Glenoid failure remains the most common mode of total shoulder arthroplasty failures. Porous tantalum metal (Trabecular Metal™, Zimmer) have grown in popularity in hip and knee arthroplasty. First-generation porous tantalum metal-backed glenoid components demonstrated metal debris, resulted in failure, and were revised to second-generation glenoid implants. Evidence for second-generation porous tantalum metal implants in shoulder arthroplasty is sparse.1–4 The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes in a series of patients with second-generation porous tantalum glenoid components at a minimum two-years postoperative. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who received a second-generation porous tantalum glenoid component anatomic shoulder arthroplasty between May 2009 and December 2017 with minimum 24 months follow-up. The shoulder arthroplasties were performed by one of two senior fellowship-trained surgeons. We collected postoperative clinical outcome indicators: EQ5D visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, and Constant Score (CS). Radiographic review was performed by an independent fellowship-trained surgeon. The Endrizzi metal debris grading system1 was utilized to grade metal debris. We computed descriptive statistics and compared outcome scores between groups via the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with group-wise comparisons defined by: metal debris and humeral head migration (secondary analyses). Thirty-five patients [23 male (65.7%) and 12 female (34.3%)] with 40 shoulder replacements participated in the study. Forty of 61 shoulders (65.6%) had an average of 64 ± 20.3 months follow-up (range 31 to 95). Average BMI was 27.5 ± 4.4 kg/m2 (range 19.5 to 39.1). The average postoperative EQ5D VAS at final follow-up was 74.6 ± 22.5, WOOS Index 87.9 ± 16.6, ASES Score 88.3 ± 10.9, and CS 80.4 ± 13. At final follow-up, 18 of 40 shoulders (45%) had metal debris [15 of 40 (37.5%) Endrizzi grade 1 and three of 40 (7.5%) Endrizzi grade 2], and 22 of 40 shoulders (55%) did not show evidence of metal debris. There was one non-revision reoperation (open subscapularis exploration), one shoulder with anterosuperior escape, three shoulders with glenoid radiolucencies indicative of possible glenoid loosening, and nine shoulders with superior migration of the humeral head (>2mm migration at final follow-up compared to immediate postoperative). When comparing postoperative scores between patients with vs without metal debris, we found no statistically significant difference in the EQ5D VAS, WOOS Index, ASES Score and CS. On further analyses, when comparing superior migration of the humeral head and postoperative outcomes scores, we found no statistically significant difference. We report the longest published follow-up with clinical and radiographic outcomes of second-generation porous tantalum glenoid anatomic shoulder arthroplasties. In this series of patients, 45% of total shoulder arthroplasties with a second-generation porous tantalum glenoid implant had radiographic evidence of metal debris. This metal debris was not statistically associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. Further investigation and ongoing follow-up are warranted

A-70-year old woman underwent uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty using a titanium modular stem with a 46mm CoCr femoral head, a titanium shell, and a metal linear (Wright Medical Technology). Eight years after implantation, she presented with a painful left hip. A pelvic radiograph revealed adequate positioning of both hip implants without any signs of wear of loosening. CT scanning confirmed the presence of a 5 × 5 cm soft tissue mass in the ilium above the cup component accompanied by the iliac fracture. The patient was diagnosed as having an adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) after a metal-on-metal THA and revision was performed. Perioperatively?tissue necrosis and partial destruction of the abductor mechanism were found in the absence of any macroscopic infection. Both the neck trunnion and bore of the head showed slight signs of corrosion. The modular neck was revised with a ceramic 28mm head and a new dual-mobility liner(Zimmer Biomet). The iliac fracture was fixed with a porous trabecular metal augment(Zimmer Biomet). The histopathology of tissue sample revealed extensively necrotic material with focal cellular areas of inflammatory cells containing macrophages and neutrophilas. Metalic debris was also scattered in the necrotic materials. After the revision, the patient was recovered without pain or dislocation, and iliac fracture was well fixed. Instability is a substantial problem in the revision of ARMD. Extensive necrosis with gross deficiency of the abductor mechanism is associated with postoperative dislocation. Revision of failed MoM THA a dual-mobility device an effective strategy

Introduction. Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) is an increasingly recognised complication of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. A previous study described poor results following revision and recommended early intervention. 1. We determined the outcome of revision for ARMD and present the largest case series to date. Methods. Between 2005 and 2010, 98 patients (101 hips) underwent revision for ARMD. The diagnosis of ARMD was based on clinical history, examination, appearance at revision and histology. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Patient satisfaction, Harris hip scores (HHS) and metal ions were analysed. Results. 54 patients (55 hips) with an average age of 58 years (29 to 81 years) completed minimum one year follow-up (range 1 to 5 years). The mean HHS improved from 49.7 (10 to 79) to 86.3 (40 to 100). Forty-five (81%) patients were satisfied and nine (16%) patients were not satisfied with the outcome. The mean serum cobalt 24.5 (1.65 to 96.6) improved to 1.17 (0.31 to 6.99). Two patients died from unrelated diseases. There were 8 (14%) dislocations and one (1.8%) sciatic nerve palsy that has not recovered. Eight (14%) patients needed re-revision (dislocation: 5 and pain: 3). 26 % had severe soft tissue damage. Six patients have persistent pain and four had recurrent effusions. There were no dislocations in the most recent 50 cases. Discussion. Treatment of ARMD is technically demanding because extensive soft tissue damage can compromise stability. Early results in the current study were promising. Early intervention reduced the dislocation rate and appeared to have a positive impact on outcome. A small group of patients may have persistent pain and recurrent effusions that may require re-revision

