Aim

Local antibiotics, delivered to the site of infection, achieve high tissue concentrations and are used as an adjunct to systemic therapy. Local gentamicin provides levels well above the minimum inhibitory concentration and may be sufficient on its own, however, the efficacy of single or combination local antibiotics has not been studied. This retrospective study evaluated the effect of combination aminoglycoside and vancomycin local antibiotic treatment compared to aminoglycoside alone in the surgical management of bone infection.

Objective

A clinical investigation into a new bone void filler is giving first data on systemic and local exposure to the anti-infective substance after implantation.

Introduction. The management of open long bone fractures is well described and has been standardised through a number of well-established guidelines. However, there is no consensus regarding the application of local antibiotics into the open fracture site as a means of reducing infection rates. Materials & Methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken as per PRISMA guidelines. PROSPERO Registration CRD42022323545. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and CENTRAL were the databases assessed. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Rob 2 Tool were used to assess bias. A qualitative synthesis of all included studies and meta-analysis of suitable subgroups was undertaken. Results. In total, 12 studies (11 observational, 1 RCT) assessing 2431 open fractures were included for analysis. All compared the addition of a local antibiotic therapy to a standard treatment versus the standard treatment alone. The methods of delivery were vancomycin powder (4 papers), tobramycin polymethylmethacrylate beads (4 papers), gentamicin coated intramedullary (IM) nails (2 papers), gentamicin injections (1 paper) and antibiotic released IM core cement (1 paper). The addition of vancomycin powder did not decrease infection rates in comparison to intravenous antibiotics alone (OR 1.3, 95% CI (0.75 – 2.26)). Antibiotic coated IM Nails appear to have an association with lower infection rates than standard IM Nails. PMMA antibiotics have shown varied results in reducing infection rates depending on the individual studies. Conclusions. There are numerous methods available to deliver antibiotics locally to an open fracture site. Further high-quality research is required to provide a definitive conclusion on their efficacy irrespective of delivery method

Aims. Bone and joint infections cause significant morbidity, often requiring combination medical and surgical treatment. The presence of foreign material reduces the number of organisms required to cause an infection. The aim of this study was to assess whether there was a difference in the species of organism identified on culture in osteomyelitis compared to prosthetic joint infection. Method. This was a retrospective observational cohort study of patients that had surgical intervention for prosthetic joint infection or osteomyelitis with positive microbial culture between 2019 and 2022. Data including patient demographics, site of injury, BACH score for osteomyelitis and JS-BACH score for prosthetic joint infection, organism classification and antibiotic resistance to vancomycin and gentamicin were extracted from the medical record. Logistic and multiple regressions were used to adjust for potential confounding variables. Results. A total of 445 patients were included in the study; 267 patients with osteomyelitis or fracture-related infection and 177 patients with prosthetic joint infection. The patients with prosthetic joint infection were older (Mean age 70 for PJI; IQR 60-77 vs 56 for OM/FRI; IQR 39-64), more likely to be female (55.6% vs 26.2%) and had a higher BMI and ASA compared to those with osteomyelitis. Symptom duration tended to be longer in osteomyelitis/FRI (p<0.001). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen isolated in both osteomyelitis (155/267 (58.1%)) and prosthetic joint infection (85/177 (48.9%), followed by other Gram negative pathogens with 77/267 (28.8%) in osteomyelitis and 48/177 (27.1%) in prosthetic joint infection. On multivariate analysis, there was no difference between the rate of Staphylococcus aureus infection between the two groups. The rate of polymicrobial infection was higher in patients with osteomyelitis (92/267 (34.5%)) compared to prosthetic joint infection (38/177 (23.7%), however after adjustment for confounders there was no difference, p = 0.842. There was no difference in the presence of gentamicin resistant organisms or vancomycin resistant Gram positive organisms in osteomyelitis compared to prosthetic joint infection. Conclusion. Causative pathogens are similar in these two common forms of bone and joint infection. There was no significant difference in the identification, presence of polymicrobial infection or gentamicin and vancomycin resistance in organisms isolated in osteomyelitis compared to prosthetic joint infection. This may have implications for empiric antibiotic choice and local antibiotic therapy in the management of bone and joint infection

