Knee Replacement (BKR) is a rotating platform knee design which is stable throughout the range of flexion. In high flexion, the BKR brings the femur to the back of the tibia. The BKR also has spiral femoral condyles, matching the natural kinematics of the knee. The combined static and dynamic effect is 10mm lateral translation of the femur in flexion and vice versa in extension. Results for seventy nine BKRs (in seventy two patients) show the best Oxford Knee Score of 12 at follow up – excluding ten patients whose inferior scores were due to other pathologies. Knee flexion results show a 21° post-operative improvement in range of flexion. On objective independent testing, maximum walking speed is slower for patients with a standard knee replacement (6.5km/h) and the loading through the replaced side does not match the normal side. Comparatively, patients with a BKR have a faster maximum walking speed of 11km/h and the loading closely matches that of the normal knee. Studies based on the National Joint Register PROMs data [2] show that nearly thirty percent of Total Knee Replacement patients are not much better since their operation. A lot of improvement is needed in the design of knee replacements in order to achieve better function for knee replacement patients

Introduction. Compared with the cruciate-retaining (CR) insert for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the cruciate-substituting (CS) insert has a raised anterior lip, providing greater anterior constraint, and thus, can be used in cases of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sacrifice. However, studies have shown that the PCL maintains femoral rollback during flexion, acts as a stabilizer against distal traction force and aids knee joint proprioception; therefore, the argument for PCL excision in CS TKA remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze CS TKA kinematics and identify the role of the PCL. Methods. Seven fresh-frozen lower-extremity cadaver specimens were analyzed using Orthomap. ®. Precision Knee Navigation software (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA). They were surgically implanted with Triathlon. ®. components (Stryker Orthopaedics). The CS insert has a raised anterior lip, and the posterior geometry shares the same profile as the CR, so we can choose retaining or sacrificing the PCL. Six patterns were analyzed: (1) natural knee; (2) only anterior cruciate ligament excision; (3) CS TKA, PCL retention, and bony island preservation; (4) CS TKA, PCL retention, and bony island resection; (5) CS TKA and PCL excision; and (6) CR TKA and PCL excision. Center of the knee and center of the proximal tibia were registered using navigation system, and the magnitudes of the condylar translation were evaluated. And then, using trigonometric function, the magnitude of anterior-posterior translation of the femur was calculated. Results. PCL excision patterns showed that the magnitude of anterior-posterior (AP) translation was higher in mid-flexion and lower in deep flexion than in other patterns (Fig. 1). Comparing two PCL excision patterns, in CS insert, the anterior translation magnitude was a little lower in extension and 30° flexion. Comparing two PCL retention patterns, the both posterior translation magnitudes in deep flexion were comparable to that of the natural knee. Discussion. Very few studies have reported about comparison of PCL retention with PCL excision in CS TKA. Omori et al. evaluated the medial pivot type TKA, and found that the design showed no femoral rollback under the PCL-sacrificing condition. In our study, increased anterior translation magnitudes in mid-flexion indicated paradoxical roll-forward, and decreased posterior translation magnitudes in deep flexion indicated decreased rollback. In other words, PCL excision in CS TKA caused mid-flexion instability and decreased the femoral rollback, so raised anterior lip was not likely to contribute to TKA kinematics. Another research is necessary to evaluate the effects of the raised anterior lip. On the other hand, PCL retention in CS TKA maintained physiological femoral rollback. The AP translation magnitude was not dependents on the bony island. Conclusions. We had better retain the PCL in raised anterior lip type CS TKA to ensure physiological knee kinematics. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

