Abstract
In an effort to understand the role of metal ion analysis and how it relates to revision surgery and implant wear, four revised MOM cases were reviewed. The first case was revised for acute infection and is representative of the low bearing wear predicted by MOM simulator studies. Two of the four cases had apparent anterior subluxation as a result of hip hyperextension occurring with long stride gaits. The last case is a true hypersensitivity response to CoCr ions.
All four MOM prostheses were implanted by one surgeon and revised by the same surgeon approximately 6–8 years postoperatively. The implants had been positioned satisfactorily with inclination angles 45°–55° and anteversion angles 28°–42°.
Patient A (76 y/o female) with bilateral MOM hip replacements, was revised at approximately 8 years due to infection and had moderately elevated ions at the time of revision surgery (Co = 5, Cr = 2.3, Ti = 4). Only the femoral head was retrieved in this case. Retrieval analysis identified a well defined main-wear zone and one polar stripe. The CMM indicated there was minimal wear overall (form factor = 11 μm).
Patient B (33 y/o male) with bilateral MOM hip replacements, was revised at approximately 8 years due to pain, popping/catching sensations, and elevated ions (Co = 33, Cr = 17, Ti = 90). Intraoperatively, the implant was observed subluxing superiorly from the acetabular cup with anterior rotation of the leg. Both the femoral head and acetabular cup were retrieved. Retrieval analysis identified a well defined main-wear zone and multi-directional polar stripe formations similar to those reported on dislocated implants (Figure 1)[McPherson 2012, 2013]. The CMM indicated that overall wear was significant (form factor > 100 μm).
Patient C (77 y/o female) was revised at approximately 6 years due to pain, suspected implant loosening, osteolytic cysts determined by CT, and highly elevated ions (co = 164, Cr = 45, Ti = 33). Intraoperatively, there was evidence of wear including darkly stained tissue and osteolytic cysts. Both the femoral head and acetabular cup were retrieved. Retrieval analysis identified a well defined main-wear zone and one polar stripe. CMM indicated considerable wear (head form factor > 200, cup form factor >300).
Patient D (45 y/o female) was revised at approximately 6 years due to pain, apparent reactive response joint effusion, and moderately elevated ions (Co = 5, Cr = 6, Ti = 71). Only the femoral head was retrieved. Retrieval analysis identified a well defined main-wear zone and one polar stripe. Minimal wear was indicated by CMM (form factor = 21).
These four cases demonstrate distinct failure models of MOM hips and their respective metal ion results. Due to the diversity of patient location, a variety of clinical labs were utilized for this patient population. Caution should be used in interpreting metal ion analysis, as there are still no standards.
Figure 1: Retrieval analysis of stripe wear identified on femoral head from patient B.
Figure 2: Femoral head from patient C showing broader polar stripe associated with anterior subluxation in comparison to narrow polar stripe found on femoral head from patient A.
