Introduction

It is well-known that wear debris generated by metal-on-metal hip replacements leads to aseptic loosening. This process starts in the local tissue where an inflammatory reaction is induced, followed by an periprosthetic osteolysis. MOM bearings generate particles as well as ions. The influence of both in human bodies is still the subject of debate. For instance hypersensitivity and high blood metal ion levels are under discussion for systemic reactions or pseudotumors around the hip replacement as a local reaction. The exact biopathologic mechanism is still unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of local injected metal ions and metal particles.

Currently, different techniques to evaluate the biocompatibility of orthopaedic materials, including two-dimensional (2D) cell culture for metal/ceramic wear debris and floating 2D surfaces or three-dimensional (3D) agarose gels for UHMWPE wear debris, are used. Moreover, cell culture systems evaluate the biological responses of cells to a biomaterial as the combined effect of both particles and ions. We have developed a novel cell culture system suitable for testing the all three type of particles and ions, separately. The method was tested by evaluating the biological responses of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) to UHMWPE, cobalt-chromium alloy (CoCr), and Ti64 alloy wear particles.

Introduction

Metal on metal bearings are used especially in hip resurfacing. On the one hand, small bone preserving implants can be used. On the other hand recent studies found a variety of local and systemic side effects, for instance the appearance of pseudotumors, that are explained by pathologic biological reaction of the metal wear debris. The detailed mechanisms are still not understood until now. Thus it was the aim of this study to investigate the local reaction of metal wear particles and metal ions in a murine model. The hypothesis was that mainly metal ions provoke adverse histopathological reactions in vivo.

Background:

Potential systemic toxicity of metal ions from metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHA) is concerning. High blood cobalt (Co) levels have been associated with neurological, cardiac and thyroid dysfunctions.

In an effort to understand the role of metal ion analysis and how it relates to revision surgery and implant wear, four revised MOM cases were reviewed. The first case was revised for acute infection and is representative of the low bearing wear predicted by MOM simulator studies. Two of the four cases had apparent anterior subluxation as a result of hip hyperextension occurring with long stride gaits. The last case is a true hypersensitivity response to CoCr ions.

All four MOM prostheses were implanted by one surgeon and revised by the same surgeon approximately 6–8 years postoperatively. The implants had been positioned satisfactorily with inclination angles 45°–55° and anteversion angles 28°–42°.

Patient A (76 y/o female) with bilateral MOM hip replacements, was revised at approximately 8 years due to infection and had moderately elevated ions at the time of revision surgery (Co = 5, Cr = 2.3, Ti = 4). Only the femoral head was retrieved in this case. Retrieval analysis identified a well defined main-wear zone and one polar stripe. The CMM indicated there was minimal wear overall (form factor = 11 μm).

Patient B (33 y/o male) with bilateral MOM hip replacements, was revised at approximately 8 years due to pain, popping/catching sensations, and elevated ions (Co = 33, Cr = 17, Ti = 90). Intraoperatively, the implant was observed subluxing superiorly from the acetabular cup with anterior rotation of the leg. Both the femoral head and acetabular cup were retrieved. Retrieval analysis identified a well defined main-wear zone and multi-directional polar stripe formations similar to those reported on dislocated implants (Figure 1)[McPherson 2012, 2013]. The CMM indicated that overall wear was significant (form factor > 100 μm).

Patient C (77 y/o female) was revised at approximately 6 years due to pain, suspected implant loosening, osteolytic cysts determined by CT, and highly elevated ions (co = 164, Cr = 45, Ti = 33). Intraoperatively, there was evidence of wear including darkly stained tissue and osteolytic cysts. Both the femoral head and acetabular cup were retrieved. Retrieval analysis identified a well defined main-wear zone and one polar stripe. CMM indicated considerable wear (head form factor > 200, cup form factor >300).

Patient D (45 y/o female) was revised at approximately 6 years due to pain, apparent reactive response joint effusion, and moderately elevated ions (Co = 5, Cr = 6, Ti = 71). Only the femoral head was retrieved. Retrieval analysis identified a well defined main-wear zone and one polar stripe. Minimal wear was indicated by CMM (form factor = 21).

