While hip arthroscopy utilization continues to increase, capsular management remains a controversial topic. Therefore the purpose of this research was to investigate the biomechanical effect of capsulotomy and capsular repair techniques on hip joint kinematics in varying combinations of sagittal and coronal joint positions. Eight fresh-frozen hemipelvises (4 left, 6 male) were dissected of all overlying soft tissue, with the exception of the hip joint capsule. The femur was potted and attached to a load cell, while the pelvis was secured to a custom-designed fixture allowing static alteration of the flexion/extension arc. Optotrak markers were rigidly attached to the femur and pelvis to track motion of the femoral head with respect to the acetabulum. Following specimen preparation, seven conditions were tested: i) intact, ii) after portal placement (anterolateral and mid-anterior), iii) interportal capsulotomy (IPC) [35 mm in length], iv) IPC repair, v)T-capsulotomy [15 mm longitudinal incision], vi) partial T-repair (vertical limb), vii) full T-repair. All conditions were tested in 15° of extension (−15˚), 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion. Additionally, all flexion angles were tested in neutral, as well as maximum abduction and adduction, resulting in 15 testing positions. 3Nm internal and external rotation moments were manually applied to the femur via the load cell at each position. Rotational range of motion and joint kinematics were recorded. IPC and T-capsulotomies increased rotational ROM and mediolateral (ML) joint translation in several different joint configurations, most notably from 0–30˚ in neutral abduction/adduction. Complete capsular repair restored near native joint kinematics, with no significant differences between any complete capsular repair groups and the intact state, regardless of joint position. An unrepaired IPC resulted in increased rotational ROM, but no other adverse translational kinematics. However, an unrepaired or partially repaired T-capsulotomy resulted in increased rotational ROM and ML translation. The results of this study show that complete capsular repair following interportal or T-capsulotomy adequately restores rotational ROM and joint translation to near intact levels. Where feasible, complete capsular closure should be performed, especially following T-capsulotomy. However, further clinical evaluation is required to determine if adverse kinematics of an unrepaired capsule are associated with patient reported outcomes

Hip arthroscopy rates continue to increase. As a result, there is growing interest in capsular management techniques. Without careful preservation and surgical techniques, failure of the repair result in capsular deficiency, contributing to iatrogenic instability and persistent post-operative pain. In this setting, capsular reconstruction may be indicated, however there is a paucity of objective evidence comparing surgical techniques to identify the optimal method. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of capsulectomy and two different capsular reconstruction techniques (iliotibial band [ITB] autograft and Achilles tendon allograft) on hip joint kinematics in both rotation and abduction/adduction. Eight paired fresh-frozen hemi-pelvises were dissected of all overlying soft tissue, with the exception of the hip joint capsule. The femur was potted and attached to a load cell connected to a joint-motion simulator, while the pelvis was secured to a custom-designed fixture allowing adjustment of the flexion-extension arc. Optotrak markers were rigidly attached to the femur and pelvis to track motion of the femoral head with respect to the acetabulum. Pairs were divided into ITB or Achilles capsular reconstruction. After specimen preparation, three conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) after capsulectomy, and (3) capsular reconstruction (ITB or Achilles). All conditions were tested in 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion. Internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) as well abduction (ABD) and adduction (ADD) moments of 3 N·m were applied to the femur via the load cell at each position. Rotational range of motion and joint kinematics were recorded. When a rotational force was applied the total magnitude of internal/external rotation was significantly affected by the condition of the capsule, independent of the type of reconstruction that was performed (p=0.001). The internal/external rotation increased significantly by approximately 8° following the capsulectomy (p<0.001) and this was not resolved by either of the reconstructions; there remained a significant difference between the intact and reconstruction conditions (p=0.035). The total anterior/posterior translation was significantly affected by the condition of the capsule (p=0.034). There was a significant increase from 6.7 (6.0) mm when the capsule was intact to 9.0 (6.7) mm following the capsulectomy (p=0.002). Both of the reconstructions (8.6 [5.6] mm) reduced the anterior/posterior translation closer to the intact state. There was no difference between the two reconstructions. When an abduction/adduction force was applied there was a significant increase in the medial-lateral translation between the intact and capsulectomy states (p=0.047). Across all three flexion angles the integrity of the native hip capsule played a significant role in rotational stability, where capsulectomy significantly increased rotational ROM. Hip capsule reconstruction did not restore rotational stability and also increased rotational ROM compared to the intact state a statistically significant amount. However, hip capsule reconstruction restored coronal and sagittal plane stability to approach that of the native hip. There was no difference in stability between ITB and Achilles reconstructions across all testing conditions

INTRODUCTION. Accurate knowledge of knee joint kinematics following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is critical for evaluating the functional performance of specific implant designs. Biplane fluoroscopy is currently the most accurate method for measuring 3D knee joint kinematics in vivo during daily activities such as walking. However, the relatively small imaging field of these systems has limited measurement of knee kinematics to only a portion of the gait cycle. We developed a mobile biplane X-ray (MoBiX) fluoroscopy system that enables concurrent tracking and imaging of the knee joint for multiple cycles of overground gait. The primary aim of the present study was to measure 6-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) knee joint kinematics for one complete cycle of overground walking. A secondary aim was to quantify the position of the knee joint centre of rotation (COR) in the transverse plane during TKA gait. METHODS. Ten unilateral posterior-stabilised TKA patients (5 females, 5 males) were recruited to the study. Each subject walked over ground at their self-selected speed (0.93±0.12 m/s). The MoBiX imaging system tracked and recorded biplane X-ray images of the knee, from which tibiofemoral kinematics were calculated using an image processing and pose-estimation pipeline created in MATLAB. Mean 6-DOF tibiofemoral joint kinematics were plotted against the mean knee flexion angle for one complete cycle of overground walking. The joint COR in the transverse plane was calculated as the least squares intersection of the femoral flexion axis projected onto the tibial tray during the stance and swing phases. The femoral and tibial axes and 6-DOF kinematics were defined in accordance with the convention defined by Grood and Suntay in 1983. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The offset in secondary joint motions at a given flexion angle was greater at larger knee flexion angles than at smaller flexion angles for abduction, anterior drawer, and lateral shift, whereas the opposite was true for external rotation. Significant variability was observed between subjects for the COR. The mean COR was on the lateral side during stance, consistent with results reported in the literature for the intact knee. Interestingly, the mean COR was on the medial side during swing. CONCLUSIONS. Our results suggest that secondary joint motions in the TKA knee, specifically, external rotation, abduction, anterior drawer and lateral shift, are determined not only by implant geometry and ligament anatomy but also by external loading, and are therefore task-dependent. The mean COR in the transverse plane shifted from the lateral to the medial side of the knee as the leg transitioned from stance to swing. Mobile dynamic X-ray imaging is a valuable tool for evaluating the functional performance of knee implants during locomotion over ground

