Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 430 - 430
1 Sep 2012
Brady M Sinz I Kinbrum A Briscoe A
Full Access

Introduction

Patients suffering from finger joint pain or dysfunction due to arthritis and traumatic injury may require arthroplasty and joint replacement. Single-part silicone-based implants remain the material of choice and most widely used option, although reports on their long-term clinical performance are variable. For trauma indications, patients have a high expectation of functionality necessitating the use of materials with high wear resistance and mechanical performance. A new proximal inter phalangeal (PIP) joint designed by Zrinski AG (Wurmlingen, Germany), comprising a self-mating carbon fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) coupling, may provide a suitable alternative. Here we describe the wear performance of the CFR-PEEK components in a PIP joint wear simulator and subsequent characterisation of the wear particles.

Methods

Four proximal and distal PIP components were milled (Zrinski AG) from CFR-PEEK (Invibio Ltd, UK) and subjected to wear testing (Endo Lab ® GmbH, Germany). The test was conducted at 37°C over 5 million cycles in 25% bovine serum (refreshed every 0.5 million cycles). The load was a static force of 63N applied at a frequency of 1Hz with a flexion/extension angle of ±40°. Wear rate was determined by mass loss from each component. Pooled serum samples from the wear simulator were subjected to protein digest and the remaining particulate debris isolated by serial filtration through 10μm, 1μm and 0.1μm filters. Particle size and morphology was subsequently determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Continuum Blue, UK).


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 86-B, Issue 3 | Pages 406 - 412
1 Apr 2004
Deshmukh SC Kumar D Mathur K Thomas B

We reviewed 13 patients with a complex fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of a finger and one patient with a complex fracture-dislocation of the interphalangeal joint of thumb. We had treated these injuries using a pins and rubbers traction system which had been modified to avoid friction of the pins against the bone during mobilisation of the joint in order to minimise the risk of osteolysis. A Michigan hand outcome questionnaire was used for subjective assessment. The active range of movement (AROM) of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints and the grip strength were used for objective assessment. The mean follow-up was 34 months (12 to 49). The mean normalised Michigan hand outcome score was 84. The mean AROM of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 85° and that of the distal interphalangeal joint 48°. The mean grip strength was 92% of the uninvolved hand. Twelve patients have returned to their original occupations. There has been no radiological osteolysis or clinical osteomyelitis. This modified traction system has given acceptable results with a low rate of complications. It is light, cheap, effective and easy to apply


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 4 | Pages 544 - 547
1 Jul 1997
Okafor B Mbubaegbu C Munshi I Williams DJ

We reviewed 31 patients at a mean of five years after mallet deformity of the finger had been treated with a thermoplastic splint. Intra-articular fractures were present in 35% of patients. Osteoarthritic changes had developed in 48%, most in association with fracture, and 29% had a swan-neck deformity. There was a loss of extension greater than 10° in 35%; the average deficit at the interphalangeal joint was 8.3° and the average flexion arc was 48.5°. Despite these findings, patient satisfaction was generally high, with little evidence of functional impairment


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 6 | Pages 829 - 836
1 Jun 2005
Kreder HJ Hanel DP Agel J McKee M Schemitsch EH Trumble TE Stephen D

A total of 179 adult patients with displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius was randomised to receive indirect percutaneous reduction and external fixation (n = 88) or open reduction and internal fixation (n = 91). Patients were followed up for two years. During the first year the upper limb musculoskeletal function assessment score, the SF-36 bodily pain sub-scale score, the overall Jebsen score, pinch strength and grip strength improved significantly in all patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the radiological restoration of anatomical features or the range of movement between the groups.

During the period of two years, patients who underwent indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation had a more rapid return of function and a better functional outcome than those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, provided that the intra-articular step and gap deformity were minimised.