Objectives

Several studies have reported elevated blood cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) concentrations in patients with total knee replacements (TKRs). Up to 44% of tissue samples taken from patients with failed TKRs exhibit histological evidence of metal sensitivity/ALVAL. In simulated conditions, metal particles contribute approximately 12% of total wear debris in TKR. We carried out this investigation to determine the source and quantity of metal release in TKRs.

Background. Previous studies have suggested that the modular junction of metal on metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THR) is an important source of metallic debris. Methods. We carried out a prospective study using custom techniques to analyse one of the largest collections of failed contemporary MoM devices in the world. All explants from patients who had suffered adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) were included in this study. These explants included: 82 36mm THRs, and 147 resurfacing head THRs and 140 resurfacing arthroplasties from several manufactures. Volumetric wear analysis of the bearing surfaces and taper junctions was carried out using a coordinate measuring machine. The relationships between total metallic loss and metal ion concentrations and the macroscopic and histological tissue appearance of THR patients were compared to those in resurfacing patients. Mann Whitney test for non-parametric data was used to assess significant differences between groups. Results. Resurfacing explants retrieved from patients who had suffered ARMD were found to have significantly higher median rates of volumetric wear than the THRs (10.16 versus 2.25mm. 3. /yr (p < 0.001)). Total volumetric material loss from taper junctions ranged from 0.01 to 21.55mm. 3. When volumetric taper wear was combined with bearing surface wear in the THR patients this total rate of material loss was still significantly less than in the resurfacing patients 2.52 versus 10.16mm. 3. /yr (p < 0.001)). Despite this, macroscopic tissue destruction and extent of ALVAL infiltration was found to be significantly greater in the THR patients. Conclusion. Taper debris appears to more readily stimulate a destructive immune cascade than debris from primary bearing surfaces. This cascade can culminate in catastrophic tissue necrosis when blood metal ion concentrations appear normal. MHRA guidance should distinguish clearly between MOM THRs and resurfacings

ARMD (Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris) is an increasingly recognised complication of metal on metal hip replacements. The MHRA (Medical and Healthcare Related Devices Agency) have advised a blood cobalt or chromium level above 7 mg/L is a threshold for further investigation, stating that “low levels are reassuring and strongly predict not having an adverse outcome”. Cross-sectional imaging should be performed when levels are above 7 mg/L. We have performed a study investigating the specificity and sensitivity of chromium and cobalt metal ion levels as a screening measure for ARMD.

79 ASR hip replacements were performed at our hospital and 75 (95%) of these underwent a Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence (MARS) MRI scan. All patients (64 hips) who had not undergone revision were invited to take part in this study. 57 patients with 62 hip replacements completed hip and activity scores, had blood cobalt and chromium ion level measurements and 3D-CT to measure acetabular component position.

Acetabular component inclination (>50 degrees), small head size (< 51mm) and female gender were significantly correlated with raised chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co) ion levels. An ARMD was detected using MRI in 18 (29%) of the hips in this study. The incidence of ARMD was significantly higher when chromium concentration was above 7 mg/l (p = 0.02). Chromium ion levels >7 mg/L had a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 83% for ARMD, and cobalt ion levels >7 mg/L 56% and 76% respectively. 40 patients had cobalt levels <7 mg/L and 33 had chromium levels <7 mg/L, but 8 of these had an ARMD on MRI. All 8 patients had minimal symptoms (Oxford Hip Score ≥ 44 out of 48).

The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has recommended that cobalt and chromium levels be measured in patients with a metal-on-metal hip replacement and cross-sectional imaging performed when these levels are above 7 μg/L. This study has shown that by using this threshold, in patients with this implant combination, the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ARMD is low and patients with soft tissue disease may be missed. Furthermore the presence of MRI detected ARMD, in the absence of significant clinical symptoms and with metal ion levels <7 μg/L is of concern.

MoM implants at risk of failure are associated with raised cobalt and chromium levels. However metal ion analysis alone is not reliable as a screening tool for ARMD, which is often clinically “silent”. We recommend the routine use of MARS MRI as the safest method of ARMD diagnosis in patients with MoM implants.