Introduction. Joint kinematics following total knee replacement (TKR) is important as it affects joint loading, joint functionality, implant wear and ultimately patient comfort and satisfaction. It is believed that restoring the natural motion of the joint (such as the screw-home mechanism) with a medial pivot knee implant will improve clinical outcomes. Daily activities such as stair climbing and stair descent are among the most difficult tasks for these patients. This study analysed dynamic knee joint motion after implantation of a medial pivot knee implant using fluoroscopy during stair ascent and descent activity. Methods. Ethics approval was granted by Macquarie University to undertake fluoroscopic testing. Four patients who had undergone a TKR were asked to participate in the study. All patients were operated by a single surgeon (JS) and were implanted with a medial pivot knee prosthesis (Sphere, Medacta International). Participants were tested at the 12 month post-operative time- point. Participants were asked to step up or down a short stair-case at a comfortable self-selected speed. Fluroscopic images were taken using a flat panel Artis Zeego (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen) angiography system during the dynamic activity. Images were processed using Joint Track Auto (Banks, University of Florida), whereby the specific femoral and tibial component CAD files were superimposed onto the fluoroscopic images, ensuring an optimised match to the outlined components. Joint kinematics were calculated using custom written code in Matlab 2017a. Results. The average maximum flexion angle during stair ascent was 64° at the time when the foot had touched the step. The average minimum flexion angle during this activity was 7.9°. On average, the tibia externally rotated relative to the femur by 3.6° as the knee extended. During stair descent the average flexion angle changed from a minimum of 4.3° of flexion to a maximum of 29.3° of flexion. The average change in internal rotation between 10° flexion and 25° flexion was 1.05°. Conclusion. The stair ascent activity showed the joint to undergo the natural screw-home mechanism motion; experiencing 4° of internal rotation over a 57° flexion angle range. The stair descent activity exhibited a lower level of internal- external rotation. This may be due to a smaller flexion angle range during this activity as well other mechanisms such as motion adaptation of the patient when descending stairs, not related to implant design

Knowledge of joint kinematics in the lower limb is important for understanding joint injuries and diseases and evaluating treatment outcomes. However, limited information is available about the joint kinematics required for high flexion activities necessary for floor sitting life style. In this study, the hip and knee joint kinematics of ten healthy male and ten healthy female subjects were investigated using an electromagnetic motion tracking system. We measured the hip and knee joints' functions moving into 1) kneeling on knees with legs parallel without using arms, 2) kneeling on knees with legs parallel with using arms, 3) kneeling on knees with one foot forward without using arms, 4) cross-legged sitting, 5) kneeling with legs to the side, 6) sitting with legs stretched out, and 7) deep squatting, and moving out of the above seven conditions. Conditions 1) through 3) were Japanese seiza style. On conditions 4) through 7), arms were not used. We further measured the functions of putting on and taking off a sock under such conditions as 8) with standing position and 9) sitting position (Fig 1). Here special attention was paid for flexion and extension motion. The data were used to produce the pattern of joint angulation against the percentage of the cycle for each individual conducting each activity. The kinematic curves were split into 3 phases: moving into the rest position, the rest position and out of the rest position. It should be noted that the moving into and the rest phases were split at the moment when the peak value was determined during the moving into phase. Thus the initiation of the rest phase on the curve was not coinciding with the moment the subject reached at the rest position. This was necessary in order not for the mean kinematic curve to become too dull in shape. Same was true when the end of rest phase was determined. The maximum hip and knee joint angles during the cycle were determined. Further a relationship between the hip and knee joint excursions were investigated. The results indicated condition 8) requires the maximum flexion angles to the hip among all conditions, 157.5 ± 20.4° and condition 3) to the knee joint, 157.1 ± 10.0° respectively (Fig 2). The results also indicated in many activities, the maximum joint angles were recorded not during the rest phase but during the moving into or out of phase. In any conditions even including donning on and off a sock, a strong relationship was found between the hip and knee joints motion (Fig 3), indicating the bi-articular muscles' co-contraction during the sit to stand activities. The data presented in this study will increase the knowledge of high-flexion needs especially in non-Western cultures and provide an initial characterization of the prosthesis kinematics in high flexion

