Aims. Controversy exists as to what should be considered a safe resection margin to minimize local recurrence in high-grade pelvic chondrosarcomas (CS). The aim of this study is to quantify what is a safe margin of resection for high-grade CS of the pelvis. Methods. We retrospectively identified 105 non-metastatic patients with high-grade pelvic CS of bone who underwent surgery (limb salvage/amputations) between 2000 and 2018. There were 82 (78%) male and 23 (22%) female patients with a mean age of 55 years (26 to 84). The majority of the patients underwent limb salvage surgery (n = 82; 78%) compared to 23 (22%) who had amputation. In total, 66 (64%) patients were grade 2 CS compared to 38 (36%) grade 3 CS. All patients were assessed for stage, pelvic anatomical classification, type of resection and reconstruction, margin status, local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival. Surgical margins were stratified into millimetres: < 1 mm; > 1 mm but < 2 mm; and > 2 mm. Results. The disease-­specific survival (DSS) at five years was 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56% to 81%) and 51% (95% CI 31% to 70%) for grade 2 and 3 CS, respectively (p = 0.092). The local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) at five years was 59% (95% CI 45% to 72%) for grade 2 CS and 42% (95% CI 21% to 63%) for grade 3 CS (p = 0.318). A margin of more than 2 mm was a significant predictor of increased LRFS (p = 0.001). There was a tendency, but without statistical significance, for a > 2 mm margin to be a predictor of improved DSS. Local recurrence (LR) was a highly significant predictor of DSS, analyzed in a competing risk model (p = 0.001). Conclusion. Obtaining wide margins in the pelvis remains challenging for high-grade pelvic CS. On the basis of our study, we conclude that it is necessary to achieve at least a 2 mm margin for optimal oncological outcomes in patients with high-grade CS of the pelvis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1150–1154

Aims. The aticularis genu (AG) is the least substantial and deepest muscle of the anterior compartment of the thigh and of uncertain significance. The aim of the study was to describe the anatomy of AG in cadaveric specimens, to characterize the relevance of AG in pathological distal femur specimens, and to correlate the anatomy and pathology with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of AG. Methods. In 24 cadaveric specimens, AG was identified, photographed, measured, and dissected including neurovascular supply. In all, 35 resected distal femur specimens were examined. AG was photographed and measured and its utility as a surgical margin examined. Preoperative MRIs of these cases were retrospectively analyzed and assessed and its utility assessed as an anterior soft tissue margin in surgery. In all cadaveric specimens, AG was identified as a substantial structure, deep and separate to vastus itermedius (VI) and separated by a clear fascial plane with a discrete neurovascular supply. Mean length of AG was 16.1 cm ( ± 1.6 cm) origin anterior aspect distal third femur and insertion into suprapatellar bursa. In 32 of 35 pathological specimens, AG was identified (mean length 12.8 cm ( ± 0.6 cm)). Where AG was used as anterior cover in pathological specimens all surgical margins were clear of disease. Of these cases, preoperative MRI identified AG in 34 of 35 cases (mean length 8.8 cm ( ± 0.4 cm)). Results. AG was best visualized with T1-weighted axial images providing sufficient cover in 25 cases confirmed by pathological findings.These results demonstrate AG as a discrete and substantial muscle of the anterior compartment of the thigh, deep to VI and useful in providing anterior soft tissue margin in distal femoral resection in bone tumours. Conclusion. Preoperative assessment of cover by AG may be useful in predicting cases where AG can be dissected, sparing the remaining quadriceps muscle, and therefore function. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:585–593

