Aims

Septic arthritis of the hip often leads to irreversible osteoarthritis (OA) and the requirement for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to report the mid-term risk of any infection, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic revision, and reoperation in patients with a past history of septic arthritis who underwent THA, compared with a control group of patients who underwent THA for OA.

Aims

The aim of this study was to examine whether socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a higher risk of infections following total hip arthroplasty (THA) at 30 and 90 days.

Aims

Femoral cement-in-cement revision is a well described technique to reduce morbidity and complications in hip revision surgery. Traditional techniques for septic revision of hip arthroplasty necessitate removal of all bone cement from the femur. In our two centres, we have been using a cement-in-cement technique, leaving the distal femoral bone cement in selected patients for septic hip revision surgery, both for single and the first of two-stage revision procedures. A prerequisite for adoption of this technique is that the surgeon considers the cement mantle to be intimately fixed to bone without an intervening membrane between cement and host bone. We aim to report our experience for this technique.

Emerging evidence from different countries around the world is increasingly associating hip and knee replacements performed during the summer months with an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI). We aimed to synthesise evidence on this phenomenon globally.

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE from inception until August 2021 for relevant original articles without language restrictions. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects models to estimate and compare the pooled odds ratio (OR) and the confidence interval (CI) of operations undertaken during the summer season as defined by study authors.

Five studies from Canada, Japan, Pakistan, and the USA (n= 2) met the inclusion criteria. Data involving 1,589,207 primary hip and knee replacements, were included in the meta-analysis. There were 5985 superficial SSIs, out of total 420121 operations during the summer season, equating to a risk of 1.4%. During the other 3 seasons, there were 15364 Superficial SSIs out of 1169086 total operations, a risk of 1.3%.

The pooled OR highlighted increased odds of developing superficial SSI for patients who underwent joint replacements during the summer months (OR 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.05 – 1.60, P < 0.0001); with evidence of significant heterogeneity.

Our preliminary meta-analysis suggests a 29% increased chance of having an SSI if the joint replacement was performed in the summer months. A high degree of heterogeneity was evident which warrants further exploration. Given the concerning consequences of developing wound infections after joint replacements, these findings may have important implications for informing individual patient-surgeon preoperative consent, surgical planning, and guiding future research.

Pre-operative definitive diagnosis of infection in painful total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not always easy to be established, making the intra-operative decision-making process crucial in management of revision hip surgery. Calprotectin is a promising point-of-care novel biomarker that has displayed high accuracy in detecting PJIs.

From November 2020 to December 2022, 105 patients with painful primary THA were treated with revision THA in 3 orthopaedic departments. Pre-operatively, 23 were considered infected and treated with two-stage revision THA. The remaining 82 were likely infected according to the 2019 EBJIS criteria. The suspicion of low-grade infection was based on clinical (rest and/or night pain), laboratory (CRP, ESR, WBC – normal or slightly elevated) and radiological evaluation (loosening). Hip aspiration under CT imaging was performed in these cases and 34 of them yielded positive culture and were treated with two-stage revision. Aspiration was ineffective in the remaining 48 cases (33 negative, 15 unsuccessful attempts). Intra-operatively, calprotectin was measured with lateral flow immunoassay test in these patients. Cases with calprotectin levels ≥ 50 mg/L were treated with 2-stage revision THA; otherwise, they were considered not-infected and one-stage revision was performed. Synovial fluid and tissue samples were collected for analysis. Implants were sent for sonication fluid cultures.

Calprotectin was positive (≥ 50 mg/L) in 27 cases and negative in 21 cases. There was 1 false negative case with positive tissue cultures. Out of the 27 positive cases, 25 had positive tissue cultures and sonication. However, 2 cases with high calprotectin levels (>200 mg/L) were not infected. The false positive result was attributed to severe metallosis. Calprotectin sensitivity was 96.2%, specificity 90.9%, PPV 92.6%, NPV 95.2%, AUC 0.935.

The results of this ongoing study indicate that calprotectin seems to be a valuable tool in facilitating the intra-operative decision-making process in cases that low-grade infection is suspected and diagnosis cannot be established pre-operatively.

