This study reports the mid-term results of a large bearing uncemented
This study reports the mid-term results of a large bearing hybrid
Fracture of the acetabulum can lead to degenerative arthritis of the hip, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, or both. Total hip arthroplasty is a common form of surgical treatment when significant joint changes and pain are present. Ten patients with fracture acetabulum were treated in this study using metal on metal total hip arthoplasty. The initial fracture was posterior wall fracture in one patient, posterior column fracture in one patient, transverse fracture in 2 patients, fracture dislocation in 3 patients and fracture posterior wall and column in 3 patients. The indications of arthroplasty were secondry osteoarthritis after internal fixation or after conservative management or collapse of the femoral head. Arthroplasty was done after an average period of 1.8 years (range from 1 to 4 years). After a follow up period ranged from 3 to 7 years with a mean of 4.6 years, the Harris hip score was improved from a mean of 51 (range 20 to 65) to a mean of 92.5 (range 90 to 95). Infection occurred in one case and two stages revision was done. Another case developed loosening of the acetabular component and was revised using cementless cup fixed with screws and bone graft. Metal on metal THR after acetabular fracture are relatively uncomplicated and lead to a good outcome despite the difficulties faced during the procedure.
The risk of dislocation in large diameter metal on metal hip replacement is significantly lower than in standard THR. This is due to the increased primary arc, increased jump distance and possibly a suction effect. Our unit has performed over 1500 of these cases with an overall revision rate of <1%. We report a case series of dislocations in 5 large diameter metal on metal hips undertaken at our unit. All cases were reduced closed and investigated for cause of dislocation. Radiological investigation included plain film radiographs and CT to exclude component mal-position and MRI to document soft tissue deficiency. Metal ion levels were measured and microbiological investigation was undertaken.INTRODUCTION
METHOD
We conducted independent wear analysis of retrieved metal on metal (MoM) hip components from around the world. All patients with resurfaced hips who developed adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) were found to have increased wear of the bearing surfaces. This was untrue in patients with large diameter (?36mm) MoM total hip replacements. This led us to search for other factors leading to ARMD. MoM THR explants retrieved from 78 patients suffering ARMD underwent full volumetric wear analysis of bearing surface and taper-junctions using coordinate measuring machine. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) used to characterise material composition of specific areas.Introduction
Methods
In a cross sectional cohort study three different metal on metal total hip systems were assessed. Two monoblock acetabular designs; the Durom socket (Zimmer, Warsaw, In) and the Birmingham socket (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN), and one modular metal on metal total hip system (Pinnacle, Depuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, In) in patients who have received these implants in the our region. 56 patients were recruited in total. All patients were assessed clinically, radiologically and biochemically. Whole blood Cobalt, Chromium and titanium levels were tested. The median head size used in the Birmingham group was 52mm (Range 44mm to 56mm), and in the Durom group, 48mm (Range 42 to 54mm). The median head size used in the modular Pinnacle group was 40mm (Range 36–44mm). The blood metal ions levels in the larger non modular acetabular sockets were significantly raised compared to the Pinnacle group. For Co 1.95 µg/l and 2.70 µg/l in the Durom and Birmingham groups respectively compared to only 0.52 µg/l in the Pinnacle group (P< 0.001). Mean Cr levels were the same for the two monoblock systems, 1.9 µg/l compared to the Pinnacle sockets 1.2 µg/l (P< 0.001). Our study clearly demonstrates that there is a significant difference in metal ion levels in patients following a monobloc large head arthroplasty system compared to a smaller modular metal on metal hip arthroplasty. The smaller head size appears to produce less metal ions whilst at the same time a 36mm–44mm head size is large enough to increase hip stability and range of movement as well as decreasing the risk of impingement. In our practice we are no longer using this design and the safest strategy, when considering metal on metal bearings, is to use a modular, smaller head system such as the Pinnacle.
Revision surgery for failed metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hip resurfacing (HR) has been a challenge. Previous studies have reported high failure and complication rates, including dislocation, infection, aseptic loosening and lower patient satisfaction. Options for revision depend on the integrity and stability of the femoral and acetabular components. When both components fail, full revision is required; however, when the acetabular component remains well fixed and oriented, only the isolated femoral component revision can be performed. Dual mobility components can be utilized to match the size to the inner diameter of the metal cup. With the dual mobility implant, the morbidity and complications associated with cup revision are avoided while maintaining a natural femoral head size and potentially increasing range of motion and stability postoperatively compared to standard THA. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- to mid-term results of revision THA after failed metal-on-metal THA or HR using the dual mobility device.Background
Purpose
Purpose of the study:. Recent literature raised concern on the adverse effects, incidence of pseudo tumours and raised blood and urine Chromium and Cobalt levels in patients with a metal on metal articulation. The purpose of this study was to follow up a cohort of patients that received a
Background. Large head
Introduction. Metal on metal hip arthroplasty continues to be controversial. Emerging evidence suggests that there are multiple modes of failure, and that the results of revision surgery are influenced by host and implant factors. Methods. This study compares a single surgeon series of hip resurfacings (Birmingham Hip Resurfacing {BHR}) and large diameter
Background. Fretting corrosion at the junction of the modular head neck interface in total hip arthroplasty is an area of substantial clinical interest. This fretting corrosion has been associated with adverse patient outcomes, including soft tissue damage around the hip joint. A number of implant characteristics have been identified as risk factors. However, much of the literature has been based on
The poor outcome of large head
The poor outcome of large head
Introduction:. Large diameter
There has been much discussion and controversy in the media recently regarding metal toxicity following large head
Background. Previous studies have suggested that the modular junction of