Introduction. Conventional pre-operative planning for total hip arthroplasty mostly relies on the patient radiologic anatomy for the positioning and choice of implants. This kind of planning essentially remains a static approach since dynamic aspects such as the joint kinematics are not taken into account. Hence, clinicians are not able to fully consider the evolving behavior of the prosthetic joint that may lead to implant failures. In fact, kinematics plays an important role since some movement may create conflicts within the prosthetic joint and even provoke dislocations. The goal of our study was to assess the relationship between acetabular implant positioning variations and resultant impingements and loss of joint congruence during daily activities. In order to obtain accurate hip joint kinematics for simulation, we performed an in-vivo study using optical motion capture and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods. Motion capture and MRI was carried out on 4 healthy volunteers (mean age, 28 years). Motion from the subjects was acquired during routine (stand-to-sit, lie down) and specific activities (lace the shoes while seated, pick an object on the floor while seated or standing) known to be prone to implant dislocation and impingement. The hip joint kinematics was computed from the recorded markers trajectories using a validated optimized fitting algorithm (accuracy: translational error ≍ 0.5 mm, rotational error < 3°) which accounted for skin motion artifactsand patient-specific anatomical constraints (e.g. bone geometry reconstructed from MRI, hip joint center) (Fig. 1). 3D models of prosthetic hip joints (pelvis, proximal femur, cup, stem, head) were developed based on variations of acetabular cup's inclination (40°, 45°, 60°) and anteversion (0°, 15°, 30°) parameters, resulting in a total of 9 different implant configurations. Femoral anteversion remained fixed and determined as “neutral” with the stem being parallel to the posterior cortex of the femoral neck. Motion capture data of daily tasks were applied to all implant configurations. While visualizing the prosthetic models in motion, a collision detection algorithm was used to locate abnormal contacts between both bony and prosthetic components (Fig. 2). Moreover, femoral head translations (subluxation) were computed to evaluate the joint congruence. Results. Simulations showed collisions occurring at maximal ranges of motion in the anterosuperior part of the acetabulum. Both prosthetic and bony impingements were observed, especially while lacing shoes and lying down. The more the inclination and anteversion were important, the lower the frequency of impingements was noted (e.g. 23% at 40°/0°, 13% at 45°/15°, 5% at 60°/30°). Subluxations followed the same trend (e.g. 4.0 mm at 40°/0°, 1.5 mm at 45°/15°, 0.2 mm at 60°/30°). They occurred in a posterior direction as a consequence of impingements. Conclusion. Daily tasks could expose the prosthetic hip to subluxation and impingement located in anterosuperior position. This location could be explained by the high hip flexion required to execute the motions (≥ 95°). Considering the kinematics solely, increasing inclination and anteversion seems to decrease possible conflicts, but mechanical aspects (stress, wear) should also be considered in the definition of ideal cup positioning

Distal radius fractures are the most common fracture of the upper extremity. Malunion of the distal radius is a common clinical problem after these injuries and frequently leads to pain, stiffness loss of strength and functional impairments. Currently, there is no consensus as to whether not the mal-aligned distal radius has an effect on carpal kinematics of the wrist. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of dorsal angulation (DA) of the distal radius on midcarpal and radiocarpal joint kinematics, and their contributions to total wrist motion. A passive wrist motion simulator was used to test six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (age: 67 ± 17yrs). The specimens were amputated at mid humerus, leaving all wrist flexor and extensor tendons and ligamentous structures intact. Tone loads were applied to the wrist flexor and extensor tendons by pneumatic actuators via stainless steel cables. A previously developed distal radius implant was used to simulate native alignment and three DA deformity scenarios (DA 10 deg, 20 deg, and 30 deg). Specimens were rigidly mounted into the simulator with the elbow at 90 degrees of flexion, and guided through a full range of flexion and extension passive motion trials (∼5deg/sec). Carpal motion was captured using optical tracking; radiolunate and capitolunate joint motion was measured and evaluated. For the normally aligned radius, radiolunate joint motion predominated in flexion, contributing on average 65.4% (±3.4). While the capitolunate joint motion predominated in extension, contributing on 63.8% (±14.0). Increasing DA resulted in significant alterations in radiolunate and capitolunate joint kinematics (p<0.001). There was a reduction of contribution from the capitolunate joint to total wrist motion throughout flexion-extension, significant from 5 degrees of wrist extension to full extension (p = 0.024). Conversely, the radiolunate joint increased its contribution to motion with increasing DA; significant from 5 degrees of wrist extension to full extension as the radiolunate and capitolunate joint kinematics mirrored each other. A DA of 30 degrees resulted in an average radiolunate contribution of 72.6% ± 7.7, across the range of motion of 40 degrees of flexion to 25 degrees of extension. The results of our study for the radius in a normal anatomic alignment are consistent with prior investigators, showing the radiocarpal joint dominated flexion, and the midcarpal joint dominated extension; with an average 60/40 division in contributions for the radiocarpal in flexion and the midcarpal in extension, respectfully. As DA increased, the radiocarpal joint provided a larger contribution of motion throughout flexion and extension. This alteration in carpal kinematics with increased distal radius dorsal angulation may increase localised stresses and perhaps lead to accelerated joint wear and wrist pain in patients with malunited distal radial fractures