Metal-on-metal (MOM) hip arthroplasty has been associated with a variety of new failure modes that may be unfamiliar to surgeons who traditionally perform metal-on-polyethylene THR. These failure modes include adverse local tissue reaction to metal debris, hypersensitivity to metal debris, accelerated wear/metallosis, pseudotumours, and corrosion. A significant number of patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty may present to surgeons for routine followup, concern over their implant, or frank clinical problems. A common issue with MOM hip arthroplasty that can lead to accelerated wear and failure is implant malposition. Malposition of a hard-on-hard bearing can lead to edge loading and accelerated wear at the articular surfaces, which will lead to elevation in blood metal ion levels and metallosis. Distinct from this failure mode is the possibility of metal hypersensitivity, which is believed to be an immunologically mediated reaction to normal amounts of metal debris. Because a modular MOM THR has multiple junctions and tapers that come into contact with one another, there also is the possibility of non-articular metal debris production and corrosion. This type of corrosion reaction can lead to soft tissue destruction not commonly seen with hip resurfacing. Therefore, it is important for orthopaedic surgeons to be aware of the intricacies of following a metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty and to be able to interpret test results such as metal ion levels and cross-sectional imaging. Furthermore, there is a difference in the incidence of problems depending upon the type of implant: hip resurfacing, small-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip replacement, and large diameter head MOM THR. This presentation will discuss the importance of routine monitoring and followup for patients with MOM THR, as well as the utility of measuring blood metal ion levels. The published risk stratification algorithm from the Hip Society will be reviewed

Dual mobility (DM) is an established bearing option in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The traditional mono-block DM designs have limited ability for additional fixation, whereas the modular DM designs allow additional screw fixation but limit internal diameter and have the potential to generate metal debris. We report the early results of a CoCrMo alloy mono-block implant manufactured by additive technology with a highly porous ingrowth surface to enhance primary fixation and osseointegration. Prospective follow-up of the Duplex. TM. implant first inserted in March 2016 enrolled into Beyond Compliance (BC). Primary outcome measure was all-cause revision and secondary outcomes dislocation, peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Patients were risk stratified and all considered to be high risk for instability. Complications were identified via hospital records, clinical coding linkage using national database and via BC website. 159 implants in 154 patients with a mean age 74.0 years and a maximum F/U of 7 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision 99.4% (95% CI 96.2–99.8). One femoral only revision. Mean gain in OHS 27.4. Dislocation rate 0.6% with a single event. Patients with a cemented Polished taper stem (PTS) had a Type B PPF rate of 2.1% requiring revision/fixation. Compared to conventional THA this cohort was significantly older (74.0 vs 68.3 years), more co-morbidity (ASA 3 46.5% vs 14.4%) and more non-OA indications (32.4% vs 8.5%). Every patient had at least one risk factor for falling and >50% of cohort had 4 or more risk factors using NICE tool. We believe our results demonstrate that risk stratification successfully aids implant selection to prevent dislocation in high-risk patients. This novel design has provided excellent early results in a challenging cohort where individuals are very different to the “average” THA patient. NJR data on DM has reported an increase in revision for PPF. A “perfect storm” maybe created using DM in high-risk falls risk population. This re-enforces the need to consider all patient and implant factors when deciding bearing selection