A growing number of recent investigations on the human genome, gut microbiome, and proteomics suggests that the loss of mucosal barrier function, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract, may substantially affect antigen trafficking, ultimately influencing the close bidirectional interaction between the gut microbiome and the immune system. This cross-talk is highly influential in shaping the host immune system and ultimately clinical infections. The hypothesis of the current study was that a change in microbiome and/or breach in GI epithelial barrier could be partially responsible for development of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).

Multiple biomarkers of gut barrier disruption were tested in parallel in plasma samples collected as part of a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty for aseptic failures or PJI (As defined by the 2018 ICM criteria). All blood samples were collected before any antibiotic was administered. Samples were tested for Zonulin, soluble CD14 (sCD14), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Statistical analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney t-test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.

A total of 134 patients were consented and included in the study. 44 were classified as PJI (30 chronic and 14 acute), and 90 as aseptic failures (26 primaries and 64 aseptic revisions). Both Zonulin and sCD14, but not LPS, were found to be significantly increased in the PJI group compared to non-infected cases (p<0.001; p=0.003). Higher levels of Zonulin were found in acute infections compared to chronic PJI (p=0.005

This prospective ongoing study reveals a possible link between gut permeability and the ‘gut-immune-joint axis’ in PJI. If this association continues to be born out with larger cohort recruitment and more in-depth analysis, it would have an immense implication in managing patients with PJI. In addition to administering antimicrobials, patients with PJI and other orthopedic infections may require gastrointestinal modulators such as pro and prebiotics.

Introduction

Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) can provide local sustained delivery of therapeutics^1,2. For example, it can deliver analgesics to address post-arthroplasty pain². Given that several analgesics, such as bupivacaine (anesthetic) and tolfenamic acid (NSAID), were shown to possess antibacterial activity against Staphylococci, we hypothesize that analgesic-loaded UHMWPE can also yield antimicrobial effects, preventing the development of periprosthetic joint infections.

Literature debates whether fluid aspirates for suspected PJI should undergo prolonged incubation for cultures. We looked at sensitivity and specificity of 14-day cultures, compared to 7-days, for aspirates from prosthetic hips and knees.

Cutibacterium species (formerly Propionibacterium species) are increasingly recognized as causative pathogens of low-grade periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). The clinical manifestation of infections caused by this low virulent microorganism is nonspecific and the interpretation remains challenging. In this prospective cohort study from 01/2012 to 07/2017 we analyzed the clinical and diagnostic characteristics of microbiologically proven hip PJI caused by Cutibacterium species. PJI was defined by growth of Cutibacteria in ≥2 periprosthetic tissue samples or in sonication fluid of the removed implant (>50 CFU/ml) at revision surgery. If Cutibacteria grew only in synovial fluid at least one other positive microbiological specimen or non-microbiological criterion was required.

We included 26 patients suffering from Cutibacterium hip PJI, among them 19 were males (73%). The majority of PJI (24, 92%) presented delayed (3–24 months) or late (>24 months) after implantation. Sinus tract was present in 4 patients (16%) and radiological implant loosening in 16 patients (62%). Among non-microbiological diagnostic tests, increased synovial fluid leukocyte count showed the highest sensitivity (82%), followed by tissue histology (71%) and serum C-reactive protein (58%). After 7 days of incubation Cutibacterium grew in synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissue and sonication fluid culture in 20%, 42% and 32%, respectively, and in 43%, 76% and 83%, respectively, after 14 days of incubation.

We conclude that Cutibacterium PJI was diagnosed late in the disease course and presented with subtle clinical signs. Prolonged culture incubation and implant sonication improved the poor performance of conventional microbiological tests. Due to lack of reliable diagnostic tests, Cutibacterium remains difficult to detect making the diagnosis challenging.

Leukocyte esterase (LE) has shown to be an accurate marker of prosthetic joint infections and has been proposed as an alternative to frozen section (FS) for intra-operative diagnosis. In this study, intra-operative determination of LE was compared with FS for the diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infections.

One hundred and nineteen patients undergoing hip revision surgery due to prosthetic joint failure from June 2015 to December 2017 were considered. Joint fluids were collected before the arthrotomy for determination of LE which was performed by using enzymatic colorimetric strips. Four to six samples were stained with hematoxylin eosin for FS and considered suggestive for infection when at least 5 polymorphonuclear leukocytes in 5 fields at high power fields were found.