Aims. The microbiological detection of microorganisms plays a crucial role in the diagnosis as well as in the targeted systemic and local antibiotic therapy of periprosthetic infections (PJI). Despite extensive efforts to improve the sensitivity of current culture methods, the rate of culture-negative infections is approximately 10–20% of all PJI. This study investigates an preanalytical algorithm (culture collection and direct processing in the OR) to potentially increasing culture yield in patients with PJI. Methods. Patients undergoing staged revision arthroplasty for PJI in our hospital between October 2021 and 2022 were included in this prospective pilot study. Intraoperatively twenty tissue samples were collected and distributed among 4 groups. Tissue samples were prepared according to standard without medium and in thioglycolate medium at 3 different temperatures (room temperature, 4°C, 37° for 24h before transport to microbiology) directly in the OR. The removed implants were sonicated. Cultures were investigated on days 1, 3, 7, 12, 14 for possible growth. All grown organism, the number of positive samples and the time to positivity were recorded and compared. Results. 71 patients were included (age, gender). Compared to the standard procedure the thioglycolate broth at 37°C was significantly more often culture-negative (p=0.031). No significant differences in the frequency of culture-negative samples were detected in the other groups. 8.4% (6/71) patients were culture negative in the standard culture but positive in the thioglycolate samples. In contrast, 7% (5/71) were culture negative in the thioglycolate samples but had bacterial detection in the standard approach. In 4.7% (3/63) of the patients, only the sonication showed growth, whereas 25.4% (16/63) had no growth in sonication fluid but in one of the cultures. For S. caprae, there was a significantly different distribution (p=0.026) with more frequent detection in the group with thioglycolate at 37°C. The standard procedure (p=0.005) and sonication (p=0.023) showed a shorter time to positivity of the culture compared to the thioglycolate approach at 4°C. Conclusions. No general differences could be shown between the standard preparation and the thioglycolate preparation; in particular, storage at different temperatures does not seem to result in any difference. For individual cases (8% in this study), bacterial growth was detected in the thioglycolate group that would have been culture-negative otherwise. There might be organism dependent differences in growth in different media

Introduction. Since the expanded war in Ukraine in 2022, explosives, mines, debris, blast waves, and other factors have predominantly caused injuries during artillery or rocket attacks. These injuries, such as those from shelling shrapnel, involve high-energy penetrating agents, resulting in extensive necrosis and notable characteristics like soft tissue defects and multiple fragmentary fractures with bone tissue defects and a high rate of infection complications caused by multi resistant gram-negative (MRGN) pathogens. Material and Methods. We conducted a prospective study at our center between March 2022 and December 2023. Out of the 56 patients from Ukraine, 21 met the inclusion criteria who had severe war injuries were included in the study. Each of these patients presented with multiple injuries to both bones and soft tissues, having initially undergone treatment in Ukraine involving multiple surgeries. The diagnosis of infection was established based on the EBJIS criteria. Prior to our treatment patients had undergone multiple revision surgeries, including debridement, biopsies, implant and fixator replacement. Additionally, soft tissue management required previously VAC therapy and flap reconstruction for successful treatment. Results. All 21 infections manifested as bone infections (11; 52%), followed by implant-associated infections (5; 24%), soft tissue infections (4; 19%), and septic arthritis (1; 5%). In all patients, the infection was polymicrobial, caused by 3- and 4-MRGN pathogens, as Klebsiella pneumonia 4MRGN, Proteus mirabilis 4MRGN, Enterobacter cloacae 4MRGN etc. Upon admission, all patients carried a diagnosis and exhibited signs indicative of chronic infection. 19 (90.5%) patients required complex antibiotic regimens combined with multiple wound revisions and debridements, changes of fixators and combination of systemic and local antibiotic therapy. In 6 patients (28%) high dosages of local antibiotics such as gentamycin, vancomycin and meropenem were incorporated into a carrier of bio-absorbable calcium sulfate, calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite which were introduced into the hip joint, femoral canal or bone defect for dead space management during the surgery. When local antibiotics were administered at intervals, the microbiology results at implantation showed negative results. 2 (9%) patients had new infections (different site, different pathogens), 1 (4.8%) is still under the treatment. In 17 (81%) patients infection complications were treated successfully with no recurrence of infection. Conclusion. War injuries result in complex bone and soft-tissue infections caused by 3-, 4-MRGN pathogens. Addressing this challenge necessitates multidisciplinary approach with multiple, thorough surgical debridements, effective local, and systemic antimicrobial therapy. As for the outlook we can see potential in local antibiotic carriers