AM Open Cell porous Ti Structures were investigated for compressive strength, morphology (i.e. pore size, struts size and porosity), and wear resistance with the aim to improve design capability at support of implant manufacturing. Specimens were manufactured in Ti6Al4V using a SLM machine. Struts sizes had nominal diameters of 200µm or 100µm, pores had nominal diameters of 700µm, 1000µm or 1500µm. These dimensions were applied to three different open-cell geometrical configurations: one with unit-cells based on a regular cubic arrangement (Regular), one with a deformed cubic arrangement (Irregular), and one based on a fully random arrangement (Fully Random). Morphological analysis was performed by image analysis applied onto optical and SEM acquired pictures. The analyses estimated the maximum and minimum Feret pores diameter, and the latter was used as one of the key parameters to describe the interconnected network of pores intended for bone colonization. Outcome revealed the systematic oversizing of the actual struts diameter Vs designed diameter; by opposite min. Feret diameters of the pores resulted significantly smaller than nominal pore diameters, thus better fitting within the range of pores dimension acknowledged to favor the osseointegration. Consequently, the actual total porosity is also reduced. Many technologic factors are responsible for the morphologic differences design vs actual, among these the influence of melting pool dimension, the struts orientation during building and the layer thickness have a significant impact. Mechanical compression was performed on porous cylinder samples. Test revealed the Yield Strength and Stiffness are highly sensitive to the actual porosity. Deformation behavior follows densification phenomenon at lower porosity, whereas at higher porosity the Gibson-Ashby model fits for most of the structure tested. The relationship among load direction, struts alignment and the collapse behavior of the unit cell geometries are discussed. Stiffness of the porous structure is evaluated in both quasistatic and cyclic compression. Wear was investigated according to Taber test method. The abrasion resistance is measured by scratching a ceramic wheel against the different AM porous structures along a circular path. Metal debris eventually loss were quantified by gravimetric analysis at different number of cycles. Correlation among AM porous structure geometry, porosity and wear loss is discussed. All the tested structures showed a debris loss within the limit suggested by FDA for the porous coating in contact with the bone tissue. The actual AM porous Titanium unit cell geometry and features are a key design input. In combination with all the other design factors of a device they may result helpful in address the stress shielding and prevent metal debris release issues. The study underlines the importance of the research activity in AM to support Design for Additive Manufacturing (DFAM) capability. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. The bearing surfaces of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip replacements (THR) show a substantially lower wear rate than metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THR in-vitro. However, revision rates for CoC THR are comparable with MoP. Our hypothesis that an explanation could be adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) from the trunnion led us to investigate the wear at both the bearing surfaces and the taper-trunnion interface of a contemporary CoC THR in an in-vitro study. Methods. Three 36mm CoC hips were tested in a hip simulator for 5 million cycles (Mc). BIOLOX. ®. delta ceramic femoral heads were mounted on 12/14 titanium (Ti6Al4V) trunnions. Wear of femoral heads, acetabular liners and trunnions was determined gravimetrically using the analytical balance. Roughness measurements (Sa) were taken on the articulating surfaces (pre and post-test) and on the trunnion surfaces (worn and unworn). Furthermore, Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) was used to identify and quantify the wear debris present in the lubricant using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results and Discussion. The total volumetric wear was 0.25 mm. 3. for CoC joints and 0.29 mm. 3. for titanium trunnions. The total wear volume of the titanium trunnions was in agreement with an explant study (Kocagoz et al, 2016, CORR) which quantified the volumetric material loss from retrieved trunnions with the total wear ranging from 0.0–0.74 mm. 3. The Sa values, pre-and post-test, for heads were 0.003 ± 0.002 and 0.004 ± 0.001 µm and for liners were 0.005 ± 0.001 and 0.005 ± 0.001 µm. Pre-and post-test measurements for Sa of heads (p = 0.184) and liners (p = 0.184) did not show a statistically significant change. The Sa of the trunnions on the unworn and worn areas showed a statistically significant decrease from 0.558 ± 0.060 to 0.312 ± 0.028 µm respectively (p < 0.001). Analysis of wear debris within the lubricant confirmed the presence of titanium. A recent clinical study (Matharu et al, 2016, BMC Musc Dis) found more ARMD in CoC hips than MoP hips. This is despite there being fewer metallic components in a CoC hip than a MoP hip. This in vitro study has shown that one source of metal debris in a CoC hip is the taper-trunnion junction. Conclusion. An explanation for wear related failures in ceramic-on-ceramic hip arthroplasty, despite the low wear arising at the articulating surfaces, may now exist; namely that titanium wear particles are generated from the trunnion. No other long-term hip simulator studies have measured wear at the taper-trunnion junction

Introduction. The release of metal debris and ions has raised concerns in joint arthroplasty. In THA metal debris and ions can be generated by wear of metal-on-metal bearing surfaces and corrosion at modular taper interfaces, currently understood to be mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) [1]. More recently, inflammatory-cell induced corrosion (ICIC) has been identified as a possible source of metal debris and/or ions [2]. Although MACC has been shown to occur at modular junctions in TKA, little is known about the prevalence of other sources. The purpose of this study was to determine the sources of metallic debris and ion release in long-term implanted (in vivo > 15y) TKA femoral components. Specific attention was paid to instances of ICIC as well as damage at the implant-bone interface. Methods. 1873 retrieved TKA components were collected from 2002–2013 as part of a multi-center, IRB-approved retrieval program. Of these, 52 CoCr femoral condyles were identified as long term TKA (Average: 17.9±2.8y). These components were predominantly revised for loosening, PE wear and instability. 40/52 of the components were primary surgeries. Components were examined using optical microscopy to confirm the presence of 5 damage mechanisms (polyethylene failure, MACC corrosion of modular tapers, corrosion damage between cement and backside, third-body wear, and ICIC). Third-body wear was evaluated using a semi-quantitative scoring method based on the percentage of damaged area. A score of 1 had minimal damage and a score of 4 corresponded to severe damage. Polyethylene components were scored using the Hood method and CoCr components were scored similarly to quantify metal wear. The total area damaged by ICIC was quantified using photogrammetry. Images were taken using a digital SLR with a calibrated ruler in the same focal plane. Using known pixel dimensions, the ICIC damaged area was calculated. Results. Surface damage indicative of corrosion and/or CoCr debris release was identified in 92% (n=48) of the components. Third-body wear was the most prevalent damage mechanism identified in 77% (n=40/52; Figure 1) of these components. ICIC was identified in 38% (n=20/52, figure 2) of the components. The polyethylene damage scores were predominantly a score of 4 out of a maximum score of 4 (89%). The corresponding femoral components had moderate to severe damage scores, with 39% with a score of 2, 37% scoring 3 and 22% scoring 4 out of a maximum score of 4. The total ICIC damaged area was an average of 0.11 ± 0.12 mm. 2. (Range: 0.01–0.46mm. 2. ). Discussion. In this study, we sought to identify mechanisms that could lead to the release of CoCr debris/ions in TKA. Five different mechanisms of potential metal release were observed. The most prevalent were third-body wear and ICIC damage. However the clinical implications remain unclear for several mechanisms because none of the devices were revised due to adverse local tissue reactions or biologic reactions to CoCr. Although we documented the prevalence of each damage mechanism, the quantity of metal removal was not investigated, warranting future studies