Introduction. Joint mechanics and implant performance have been shown to be sensitive to ligament properties [1]. Computational models have helped establish this understanding, where optimization is typically used to estimate ligament properties for recreation of physically measured specimen-specific kinematics [2]. If available, contact metrics from physical tests could be used to improve the robustness and validity of these predictions. Understanding specimen-specific relationships between joint kinematics, contact metrics, and ligament properties could further highlight factors affecting implant survivorship and patient satisfaction. Instrumented knee implants offer a means to measure joint contact data both in-vivo and intra-operatively, and can also be used in a controlled experimental environment. This study extends on previous work presented at ISTA [3], and the purpose here was to evaluate the use of instrumented implant contact metrics during optimization of ligament properties for two specimens. The overarching goal of this work is to inform clinical joint balancing techniques and identify factors that are critical to implant performance. Methods. Total knee arthroplasties were performed on 4 (two specimens modeled) cadeveric specimens by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon. An instrumented trial implant (VERASENSE, OrthoSensor, Inc., Dania Beach, FL) was used in place of a standard insert. Experimentation was performed using a simVITROTM controlled robotic musculoskeletal simulator (Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) to apply intra-operative style loading and measure tibiofemoral kinematics. Three successive laxity style tests were performed at 10° knee flexion: anterior-posterior force (±100 N), varus-valgus moment (±5 Nm), and internal-external moment (±3 Nm). Tibiofemoral kinematics and instrumented implant contact metrics were measured throughout testing (Fig. 1). Specimen-specific finite element models were developed for two of the tested specimens and solved using Abaqus/Explicit (Dassault Systèmes). Relevant ligaments and rigid bone geometries were defined using specimen-specific MRIs. Virtual implantation was achieved using registration and each ligament was modeled as a set of nonlinear elastic springs (Fig. 1). Stiffness values were adopted from the literature [2] while the ligament slack lengths served as control variables during optimization. The objective was to minimize the root mean square difference between VERASENSE measured tibiofemoral contact metrics and the corresponding model results (Fig. 1). Results and Discussion. The models for both specimens successfully recreated joint kinematics with average errors less than 4° in rotations, and 3 mm in translations (not shown). Minus a systematic offset in θ for specimen 3, AFD and θ contact kinematics also realized good agreement for both specimens (Fig. 2). Contact forces were generally over-predicted, though both specimens recreated the experimental trends (Fig. 2). The present work shows continued progress towards simulation based tools that can be used for both research and to support the clinical decision making process. A separate ISTA submission presents assessment of these model's predictive capacity, while future work will evaluate additional specimens, and explore the sensitivity to uncertainties in experimental and modeling parameters. Acknowledgements. This work was supported by Orthosensor Inc. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction. Surgeons performing a total knee replacement (TKR) have two available techniques available to help them achieve the proper bone resections and ligament tension – gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR). GB relies on balancing ligaments prior to bony resections whereas bony resections are made based on anatomical landmarks in MR. Many studies have been done to compare the joint kinematics between the two techniques, however the results have been varied. These studies were not done with anatomically designed prostheses. The Journey II (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) is one such design which attempts to mimic the normal knee joint structure to return more natural kinematics to the joint, with emphasis on eliminating both paradoxical anterior motion and reduced posterior femoral rollback. Given the design differences between anatomical and non-anatomical prostheses, it is important to investigate whether one technique provides superior kinematics when an anatomical design is used. We hypothesize that there will be no difference between the two techniques. Methods. A total of 56 individuals were recruited to receive a Journey II prosthesis and randomized evenly to groups where the GB technique or MR technique is used. For all patients in the study, a series of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) images were acquired at 3-months post-operatively at different knee flexion angles, ranging in 20° increments from 0° to 120°. Model-based RSA software (RSACore, Leiden, Netherlands) was used to obtain the 3D positions and orientations of the femoral and tibial implant components, which were in turn used to obtain kinematic measures (contact locations and magnitude of excursion) for each condyle. Results. Preliminary results for the anterior-posterior (AP) contact locations from 33 patients (18 GB, 15 MR) are displayed in Figure 1. There were no significant differences in medial and lateral contact locations between the GB and MR groups for all angles of flexion. However, the pattern of medial contact for the MR technique displays more paradoxical anterior motion at mid-flexion (40°–60°) than the GB group. There were no significant differences in magnitude of excursion between groups on both medial (mean difference=1.96 mm, p=0.16) and lateral (mean difference=0.21 mm, p=0.79) condyles, indicating that posterior femoral rollback is similar between groups. Conclusions. Early results suggest that the MR technique is associated with slightly more abnormal kinematics than the GB technique when an anatomical prosthesis design is used for TKR. The GB technique may be more appropriate than MR technique for implanting anatomically designed knee replacements. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Providing proper rotational alignment of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty is mandatory to achieve correct kinematics, good ligament balance and proper patellar tracking. Recently functional references, like the function flexion axis (FFA), have been introduced to achieve this goal. Several studies reported the benefits of using the FFA but highlighted that further analyses are required to better verify the FFA applicability to the general clinical practice. Starting from the hypothesis that the FFA can thoroughly describe knee kinematics but that the joint kinematics itself can be different from flexion to extension movements, the purpose of this study was to analyse which factors could affect the FFA estimation by separately focusing on flexion and extension movements. Methods. Anatomical acquisitions and passive joint kinematics were acquired on 79 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using a commercial navigation system. Knee functional axis was estimated, from three flexion and extension movements separately acquired included in a range between 0° and 120°. For flexion and extension, in both pre- and post-implant conditions, internal-external (IE) rotations was analysed to track any changes in kinematic pattern, whereas differences in FFA estimation were identified by analysing the angle between the FFA itself and the transepicondylar axis (TEA) in axial and frontal plane. Results. The analysis of IE rotation (Figure 1) showed a statistically significant difference between the two paths in pre-implant condition, between 25°and 35° of flexion (p < 0.05). The analysis of the angle between FFA and TEA showed statistical differences between flexion and extension (Figure 2) in both pre- and post-implant conditions and in both frontal and axial plane. Analogously, pre- and post-operative conditions (Figure 3) presented statistically significant difference. Conclusions. The estimation of the functional axis changed in the frontal plane in relation to flexion and extension movements, above all considering pre-operative conditions. Therefore from a clinical point of view this study suggested to consider the only flexion movement for functional axis estimation during navigated TKA

Introduction. Untreated hip osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition leading to pain, bone deformation, and limited range of motion. Unfortunately, studies have not been conducted under in vivo conditions to determine progressive kinematics variations to a hip joint from normal to pre-operative and post-operative THA conditions. Therefore, the objective was this study was to quantify normal and degenerative hip kinematics, compared to post-operative hip kinematics. Methods. Twenty unique subjects were analyzed; 10 healthy, normal subjects and 10 degenerative, subjects analyzed pre-operatively and then again post-operatively after receiving a THA. During each assessment, the subject performed a gait (stance and swing phase) activity under mobile, fluoroscopic surveillance. The normal and diseased subjects had CT scans in order to acquire bone geometry while implanted subjects had corresponding CAD models supplied. Femoral head and acetabular cup centers were approximated by spheres based on unique geometries while the component centers were pre-defined as the center of mass. These centers were used to compare femoral head sliding magnitudes on the acetabular cup during the activity for all subjects. Subjects were noted to have separation with changes in center magnitudes of more than 1 mm during gait. Utilizing 3D-to-2D registration techniques, the hip joint kinematics were derived and assessed. This allowed for visualization of normal subject positioning, pre-op bone deterioration, and implant placement within the bones. Results. None of the normal, experienced femoral head sliding (FHS) within the acetabulum. Two of the normal subjects revealed tendencies more similar to a degenerative hip. However, 4/10 of the degenerative subjects saw significant FHS with an average maximum of 1.344 0.522 mm. It was interesting to note that none of the implanted subjects experienced FHS, demonstrating improved kinematic trends more normal-like and revealing better kinematic patterns post-operative compared to their pre-operative conditions. Discussion. Overall, analysis has revealed trends of degenerative hips experiencing more abnormal hip kinematics due to lower surface area and greater magnitudes of femoral center head displacement. The implanted subjects saw decreased amounts of displacement which correlated to increases in contact area. These results more closely matched normal hip kinematics and showed an improvement over their diseased condition. It seems that the surgeon in this study better replicated the stem version angle to the pre-operative conditions, leaving less transverse stress of the femoral head on the acetabular cup, possibly leading to the femoral head remaining within the acetabular cup and the subjects not experiencing FHS. Significance. Pre-operative, degenerative hip subjects displayed abnormal femoral hip displacement at greater magnitudes to normal hip subjects. After THA, these subjects saw reduced magnitudes of displacement more in line with normal hip kinematics. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