These four cases demonstrate distinct failure models of MOM hips and their respective metal ion results. Due to the diversity of patient location, a variety of clinical labs were utilized for this patient population. Caution should be used in interpreting metal ion analysis, as there are still no standards.

Figure 1: Retrieval analysis of stripe wear identified on femoral head from patient B.

Figure 2: Femoral head from patient C showing broader polar stripe associated with anterior subluxation in comparison to narrow polar stripe found on femoral head from patient A.

The Conserve® Plus (Wright Medical Technology Inc., Arlington, TN) was introduced clinically in the United States in 1996. A study of the serum cobalt and chromium ion levels was started in 2000 in our center to monitor the metal ion levels over time as part of an FDA clinical trial.

Thirteen male and five female patients received this resurfacing for idiopathic osteoarthritis (14), post-traumatic degenerative changes (3) or developmental dysplasia (1). Fourteen received a unilateral implant but four subsequently received a contralateral device from 52 to 86 months post-op. Four patients had bilateral resurfacings done in a one-stage procedure. All surgeries were performed by the senior author. None of these patients had known exposure to cobalt or chromium, kidney disease or other metal implants elsewhere in their bodies. Each prospectively provided blood samples and then yearly thereafter to measure cobalt and chromium levels for up to 11 years. Metal levels were measured using atomic absorption spectrophotometry and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry by a specialized trace element analysis laboratory. Acetabular component position was evaluated using Einzel-Bild-Röentgen-Analysis (EBRA) software. Contact patch to rim (CPR) distance was computed as described by Langton et al JBJS Br 91: 2009. A mixed model linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate long term trends, and multivariate analysis was performed to examine effects of implant and patient covariates on the metal ion levels.

One bilateral patient underwent revision for femoral loosening, all other patients were clinically well-functioning at the time of last follow-up (ave 89 mos). The median pre-operative Co was below the detection limit (d.l) of 0.3μg/L and the median pre-operative Cr was 0.069μg/L (d.l. 03μg/L). Metal levels increased within the first year then decreased and stabilized (fig 1). For unilaterals over all time intervals, the median Co was 1.06 μg/L, while the median Cr was 1.58 μg/L. For bilaterals, the mean post-operative Co was 2.80 μg/L, while the mean Cr was 5.80 μg/L. Generally, Cr levels were higher at all time points than Co. Bilateral patients had Co values 1.96 times greater on average than the unilateral patients (p<0.001). None of the possible covariates studied (femoral size, cup abduction angle, cup anteversion, CPR distance, activity, BMI and testing method) were related to the assay values.

The results of this study have shown that serum metal levels in well functioning implants can be low and do not increase over time. These are among the lowest levels reported for resurfacing devices and comparable to levels reported for well functioning small diameter metal-on-metal total hips. The study is limited due to the relatively small sample size and limited range of values for the covariates studied. However, it included patients who were active, female or bilateral and we collected ion levels up to 11 years. We now recommend that patients who have well-oriented Conserve Plus components with stable radiographic interfaces and no incidences of unexplained pain or hip noises be scheduled for follow-up every 2–3 years, rather than annually.

INTRODUCTION

Systemic levels of metal ions are surrogate markers of in-vivo wear of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings (MoMHRA). The wear-related generation of metal ions is associated with component size and positioning but also with design specific features such as coverage angle, clearance, metallurgy and surface technology.

Introduction

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacings (MoMHRAs) have a characteristic wear pattern initially characterised by a run-in period, followed by a lower-wear steady-state. The use of metal ions as surrogate markers of in-vivo wear is now recommended as a screening tool for the in-vivo performance of MoMHRAs. The aims of this retrospective study were to measure ion levels in MoMHRAs at different stages during the steady-state in order to study the evolution of wear at minimum 10 years postoperatively and describe factors that affect it.

Purpose

Elevated blood metal ions are associated with the early failure of the Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to analyse our prospective database of Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty patients, to independently review the outliers with elevated blood metal ions and to determine whether a screening program would be of value at our institution.