Large bearing surfaces are appealing in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as they may help create a greater range of impingement free motion and reduce the risk of dislocation. However, attempts to achieve this with a metal bearing surface have been blighted by adverse reactions to metal debris. Ceramic bearings have a good long-term track record in more conventional head sizes, and manufacturing techniques now permit the use of larger ceramic bearing surfaces using monoblock uncemented acetabular components. In this study, we are reviewing the early results of the Maxera® acetabular component (Zimmer, Indiana) at our institution. All data was collected prospectively. Maxera® acetabular component is a Titanium (Ti) shell with plasma sprayed Ti for the osteointegrative surface. Delta ceramic liner is inserted & locked into the cup shell by the manufacturer (non-modular). With the Maxera cup system, the bearing diameter is dictated by the acetabular component size. Acetabular components (AC) of 46 and 48 mm have a bearing diameter (BD) of 36 mm, AC of 50 and 52 mm: have a 40 mm BD, AC of 54 and 56 mm: have a BD of 44 mm and AC of 58–64: have a 48mm BD. Delta ceramic femoral head size of 44 and 48 mm have a modular Ti sleeve between the head and femoral stem trunnion. Femoral head sizes of 36 and 40 mm have no Ti sleeve. All THA had an uncemented femoral stem. Implants were inserted with a posterior approach. Patients were reviewed at 6 weeks, 6 months and then annually with radiographs. Clinical function was evaluated using WOMAC and UCLA scores along with joint perception questionnaires. Five hundred components have been implanted in 442 patients (250 women, 192 men) with a mean age of 55, (min 17, max 80) and a mean BMI of 26.9 (min 17.8, max 51). The mean acetabular size was 54 (min 46, max 64), leading to a mean femoral head size of 44. At a minimum of two years follow-up (mean 3.8 years): 5 patients have been revised, 4 secondary to undetected intraoperative fracture of the femur and only one due to early displacement of a Maxera® cup (0.2%). Five patients reported a mild squeaking; two reported clicking and one patient presented with a symptomatic heterotopic ossification. The WOMAC score improved significantly post-operatively, (57.4 compared to 4.4 post-operatively, p<0.001). The mean post-operative UCLA score was 6.9. Sixty percent (60.6%) of patients rated their joint perception as either “natural” or “artificial without limitation”. two patients (0.4%) suffered a dislocation after high velocity trauma without recurrence after closed reduction. No ceramic component fracture was recorded. This prospective study shows that this monoblock acetabular component provides an easy implantation with minimal complications. The ceramic bearing surface provides good clinical function and joint perception. Bearing surfaces of this design may provide an alternative to large head metal on metal (MoM) implants without the side effects of metal debris/ions

BACKGROUND. The most common salvage of a failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is to remove both the femoral and acetabular resurfacing components and perform a total hip replacement. The other choices are to perform an acetabular or femoral only revision. A one or two piece acetabular component or a polyethylene bipolar femoral component that matches the retained metal resurfacing acetabular component is used. The considerations in favor of performing a one component resurfacing revision are maintaining the natural femoral head size, limiting the surgical effort for the patient and surgeon, and bone conservation. There are often favorable cost considerations with single component revision surgery. The reasons for femoral component revision are femoral neck fracture, femoral component loosening and an adverse reaction to metal wear debris. Performing a femoral component only revision requires a well fixed and well oriented acetabular component. Acetabular revision is most often performed for an adverse reaction to metal wear debris or loosening. METHODS. 81 acetabular revisions and 46 femoral revisions were evaluated 4 to 14 years after surgery. 83% of patients had their initial surgery at outside institutions. The mean age was 46 and 65% of patients were women. A two piece titanium backed polyethylene component was used in 44 patients and a one or two piece metal component was used in 37. A dual mobility femoral prosthesis mated to a retained metal acetabular component was used for the femoral revisions and no conversions to a metal-on-metal total hip replacement were performed. We selected polyethylene acetabular components for patients with adverse reactions to metal wear debris if their femoral component was less than 48 mm or if there was no matching metal acetabular component available for their femoral component. We used dual mobility components for femoral loosening, femoral neck fractures and adverse reactions to metal wear debris in patients with well-fixed and well oriented metal acetabular components. Dual mobility components were also used if there are any concerns about the femoral component or in some older patients. We performed one component revisions rather than conversion to total hip replacement on 88% of patients presenting with failed resurfacing prostheses. RESULTS. There were no failures with polyethylene acetabular components. There were two failures due to ongoing adverse metal reactions in patients receiving metal revision acetabular components. There was one failure with a dual mobility prosthesis due to accelerated polyethylene wear from undetected edge loading on a retained worn metal acetabular component. There were two infections and one patient with continued pain. There were no dislocations. The average Harris Hip Score was 94. The UCLA activity score was 6 or greater for all but 4 patients. There were 6 revisions to total hip replacement. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 94%. 95% of patients rated their outcome as excellent or good. CONCLUSIONS. Failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses can be successfully revised without conversion to total hip replacement in most instances. A detailed knowledge of matching prostheses is necessary. Polyethylene prostheses for the acetabular or femoral reconstruction are often needed