During total knee replacement (TKR), knee surgical navigation systems (KSNS) report in real time relative motion data between the tibia and the femur from the patient under anaesthesia, in order to identify best possible locations for the corresponding prosthesis components. These systems are meant to support the surgeon for achieving the best possible replication of natural knee motion, compatible with the prosthesis design and the joint status, in the hope that this kinematics under passive condition will be then the same during the daily living activities of the patient. Particularly, by means of KSNS, knee kinematics is tracked in the original arthritic joint at the beginning of the operation, intra-operatively after adjustments of bone cuts and trial components implantation, and after final components implantation and cementation. Rarely the extent to which the kinematics in the latter condition is then replicated during activity is analysed. As for the assessment of the active motion performance, the most accurate technique for the in-vivo measurements of replaced joint kinematics is three-dimensional video-fluoroscopy. This allows joint motion tracking under typical movements and loads of daily living. The general aim of this study is assessing the capability of the current KSNS to predict replaced joint motion after TKR. Particularly, the specific objective is to compare, for a number of patients implanted with two different TKR prosthesis component designs, knee kinematics obtained intra-operatively after final component implantation measured by means of KSNS with that assessed post-operatively at the follow-up by means of three-dimensional video-fluoroscopy. Thirty-one patients affected by primary gonarthrosis were implanted with a fixed bearing posterior-stabilized TKR design, either the Journey® (JOU; Smith&Nephew, London, UK) or the NRG® (Stryker®-Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ-USA). All implantations were performed by means of a KSNS (Stryker®-Leibinger, Freiburg, Germany), utilised to track and store joint kinematics intra-operatively immediately after final component implantation (INTRA-OP). Six months after TKR, the patients were followed for clinical assessment and three-dimensional video fluoroscopy (POST-OP). Fifteen of these patients, 8 with the JOU and 7 with the NRG, gave informed consent and these were analyzed. At surgery (INTRA-OP), a spatial tracker of the navigation system was attached through two bi-cortical 3 mm thick Kirschner wires to the distal femur and another to the proximal tibia. The conventional navigation procedure recommended in the system manual was performed to calculate the preoperative deformity including the preoperative lower limb alignment, to perform the femoral and tibial bone cuts, and to measure the final lower limb alignment. All these assessment were calculated with respect to the initial anatomical survey, the latter being based on calibrations of anatomical landmarks by an instrumented pointer. Patients were then analysed (POST-OP) by three-dimensional video-fluoroscopy (digital remote-controlled diagnostic Alpha90SX16; CAT Medical System, Rome-Italy) at 10 frames per second during chair rising-sitting, stair climbing, and step up-down. A technique based on CAD-model shape matching was utilised for obtaining three-dimensional pose of the prosthesis components. Between the two techniques, the kinematics variables analysed for the comparison were the three components of the joint rotation (being the relative motion between the tibial and femoral components represented using a standard joint convention, the translation of the line through the medial and lateral contact points (being these points assumed to be where the minimum distance between the femoral condyles and the tibial baseplate is observed) on the tibial baseplate and the corresponding pivot point, and the location of the instantaneous helical axes with the corresponding mean helical axis and pivot point. In all patients and in both conditions, physiological ranges of flexion (from −5° to 120°), and ab-adduction (±5°) were observed. Internal-external rotation patterns are different between the two prostheses, with a more central pivoting in NRG and medial pivoting in JOU, as expected by the design. Restoration of knee joint normal kinematics was demonstrated also by the coupling of the internal rotation with flexion, as well as by the roll-back and screw-home mechanisms, observed somehow both in INTRA- and POST-OP measurements. Location of the mean helical axis and pivot point, both from the contact lines and helical axes, were very consistent over time, i.e. after six months from intervention and in fully different conditions. Only one JOU and one NRG patient had the pivot point location POST-OP different from that INTRA-OP, despite cases of paradoxical translation. In all TKR knees analysed, a good restoration of normal joint motion was observed, both during operation and at the follow-up. This supports the general efficacy of the surgery and of both prosthesis designs. Particularly, the results here reported show a good consistency of the measurements over time, no matter these were taken in very different joint conditions and by means of very different techniques. Intra-operative kinematics therefore does matter, and must be taken into careful consideration for the implantation of the prosthesis components. Joint kinematics should be tracked accurately during TKR surgery, and for this purpose KSNS seem to offer a very good support. These systems not only supports in real time the best possible alignment of the prosthesis components, but also make a reliable prediction of the motion performance of the replaced joint. Additional analyses will be necessary to support this with a statistical power, and to identify the most predicting parameters among the many kinematics variables here analysed preliminarily