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, monoclonal dermal neoplasm. DFSP is known to be locally aggressive and infiltrative, but with a very low systemic recurrence risk. It is reported to be associated with high local recurrence rates following surgical excision. Positive or marginal resection margins can lead to a high risk of local recurrence. The objective was to determine the oncologic outcome for DFSP treated at our institution. We reviewed our prospectively collected database for all DFSP treated at our unit between 1990 and 2016. Patients were included whether or not they had excision prior to referral (“whoops” procedure). Those with fibrosarcomatous degeneration at presentation to our unit or less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded. The goal of surgery was a negative margin with a minimum margin of 2 cm where possible. Patients were followed up after surgery to monitor complications, recurrence, transformation and/or metastasis. 139 patients with a mean age of 42.7 (SD=14.1) were included. Mean follow-up was 56 months.101 patients had prior “whoops” surgery before referral. 14 patients were also treated with radiotherapy (13 preoperatively, 1 postoperatively). Following surgery, 6 patients had positive margins, 4 underwent radiation treatment while the other 2 had no further treatment. One patient who presented to our unit with a local recurrence developed a further local recurrence, which demonstrated fibrosarcomatous degeneration at the time of resection (1/139, 0.7%). 1 other patient developed a lesion at another site. The recurrence rate in our DFSP cohort is significantly lower than previous reports. Wide margin resection following oncologic principles can result in a very low recurrence rate. After the initial recovery phase, these patients do not require ongoing, frequent follow-up. Future studies should look at if closer margins can also produce similar treatment outcome

The definition of a ‘safe’ tumour margin remains controversial. Enneking’s original definition of intralesional, marginal, wide and radical margins was based on a study of just 40 patients of whom only 12 had limb salvage surgery. Since that time thre have been numerous attempts to try and define tumour margins more clearly based on anatomical structures and distances of the tumour from the cut edge. Whilst all can agree on what is a radical margin (usually an amputation) and what is an intralesional margin (tumour exposed) there remains a lack of clear definition of what comprises a wide margin and what is a marginal margin. As an example three large tumour units were asked to assess their margins for adequacy. While the rated of adequate excision varied from 49% to 70%, all 3 units had near identical local recurrence rates of 17–20%. The rate of local recurrence is also modified by adjuvant therapy. A suggestion for an International study assessing tumour margins is made, investigating both anatomical and biological factors

INTRODUCTION. Bone tumour resection and subsequent reconstruction remains challenging for the surgeon. Obtaining adequate margins is mandatory to decrease the risk of local recurrence. Improving surgical margins quality without excessive resection, reducing surgical time and increasing the quality of the reconstruction are the main goals of today's research in bone tumour surgical management. With the outstanding improvements in imaging and computerised planning, it is now a standard. However, surgical accuracy is essential in orthopaedic oncologic surgery (Grimmer 2005). Patient specific instruments (PSI) may greatly improve the surgeon's ability to achieve the targeted resection. Thanks to its physical support, PSI can physically guide the blade yielding to a better control over the cutting process (Wong, 2014). Surgical time might significantly be reduced as well when compared to conventional method or navigated procedure. Finally, reconstruction may gain in rapidity and quality especially when allograft is the preferred solution as PSI can be designed as well for allograft cutting (Bellanova, 2013). Since 2011, PSI have systematically been used in our institution for bone tumour resection and when applicable allograft reconstruction. This paper reports the mid- to long-term medical outcomes on a large series. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between 2011 and 2016, we systematically used PSI to remove bone tumours in 30 patients. The pre-operative planning involved the tumour delineation drawn on MRI by the surgeon. The MRI and obtained tumour volume were transferred to the CT-scan by image fusion (co- registration). Cutting planes were positioned around the tumour including a safe margin. The PSI were designed to ensure a sufficient stability but kept thin enough to limit the bone exposure. The PSI was manufactured by 3D-printing in a biocompatible and sterilisable material. PSI has been intraoperatively to cut the bone with predetermined margins. Medical files were reviewed for large data collection: type, size and site of the tumour, pre-and post-operative metastatic status, bone and soft tissues resection margins, local recurrence, use of an allograft and a PSI for graft adjustment or not for the reconstruction, the fusion of the allograft when applicable, the follow-up time and early/late complications. RESULTS. Over a period of 5 years, 30 patients were operated on with PSI (10 osteosarcomas, 4 chondrosarcomas, 10 Ewing sarcomas and 6 other types of bone tumours). Mean follow-up was 27±20 months. 18 cases out of 30 have more than 2 years follow-up and 13 out of 30 have more than 3 years of follow-up. Mean operating time was 6h02±3h44. Mean size of the tumours was 8,4±4,7cm and location was the upper limb in 5 cases, inferior limb in 15 cases and the pelvis in 10 occurrences. Metastatic disease developed postoperatively in 5 patients. Surgical margins in the bone were R0 in all cases but one case where a R1 surgery was planned to preserve a nerve root. We did not observe any local recurrence in the bone. Within soft tissues, margins were classified as R0 in 28 patients and R1 in 2 patients. In 26 cases, an allograft was used to reconstruct the bone defect. In 23 of those patients, the allograft was selected by CT scan and cut using a PSI. In the 3 allografts cut free-handily, only one demonstrated a fusion. Of the 23 cut with a guide, 12 fused completely, 2 demonstrated a partial fusion and 9 were not fused at the last follow-up. At the last follow-up, 2 patients were dead of disease, 5 were alive with metastatic disease and 23 were alive without disease. DISCUSSION. Oncology is probably the field where PSI can bring the largest advantage when compared to the conventional procedure. Several papers have reported the use of PSI for bone tumour resection. All of them have shown very promising results on in-vitro experiments (Cartiaux 2014), cadaver experiment (Wong 2012) or small clinical series (Bellanova 2013, Gouin, 2014). None of these papers report a large patient series associated with a clinically relevant follow-up. This series is the first mid- to long-term follow-up series involving PSI tumour surgery. These results are showing strong evidences of clinical improvements. It comes into contradiction with PSI for total knee arthroplasty where controversial results on the patient's outcome has been reported (Thienpont 2014). R0 margin has been systematically obtained for all bone cuttings, and local recurrence has been strongly decreased (3%) when compared to the usual recurrence rates published in the literature (from 15% to 35% according to the location). Allograft fusion seems improved as well thanks to the shape-matching of the selected allograft and a close contact between host and allograft at bony junctions. With a longer follow-up, these evidences should be stronger to definitely make PSI the best option for bone tumour resection