Introduction. Large head total hip arthroplasty (THA) reduces dislocation rates and provides a theooretically larger range of motion. We hypothesised that this would translate into greater improvement in functional scores when compared to 28mm metal-on-polyethylene THA at 5 years. We believe ours to be the first in vivo comparison study. Methods. A multi-surgeon case-control study in a District General Hospital. The study group consisted of 427 patients with 452 hips, the 38mm uncemented metal-on-metal articulation THA (M2A/Bi-metric, Biomet UK). The control group consisted of 438 age and sex-matched patients with 460 28mm metal-on-polyethylene articulation THA (Exeter/Exeter or Exeter/Duraloc - Stryker UK. All patients were assessed in a physiotherapist led Joint Review Service as part of their standard follow up, with functional scoring using Oxford Hip (scored 0–48) and WOMAC scores (0–100). Results. The demographics for the 38mm and 28mm groups gave mean ages of 65.8 years and 66.4 years, 40.4% and 39.3% male respectively. Pre-operative functional scores were comparable, with Oxford Hip scores of 23.3 and 26.8 respectively, WOMAC 49 compared to 53. At each review point there was no statistical difference in either Oxford or WOMAC scores and this was sustained at 5 yrs. Dislocation rates in the 38mm group were lower (2.9% vs. 5%) though not statistically significant (p = 0.111). Revision rate was significantly higher in the larger head group, primarily due to adverse reaction to metal debris (4.6% vs. 2.0%). Conclusions. There is no functional difference between 38mm metal-on-metal THA and 28mm metal-on-polyethylene THA at five years. Dislocation rates were found to be lower in the 38mm THAs as would be expected, but this was not statistically significant. The difference in revision rates was found to be due to metal-on-metal adverse reactions to metal debris, and their use is therefore not advocated in the current climate

Taper corrosion and Trunionnosis are recognized as a major complication of hip replacement surgery presenting in a variety of clinical manifestations commonly referred to as Adverse Local Tissue Reactions. Metal debris is produced through Mechanically Assisted Crevice Corrosion with several implicating factors including mixed alloy components, taper design, head offset, femoral head size, and taper impaction techniques (including magnitude of force, control of alignment and environmental factors). Our project has focused singularly on taper impaction techniques and surgeon controlled factors, as we believe the process of head impaction unto a trunnion is non-standardized, which often times dooms the trunionn to failure. We have contemplated a standardization process, such that given the right tool, the surgeon can control the quality of the taper interlock, which may produce a “cold weld” or perfect taper interlock, eliminate micro motion, mechanically assisted crevice corrosion, and trunionnosis. We have considered four specific problems with current head to trunionn impaction techniques: 1. The magnitude of applied force is uncontrolled, haphazard, and non-standardized. 2. Non-axial application of force is the norm, which produces canting, leading to micro-motion and tribocorrosion. 3. The transfer of energy from the head to the trunionn interface is highly inefficient, such that the energy produced by the surgeon is mostly dissipated in a non-constrained system. 4. No in vitro studies exist to guide surgeons as to the magnitude of force required for a proper interlock. Regardless of the design, including taper angles, larger heads, offset heads, mixed alloy components, shorter and slimmer trunionns there is a widespread problem with the process of head impaction onto the trunionn and the engagement of the modular taper interface that dooms the trunionn interface to failure. The deficiencies noted in current techniques are addressed with a simple tool and minor modification of the femoral stem. We present a new concept/apparatus for head to trunionn taper assembly that fully controls the magnitude and direction of assembly force within a constrained, dry and contaminant free environment. This tool allows application of a perfectly axial and high insertional forces without risk of damage to the femoral stem/bone interface to obtain a cold weld and perfect taper interlock with no chance for canting, micro motion and tribocorrosion. The concept has been verified through several prototypes and can be adopted in order to standardize the process of taper assembly, making this procedure independent of surgeon skill and strength, and minimizing the incidence of trunionnosis

Ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) bearings have traditionally been reserved for younger patients that were at high risk of polyethylene wear requiring revision. With the 1999 advent of highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLP), wear with XLP has not been a cause for revision. Simulator studies have not shown a difference in wear comparing COP to metal-on-polyethylene (MOP). Therefore, and considering the additional cost of COP, we have until recently not needed COP. However, a 2012 report of 10 cases that developed an adverse reaction to metal debris generated by head neck corrosion has resulted in COP becoming the most common bearing surface as reported by the American Joint Replacement Registry. This reactionary change has occurred despite the fact that we do not understand the cause, do not know the frequency, if it is more common in some implants than others, and we do not know the additional cost or markup of ceramic heads. One study reported a 3.2% revision prevalence caused by mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) at the head neck junction of a single manufacturer's implant. Other studies have estimated the frequency to be less than 5%. COST IS THE CONCERN in a value based healthcare environment. Models for and against the wholesale use of COP have been proposed and are based on variables that are unknown, including estimated frequency of the problem and the incrementally higher cost of a ceramic head. I use COP in younger patients that I believe will use their hip for more than 15 years. This is based on my personal experience. I have prospectively followed a series of MOP patients for 5 years and not seen cobalt elevations. I have placed new metal femoral heads on corroded femoral tapers without subsequent failure. I have evaluated the taper junctions of postmortem retrievals and found them virtually free of corrosion. A query of our institutional database for MOP primary hips identified 3012 cases between 2006–2017. Eighty revisions (2.7%) were identified. 2 of the 80 were for MACC representing 2.5% of revisions done on our own patients and 0.07% of our MOP cases. Further, evaluating our most recent all cause 350 revisions (7/2015–10/2017) there were 3 revisions for MACC (0.9%). Each one of us needs to EVALUATE OUR OWN PRACTICE AND MAKE AN EDUCATED, VALUE BASED DECISION whether or not to use COP in all patients

Aims. Metal-on-metal total hip replacements (MoM THRs) are frequently revised. However, there is a paucity of data on clinical outcomes following revision surgery in this cohort. We report on outcomes from the largest consecutive series of revisions from MoM THRs and consider pre-revision factors which were prognostic for functional outcome. Materials and Methods. A single-centre consecutive series of revisions from MoM THRs performed during 2006–2015 was identified through a prospectively maintained, purpose-built joint registry. The cohort was subsequently divided by the presence or absence of symptoms prior to revision. The primary outcome was functional outcome (Oxford Hip Score (OHS)). Secondary outcomes were complication data, pre- and post-revision serum metal ions and modified Oxford classification of pre-revision magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, the study data along with demographic data was interrogated for prognostic factors informing on post-revision functional outcome. Results. 180 revisions in 163 patients were identified at a median follow-up of 5.48 (2–11.7) years. There were 152 (84.4%) in the symptomatic subgroup and 28 (15.6%) in the asymptomatic group. Overall median OHS improved from 29 to 37 with revision (P<0.001). Symptomatic patients experienced greater functional benefit (DOHS 6.5 vs. 1.4, p=0.012) compared to asymptomatic patients, though they continued to report inferior outcomes (OHS 36.5 vs 43, p=0.004). The functional outcome of asymptomatic patients was unaffected by revision surgery (pre-revision OHS 41, post-revision OHS 43, p=0.4). Linear regression analysis confirmed use of a cobalt-chrome (CoCr)-containing bearing surface (MoM or metal-on- polyethylene) at revision and increasing BMI were predictive of poor functional outcome (R. 2. 0.032, p=0.0224 and R. 2. 0.039, p=0.015 respectively). Pre- and post-revision serum metal ions and pre-revision MRI findings were not predictive of outcome. The overall complication rate was 36% (n=65) with a re-revision rate of 6.7%. The most common complication was ongoing adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD, defined as positive post-revision MRI) in 21.1%. The incidence of ongoing ARMD was not significantly different between those with CoCr reimplanted and those without (p=0.12). Conclusions. To our knowledge, our study represents the largest single-centre consecutive series of revision THRs from MoM bearings in the literature. Symptomatic patients experience the greatest functional benefit from revision surgery but do not regain the same level of function as patients who were asymptomatic prior to revision. The re-implantation of CoCr as a primary bearing surface and increasing BMI was associated with poorer functional outcome