Introduction

Femoral heads made from zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA) are the most advanced bioceramic available for total hip arthroplasty. ZTA's superior mechanical properties result from the polymorphic transformation of its zirconia (ZrO₂) phase in the presence of a propagating crack. In vitro derived activation energies predict that several human lifetimes are needed to reach a state of significant transformation;¹ but in vivo confirmation of material stability is still lacking. This investigation determined if transition metal ions might be responsible for triggering the tetragonal to monoclinic (t®m-ZrO₂) phase transformation in this bioceramic.

Introduction

There has been much discussion in the literature concerning the possible detrimental effects of metal ion circulating in the body after MOM THR. This study seeks to evaluate the differences in observed Co and Cr levels in blood after TKR and several popular THR options.

Background

Previous studies have indicated poor outcomes and high complication rate in patients having revision of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip implants resulting from adverse local tissue reactions. Metal ions released by MoM bearings may potentially increase infection occurrence in patients with failed implants.

Metal-on-metal bearings (MoM) saw an increase in global utilisation in the last decade. This peaked in 2008 in the US, with approximately 35% of bearings being hard-on-hard (metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic). Beginning in 2008, reports began to surface regarding local soft tissue reactions and hypersensitivity to MoM bearings. A major implant manufacturer recalled a resurfacing device in 2010 after national joint registries demonstrated higher than expected revision rates. Patients with painful MoM bearings are a difficult diagnostic challenge. The surgeon must go back to basic principles, perform a complete history and physical exam, obtain serial radiographs and basic blood work (ESR, CRP) to rule out common causes of pain and determine if the pain is, or is not, related to the bearing. The Asymptomatic MoM Arthroplasty: Patients will present for either routine follow up, or because of concerns regarding their bearing. It is important to emphasise that at this point the vast majority of patients with a MoM bearing are indeed asymptomatic and their bearings are performing well. The surgeon must take into account: a) which specific implant are they dealing with and what is its track record; b) what is the cup position; c) when to perform metal ion testing; d) when to perform further soft tissue imaging (MARS MRI, Ultrasound); e) when to discuss possible surgery. Painful MoM THA causes not related to the bearing couple: These can be broken down into two broad categories. Causes that are Extrinsic to the hip include spine, vascular, metabolic and malignancy. Causes that are Intrinsic to the hip can either be Extracapsular or Intracapsular. Painful MoM THA causes related to the bearing couple: There are now described a number of possible clinical scenarios and causes of pain that relate to the MoM bearing couple itself: A) Local hypersensitivity reaction without a significant soft tissue reaction; B) Local hypersensitivity reaction with a significant soft tissue reaction; C) Impingement and soft tissue pain secondary to large head effect. Factors related to a hypersensitivity reaction: Some patients, and prostheses, seem to be at a higher risk of developing issues following a MoM bearing, although our understanding of the interplay of these factors is still in evolution: patients at risk include all women and patients with smaller component sizes. Implant factors play a role with some implants having higher wear rates and being more prone to corrosion. Special tests: There is ongoing confusion related to the relative value of the various special tests that patients with a painful MoM undergo. A) Metal Ions - obtaining serum, or whole blood, cobalt and chromium levels is recommended as a baseline test. However, there is no established cutoff level to determine with certainty if a patient is having a hypersensitivity reaction. Metal ions therefore can be used as a clue, but cannot be relied upon in isolation to make a diagnosis. B) MARS MRI - a useful tool for demonstrating soft tissue involvement, but there are many painless, well-functioning MoM implants that have soft tissue reactions, that don't require a revision. In the painful MoM hip an MRI, or ultrasound, is recommended to look for soft tissue destruction or a fluid-filled periprosthetic lesion (pseudotumor). Significant soft tissue involvement is concerning and is commonly an indication for revision in the painful MoM hip. C) CT imaging - can be utilised to help determine cup position and combined anteversion, however, plain radiographs can give a rough estimate of this as well, so routine CT scan evaluations are not currently recommended. The painful MoM bearing, that is demonstrating significant soft tissue involvement is a concerning scenario. Earlier revision, to prevent massive abductor damage, would seem prudent for these patients. The painful MoM bearing with no significant soft tissue changes can probably be followed and reviewed at regular intervals. If the pain persists and is felt to be secondary to a hypersensitivity reaction, then revision is really the only option, although the patient must be cautioned regarding the unpredictable nature of the pain relief