Arthritis is a common and debilitating disease and is associated with an increased fall risk. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of impacted joint and limb on fall risk as measured by the margin of stability (MOS). There were 110 participants, including healthy controls (HC; n=30), ankle arthritis (AA; n=30), knee arthritis (KA; n=20) and hip arthritis (HA; n=30) patients. All protocols were Institutional Review Board approved and all participants signed informed consent. Participants walked approximately 6 meters at a self-selected pace. MOS was calculated in the foot coordinate system in the anterior/posterior (AP) and medial/lateral (ML) directions at heel strike. A one-way ANOVA was used to examine group effects (HC, AA, KA, HA) on gait speed. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine the effects of limb (Non-Surgical, Surgical) and group on AP and ML MOS. HC had the fastest gait speed (1.40±0.24 m/s; p<0.001) when compared to AA (0.85±0.24 m/s), KA (0.94±0.22 m/s) and HA (1.05±0.22 m/s). HA participants had a greater gait speed compared to AA (p=0.004). AP MOS was greater in the surgical limb compared to the non-surgical limb for AA (p<0.001) and HA (p<0.001). AP MOS was smaller in HC compared to AA, KA, and HA, regardless of limb (p<0.030). AP MOS was similar between AA, KA, and HA for the non-surgical limb (p>0.194) and the surgical limb (p>0.096). ML MOS was greater in the surgical compared to non-surgical limb (p=0.003). ML MOS was smaller in KA participants compared to all other groups (p<0.001). Our results demonstrate stability during gait varies between limbs in arthritis patients, with a more conservative pattern for the surgical limb and suggest KA may be at an increased risk of falls with a smaller ML MOS