Introduction. Hip osteoarthritis can be debilitating, often leading to pain, poor kinematics and limiting range of motion. While the in vivo kinematics of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) are well documented, there is limited information pertaining to the kinematics of native, non-arthritic (normal) hips and degenerative hips requiring a THA. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the in vivo kinematics of the normal hip with pre-operative, degenerative hips and post-operative THA. Methods. Twenty subjects, ten having a normal hip and ten having a pre-operative, degenerative hip that were analyzed before surgery and then post-operatively after receiving a THA. Each subject was asked to perform gait while under mobile fluoroscopic surveillance. Normal and pre-operative degenerative subjects underwent a CT scan so that 3D models of their femur and pelvis could be created. Using 3D-to-2D registration techniques, the hip joint kinematics were derived and assessed. Femoral head and acetabular cup rotational centers were derived using spheres. The centers of these spheres were used to obtain the femoral head sliding distance on the acetabular cup during the activity. The patient-specific reference femoral head values were obtained from the subjects’ CT scans in a non-weight bearing situation. Results. Overall, 0% of the normal subjects experienced femoral head sliding (FHS) within the acetabulum, and 33% of the degenerative subjects experienced FHS. The degenerative hips experienced an average maximum sliding of 0.902 ± 0.864 mm. Further evaluation seems to indicate that the femoral head ligament played a significant role in hip separation. If this ligament was not functioning, it appeared that the femoral head experienced more abnormal motion. Therefore, degenerative hip subjects having an intact femoral head ligament did not experience femoral head sliding of their femoral head within the acetabulum. A further analysis was then conducted to assess the contact area between femoral head and acetabular cup (Figure 1). After THA implantation, subjects experienced greater abnormal hip motion leading to hip separation. Discussion. Overall, our current analysis has revealed trends that degenerative hips experience more abnormal hip kinematics that lead to higher bearing surface forces and stresses. It was interesting to note that the intact femoral head ligament did stabilize the hip joint leading to no femoral head sliding. Therefore, further research needs to be conducted to determine the role of the femoral head ligament and degeneration of the hip joint. Also, it is worth noting that the maximum displacement usually occurs during swing phase of the gait, just before heel-strike for degenerative hips, similar to total hip arthroplasty, evaluated in previous fluoroscopic studies. Further investigation is being conducted to evaluate component placement for the THA subjects, comparing their motion pre and post-operatively

Background. The current use of a spherical prosthetic humeral head in total shoulder arthroplasty results in an imprecise restoration of the native geometry and improper placement of the center of rotation, maintained in a constant position, in comparison to the native head and regardless of glenoid component conformity. A radially-mismatched spherical head to allow gleno-humeral translation is a trade-off that decreases the contact area on the glenoid component, which may cause glenoid component wear. This finding suggests that the use of a non-spherical head with a more conforming glenoid component may reduce the risk of glenoid component wear by allowing gleno-humeral translation while increasing the contact area. A non-spherical prosthetic head more accurately replicates the head shape, rotational range of motion and gleno-humeral joint kinematics than a spherical prosthetic head, compared with the native humeral head. The combination of inversion of the bearing materials with the non-spherical configuration of the humeral head may thus decrease polyethylene wear. Aim of the present study is to evaluate in vitro wear behaviour of an all-polyethylene elliptical humeral head component against a metallic glenoid component in an anatomic configuration. Material and methods. The prosthetic components tested are from the Mirai. ®. Modular Shoulder System by Permedica S.p.A.. The prosthetic bearing components were tested in their anatomic configuration: the humeral head rubbing against the glenoid inlay, assembled over the glenoid base-plate. The glenoid insert is made of Ti6Al4V alloy coated with TiNbN. The glenoid insert, as the glenoid base-plate have the same shape which reproduce the native shape of the glenoid. Moreover, the glenoid insert has a concave articular surface described by two different radii on orthogonal planes. The vitamin E-blended UHMWPE humeral head is not spherical but elliptic-shaped with an articular surface described by two different profiles in sagittal and coronal plane. The component sizes combination tested have the greatest radial mismatches allowed between humeral head and glenoid insert. The test was performed up to 2.5 million of cycles applying a constant axial load of 756 N. Results. After 2.500.000 cycles the mean mass loss from the humeral head was 0.68 mg. The mean wear rate of the humeral head was 0.28 mg/Mc (SD 0.45 mg/Mc). The surface of the humeral heads showed an elliptical worn area with matt and polished areas with scratching. The surface of the TiNbN-coated glenoid insert counterparts did not show wear signs. Conclusion. The tested prosthetic humeral head has a non-spherical shape with an elliptical base and 2 different radii on sagittal and coronal plane. Also the tested glenoid insert has 2 different radii on sagittal and coronal planes. This components geometry leads to a radial mismatch between head and glenoid on sagittal and coronal planes. A different kinematics, allowing gleno-humeral translation while increasing the contact area, radial mismatch in different planes and the inversion of bearing materials may have a role in reducing component wear and may explain the extremely low wear rate found in the present study

Introduction. Total-knee-arthroplasty (TKA) is used to restore knee function and is a well-established treatment of osteoarthritis. Along with the widely used fixed bearing TKA design, some surgeons opt to use mobile bearing designs. The mobile-bearing TKA is believed to allow for more freedom in placement of the tibial plate, greater range of motion in internal-external (IE) rotation and greater constraint through the articular surface. This current study evaluates 1) the kinematics of a high constraint three condyle mobile bearing TKA, 2) the insert rotation relative to the tibia, and 3) compares them with the intact knee joint kinematics during laxity tests and activities-of-daily-living (lunge, level walking, stairs down). We hypothesize that 1) in contrast to the intact state the anterior-posterior (AP) stability of the implanted joint increases when increasing compression level while 2) maintaining the IE mobility, and that 3) the high constraint does not prevent differential femorotibial rollback during lunge. Methods. Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric knee joints with a mean donor age of 64.5 (±2.4) years and BMI of 23.3 (±7.3) were tested on a robot (KR140, KUKA) in two different states: 1) intact, 2) after implantation of a three condyle mobile bearing TKA. The tibia plateau and the insert of each tested specimen were equipped with a sensor to measure the insert rotation during testing. Laxity tests were done at extension and under flexion (15°, 30°, 45°, 60° 90°, 120°) by applying subsequent forces in AP and medial-lateral (ML) of ±100N and moments in IE and varus-valgus (VV) rotation (6Nm/4Nm, 12 Nm/-). Testing was performed under low (44N) and weight bearing compression (500N). Loading during the lunge, level walking and stairs descent activity was based on in-vivo data. Resulting data was averaged and compared with the kinematics of the intact knee. Results. Increasing the joint compression resulted in a 90% reduced AP laxity (increased stability) for the implanted case while the intact knee laxity stayed similar. In high compression the implanted IE mobility was reduced by 45% for low and mid flexion angles and by 20% for high flexion angles, while the intact knee IE mobility was reduced by 30% at low and mid flexion and 20% at high flexion. The trend of the rollback behaviour was similar for the implanted and intact joints and showed higher lateral than medial rollback (Figure 3 A). The average insert-rotation was highest during level walking (+ 5° to −2.5°) and lowest during lunge (−3.5° to 2.5° over flexion). Conclusion. The established hypotheses were supported by the above listed results. Increasing the joint compression in the mobile bearing design stabilized the knee in the AP direction and maintained the IE mobility similar to the intact knee. This can be directly related to the design of the TKA articular surface, which has a high impact on constraint as soon as the joint is loaded. However, the high constraint of the TKA did not prevent differential rollback

