Abstract. MAGnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) rods are used in the surgical treatment of children with early onset scoliosis. The magnetically controlled lengthening mechanism enables rod distractions without the need for repeated invasive surgery. The CE certification of these devices was suspended in March 2021 due, primarily, to performance evidence gaps in the documents provided by the manufacturer to regulators and notified bodies. MAGEC rods are therefore not permitted for use in countries requiring CE marking. This was a survey of 18 MAGEC rod surgeons in the UK about their perception of the impact of the CE suspension on the clinical management of their patients. Unsurprisingly, virtually all perceived a negative impact, reflecting the complexity of this patient group. Reassuringly, these surgeons are highly experienced in alternative treatment methods. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):155–157

Aims

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have been gaining popularity in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) over the past decade. We present our experience with the first 44 MCGR consecutive cases treated at our institution.

The MAGnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) system is used increasingly in the management of early-onset scoliosis. Good results have been published, but there have been recent reports identifying implant failures that may be associated with significant metallosis surrounding the implants. This article aims to present the current knowledge regarding the performance of this implant, and the potential implications and strategies that may be employed to identify and limit any problems. We urge surgeons to apply caution to patient and construct selection; engage in prospective patient registration using a spine registry; ensure close clinical monitoring until growth has ceased; and send all explanted MAGEC rods for independent analysis. The MAGEC system may be a good instrumentation system for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. However, it is innovative and like all new technology, especially when deployed in a paediatric population, robust systems to assess long-term outcome are required to ensure that patient safety is maintained. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:708–13

Aim:. To determine the efficacy and safety of the Magec system in early onset scoliosis (EOS). Methods:. In 2011, 6 males and 2 females had Magec rods, with an average age of 8.5 years (2.9–12.7 years), 7 patients had dual rods, and 1 had single. The main cause of EOS was idiopathic scoliosis (n=6), followed by Congenital (n=1), and Syndromic (n=1). Average follow up was 19.4 months (14–26 months). 4 of these patients had their previous Paediatric Isola growing rods exchanged to Magec, and 1 patient had an exchange from single to Dual Magec rods. Results:. In total, the cohort of patients underwent 65 extensions in clinic with an average 8 each (4–19). The first rod extension was performed at an average of 4.6 months following surgery. From there on extensions were done at two monthly intervals on an average. A total of 75 radiographs were taken after Magec insertion, ranging from 5 to 15 per patient. The mean pre-operative Cobb angle 59° improved to 41° at final follow up. This is a mean reduction of 31%. The mean pre-operative T1-S1 length was 305mm which improved to 349mm at final follow up. A mean increase in spinal length of 14%.m. During follow up, 5 complications were noted: 2 metalwork pullouts, 1 extension failure, 1 rod fracture and 1 patient had dermatitis at site of wound. Conclusion:. Our early results using the Magec magnetic growing rod system are encouraging with maintenance of curve correction and in achieving trunk growth in EOS. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

Background. Established hip and knee arthroplasty registers exist in many countries but this is not the case with spinal implants. Moreover, in the case of a rod intended to guide spinal growth in a child and then be removed, the definition of ‘failure’ (revision) used for hip or knee arthroplasty is inappropriate. How can the performance of such spinal implants be judged?. Methods. Ninety-six MAGnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) spinal rods were obtained from multiple centres after removal from the spines of 52 children with scoliosis. Clinical details were assessed and divided between unplanned revision operations (‘failures’) and those which were planned. Of the explanted rods, 49 were tested for the amount of force they could output, using the manufacturer's supplied test jig. Sixty-five rods were cut apart so that the internal components (bearings, O-ring seals, drive pins) could be assessed, alongside if there was evidence of internal wear. Results. Seventy-four per cent of revision operations were unplanned. Eighty per cent of explanted rods were unable to produce the force expected from a new rod. All rods (100%) that were successfully cut open showed signs of internal wear. Non- functional bearings were seen in 74% of cases, obvious seal damage in 57% of cases and broken drive pins in 47% of cases. Conclusion. Despite potential clinical benefits, explanted MAGEC rods showed consistent and substantial damage. The majority of rods showed zero force output and most revision operations were unplanned. Independent explant analysis allows appraisal of new technology in arthroplasty for patient benefit

Aim:. To measure truncal parameters for patients treated with growing rod systems for early onset scoliosis (EOS). Methods:. 44 patients underwent growth rod surgery for EOS between 1999 and 2013 (24 females and 20 males). 27 patients had idiopathic scoliosis, 13 congenital, 3 syndromic and 1 neuromuscular. 26 patients had Paediatric Isola, 8 had Paediatric Expedium, 4 had dual growth rods with domino's and 9 each had VEPTR and MAGEC rods systems. Medical records and radiographs were analysed. Cobb angle, T1-T12 and T1-S1 length, coronal and sagittal balance, apical vertical translation (AVT), space available for the lung (SAL) and shoulder balance were measured. Results:. Average age at initial surgery was 6.2 (1–9) years with an average duration of follow up of 69 months (15–131). T1-T12 length measured 152 mm preoperatively (95–222), increasing by 14% postoperatively and by 30% at final follow up. There was an average overall growth of 42 mm in our group compared with 50 mm of normal physiological growth expected in a 5 year old over 60 months. Mean T1-S1 length measured 273 mm (196–415) increasing by 16% postoperatively and by 29% (80 mm) at final follow up. AVT preoperative mean was 68 mm (29–113) decreasing by 29% postoperatively. SAL ratio increased from 0.91 (0.70–0.99) to 0.93 (0.75–0.99) at final follow up. Coronal balance was maintained but 5 patients had sagittal balance complications. Shoulder balance remained constant at 14–15 mm. Conclusion:. Our results show improvement or maintenance in each parameter and also demonstrate that growth rod systems help improve or maintain truncal parameters whilst allowing normal growth. Conflict Of Interest Statement: No conflict of interest

Objectives

The Precice nail is the latest intramedullary lengthening nail with excellent early outcomes. Implant complications have led to modification of the nail design. The aim of this study was to perform a retrieval study of Precice nails following lower-limb lengthening and to assess macroscopical and microscopical changes to the implants and evaluate differences following design modification, with the aim of identifying potential surgical, implant, and patient risk factors.

Aims

We undertook a prospective non-randomised radiological study to evaluate the preliminary results of using magnetically-controlled growing rods (MAGEC System, Ellipse technology) to treat children with early-onset scoliosis.

Aims

We present a case series of five patients who had revision surgery following magnetic controlled growing rods (MGCR) for early onset scoliosis. Metallosis was found during revision in four out of five patients and we postulated a mechanism for rod failure based on retrieval analysis.