The aim of this study was to assess the significance of the extent and adequacy of the surgical margin on three outcome variables; survival, metastasis and local recurrence. We statistically analysed (Cox proportional hazards regression modelling) 279 consecutive patients who presented with soft tissue sarcoma without meta-static disease. They were treated by a single surgeon to a standard protocol in two centres. In terms of overall survival, the failure to achieve a wide surgical margin by contaminating the resection, led to an elevenfold increase in the relative death rate (p=0.04). However, where the margin was not contaminated (even if the margin was closer than 1 mm) then the overall survival rate was similar across all groups of patients with a clear margin up to 20 mm. A large margin greater than 20mm afforded the lowest risk to overall survival. The extent of the surgical margin was not statistically significant in the development of metastatic disease. The presence of a contaminated surgical margin and a narrow margin less than 1mm led to a significantly higher rate of local recurrence (p=0.02) A margin greater than 1 mm allowed a satisfactory outcome in terms of a low local recurrence rate and the extent of the margin up to 20mm was not statistically important. Patients who had radical resections did poorly and generally represent a group where palliative surgery was performed, and there was a very high relative metastasis and death rate. Our study provides statistically significant evidence that increasing width of resection improves local control and overall survival. However a narrow margin due to anatomical constraints such as bone or neurovascular structures does not significantly compromise patient outcome and this provides guidance for surgical decision making in limb salvage surgery

Chondrosarcoma of bone is a surgical disease and excision with wide margins is the optimum treatment. Sometimes the size or location of the tumour at the time of diagnosis mean that only a marginal excision can be achieved. The effect of the margin of excision on outcome is investigated. Method. All patients with newly diagnosed primary chondrosarcoma of bone and without metastases at the time of diagnosis were identified from a prospective database. Their outcome was investigated to assess whether the margin of excision affected outcome. Results. 492 patients were included in the analysis with a mean age of 48. The mean tumour size was 11cm and 59% were male. The 10 year tumour specific survival was 85% for clear cell (N=7) and grade 1 (N=210), 60% for grade 2 (N=180), 47% for grade 3 (N=59) and 16% for dedifferentiated (N=36). The 10 year local recurrence free survival was 86% (clear cell), 73% (grade 1), 67% (grade 2), 36% (grade 3) and 56% dedifferentiated. Local recurrence was strongly related to older age (p=0.0065), grade (p⋋0.0001) and margins (p⋋0.0001). Patients who developed local recurrence had a 43% survival at 10 years compared with 76% for those who did not (p⋋0.0001). They also had a 49% risk of developing metastases compared to a 17% risk for those without local recurrence (p⋋0.0001). However most of these patients had metastases before developing LR(57%). 16 of 65 patients with local recurrence but no metastases, died due to local progression (usually pelvic or spinal tumours). There was however no relation of the margin of excision to either the risk of developing metastases or survival for any grade of tumour. Conclusion. Whilst local control is strongly related to margins of excision and grade, overall survival is related principally to grade but not to margins

Introduction and Aims: The aim of surgeons including patients with soft tissue sarcoma is to gain local control of the tumor, to avoid the risk of local recurrence, and to avoid the compromise of the patient’s potential survival. The aim of the investigation was to assess the significance of the extent of surgical margin on the chance of death, metastasis and local recurrence in soft tissue sarcoma. Method: Three hundred and twenty-four patients were reviewed. Surgical margin data was unavailable for 21, and of the remaining 303 patients, 10 patients had no residual tumor, margins were not defined for 24 patients and nine patients had radical resections. Wide margins were achieved for the remaining 260 patients. Fifty-four percent had surgical margins of under five millimetres. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression modelling was used to consider the impact of surgical margin with an overall survival, disease-free survival and metastasis-free survival. Results were expressed as survival rate ratios and graphics represented as model-based survival curves. All associations that were statistically significant, as well as any associations for which the rate ratios were 2.0 or greater, were reported. Follow-up ranged from 53 days to 187 months, with a median of 40 months. Results: Overall survival time for the 279 patients with complete information was 124 months. There was a significant association between overall survival and extent of the surgical margin (chi-squared test statistic = 14.7, 8df, p = 0.043). There was a significantly higher death rate in patients who had a wide contaminated margin or a radical resection – indicating a likely poorer prognostic group. There was however no difference between any margin less than 20mm. With respect to disease relapse, there were 27 local recurrences among 279 patients. There were no local recurrences in the 44 patients who had margins of 20mm or greater, no residual tumor, radical resection or for whom margins were not defined. Therefore to permit stable statistical analysis, 24 local recurrences among 213 patients were reviewed. There was a significant association between the extent of surgical margin and disease-free survival (chi-squared test statistic = 9.5, 4df, p = 0.051). However, with respect to metastasis, there was no relationship between surgical margin and the development of metastatic disease (chi-squared test statistic = 8.5, 8 df, p = 0.383). Conclusion: There is significant statistical evidence to suggest improved overall survival and also improved local recurrence survival with increasing width of surgical margins. There is however the confounding information that the rate of metastasis does not depend on the width of the surgical margin. The question of whether success in obtaining local control is significant in terms of overall metastasis and death remains unresolved in terms of our study