Introduction. Various anti-infective agents can be added to the surface of orthopaedic implants to actively kill bacteria and prevent infection. Silver (Ag) is a commonly used agent in various anti-infective applications. Silver disrupts bacterial membranes and binds to bacterial DNA and to the sulfhydryl groups of metabolic enzymes in the bacterial electron transport chain, thus inactivating bacterial replication and key metabolic processes. Recently we are implanting Silver coated megaprosthesis for the treatment of post-traumatic septic non unions/bone defects and for infected hip or knee prosthesis revision. We treat these complications utilizing a two steps procedure: 1° step: devices removal, resection, debridment and antibiotic spacer implantation; 2° step: spacer removal and megaprosthesis implantation. This technique produce a reactive pseudosynovial membrane, well known in traumatology (Masquelet technique), following the Chamber Induction Technique principles. This chamber creates the perfect environment in which implant the prosthesis with safety. We are nowadays investigating if this membrane could optimize the Silver antimicrobical effects reducing the Silver ions dispersion and reducing toxicity on the human body. Objectives. The aim of this study is to perform a review of the literature about Silver coated implants in Orthopaedics and Trauma and to analyze our cases treated with this implants in order to measure their efficacy and the ion dispersion in urine and blood. Methods. We performed a literature review using the universally validated search engines in the biomedical field: PubMed / Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus, EMBASE. The keywords used were: “Silver”, “Silver coating”, “Silver surface”, “were crossed with “Prosthesis”, “Megaprosthesis”, “Infection”, “Sepsis”, “Revision”. We also analized all our patients treated with Silver coated implants measuring Silver dose in blood and urine before implantation, 1 day after implantation and then after 15 days, 3,6,12,24,36 months. Results. The search led to 468 items, of these were considered only article in English with full text available. We found 1 in vitro study, 1 animal study and 2 human studies. The animal study showed a reduction in periprosthetic infection from 47% to 7%, 1 human study in Oncology application of megaprosthesis showed a reduction of septic complications from 17,6% to 5,9%. Te other human study demonstrated that Silver surface implants don't have toxicity cause the blood level of silver Ions were only 56,4 parts per billion. The analysis of our casuistry is giving good results with low level of Silver in the blood and urine, lower concentrations are observed in patients treated with the 2 steps-CIT technique. Conclusions. The use of silver-coated prosthesis can reduce the infection rate in the medium-long term with no toxicity for the patients. Further studies with longer term follow-up periods and larger numbers of patients are warranted in order to confirm these encouraging results most of all in the patients treated with the 2 steps procedure in order to better understand the role of the membrane and of the Chamber Induction Technique in Silver ions dispersions