The elevation of the joint line is considered a possible cause of mid-flexion instability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The authors evaluated the effects of joint line change on mid-flexion stability in cruciate retaining TKA. Seventy-nine knees treated by cruciate retaining TKA using a modified balanced gap technique were included in this prospective study. After prosthesis insertion, valgus and varus stabilities were measured under valgus and varus stress using a navigation system at 0, 30, 60 and 90° of knee flexion. Changes of joint lines were measured preoperatively and postoperatively and compared. The knees were allocated to a “No change group (≤4mm, 62 patients)” or to an “Elevation group (>4mm, 17 patients)”. Medio-lateral stabilities (defined as the sums of valgus and varus stabilities measured intra-operatively) were compared in the two groups. The mean joint line elevation was 4.6mm in the no change group and 1.7mm in the elevation group. Mean medio-lateral stability at 30° of knee flexion was 4.8±2.3 mm in the no change group and 6.3±2.7 mm in the elevation group, and these values were significantly different (p = 0.02). However, no significant differences in medio-lateral stability were observed at other flexion angles (p>0.05). Knees with a < 5mm joint line elevation provide better mid-flexion stability after TKA. The results of this study suggest that a < 5mm elevation in joint line laxity is acceptable for cruciate retaining TKA

Severely varus deformed knees are common in Asian countries due to lifestyles such as sitting on the floor. MCL release is essential for encountering severe varus deformity. However, conventional subperiosteal MCL release for severe varus deformity can cause the complete detachment of MCL and it can induce mid-flexion instability. We performed medial epicondylar osteotomy when conventional subperiosteal MCL release couldn't resolve tight medial gap of severely varus deformity. The epicondyle is reattached with #5 nonabsorbable sutures or screws (figure 1). This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results of medial epicondylar osteotomy for severe varus TKA. From 2004 to 2012, 63 cases (of total 909 cases of primary TKA, 6.9%) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (24 to 116 months) were included in this study. Two cases of 63 cases were excluded due to the loss of follow up. Intraoperative medial and lateral gap difference in flexion and extension was accepted at less than 2 mm. Average follow up was 50.6±29.8 months (24–116 months). Average clinical knee score was 35.5±17.1 preoperatively and 89.1±8.4 postoperatively. Average function score improved from 48.7±16.0 preoperatively to 88.6±8.0 postoperatively. Average flexion contracture was reduced from 8.5±9.8° preoperatively to 1.0±2.3° postoperatively and range of motion improved from 112.0±21.8° preoperatively to 118.9±13.3° postoperatively. Preoperative femorotibial angle was average varus 10.4±5.7° and mechanical axis was average varus 16.7±5.6°. Postoperative femorotibial angle was average valgus 5.5±3.4° and mechanical axis was average varus 1.0±4.1° (figure 2). Valgus stress radiographs showed average 1.6±0.7 mm gap (femoral implant to liner) and varus stress radiographs revealed average 2.7±1.5 mm gap. The difference with medial and lateral gaps was average 1.2±1.1 mm (figure 2). Unions of bony wafer were 39 bony and 22 fibrotic unions (figure 3). According to the difference with medial and lateral gaps, bony union was average 1.2±1.2 mm and fibrotic union was average 1.2±0.9 mm. There were no significant differences between bony and fibrotic union groups. The clinical and radiological results of medial epicondylar osteotomy are satisfactory in severe varus TKA. The stability with bony and fibrotic unions is not different

Instability is one of the leading causes of clinical faiure after total knee arthroplasty. Instability can be categorized according to four type: extension instabiity, flexion instability, genu recurvatum and global instabi;ity. Basically flexion and extenion gap should be equal. And also medial and lateral gap should be equal balance. we should know basic concepts, the effect of the ligament or capsular structure release. And also surgeon should understand of the nine gap- balancing permutaiion that can occur during revision TKA. After bony mechnical and rotational alignment correction, flexion gap correction first then adjust extension gap methode will be easier to adjust ligament balancing. Joint line elevation should be avoid if possible because this can lead to mid-flexion instability, decreased range of motion soft tissue impingement or anterior knee pain associated with patella infera. Varus/valgus constrained components should be considered only in the presence of adequate inherent or to stabilize the knee until a ligament repair or reconstruction heal. In a situation of severe varus/valgus, or gobal instability where the knee cannot be stabilized other than through the implant, use of a rotating hinge or linked component is advocated