Introduction The aim of the investigation was to assess the significance of the extent of surgical margin on the chance of death, metastasis and local recurrence in soft tissue sarcoma. Methods The review consisted of 324 patients. Surgical margin data was unavailable for 21, and of the remaining 303 patients, 10 patients had no residual tumour, margins were not defined for 24 patients and nine patients had radical resections. Wide margins were achieved for the remaining 260 patients. Fifty-four percent had surgical margins of under five millimetres. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression modelling was used to consider the impact of surgical margin with an overall survival, disease-free survival and metastasis-free survival. Results were expressed as survival rate ratios and graphics represented as model based survival curves. All associations that were statistically significant as well as any associations for which the rate ratios were 2.0 or greater were reported. Follow-up ranged from 53 days to 187 months, with a median of 40 months. Results Overall survival time for the 279 patients with complete information was 124 months. There was a significant association between overall survival and extent of the surgical margin (chi-squared test statistics = 14.7, 8df, p = 0.043). There was a significantly higher death rate in patients who had a wide contaminated margin or a radical resection indicating likely poorer prognostic groups. There was however no difference between any margin from one to 20 mm. With respect to disease relapse, there were 27 local recurrences among 279 patients, and for statistical reasons, 24 local recurrences among 213 patients were reviewed. There was a significant association between the extent of surgical margin and disease-free survival (chi-squared test statistics = 9.5, 4df, p = 0.051). With relation to metastasis, 68 of 257 patients were reviewed, there being no statistical association between metastasis-free survival and margin extent. Conclusions There is significant statistical evidence to suggest overall and disease-free survival increase with increasing width of surgical margin. The evidence is not convincing in our assessment of metastasis-free survival. In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors is in receipt of a research grant from a non-commercial source

Aims. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the minimum five-year outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device (KARD) in patients with Paprosky type III acetabular defects and destruction of the inferior margin of the acetabulum. Patients and Methods. We identified 36 patients (37 hips) who underwent revision THA under these circumstances using the KARD, fresh frozen allograft femoral heads, and reconstruction of the inferior margin of the acetabulum. The Merle d’Aubigné system was used for clinical assessment. Serial anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were used to assess migration of the acetabular component. Results. At a mean follow-up of 8.2 years (5 to 19.3), the mean Merle d’Aubigné score increased from 12.5 (5 to 18) preoperatively to 16.5 (10 to 18) (p < 0.0001). The survival rate at ten years was 95.3% (. sd. 4.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 86.4 to 100) and 76.5% (. sd. 9.9, 95% CI 57.0 to 95.9) using aseptic loosening and radiological loosening as the endpoints, respectively. Conclusion. These results show that the use of the KARD with reconstruction of the inferior margin of the acetabulum in revision THA is associated with acceptable clinical results and survival at mid-term follow-up with, however, a high rate of migration of the acetabular component of 21.6%. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:725–32