Between April 2008 and February 2012, we implanted 159 large-diameter MOM stemmed THA with head diameters of 38–50mm. There were 6–38mm, 22–40mm, 42–42mm, 42–44mm, 24–46mm, 13–48mm, 4–50mm, 5–52mm, and one-54mm heads implanted in 138 patients (21 males and 117 females). The pre-operative diagnoses included: 120 OAs, 12 IONs, 4 femoral neck fractures, one RA, and one post-traumatic OA. Their ages were 40–86 years (avg. 63.6 yrs). Follow up was 4 to 67 months post implantation (avg. 40.4 months). All implants were manufactured by one company (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN, USA). The stems were of a standard titanium-aluminum alloy, either 44 ANCA-FIT or 115 PROFEMUR Z non-cemented stems. Acetabular components were all CONSERVE PLUS cobalt-chromium monoblock shells. Heads were also fabricated out of cobalt-chromium alloy, with modular junctions. Patients with complaints of groin pain and/or swelling or hip instability underwent MRI examination in order to detect the presence of fluid collections or soft tissue masses. The statistical correlation between abnormal findings on MRI and age, gender, head diameter, component position and duration post-surgery was performed. 35 hips in 31 patients (22.0%) were found to have either a fluid collection or “pseudotumor” on MRI. These were in 5 males and 26 female patients. According to Hart's MRI classification, they were classified 21 hips in Type 1, twelve hips in Type 2, and two hips in Type 3 (Fig. 1, 2 and 3). 8 hips in 8 patients who had any pseudotumors were undergone revision THA (Fig. 4, 5 and 6). All hips had corrosions at head-neck taper junctions (Fig. 7). There was no difference in age between these two groups of patients (63.7 vs. 63.6 yrs.), but a significant difference in duration from the time of implantation of two groups (23.9 vs. 44.8 months). There appeared to be no significant difference between the mean head diameter of the two groups, 43.2mm and 44.0mm respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two groups with regard to implant orientation: cup inclination 18–70 degrees (41.8 vs. 43.6 degrees); cup anteversion −13–49 degrees (15.1 vs. 14.7 degrees); stem anteversion 2–48 degrees (20.1 vs. 23.3 degrees); and stem offset 17.5–56.2mm (38.2 vs. 37.8mm). Furthermore, according to Lewinnek's safe zone, there was no difference in cup orientation between the two groups (Fig. 8). When we investigated the types of modular neck, the hips having any pesudotumors tended to have long or varus necks. In this study, it is important to emphasize that the appearance of symptoms and development of a pseudotumor occurred early after a MOM THA in some patients. Also it will be important to subject all patients to MRI examination to evaluate the possibility of “silent” fluid collections and pseudotumors. In large-diameter head metal-on-metal stemmed THAs, femoral stems having long or varus neck may contribute to head-neck junction failure

Introduction. Metal on metal (MoM) bearings have been dealt a severe blow in the past few years. The release of metal ions may have arisen from corrosion, wear, or a combination of the two. Edge loading due to implant malposition is thought to cause a failure of lubrication and to contribute to excessive wear and increased metal ion release [1]. Literature reports aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVAL) are associated with a variety of failures which occur to some degree in all implanted metal femoral components [2, 3]. Moreover, Willert et al [4] has described ALVAL in non-MoM bearing designs too. This paper has investigated the metal ion release due to total hip replacement (THR), Hip Resurfacing (HR) and total knee replacement (TKR). Methods. Following human ethics approval 200 patients were enrolled in this single surgeon randomised controlled study. The treatment groups were total knee replacement (TKR) (n=100), HR (n=50) and THR (n=50). Serum cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ion levels were taken preoperatively for baseline measurement then at 6 month, 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. Results. A preliminary observation of the data was performed to investigate the release trend of the Metal Ions (Figs 1 & 2). Initially there is a significant difference (p<0.05) between TKR and THR for the 6 month ion levels. At the 1 year time-point there is no difference between the TKR and THR for Cr levels. However, there is a significant difference (p<0.05) between TKR and HR for Cr levels at the 1 year time-point and a highly significant difference (p<0.001) between TKR, THR and HR for Co levels at 1 year. At the 2 year time-point there is no difference (p>0.05) between the TKR and THR for Cr levels. However, there is still a highly significant difference (p<0.001) between TKR, THR and HR for Co levels at 2 years. There was no significant difference detected between THR and HR (p>0.05) for both Co and Cr levels at all time-points. Discussion and Conclusion. All patient metal ion levels were in the safe range. Whilst there are other reported studies comparing the effect of head diameter of MoM bearings on systemic release of metal ions, this is the first paper to compare MoM hip bearings with TKR bearings. There was no difference between the release of Cr levels for the TKR and THR at the 2 year time-point. The trend of metal ion release is similar for all implants. However, THA deviates from HR at the 12 month time-point for Co levels. This paper demonstrates that surgical technique plays an important role in metal ion release and the long term integrity of a MoM bearing