Hip resurfacing presents advantages and disadvantages compared to total hip arthroplasty. Dislocation and leg length discrepancy, common complaints with total hips, are unusual following resurfacing. Bone stock in the proximal femur is retained, and revision options on the femoral side of a resurfacing are much better. Concerns persist regarding adverse tissue reactions to metal debris. Conflicting data abounds regarding ultimate hip function, patient satisfaction, durability, etc. Yet all of these would be rendered irrelevant if resurfacing carried with it greater life expectancy. We would not speak of survivorship of the implant, but survival of the patient. Instead of quality of life, let us preserve life itself. Beginning in 2010, the UK Registry reported improved mortality rates at 90 days and five years after hip resurfacing compared with total hip replacement. This persisted after multivariate analysis for several covariables, including age, gender, health status, type of device, provider, and country. Recently, the 2016 Australian Registry Mortality Supplement showed similar results, corrected for age and gender. Analysis of UK data by the designing surgeons of the Birmingham device, and an independent group of Oxford statisticians confirmed the lower mortality rate in patients treated with resurfacing vs. total hip replacement. Possible reasons for these differences include greater post-operative activity, longer stride length, less fat and marrow embolism, or perhaps more internet-savvy, health-conscious patients seeking out a resurfacing procedure. Mid-term data from the US is now starting to come in, and mortality benefits are being confirmed in a series of patients from a large, academic center. Should there be a confirmed mortality advantage of resurfacing over total hip replacement, more surgeons and patients would be interested in this procedure, and new materials and techniques may follow

INTRODUCTION. The cup component of modern resurfacing systems are often coated creating a cementless press-fit fixation in the acetabulum based on surgical under-reaming, also enabling osseoconduction/integration. Due to the higher density of cortical bone along the antero-superior and postero-inferior regions of the acetabulum, the greatest forces occur between the anterior and posterior columns of the pelvis. This produces pinching of the implant that can result in deformation of the cup. Metal shell/modularpress-fit acetabular cups are susceptible to substantial deformation immediately after implantation. This deformation may affect the lubrication, producing point loading and high friction torques between the head and the cup that increase wear and may lead to head clamping and subsequent cup loosening. We sought to test a novel ceramic on ceramic (CoC) hip resurfacing system that should allay any concerns with the Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris associated with metal on metal (MoM) resurfacing devices. AIM. We sought to quantify the deformation of a novel CoC hip-resurfacing cup after implantation, using a standard surgical technique in a cadaveric model, and compare to the MoM standard. We also assessed if the design clearances proposed for this CoC hip resurfacing implant are compatible with the measured deformations, allowing for an adequate motion of the joint. METHODS. The pelvis from four fresh frozen cadavers were placed into the lateral position. One surgeon with extensive experience in hip resurfacing surgery (JH) prepared all the pelvises for implantation using a posterior approach to the joint and sequential reaming of the acetabulum to 1mm below the implant outer diameter. The acetabulum components were then impacted into the prepared pelvis. We used four ceramic and four metal implants of equal and varying size. (2 × (40/46mm, 44/50mm, 50/56mm, 52/58mm)). The acetabulum cup bearing surface diameter and deformation was measured using a GOM-ATOS optical high precision 3D scanner. 3-Dimensional measurements were taken pre-implantation, immediately after and at 30 minutes following implantation. Two techniques were used to analyse the 3D images: by maximum inscribed diameter and by radial segments. These were compared to the known articulating surface clearance values. RESULTS. The diameter of the cups in both metal and ceramic systems was reduced after implantation when analysing by maximum inscribed diameter and by radial segments. This deformation was maintained at 30 minutes. We can infer there is no significant bone stress relaxation effect following implantation. On ceramic cups, the deformation was larger in larger sizes. However, the 44/50 (the second smallest cup) deformed the least. Despite this, the difference in deformation between these two sizes is minimal. The deformation of sizes 50/56 and 52/58 was equivalent. For the metal cups, there was not a clear correlation between the cup size and the deformation. The largest cup size had the same deformation as the smallest size. CONCLUSIONS. The deformation following implantation of the cup component in a ceramic acetabulum resurfacing behave similarly to a metal implant. Cup deformation measured after implantation is minimal when compared to the minimum design clearance in both systems

Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces were reintroduced to take advantage of the reduction in volumetric wear afforded by these bearings and reduce the complications of osteolysis and aseptic loosening. In addition, metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and many metal-on-metal total hip replacement systems employed large diameter femoral heads, thereby reducing the risk of dislocations. Unfortunately, many metal-on-metal systems demonstrated poor survivorship and were associated with adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) related to metal debris generated from the bearings and/or modular connections. Careful clinical surveillance of patients with metal-on-metal bearings is warranted to identify patients with ALTR at an early stage in order to intervene prior to the development of extensive peri-articular soft tissue damage. Monitoring may include serum or whole blood metal levels and metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MARS-MRI) depending on the patient's signs and symptoms and the track record of the implanted device. While there currently is a lack of high quality evidence-based guidelines on the management of patients with either symptomatic or asymptomatic metal-on-metal total hip replacements, professional organizations have issued consensus-based algorithms to guide the practitioner in management. Ultimately, the decision for revision surgery should not be based on a single diagnostic test but on the entire clinical scenario