Aims. The existing clinical guidelines do not describe a clear indication for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of superficial soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). We aimed to determine the efficacy of adjuvant RT for superficial STSs. Methods. We retrospectively studied 304 patients with superficial STS of the limbs and trunk who underwent surgical resection at a tertiary sarcoma centre. The efficacy of RT was investigated according to the tumour size and grade: group 1, ≤ 5 cm, low grade; group 2, ≤ 5cm, high grade; group 3, > 5 cm, low grade; group 4, > 5 cm, high grade. Results. The five- and ten-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) for all patients was 88% and 81%, respectively. While the efficacy of adjuvant RT was not proven in local control of all patients (five-year LRFS; RT+, 90% versus RT-, 83%; p = 0.074), the LRFS was significantly improved by adjuvant RT in group 2 (five-year LRFS; RT+, 96% versus RT-, 82%; p = 0.019), and group 4 (five-year LRFS; RT+, 87% versus RT-, 73%; p = 0.027). In groups 2 and 4, adjuvant RT significantly reduced the LR risk if the resection margin was clear but less than 5 mm; the LR rate was 7% with adjuvant RT compared with 26% with surgery alone (p = 0.003). There was no statistical relationship with the use of adjuvant RT and survival in every group. Conclusion. Adjuvant RT reduces the risk of local recurrence in patients with superficial high-grade STS regardless of tumour size, especially when resection margin is less than 5 mm. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):1088–1094

A poor response to chemotherapy (≤ 90% necrosis) for osteosarcomas leads to poorer survival and an increased risk of local recurrence, particularly if there is a close margin of excision. We evaluated whether amputation confers any survival benefit over limb salvage surgery (LSS) with narrow margins in patients who respond poorly to chemotherapy. We only analysed patients with an osteosarcoma of the limb, a poor response to chemotherapy and close margins on LSS (marginal/intralesional) or primary amputation: 360 patients (36 LSS (intralesional margins), 197 LSS (marginal margins) and 127 amputations) were included. Local recurrence developed in 13 (36%) following LSS with intralesional margins, and 39 (20%) following LSS with marginal margins. There was no local recurrence in patients who underwent amputation. The five-year survival for all patients was 41% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35 to 46), but for those treated by LSS with marginal margins was 46.2% (95% CI 38 to 53), 36.3% (95% CI 27 to 45) for those treated by amputation, and 28% (95 CI 14 to 44) for those treated by LSS with intralesional margins. Patients who had LSS and then developed local recurrence as a first event had the same survival as those who had primary amputation without local recurrence. Prophylactic adjuvant radiotherapy was used in 40 patients but had no discernible effect in preventing local recurrence. Although amputation offered better local control, it conferred no clear survival benefit over LSS with marginal margins in these patients with a poor overall prognosis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:115–20

Introduction. Malalignment of cup in total hip replacement (THR) increases rates of dislocation, impingement, acetabular migration, pelvic osteolysis, leg length discrepancy and polyethylene wear. Many surgeons orientate the cup in the same anteversion and inclination as the inherent anatomy of the acetabulum. The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and acetabular rim can be used as a reference. No study has yet defined the exact orientation of the TAL. The aim of this study was to describe the orientation of acetabular margin and compare it with TAL orientation. Materials and Methods. Sixty eight hips with osteoarthritis undergoing THR with computer navigation were investigated. Anterior pelvic plane was registered using anterior superior iliac spines and pubic symphysis. Orientation of the natural acetabulum as defined by the acetabular rim with any osteophytes excised was measured. Since TAL is a rectangular band like structure, three recordings were done for each corresponding to the outer middle and inner margin of the band. All the readings were given by software as radiological anteversion and inclination. Results. All patients were Caucasian, 30 males and 38 females with mean age 67.4 years (SD 9.6) and BMI 30 (SD 5). Inclination was 54.7(SD7.9), 53(SD6.9), 47.5(SD6.8), 42.1(6.7) and anteversion 5.7(SD8.7), 5.4(SD9.9), 9.7(SD9.6), 13.5(SD9.4) for acetabular rim, outer, middle and inner borders of the TAL respectively. For inclination TAL outer border was not significantly different to acetabular rim (mean difference 1.7°, 95%CIs −0.2° to 3.6°, p=0.082) but the middle (mean difference 7.3°, 95%CIs 5.6° to 8.9°) and inner (mean difference 12.6°, 95%CIs 11.0° to 14.2°) borders were (both p<0.001). For anteversion TAL outer border was not significantly different to acetabular rim (mean difference 0.2°, 95%CIs −1.3° to 1.8°, p=0.758) but the middle and inner borders were (mean difference −4.0° 95%CIs −5.5° to −2.5° and −7.9°, 95%CIs −9.6° to −6.1° respectively, both p<0.001). Anteversion for males was significantly lower than females with a mean difference of 4 for the rim and 5.7, 4.8 and 5.1 for the TAL outer, middle and inner margins respectively. Overall 57,53,40&26 of 68 patients had a combined inclination and anteversion of the native acetabulum that fell outside the “safe zone” of Lewinnek with acetabular rim, outer, middle and inner margins of TAL respectively. Compared to Lewinnek safe zones for inclination TAL inner margin performed best with 14.7% outliers and acetabular rim performed worst with 72% outliers. For anteversion TAL inner margin performed best with 25% outliers while outer margin of TAL performed worst with 39.7% outliers. Conclusion. Orientation of the acetabulum differs a lot between individuals. The TAL middle and inner margins differ in orientation as compared to acetabular rim and TAL outer border. TAL inner border provides the best bet for placing the cup in Lewinnek's safe zone. When using the natural acetabular orientation or TAL as a guide, it should not be assumed this will orientate the cup in Lewinnek safe zone although the validity of safe zones itself is questionable. Variation between patients must be taken into account and the difference between males and females, particularly in terms of anteversion, should be considered