Sensitivity and specificity of LE were 100% and 93.8 %, respectively. The positive predictive value was 79.3 %, while the negative predictive value was 100%. Time from collection to response was 20.1 ± 4.4 minutes.

Sensitivity and specificity of FS were 83.3 % and 92.1 %, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 84.6 % and 97.1%. Time from sample collection response was 27.2 ± 6.9 minutes.

LE showed a higher sensitivity and a slightly lower specificity and the same diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative FS. The faster turnaround time (about 20 minutes from receiving of sample by the laboratory), its ease of use and the low costs make this test a valuable alternative to frozen sections and is going to replace FS in our clinical practice.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a challenging complication following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). It is associated with high levels of morbidity, mortality and is time consuming and expensive to treat. Our management generally relies on identification of the infecting organism(s) in order to define the appropriate treatment strategy. Patients with culture-negative PJI poses a greater challenge to surgeons and to the wider multidisciplinary team.

This study compares the outcomes of 50 consecutive complex culture-positive (deemed unsuitable for single stage exchange) and 50 culture-negative THAs managed with two-stage revision arthroplasty with a minimum of five years follow-up.

Culture-negative PJIs were associated with older age, smoking, external referral source and greater use of preoperative antibiotics. There was however no significant difference in outcome between these groups of patients with a similar complication rates and reinfection rates of 6% at 5 years.

Culture negative periprosthetic sepsis generates concern, and is often considered a poor prognostic indicator. This study suggests that a strict 2 stage protocol is associated with satisfactory outcomes in such cases.

Introduction

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) generate significant clinical and socio-economic pressures on the health service. Recent advances in the diagnosis of PJIs, with biomarkers and sonification have aided delineation of PJIs from aseptic processes. However these investigations are not widely available and expensive. Interface membrane histology has been shown to be superior to pseudocapsule histology; we therefore sought to ascertain the diagnostic benefit of deep canal sample microbiology in conjunction with standard pseudocapsule sampling.

Reliability of microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection [PJI] strongly depends on the ability to dislodge microorganisms from biofilm and on the rate of contaminating samples during collection in the operating room and processing. The aim of a correct protocol is to avoid false negative and false positive results in order to adapt the correct therapy for each patient.

The object of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a novel closed bag system designed for samples collection and processing based on dithiothreitol (DTT), which is a sulfydryl compound able to remove bacteria from biofilm (MicroDTTect, 4i, Italy), on isolation of contaminant microorganisms in hip prostheses.

Specimens (prostheses, spacers, periprosthetic tissues) were aseptically collected according to a standard protocol into the device, which was transported to the laboratory for culture. Three different models of the system were prospectively evaluated, each being a development of the previous one. The first generation device consisted in an “open” system (DTT eluate was collected with a syringe and dispensed into sterile tubes), the second generation device in a “partially closed” system (DTT eluate collected directly in sterile vacuum tubes) and the third generation device in a “completely closed system” (DTT reservoir directly connected with sealed tubes inside the device). PJI was diagnosed following criteria established by MSIS.

The overall contamination rate, sensitivity and specificity of the first generation “open” system MicroDTTect were respectively 2.6% (1/39), 82.3% and 95.4% in 39 hips. The second generation “partially closed” device was characterized by a contamination rate of 1.96% (1/51), a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 96.1% in 51 hips. Contamination rate further decreased in the third generation “closed” system (1.89%, 2/106), while sensitivity (91.3%) and specificity (96.7%) improved in 106 hips. Differences have been also observed in hips (106) when compared to knees (70 cases) prosthetic infections (sensitivity 91.3% vs 89.3% and specificity 96.7% vs 100%).

Our data show as, thanks to its ease of use, low contamination rate and high sensitivity, MicroDTTect can represent a useful tool for improving the microbiological diagnosis of PJIs in hip revisions and has replaced sonication in our practice.