During the preoperative examination, surgeons determine whether a patient, with a degenerative hip, is a candidate for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although research studies have been conducted to investigate in vivo kinematics of degenerative hips using fluoroscopy, surgeons do not have assessment tools they can use in their practice to further understand patient assessment. Ideally, if a surgeon could have a theoretical tool that efficiently allows for predictive post-operative assessment after virtual surgery and implantation, they would have a better understanding of joint conditions before surgery. The objectives of this study were (1) to use a validated forward solution hip model to theoretically predict the in vivo kinematics of degenerative hip joints, gaining a better understanding joint conditions leading to THA and (2) compare the predicted kinematic patterns with those derived using fluoroscopy for each subject. A theoretical model, previously evaluated using THA kinematics and telemetry, was used for this study, incorporating numerous muscles and ligaments, including the quadriceps, hamstring, gluteus, iliopsoas, tensor fasciae latae, an adductor muscle groups, and hip capsular ligaments. Ten subjects having a pre-operative degenerative hip were asked to perform gait while under surveillance using a mobile fluoroscopy unit. The hip joint kinematics for ten subjects were initially assessed using in vivo fluoroscopy, and then compared to the predicted kinematics determined using the model. Further evaluations were then conducted varying implanted component position to assess variability. The fluoroscopic evaluation revealed that 33% of the degenerative hips experienced abnormal hip kinematics known as “hip separation” where the femoral head slides within the acetabulum, resulting in a decrease in contact area. Interestingly, the mathematical model produced similar kinematic profiles, where the femoral head was sliding within the acetabulum (Figure 1). During swing phase, it was determined that this femoral head sliding (FHS) is caused by hip capsular laxity resulting in reducing joint tension. At the point of maximum velocity of the foot, the momentum of the lower leg becomes too great for capsule to properly constrain the hip, leading to the femoral component pistoning outwards. During stance phase, kinematics of degenerative hips were similar to kinematics of a THA subject with mal-positioning of the acetabular cup. Further evaluation revealed that if the cup was placed at a position other than its native, anatomical center, abnormal forces and torques acting within the joint lead to the femoral component sliding within the acetabular cup. It was hypothesized that in degenerative hips, similar to THA, the altered center of rotation is a leading influence of FHS (Figure 2). The theoretical model has now been validated for subjects having a THA and degenerative subjects. The model has successfully derived kinematic patterns similar to subjects evaluated using fluoroscopy. The results in this study revealed that altering the native joint center is the most influential factor leading to FHS, or more commonly known as hip separation. A new module for the mathematical model is being implemented to simulate virtual surgery so that the surgery can pre- operatively plan and then simulate post-operative results

Due to technology advancement, many studies have reported on in-vivo human knee kinematics recently (Dannis, 2005; Moro-oka, 2008; Tashman, 2003; Koo, 2008). This abstract summarized the joint kinematics during three motions usually seen in our daily living, i.e. gait, step-up (stair ascending) and single-legged lunge that was measured using a combined dual-fluoroscopic imaging system and MRI based modeling technique (Li, 2008). Cartilage contacts or condylar motion using transepicondylar axis (TEA)/geometric center axis (GCA) were used to describe the motion characters of the knee during these motions. In the treadmill gait, the movement of the medial femoral condyle along the anteroposterior direction was significantly greater than that of the lateral femoral condyle during the stance phase using either TEA (9.7 ± 0.7 mm vs. 4.0 ± 1.7 mm, respectively; p < 0.01; Fig. 1A) or GCA (17.4 ± 2.0 mm vs. 7.4 ± 6.1 mm, respectively; p < 0.01; Fig. 1B). A “lateral-pivoting” of the knee was observed (Kozanek, 2009). In the step-up motion, both medial and lateral contact points moved anteriorly on the tibial articular surfaces along the step-up motion path. The contact points on the medial and lateral tibial plateau moved anteriorly (13.5 ± 3.2 mm vs. 10.7 ± 5.0 mm, respectively; p > 0.05; Fig. 2A) with knee extension. Using the TEA (Fig. 2B), the femoral condylar motions presented a similar pattern as the contact points; nonetheless, using the GCA (Fig. 2C), the femoral condylar motion pattern was dramatically different. The medial condyle moved anteriorly, while the lateral condyle shifted posteriorly. However, none of them showed a significant pivoting phenomenon (Li, 2013). In the single-legged lunge, both medial and lateral contact points moved similarly before 120° of knee flexion, but the lateral contact moved posteriorly and significantly more than the medial compartment in high flexion (1.9 ± 2.1 mm vs. 4.8 ± 2 mm, respectively; p < 0.05). The single-legged lunge didn't show a single motion pattern (Fig. 3) (Qi, 2013). These data provide baseline knowledge for the understanding of normal physiological function of the knee during gait, step-up and lunge activities. The findings of these studies demonstrated that knee joint kinematics is activity-dependent and indicated that the knee joint motions could not be described using a single motion character such as “medial-pivoting” that has recently been popularized in total knee arthroplasty design areas