Aims. Due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis, limb-sparing resections of pelvic tumours achieving adequate surgical margins, can often be difficult. The advent of computer navigation has improved the precision of resection of these lesions, though there is little evidence comparing resection with or without the assistance of navigation. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of navigation-assisted surgery for the resection of pelvic bone tumours involving the posterior ilium and sacrum. . Patients and Methods. Using our prospectively updated institutional database, we conducted a retrospective case control study of 21 patients who underwent resection of the posterior ilium and sacrum, for the treatment of a primary sarcoma of bone, between 1987 and 2015. The resection was performed with the assistance of navigation in nine patients and without navigation in 12. We assessed the accuracy of navigation-assisted surgery, as defined by the surgical margin and how this affects the rate of local recurrence, the disease-free survival and the effects on peri-and post-operative morbidity. . Results. The mean age of the patients was 36.4 years (15 to 66). The mean size of the tumour was 10.9 cm. In the navigation-assisted group, the margin was wide in two patients (16.7%), marginal in six (66.7%) and wide-contaminated in one (11.1%) with no intralesional margin. In the non-navigated-assisted group; the margin was wide in two patients (16.7%), marginal in five (41.7%), intralesional in three (25.0%) and wide-contaminated in two (16.7%). Local recurrence occurred in two patients in the navigation-assisted group (22.2%) and six in the non-navigation-assisted group (50.0%). The disease-free survival was significantly better when operated with navigation-assistance (p = 0.048). The blood loss and operating time were less in the navigated-assisted group, as was the risk of a foot drop post-operatively. Conclusion . The introduction of navigation-assisted surgery for the resection of tumours of the posterior ilium and sacrum has increased the safety for the patients and allows for a better oncological outcome. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:261–6

We considered whether a positive margin occurring after resection of a soft-tissue sarcoma of a limb would affect the incidence of local recurrence. Patients with low-grade liposarcomas were expected to be a low-risk group as were those who had positive margins planned before surgery to preserve critical structures. Two groups, however, were expected to be at a higher risk, namely, patients who had undergone unplanned excision elsewhere with a positive margin on re-excision and those with unplanned positive margins occurring during primary resection. Of 566 patients in a prospective database, 87 with positive margins after limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were grouped according to the clinical scenario by an observer blinded to the outcome. The rate of local recurrence differed significantly between the two low- (4.2% and 3.6%) and the two high-risk groups (31.6% and 37.5%). This classification therefore provides useful information about the incidence of local recurrence after positive-margin resection