Dental procedures may lead to a transient bacteraemia lasting for up to 30 minutes. Of the numerous cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA) reported which have been infected from haematogenous sources, dental procedures have been involved only infrequently. We reviewed the records of 2973 patients after THA. Of the late infections identified in 52 patients, three (6%) were strongly associated with a dental procedure. Infection was diagnosed by culture from the affected joint; Streptococcus viridans was identified in two cases and Peptostreptococcus in one. One patient had diabetes mellitus and another rheumatoid arthritis, both conditions predisposing to infection. The dental operations all lasted for more than 45 minutes and no patient received perioperative antibiotics.

Infection of a THA after dental procedures is more common than has been previously suspected. Patients with systemic disease, or who are undergoing extensive procedures, should be considered for prophylactic antibiotic treatment.

The aims of the study were primarily to establish the overall success of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in the management of infected total hip replacements (THRs) and secondarily to identify risk factors for failure.

Using a standardised and recognised study protocol (“Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines) a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed. The primary outcome measure of interest was treatment success. The search strategy and inclusion criteria plus quality assessment yielded 39 articles eligible for analysis.

The proportion of success from the literature following DAIR in the management of infected THRs is improving over time – the pooled mean proportion of success is 84.5% in studies from 2011–15. There was improved success with early debridement (75.7%) compared with delayed debridement (48.1%) (p=0.006).

The reported outcomes following DAIR appear to be improving with time. One of the most influential determinants of outcome is timing of debridement from onset of symptoms.

Surgeons should have a low threshold for investigating deep infection when presented with an acutely symptomatic THR and be aware of the updated reported outcomes associated with DAIR when considering management options.

Aims

Single-stage revision is not widely pursued due to restrictive inclusion criteria. In this study, we evaluated the results of single-stage revision of chronically infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) using broad inclusion criteria and cementless implants.

Objectives

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is difficult and requires a battery of tests and clinical findings. The purpose of this review is to summarize all current evidence for common and new serum biomarkers utilized in the diagnosis of PJI.

Aims

To analyse the effectiveness of debridement and implant retention (DAIR) in patients with hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and the relationship to patient characteristics. The outcome was evaluated in hips with confirmed PJI and a follow-up of not less than two years.

Revision total hip replacement (THR) for young patients is challenging because of technical complexity and the potential need for subsequent further revisions. We have assessed the survivorship, functional outcome and complications of this procedure in patients aged <  50 years through a large longitudinal series with consistent treatment algorithms. Of 132 consecutive patients (181 hips) who underwent revision THR, 102 patients (151 hips) with a mean age of 43 years (22 to 50) were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 11 years (2 to 26) post-operatively. We attempted to restore bone stock with allograft where indicated. Using further revision for any reason as an end point, the survival of the acetabular component was 71% (sd 4) and 54% (sd 7) at ten- and 20 years. The survival of the femoral component was 80% (sd 4) and 62% (sd 6) at ten- and 20 years. Complications included 11 dislocations (6.1%), ten periprosthetic fractures (5.5%), two deep infections (1.1%), four sciatic nerve palsies (2.2%; three resolved without intervention, one improved after exploration and freeing from adhesions) and one vascular injury (0.6%). The mean modified Harris Hip Score was 41 (10 to 82) pre-operatively, 77 (39 to 93) one year post-operatively and 77 (38 to 93) at the latest review.

This overall perspective on the mid- to long-term results is valuable when advising young patients on the prospects of revision surgery at the time of primary replacement.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1047–51.

In March 2012, an algorithm for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip was introduced in our academic department of Orthopaedic Surgery. It included the use of specified implants for particular patterns of fracture. In this cohort study, 102 consecutive patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture were followed prospectively (post-algorithm group). Another 117 consecutive patients who had been treated immediately prior to the implementation of the algorithm were identified retrospectively as a control group (pre-algorithm group). The total cost of the implants prior to implementation of the algorithm was $357 457 (mean: $3055 (1947 to 4133)); compared with $255 120 (mean: $2501 (1052 to 4133)) after its implementation. There was a trend toward fewer complications in patients who were treated using the algorithm (33% pre- versus 22.5% post-algorithm; p = 0.088). Application of the algorithm to the pre-algorithm group revealed a potential overall cost saving of $70 295.

The implementation of an evidence-based algorithm for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures reduced costs while maintaining quality of care with a lower rate of complications and re-admissions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1192–7.