INTRODUCTION. In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the effectiveness of the mechanical alignment (MA) within 0°±3° has been recently questioned. A novel implantation approach, i.e. the kinematic alignment (KA), emerged recently, this being based on the pre-arthritic lower-limb alignment. In KA, the trans-cylindrical axis is used as the reference, instead of the trans-epicondylar one, for femoral component alignment. This axis is defined as the line passing through the centres of the posterior femoral condyles modeled as cylinders. Recently, patient specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced in TKA as an alternative to conventional instrumentation. This provides a tool for preoperative implant planning also via KA. Particularly, KA using PSI seems to be more effective in restoring normal joint kinematics and muscle activity. The purpose of this study was to report preliminarily joint kinematic and electromyography results of two patient groups operated via conventional MA or KA, the latter using PSI. PATIENT AND METHODS. Twenty patients recruited for TKA were implanted with Triathlon® prosthesis (Stryker®-Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ-USA). Seventeen patients, eleven operated targeting MA using the convention instrumentation (group A) and six targeting KA (group B) using PSI (Stryker®-Orthopaedics), were assessed at 6 month follow-up clinically via IKSS and biomechanically. Knee kinematics during stair-climbing, chair-rising, and extension-against-gravity were evaluated using three-dimensional mono-planar video-fluoroscopy (CAT® Medical-System, Monterotondo, Italy) synchronised with electromyography (Wave-Wireless, Cometa®, Milan, Italy). Component pose was reconstructed to calculate knee flexion/extension (FE), ad/abduction (AA), internal/external-rotation (IE), together with the rotation of the contact-line (CLR), i.e. line connecting the medial (MCP) and lateral (LCP) tibio-femoral contact points. MCP and LCP antero-posterior translations were calculated and reported in percentage (%) of the tibial base-plate length. RESULTS. Postoperative clinical scores were better in group B. Knee/functional scores were 78±20/80±23 in group A and 91±12/90±15 in group B. AA range was found smaller than 3°, and physiological ranges of FE and IE were found in both groups. From extension to flexion, MCP translations were all anterior of about 13.8±5.6% anterior, 17.0±6.6% posterior and 15.4±6.6.9% posterior in group A, and 13.0±3.4%, 16.6±5.3% and 16.6±5.6% in group B; corresponding values for LCP were all posterior of about 9.5±3.6%, 11.1±4.3% and 8.7±2.6% in group A, and 102±2.1%, 13.7±8.6% and 14.6±9.8% in group B. These resulted in a CLR equal to 8.2°±3.2°, 10.2°±3.7° and 8.8°±5.3° in group A, and 7.3°±3.5°, 12.6°±2.6° and 12.5°±4.2° group B. Much more consistent patterns of motion were observed in group B. A prolonged activation of the vastus medialis and lateralis was observed in group A. DISCUSSION. These preliminary results show that better scores can be expected using PSI via KA. Although not relevant kinematic differences were observed between groups, more consistent patterns were observed in using PSI via KA. Furthermore, the observed less prolonged activation of the knee extensor muscles suggest that a more natural soft tissue balance is experienced in this group. These findings show a good efficacy of KA using PSI in TKA. The clinical/functional analysis of more patients and a longer follow-up are necessary to establish the claimed superiority of the novel approach

The numbers of anatomic total shoulder joint replacements (ATSR) is increasing during the past years with encouraging clinical results. However, the survivorship of ATSR is lower as compared to total knee and hip replacements. Although the reasons for revision surgery are multifactorial, wear-associated problems like loosening are well-known causes for long-term failure of ATSR. Furthermore there is lack of valid experimental wear tests for ATSR. Therefore the purpose of this study was to define experimental wear testing parameters for ATSR and to perform a wear study comparing ceramic and metallic humeral heads. Kinetic and kinematic data were adopted from in-vivo loading measurements of the shoulder joint (. orthoload.com. ) and from several clinical studies on shoulder joint kinematics. As activity an ab/adduction motion of 0 to 90° in combination with an ante/retroversion while lifting a load of 2 kg has been chosen. Also a superior-inferior translation of the humeral head has been considered. The wear assessment was performed using a force controlled AMTI joint simulator for 3×10. 6. cycles (Fig. 1) and polyethylene wear has been assed gravimetrically. The studied ATSR (Turon. TM. , DJO Surgical, USA) resulted in a polyethylene wear rate of 62.75 ± 1.60 mg/10. 6. cycles in combination with metallic heads. The ceramic heads significantly reduced the wear rate by 26.7 % to 45.99 ± 1.31 mg/10. 6. (p<0.01). The wear scars dimensions were in good agreement to clinical retrievals. This study is the first that experimentally studied the wear behavior of ATSR based on clinical and biomechanical data under load controlled conditions. In term of wear the analyzed ATSR could clearly benefit from ceramic humeral heads. However, in comparison to experimental wear studies of total knee and hip replacements the wear rate of the studied ATSR was relatively high. Therefore further research may focus on optimized wear conditions of ATSR and the hereby described method may serve as a tool to evaluate a wear optimization process

The main purpose of the present study is to prospectively investigate whether preoperative functional flexion axis in patients with osteoarthritisand varus-alignment changes after total knee arthroplasty and whether a correlation exists both between preoperative functional flexion axis and native limb deformity. A navigated total knee arthroplasty was performed in 108 patients using a specific software to acquire passive joint kinematics before and after implant positioning. The knee was cycled through three passive range of motions, from 0 to 120. Functional flexion axis was computed using the mean helical axis algorithm. The angle between the functional flexion axis and the surgical transepicondylar axis was determined on frontal (aF) and axial (aA) plane. The pre- and postoperative hip-kneeankle angle, related to femur mechanical axis, was determined. Postoperative functional flexion axis was different from preoperative only on frontal plane, while no differences were found on axial plane. No correlation was found between preoperative aA and native limb deformity, while a poor correlation was found in frontal plane, between aF and preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle. Total knee arthroplasty affects functional flexion axis only on frontal plane while has no effect on axial plane. Preoperative functional flexion axis is in a more varus position respect to the transepicondylar axis both in pre- and postoperative conditions. Moreover, the position of the functional axis on frontal plane in preoperative conditions is dependent on native limb alignment, while on axial plane is not dependent on the amount of preoperative varus deformity