Aim. Skeletal tuberculosis (TB) accounts for up to one third of cases of extra-pulmonary TB but comprises a minority of osteoarticular infection in areas with low TB incidence. Consequently, unexpected cases may receive surgical management targeted at non-tuberculous orthopaedic infections. This study reviewed treatment and outcomes of non-spinal osteoarticular TB to assess outcomes from modern surgical techniques. Method. All patients with a diagnosis of non-spinal osteoarticular TB between 2009–2017 from one tertiary referral centre were included. Retrospective review of surgical intervention, antibiotic treatment and outcome was conducted. Results. Fourteen patients with an average age of 48 (range 20–77) were identified; all were HIV-negative. Articular infections affected 7 patients, including one prosthetic joint infection. Osteomyelitis affecting the carpus, femur, tibia, olecranon and metatarsals was diagnosed in the remaining patients. Only 4 patients had radiological findings consistent with prior pulmonary TB, and only 3 had a history of prior TB or TB exposure. In 2 cases, symptom exacerbation was associated with local steroid injection. Diagnostic biopsy was employed in 5 cases, of whom 4 proceeded to medical management. Diagnosis was made following positive culture in 86% of cases; all TB isolates were fully sensitive. 71% of cases underwent surgical treatment according to best practice for biofilm-forming infection, including excision of osteomyelitis with local antibiotic therapy for three patients, and first-stage excision with spacer implantation for four patients. Quadruple therapy for an average of 8.5 months, range 6–12 months, was administered. Patients were followed up for a mean of 15.2 months. Half of the patients treated with surgery reported ongoing pain at 3 months and 4 patients underwent further surgery for persistent signs of infection (2 for probable persistent TB, 2 for bacterial super-infection). Conclusions. The role of surgical debridement in management of osteoarticular TB is unclear. In patients with a previous history of TB exposure a pre-operative diagnosis of TB could prevent unnecessary surgery and therefore prevent associated post-operative complications including bacterial super-infection and pain. Pre-op biopsy should therefore be considered in all patients with a history of TB exposure

Several risk factors can and should be addressed during first stage or spacer implantation surgery in order to minimize complications. Technical aspects as well as practical tips and pearls to overcome common nuisances such as spacer instability or femoral and acetabular bone loss will be discussed and shown with pictures. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most successful procedures in orthopaedics and excellent results are expected in virtually all cases. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) though unusual, is one of the most frequent and challenging complications after TJA. It is the third most common cause of revision in total hip replacement, responsible for up to 15% of all cases. In the past few years several improvements have been made in the management of an infected total hip prosthesis. Nevertheless it remains a challenging problem for the orthopaedic surgeon. Although numerous studies report favourable outcomes after one-stage revision surgery, two-stage has traditionally been considered as the gold standard for management of chronic infection. Two-stage exchange consists of debridement, resection of infected implants and usually temporary placement of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer before reimplantation of a new prosthesis. Spacers can be classified as static or articulating. The goals of using an articulating antibiotic loaded cement spacer are two-fold: to enhance the clearance of infection by local antibiotic therapy and dead-space management while maintaining joint function during treatment thus improving the functional outcome at reimplantation. Still, hip spacer implantation is not innocuous and there are several possible complications. Going forward, one must consider not just eradicating infection but also the importance of restoring function. In this regard using a mobile spacer adds an element of physiologic motion that both increases patient comfort between stages and facilitates re-implantation surgery. Conversely, mechanical complications are one of the major consequences of this preference. Be that as it may there are ways to minimize these problems. It is the surgeon responsibility to optimize mechanical circumstances as much as possible. I would like to thank Dr. Ricardo Sousa for his help with this work

Aims

The standard of wide tumour-like resection for chronic osteomyelitis (COM) has been challenged recently by adequate debridement. This paper reviews the evolution of surgical debridement for long bone COM, and presents the outcome of adequate debridement in a tertiary bone infection unit.