We hypothesised that the use of computer navigation-assisted surgery for pelvic and sacral tumours would reduce the risk of an intralesional margin. We reviewed 31 patients (18 men and 13 women) with a mean age of 52.9 years (13.5 to 77.2) in whom computer navigation-assisted surgery had been carried out for a bone tumour of the pelvis or sacrum. There were 23 primary malignant bone tumours, four metastatic tumours and four locally advanced primary tumours of the rectum. The registration error when using computer navigation was <  1 mm in each case. There were no complications related to the navigation, which allowed the preservation of sacral nerve roots (n = 13), resection of otherwise inoperable disease (n = 4) and the avoidance of hindquarter amputation (n = 3). The intralesional resection rate for primary tumours of the pelvis and sacrum was 8.7% (n = 2): clear bone resection margins were achieved in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 13.1 months (3 to 34) three patients (13%) had developed a local recurrence. The mean time alive from diagnosis was 16.8 months (4 to 48). . Computer navigation-assisted surgery is safe and has reduced our intralesional resection rate for primary tumours of the pelvis and sacrum. We recommend this technique as being worthy of further consideration for this group of patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1417–24

Abstract

Aims. This study aimed to analyze the accuracy and errors associated with 3D-printed, patient-specific resection guides (3DP-PSRGs) used for bone tumour resection. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 29 bone tumour resections that used 3DP-PSRGs based on 3D CT and 3D MRI. We evaluated the resection amount errors and resection margin errors relative to the preoperative plans. Guide-fitting errors and guide distortion were evaluated intraoperatively and one month postoperatively, respectively. We categorized each of these error types into three grades (grade 1, < 1 mm; grade 2, 1 to 3 mm; and grade 3, > 3 mm) to evaluate the overall accuracy. Results. The maximum resection amount error was 2 mm. Out of 29 resection amount errors, 15 (51.7%) were grade 1 errors and 14 (48.3%) were grade 2 errors. Complex resections were associated with higher-grade resection amount errors (p < 0.001). The actual resection margins correlated significantly with the planned margins; however, there were some discrepancies. The maximum guide-fitting error was 3 mm. There were 22 (75.9%), five (17.2%), and two (6.9%) grade 1, 2, and 3 guide-fitting errors, respectively. There was no significant association between complex resection and fitting error grades. The guide distortion after one month in all patients was rated as grade 1. Conclusion. In terms of the accurate resection amount according to the preoperative planning, 3DP-PSRGs can be a viable option for bone tumour resection. However, 3DP-PSRG use may be associated with resection margin length discrepancies relative to the planned margins. Such discrepancies should be considered when determining surgical margins. Therefore, a thorough evaluation of the preoperative imaging and surgical planning is still required, even if 3DP-PSRGs are to be used. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):190–197

Aims. For rare cases when a tumour infiltrates into the hip joint, extra-articular resection is required to obtain a safe margin. Endoprosthetic reconstruction following tumour resection can effectively ensure local control and improve postoperative function. However, maximizing bone preservation without compromising surgical margin remains a challenge for surgeons due to the complexity of the procedure. The purpose of the current study was to report clinical outcomes of patients who underwent extra-articular resection of the hip joint using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis. Methods. We reviewed 15 patients over a five-year period (January 2017 to December 2022) who had undergone extra-articular resection of the hip joint due to malignant tumour using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis. Each of the 15 patients had a single lesion, with six originating from the acetabulum side and nine from the proximal femur. All patients had their posterior column preserved according to the surgical plan. Results. Postoperative pathological assessment revealed a negative surgical margin was achieved in all patients. At final follow-up, 13.3% (2/15) died and no recurrence occurred. The overall survival was 81.7% at five years. None of the patients showed any signs of aseptic loosening, and no wound healing issues were observed. In total, 20% (3/15) developed complications, with two cases of early hip dislocation and one case of deep infection. The cumulative incidence of mechanical and non-mechanical failure in this series was 13.7% and 9.3%, respectively, at five years. In this cohort, the mean time to full weightbearing was 5.89 (SD 0.92) weeks and the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24.1 (SD 4.4). Conclusion. For patients with a hip joint tumour who met the inclusion criteria and were deemed suitable for posterior column preservation, a custom-made osteotomy guide combined with 3D-printed endoprosthesis is worth performing when treating patients who require extra-articular resection of the hip joint, as it can achieve adequate margin for local control, maximize bone preservation to maintain pelvic ring integrity, reduce the risk of complications by simplifying the surgical procedure, and allow for more precise reconstruction for better function. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(11):1027–1036