Fractures of the tibial shaft are common injuries, but there are no long-term outcome data in the era of increased surgical management. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the clinical and functional outcome of this injury at 12 to 22 years. Secondary aims were to determine the short- and long-term mortality, and if there were any predictors of clinical or functional outcome or mortality. From a prospective trauma database of 1502 tibial shaft fractures in 1474 consecutive adult patients, we identified a cohort of 1431 tibial diaphyseal fractures in 1403 patients, who fitted our inclusion criteria. There were 1024 men, and mean age at injury was 40.6 years. Fractures were classified according to the AO system, and open fractures graded after Gustilo and Anderson. Requirement of fasciotomy, time to fracture union, complications, incidence of knee and ankle pain at long-term follow-up, changes in employment and the patients’ social deprivation status were recorded. Function was assessed at 12 to 22 years post-injury using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and short form-12 questionnaires. Long-term functional outcome data was available for 568 of the surviving patients, 389 were deceased and 346 were lost to follow-up. Most fractures (90.7%, n = 1363) united without further intervention. Fasciotomies were performed in 11.5% of patients; this did not correlate with poorer functional outcome in the long term. Social deprivation was associated with a higher incidence of injury but had no impact on long-term function. The one-year mortality in those over 75 years of age was 29 (42%). At long-term follow-up, pain and function scores were good. However, 147 (26%) reported ongoing knee pain, 62 (10%) reported ankle pain and 97 (17%) reported both. Such joint pain correlated with poorer functional outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1370–7

Aims

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with limitations in function, measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), six to nine months after a proximal humeral fracture, from a range of demographic, injury, psychological, and social variables measured within a week and two to four weeks after injury.

Introduction. Patients suffering from finger joint pain or dysfunction due to arthritis and traumatic injury may require arthroplasty and joint replacement. Single-part silicone-based implants remain the material of choice and most widely used option, although reports on their long-term clinical performance are variable. For trauma indications, patients have a high expectation of functionality necessitating the use of materials with high wear resistance and mechanical performance. A new proximal inter phalangeal (PIP) joint designed by Zrinski AG (Wurmlingen, Germany), comprising a self-mating carbon fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) coupling, may provide a suitable alternative. Here we describe the wear performance of the CFR-PEEK components in a PIP joint wear simulator and subsequent characterisation of the wear particles. Methods. Four proximal and distal PIP components were milled (Zrinski AG) from CFR-PEEK (Invibio Ltd, UK) and subjected to wear testing (Endo Lab ® GmbH, Germany). The test was conducted at 37°C over 5 million cycles in 25% bovine serum (refreshed every 0.5 million cycles). The load was a static force of 63N applied at a frequency of 1Hz with a flexion/extension angle of ±40°. Wear rate was determined by mass loss from each component. Pooled serum samples from the wear simulator were subjected to protein digest and the remaining particulate debris isolated by serial filtration through 10μm, 1μm and 0.1μm filters. Particle size and morphology was subsequently determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Continuum Blue, UK). Results. Both components exhibited high resistance to wear, with the proximal component resulting in a wear rate of 0.09mg/million cycles, whilst that of the distal component was 0.07mg/million cycles. Particle analysis revealed that the majority of debris generated during the wearing in phase (0.5 million cycles) was <0.5μm in diameter. During the steady state phase (0.5–3 million cycles) a large peak in particle size was observed in the 2μm diameter range, whilst in the latter stage (3–5 million cycles) peaks in particle size were seen at 0.4μm and 2μm. During each stage, both the particle count and aspect ratio remained relatively unchanged. Conclusion. Under these test conditions the CFR-PEEK coupling demonstrated a linear and consistently low wear rate over the 5 million cycle test period, with the majority of particles generated being <2μm in diameter. The low wear rate and biocompatibility demonstrated by CFR-PEEK suggests it is a suitable alternative to silicone in PIP joint prostheses. Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank Zrinski AG, Christian Kaddick at EndoLab GmbH for the wear simulator work and Mark Yeoman at Continuum Blue Ltd. for particle analysis

In the time since Letournel popularised the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures, more than 25 years ago, there have been many changes within the field, related to patients, surgical technique, implants and post-operative care. However, the long-term outcomes appear largely unchanged. Does this represent stasis or have the advances been mitigated by other negative factors? In this article we have attempted to document the recent changes within the surgery of patients with a fracture involving the acetabulum, outline contemporary management, and identify the major problem areas where further research is most needed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1125–31

We retrospectively analysed the clinical results of 30 patients with injuries of the sternoclavicular joint at a minimum of 12 months’ follow-up. A closed reduction was attempted in 14 cases. It was successful in only five of ten dislocations, and failed in all four epiphyseal disruptions. A total of 25 patients underwent surgical reduction, in 18 cases in conjunction with a stabilisation procedure.

At a mean follow-up of 60 months, four patients were lost to follow-up. The functional results in the remainder were satisfactory, and 18 patients were able to resume their usual sports activity at the same level. There was no statistically significant difference between epiphyseal disruption and sternoclavicular dislocation (p > 0.05), but the functional scores (Simple Shoulder Test, Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand, and Constant scores) were better when an associated stabilisation procedure had been performed rather than reduction alone (p = 0.05, p = 0.04 and p = 0.07, respectively).

We recommend meticulous pre-operative clinical assessment with CT scans. In sternoclavicular dislocation managed within the first 48 hours and with no sign of mediastinal complication, a closed reduction can be attempted, although this was unsuccessful in half of our cases. A control CT scan is mandatory. In all other cases, and particularly if epiphyseal disruption is suspected, we recommend open reduction with a stabilisation procedure by costaclavicular cerclage or tenodesis. The use of a Kirschner wire should be avoided.